Robyn Levine 1,2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Robyn Levine 1,2

Description:

1. JILA, University of Colorado 2. Fermilab 3. University of Chicago. Why use ... Zoom ... Zooming in... (similar to simulations of the 1st star by Abel, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: robynl
Category:
Tags: levine | robyn | zoom

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Robyn Levine 1,2


1
Growing Supermassive Black Holes in
Cosmological AMR Simulations
  • Robyn Levine 1,2
  • Nick Gnedin 2,3
  • Andrew Hamilton 1

1. JILA, University of Colorado 2. Fermilab
3. University of Chicago
2
Why use adaptive techniques?
  • Small scale-physics
  • (hydrodynamics, radiative transfer, etc)
  • cosmological context
  • (major evolutionary events)
  • ? need a LARGE dynamic range!

3
Hydrodynamic Adaptive Refinement Tree(a
cosmological hydrodynamic code)
  • Includes
  • dark matter, stars, gas dynamics
  • star formation and feedback
  • physics of the ISM
  • radiative transfer
  • gas cooling by heavy elements and dust under the
    assumption of collisional ionization equilibrium

(Kravtsov, Klypin, Khokhlov)
4
Using the Zoom-in Approach
  • Initial conditions 1,700 kpc cosmological
    simulation with a single milky way progenitor
    galaxy (resolution of 50 pc-- 9 refinement
    levels)
  • 1.5 kpc region centered on galaxy allowed to
    refine further
  • replace gas from densest region with a
    supermassive black hole
  • measure accretion of matter and follow the
    transport of angular momentum on different scales
  • repeat above process at different cosmological
    epochs, measuring accretion rates as a function
    of time
  • Quite feasible to conduct parallel tests
    involving different physical processes!

5
Zooming in
(similar to simulations of the 1st star by Abel,
Bryan, and Norman (2002))
6
Density Profile
10 orders of magnitude!
7
Questions about SBH growth
  • Mass accretion rates?
  • dark matter, stars, gas
  • time, radial dependence
  • Angular momentum?
  • Feedback effects?
  • opening angle
  • efficiency
  • Merger rate?

Drawing Credit A. Hobart, CXC
8
  • Average gas accretion rate over time from a very
    simple run
  • Initial simulation z 4
  • BH mass 3?107 M?
  • maximum refinement level 15 (0.8 pc)
  • no feedback!
  • measurement of accretion rates non-trivial!

9
Summary Future Direction
  • The technique of AMR allows us to measure
    accretion rates on a computationally challenging
    wide range of scales at many different epochs,
    including realistic evolutionary events and
    small-scale physics.
  • The approach is complimentary to observational,
    semi-analytic and other numerical methods of
    studying SBH growth, and will provide useful
    boundary conditions for simulations of accretion
    disks.
  • The inclusion of feedback and eventually mergers,
    will soon give an even more realistic picture of
    SBH growth.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com