The Nature of Leadership - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

The Nature of Leadership

Description:

van Linden & Fertman (1998) hold that every adolescent has the potential to lead. ... van Linden and Fertman (1998) define leadership as 'an individual who thinks for ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: peterg8
Category:
Tags: leadership | nature | van

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Nature of Leadership


1
The Nature of Leadership
  • CEP 917 - Space Camp
  • Peter G. Osborn

2
Introduction
  • How does one navigate the turbulent waters of
    becoming a leader?
  • If adults find answering such a question
    challenging consider how confused an adolescent
    must feel?
  • The purpose of my research was to explore the
    nature of leadership in adolescents as they
    engaged in collaborative design processes.

3
Literature Review
  • One part of making the transition from child to
    adult is learning about leadership, says van
    Linden and Fertman (1998 p.1). However, the
    authors share that their research shows most
    adolescents do not see themselves as leaders or
    understand how they might become leaders.

4
Literature Review
  • While most children dont see themselves as
    leaders research (Gardner 1987) has stated that
    the skills critical for effective leadership
    begin even before five years of age.
  • van Linden Fertman (1998) hold that every
    adolescent has the potential to lead.

5
Literature Review
  • Leadership Defined
  • Peters and Austin (1985) define leadership as an
    act that promotes growth and the releasing of new
    energy in others.
  • Halloran and Benton (1987) define leadership as
    the ability to motivate or direct the actions of
    others.
  • van Linden and Fertman (1998) define leadership
    as an individual who thinks for themselves,
    communicates their thoughts and feelings to
    others, and helps others understand and act on
    their own beliefs they influence others in an
    ethical and socially responsible way (p. 17).
  • Kouzes and Posner (1988) define leadership as an
    observable set of skills and abilities that both
    experienced and novice leaders can use to turn
    challenging opportunities into remarkable
    successes.

6
Literature Review
  • Based on the previous definitions of leadership
    when does not have to look for very long at the
    data from Space Camp to conclude that leadership
    was present in both the eight grade boys and
    girls groups. The question that remains to be
    answered is what was the nature of the leadership
    taking place?

7
Literature Review
  • Society continues to confirm Eriksons (1969)
    theory that adolescents and adults tend to define
    themselves by what they do and the visible skills
    they possess.
  • What impact does this have on ones identify
    formation?
  • Are adolescents provided with sufficient
    opportunities and resources to define themselves
    as leaders?

8
Literature Review
  • van Linden Fertman (1998)

9
Literature Review
  • Kouzes Posner (1988)
  • The Five Practices of Leadership
  • Model the Way
  • Inspire a Shared Vision
  • Challenge the Process
  • Enable Others to Act
  • Encourage the Heart

10
Method
  • Qualitative Approach
  • Identified specific characteristics of difference
    between the boys and the girls by examining the
    variation between the number of occurrences of
    recorded events or attitudes
  • Examined the research observers written
    transcripts to make meaning of the interactions
    during the design process

11
Participants
  • The participants are made up of girls and boys
    that just completed eighth grade.
  • During week one students experienced a variety of
    learning activities. During week two the
    students envisioned and prototyped a virtual
    learning experience.

12
Data Analysis
  • Number of Occurrences in Boys and Girls

13
Results / Findings
  • Differences between girls and boys
  • Girls focused more on cooperation collaboration
    while the boys focused more on individual play
    design
  • Boys group, Neptune Jihad, game was based on
    making as much money as possible (Mars tycoon
    Presentation.ppt). The other group, Frozen
    Eclipse, had each group member create a character
    but failed to collaborate on a common
    skill/strength chart to compare the players
    (frozeneclipse.ppt)
  • Girls focus is to explore and colonize planets
    for people to live on (Desdemonapresentation.ppt)

14
Results / Findings
  • Differences between girls and boys
  • Girls presented more of a team approach
  • Consider Desdemona title slide which states Team
    Desdemona and also has built into the game play
    that the other characters attitude toward the
    main player is determined by the main players
    actions toward the other character. The need to
    face a person in the game in order to speak
    with them. All these elements are valued by the
    girls group and are missing in the boys prototype
    design (Desdemonapresentation.ppt). The Kalisti
    used completing the building of a resort as the
    main goal of the game. When I think of a resort
    I think of relationships and interaction
    (Kalisti.ppt)

15
Results / Findings
  • Differences between girls and boys
  • Cooperation
  • The boys groups not only had less recorded
    occurrences of cooperation (53 to 88) the nature
    was different as well. The boys cooperation was
    not as collaborative or as relationally focused
    as the girls. Rather the focus was on completing
    a task and often failed to comprehend the
    relational elements of the interaction (HYDRUS
    writes with a lot of spelling mistakes, so he
    uses the help of SAGITTA. SAGITTA gives the
    correct spelling but feels as thrown
    aside/excluded (ET20030728 paragraph 164-165).

16
Results / Findings
  • Differences between girls and boys
  • Encouragement
  • The girls groups not only had a greater recorded
    number of occurrences (16 to 6) of encouragement
    but the nature of the encouragement was more
    personal and deeper (CARINA encouraging AQUILLA
    when she is doubting herself (JP20030729). The
    boys encouragement was connected less to the
    person and more to their idea or action
    (MoNOSeros to Telescopium Nice job (TM20030723)
    and I like that game, thats a great idea
    (TM20030724).

17
Results / Findings
  • Differences between girls and boys
  • Leadership
  • The boys groups had a significantly greater
    number of occurrences (27 to 3). The leadership
    style is very dominating and control focused
    (ORION says at one point I will be the
    commander with PHOENIX replying No, I will be
    (GP200030722). For the most part the leadership
    nodes appears to be placed on activities that
    represent a transactional leadership style. The
    boys groups as a whole demonstrated a much more
    transactional atmosphere than the girls
    transformational environment.

18
Conclusion
  • When leadership emerged in the girls
    collaborative activities the occurrences
    demonstrated more of a transformational
    leadership style that not only permeated the
    atmosphere but also to some degree in the
    prototype games themselves.
  • When leadership emerged in the boys groups it
    demonstrated more of a transactional leadership
    style and this style is also evident to some
    degree in the prototype game designs.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com