Title: South Dakota Ethanol Plants
1Mixing
Are You Feeding What You Formulated???
2What Factors do you need to be aware of?
3- DIET FORMULATION Actual Feed
Composition - Accuracy of Weights
- MIXED FEED
- The integrity of the mix
- The integrity of
- the discharge in the bunk
- DELIVERED FEED
- Wind Sift
- Cattle Sorting
- Weather Damage
- CONSUMED FORMULATION
4- DIET FORMULATION Actual Feed
Composition - Accuracy of Weights
- MIXED FEED
- The integrity of the mix
- The integrity of
- the discharge in the bunk
- DELIVERED FEED
- Wind Sift
- Cattle Sorting
- Weather Damage
- CONSUMED FORMULATION
5Feeding Handling
- Feed Composition
- - Dry Matter
- - Crude Protein
- Quality
- Price
6Feed Values
- Do Assays Match Computer File?
- CP,
- 97 Corn 8.2 to 9.8
- 98 Corn 7.8 to 9.6
- 99 Corn 8.0 to 9.4
- NRC Corn 9.8
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9Determining Dry Matter
- Important for feed delivery
- Changes in DM consumed
- Pricing Feedstuffs
- Monitoring shrink
10DM Content of Hay Pile
11- DIET FORMULATION Actual Feed
Composition - Accuracy of Weights
- MIXED FEED
- The integrity of the mix
- The integrity of
- the discharge in the bunk
- DELIVERED FEED
- Wind Sift
- Cattle Sorting
- Weather Damage
- CONSUMED FORMULATION
12Factors Influencing Mixing
- Bulk density of ingredients
- Particle size
- Surface Friction
- Mixing action
- Load size
13Mixer Performance
- Style of mixer
- Condition of mixer
- Type of diet
- Ingredient sequencing
- Operator proficiency
14Factors affecting mixing integrity
- 1. Particle size
- - Ground hay vs. long-grass hay
- 2. Particle shape
- - Round particles are more mobile
- - Prone to over mixing
- 3. Particle density or specific weight
- - Denser particles will separate to the bottom
- Premixs Minerals, ionophores, drug additives
- - Less dense particles rise or maintain position
in mixer
15Factors affecting mixing integrity
- 4. Hygroscopicity
- - Ability to attract or take-up water (i.e.
urea) - - Can cause caking
- 5. Static charge
- - Drugs, additives vitamins posses a large
static charge which may cause them to bind to
the mixer walls - 6. Adhesiveness
- - i.e. Molasses on top of grass hay
- Clumps or feed balls
16Factors affecting mixing integrity
- 7. Time
- The previously mentioned factors all interact
with time. - How long do you mix???
- Mixer Type / condition of mixer
- Type of diet
17 2 basic types of mixers
- 1) Horizontal mixer
- - Most common mixer setup
- - Stationary Mobile
- Combination of forcing the feed back forth,
while tumbling in-between - 1) Ribbon-type
- 2) Reel-type
- 3) Paddle-type
- 4) Auger-Type
- - 1 Auger, Mono-mixer
- - 3 or 4 Augers
18Types of Mixers
- Ribbon-Type
- Made up 2 large ribbons
- Shaft may have paddles
- Advantages
- Good with roughages
- Disadvantages
- Tends to over mix finishing diets
-
19(No Transcript)
20Types of Mixers
- Reel type
- Popular Mixer, versatile
- Good with finishing diets
- Disadvantages
- Trouble with large amounts of grass, especially
long
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23(No Transcript)
24Types of Mixers
- Paddle-Type
- Oldest design, found more on stationary mixers
- Disadvantages
- Cant handle large amounts of long hay
25Types of Mixers
- Monomixer
- Designed for high roughage diets and long
stem hay -
- Smaller size beneficial to cow/calf,
backgrounder producer - Finishing diets may tend to separate out
26(No Transcript)
27Types of Mixers
- Auger Mixers
- Companies have different sizes and location of
augers - 3 auger
- Better with backgrounding diets were hay is
ground - 4 auger Popular being used by a variety of
operations. - SDSU trials showed variability
28Types of Mixers
- Vertical
- Relatively new
- Designed for dairies with high roughage diets
-
- Can utilize whole round bales
- Watch for dead spaces
- Longer amount of mixing time
29(No Transcript)
30Wagons
31Mixer Comparisons
32Factors Affecting Mix
- Sequence of feedstuffs in to mixer
- Whats first
- Bulky? Dense? Light? Wet?
33Factors Affecting Mix
- Sequence of feedstuffs in to mixer
- Whats first
- Bulky? Dense? Light? Wet?
- Nutrition Unit
- Corn, Supplement, mix, Roughages
- Problem with Clams
34Ingredient Loading Sequence
- gt.75 in .75-.31 in lt.31 in
- Ordera CV CV CV
- W-A-C 28.7 17.4 35.3 7.7 35.8 13.7
- A-W-C 29.1 19.6 32.9 12.4 37.9 12.4
- A-C-W 22.8 22.0 36.2 9.4 40.9 5.9
- W-C-A 29.7 9.3 33.6 10.8 36.5 9.4
- a W wheatlage A chopped alfalfa hay C
concentrate - Rippel et al., 1998
35Ingredient Loading Sequence
- gt.75 in .75-.31 in lt.31 in
- Ordera CV CV CV
- W-A-C 28.7 17.4 35.3 7.7 35.8 13.7
- A-W-C 29.1 19.6 32.9 12.4 37.9 12.4
- A-C-W 22.8 22.0 36.2 9.4 40.9 5.9
- W-C-A 29.7 9.3 33.6 10.8 36.5 9.4
- a W wheatlage A chopped alfalfa hay C
concentrate - Rippel et al., 1998
36Time Required to Thoroughly Mix
- Most demonstrations as SDSU have looked at 2, 4,
6, 8 mixing times - Some groups have mixed as long as 14 min, based
on visual appearance
37(No Transcript)
38CV of ADF Across Top of Mixer
Diet Backgrounding Rolled Corn 12.4, Corn
Gluten 23.7, Soybean hulls 42.0, Grass 15.8,
Liq 6.1
39Red Hots ConcentrationRecovered from Three Mixers
40Steps to quantify if you mixer is working
- Best is the use of an ionophore as a maker
- Expensive
- Chose markers that represent similar bulk
densities or sizes of feedstuffs - Corn - Died whole shelled corn
- Pellets - Red hot candies
- Hay - Styrofoam or paper shreds
41Mixer Sampling Discrepancies
Reel Type
42Mixer Sampling Discrepancies
Reel Type
43Mixer Sampling Discrepancies
4 Auger
44Mixer Sampling Discrepancies
4 Auger
45Condition of Mixer
- Is your mixer working properly?
463 Mixers After 8 Minutes
47Before . . . . . .3-Auger MixerCommercial
Feedlot
Avg. 12.00 CV 22.05
48After . . . . . .3-Auger MixerCommercial Feedlot
Avg. 19.5 CV 10.7
49CV for ADF Across Top of Mixer
Diet Backgrounding 40 roughage 60 concentrate
50Do I need a mixer Wagon
- If you dont use a mixer or scale you may just be
feeding by volume. - - result in large fluctuations in feed
delivery - How many head do I need to feed to justify a
mixer wagon with scales?
51Do I need a mixer Wagon
- Wagner et al. 1988
- - 72 were divided in to 8 9 head pens
- - 4 pens were fed with a mixer wagon
- - 4 pens were fed by volume
- - feed was set out loaded with loader
- - corn silage, hay, corn and supplement
- - Heifers were growing diet for133 d
52Do I need a mixer Wagon
- Diet
- Corn Silage 40
- Ground Alfalfa 40
- Ground HMC 15
- Supplement 5
53Do I need a mixer Wagon
- Results
- Mixed Unmixed
- In wt., lbs. 476 474
- ADG, lbs.a 1.82 1.65
- DM, lbs 16.6 17.1
- Feed/gain 9.12 10.4
- a Plt.05
- 22 lbs of gain with 61 lbs less feed
54Do I need a mixer Wagon
- Results
- 22 lbs of gain with 61 lbs less feed
- 22 x .85 18.70 per head
- 3-4 dollars per head feed savings
- 21.70 per head per year
55- DIET FORMULATION Actual Feed
Composition - Accuracy of Weights
- MIXED FEED
- The integrity of the mix
- The integrity of
- the discharge in the bunk
- DELIVERED FEED
- Wind Sift
- Cattle Sorting
- Weather Damage
- CONSUMED FORMULATION
56Proper Bunk Management
- Cattle are prone to sort
- Quality of feeds is imperative cleanliness
- Weather
57Proper Bunk Management
58(No Transcript)
59If I Have.
- carefully formulated diets
- tracking that matches closeouts
- what I consider a well-run yard
- Could anything be wrong?
60Two Big Concerns
- The expression what you cant see or dont know
wont hurt you is a lie our parents told us that
we must reconsider. - If we havent measured it we really have no idea
about whether it is a problem.
61In Your Yards
- Where can the system fail?
- How big is the concern?
- Are there simple or cumulative effects on profits?
62(No Transcript)
63Rumensin VariationCommercial Feedlot (Botec
4-Auger)
Mean 15.64 CV 9.0
64Diet Ingredients/Supplement Type
65Order of Ingredients
- 4 screw
- Corn
- Liquid
- Mixed 1 min
- All Markers
- WCGF
- Hay
- Mixed 14 min
- 3 screw
- Corn
- Liquid
- Mixed 1 min
- Milk balls and red hots
- Hay
- Peanuts
- WCGF
- Mixed 4 min
- Reel type
- Corn
- Liquid
- Mixed 1 min
- Milk balls and red hots
- Hay
- Peanuts
- WCGF
- Mixed 2 min
66(No Transcript)