Risk Intelligence : The people dimension - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Risk Intelligence : The people dimension

Description:

... improbable experiences make such a strong impression on us that we try to apply ... It makes far more sense for companies to shift the burden in moving what ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: vedp3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Risk Intelligence : The people dimension


1
Risk Intelligence The people dimension
  • By A.V. Vedpuriswar
  • Based on the book by David Apgar

2
What is Risk intelligence ?
  • Companies must proactively build their
    capabilities to deal with risk.
  • Learning plays an important role here.
  • Companies must assume those risks where they have
    a learning advantage.
  • Learning effectiveness is enhanced if we leverage
    the strengths of people working in the
    organization.

3
Risk intelligence score
4
Impressionists, encyclopaedists, and amnesiacs
  • The three patterns of risk assessment are
    impressionists, encyclopaedists and amnesiacs
  • Impressionists anchor on highly memorable
    experiences that often lack relevance to their
    immediate problems
  • Encyclopaedists accumulate a wealth of
    superficial knowledge that lacks surprise and
    tells little thats not already known
  • Amnesiacs gather experience thats relevant and
    memorable.
  • But they dont distinguish it from less important
    information and do not preserve it for ready use
    when needed.

5
Impressionists (1/3)
  • Impressionists anchor on strong experiences and
    then apply them broadly.
  • The problem is that they apply them too broadly.
  • The memorability of their experiences is much
    greater than the relevance of their experiences.
  • The impressionists highly memorable experiences
    are misleading when they are not relevant to a
    particular problem or the risks underlying it.

6
Impressionists (2/3)
  • Its precisely because improbable experiences
    make such a strong impression on us that we try
    to apply them where they are irrelevant.
  • Impressionists are average in the amount and
    diversity of experience they bring to bear on
    their projects risk problems
  • But their experiences are typically strong in
    surprise while weak in relevance to most of the
    problems they face
  • How can impressionists enhance the relevance of
    their experience without sacrificing its
    memorability?

7
Impressionists (3/3)
  • The three most important practical steps
    impressionists can take fall under three of the
    elements of the risk intelligence score
    relevance itself, diversity of experiences, and
    record keeping.
  • Address the relevance gap through personal or
    organizational experience.
  • In general, tackle a problem that seems to share
    root causes with the new risks you are evaluating
  • Another way to fight a tendency toward
    impressionism is consulting the record.
  • You may not recall or know of experience in your
    organization relevant to a new risk, but it may
    be there.
  • Reach out to your colleagues and ask.

8
Encyclopedists
  • Encyclopedists have lots of experience that
    applies to the risks underlying new projects or
    risky decisions, but the experience teaches no
    strong lessons.
  • The encyclopaedists experience suggests nothing
    about the risks that we would not have guessed.
  • The key gap in the encyclopaedists experience is
    surprise or improbability.
  • People changing occupations or entering the
    workforce can bring along their training and
    background.
  • But that training cannot replace the memorability
    of a few shocking experiences that gives us our
    strongest sense of how the word is not
  • This is the predicament of the encyclopaedist.

9
Amnesiacs (1/2)
  • The amnesiac has surprising, memorable
    experiences relevant to a broad variety of
    project choices, risky decisions, and problems
    challenging an organization.
  • The problem for such people is not just
    forgetting what they learn.
  • Its failing to record it in a format others can
    use.
  • Amnesiacs have loads of raw experience but what
    they know cannot really accelerate the
    performance of a colleague unless it can reduce
    the colleagues personal dependence on them.

10
Amnesiacs (2/2)
  • Companies must systematically capture the
    amnesiacs rich experience in a way that others
    can use.
  • It makes far more sense for companies to shift
    the burden in moving what amnesiacs know to
    software the rest of the firm can use
  • Rather than assume amnesiacs zealously guard
    knowledge, organizations should ask other
    employees to debrief their amnesiacs through a
    formal interview process

11
The three ages of risk intelligence
  • The encyclopaedist, the impressionist, and the
    amnesiac represent three stages in a life cycle
    of risk assessment skills and the experience
    underlying them.
  • Encyclopedists have lots of book knowledge, but
    lack memorable experiences that sharpen judgment.
  • Impressionists have highly memorable knowledge
    but apply it indiscriminately in cases where it
    doesnt apply.
  • Amnesiacs have rich stores of relevant, memorable
    experiences but do not reliably record it for
    others to use.
  • Together, they represent the youth, adulthood,
    and old age orrisk intelligence.

12
Creating complementarities in the team
  • Grouping encyclopaedists, impressionists, and
    amnesiacs to complement one another makes sense.
  • A task force with an encyclopaedist will have
    rich background knowledge.
  • A task force with an impressionist will be
    decisive.
  • A task force with an amnesiac will avoid errors.
  • Together, the three can be formidable.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com