Instructional Media

1
Instructional Media Technology Regional
Meetings

• January 2005
• Brookfield -- Appleton
• Wisconsin Dells -- Rice Lake

2
Division for Libraries Technology and Community
Learning
Rick Grobschmidt, Division Administrator
Instructional Media and Technology TeamNeah J.
Lohr, Director
Consultants IS Systems
Development Kate Bugher Arun Marathe
Stuart Ciske Program Assistants Barry Golden
Cathy Debevec Robert Roy Amy
French Steve Sanders Donna Steffan

3
Update Briefs

• Library Media Issues

4
Wisconsins Common School Fund 2005

• January 4 Estimate (2005 - 19.52 per census
  child)
• May 1 Payment must be made
• June 30, 2005 MUST be expended
• Program Description www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/df
  m/sfms/csf_expl.html
• Questions and Answers www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/
  dfm/sfms/csfqanda.html
• What Can Be Purchased www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/
  dfm/sfms/csf_purc.html

5
Wisconsins Common School Fund 2005

• For more information, contact
• For questions regarding eligibility of school
  library purchases contact
• Kate Bugher, School Library Consultant
• Phone [phone]
• Email kathyrn.bugher_at_dpi.state.wi.us
• For questions regarding school library aid
  contact
• Brad Adams, School Finance Consultant
• Phone [phone]
• Email Bradley.Adams_at_dpi.state.wi.us

6
Improving Literacy Through School Libraries

• Purpose to improve the literacy skills of
  students by providing them with
• current school library materials in
• technologically advanced school library media
  centers with
• well-trained, professional certified school
  library media specialists

7
Improving Literacy Through School Libraries

• 2004 Funding
• Title I, Part B, subpart 4, section 1251 of NCLB
  - 19,800,000
• 92 grants awarded averaging 200,000
• 20 or greater poverty on 2000 census
• 19 Wisconsin districts eligible
• 2 Wisconsin proposals awarded

8
Improving Literacy Through School Libraries

• Revitalizing Reading Improving Literacy through
  School Libraries
• 6 rural school districts in CESA 10-- 210,289
• Augusta
• Granton
• Greenwood
• Loyal
• Owen-Withee
• Weyerhaeuser

9
Improving Literacy Through School Libraries

• Libraries Improving Literacy through
  Collaboration
• 10 Milwaukee Public elementary schools -- 316,838

• Academy of
• Accelerated Learning
• Allen Field
• Browning
• Clarke Street
• Green Bay Ave.

• Hayes Bi-lingual
• Hi-Mount
• Honey Creek
• LaFollette
• Riley

10
Improving Literacy Through School Libraries

• To view list of grant awards and abstracts
• www.ed.gov/programs/lsl/awards.html

11
National Board Certification

• Six Wisconsin library media specialists have
  received NBC
• Requirements
• College degree
• 3 years classroom experience in public or private
  school
• Advantages
• Professional development experience
• State subsidy to offset cost
• Process replaces 6 credits for license renewal
• 10 year license as Wisconsin Master Educator
• For more information
• www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/dlsis/tel/nb.html

12
National Board Certification

• Wisconsin library media specialists that have
  received NBC
• Nancy Biese - Menasha
• Linda Brokish - Lodi
• Corey Hansen - Ashwaubenon
• Bobbie Kuchta - Altoona
• Gail Kuhl - Amery
• Karen Reusch - Cuba City
• Congratulations !! Master Educators!!

13
Certification and Licensing

• PI 34 July 1, 2004 or August 31, 2004
• Instructional Library Media Specialist 902
• Initial Educator
• Professional with stipulations
• Professional Educator
• Master Educator

14
Certification and Licensing

• Instructional Library Media Supervisor 91
• Initial Administrator
• Professional Administrator
• Master Administrator

15
Certification and Licensing

• Instructional Technology Coordinator 92
• Initial Administrator
• Professional Administrator
• Master Administrator
• DPI IMT certification page
• www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/dltcl/imt/licenspg.html
• DPI Educator Licensing page www.dpi.state.wi.us/d
  pi/dlsis/tel/index.html

16
Wisconsin School Library Impact Study

• to provide empirical evidence of the impact of
  school libraries on student learning where
  Wisconsins ITLS are integrated with Wisconsins
  content standards in daily instruction
  collaboratively taught by certified library media
  specialists and certified classroom teachers.

17
Wisconsin School Library Impact Study

• LSTA funded grant -- 80,000
• Tentative Timeline
• RFP released January 2005
• Contract begins March 2005
• Data collection April-October 2005
• Report completed December 2005

18
Update Briefs

• enGauge

19
enGauge Wisconsin

• Three Cohorts offered in 2004-05
• By June, 276 of 426 districts (65 ) will have
  completed both Online On-Site parts
• For 2005-06
• Anticipate 1 cohort in Fall and 1 in Spring (See
  handout in packet)
• Working with Learning Point Associates to develop
  / streamline training for repeat districts
• www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/dltcl/imt/engauge.html

20
enGauge Wisconsin

• Since inception on January 1, 2000 Online Results
  based on n of over 140,000 responses (figures
  below are approximates)
• School Board 650
• Parents 9,000
• Community Members 2,000
• Students 97,000
• Building (level) Administrators 1000
• District (level) Administrators 350
• Building (level) Technology Coordinators 380
• District (level) Technology Coordinators 250
• Educators 30,000

21
enGauge Wisconsin
1 2
3 4
5
Since inception on January 1, 2000 Online Results
22
Update Briefs

• Technology Grants

23
Technology Grants

• ESEA, No Child Left Behind
• Title II, Part D
• Enhancing Education through Technology

24
Title II Part D Ed Tech

• Goals of the program
• Improve student academic achievement through the
  use of technology in schools
• Assist all students in becoming technologically
  literate by the end of eighth grade
• Encourage the effective integration of technology
  with teacher training and curriculum development
  to establish successful research-based
  instructional methods.

25
Title II Part D - Ed Tech

• Competitive Grant
• Applications will be available in spring of 2005
  after Census and formula updates are made
• Formula Grant
• The Electronic Application for 2004-05 ESEA
  Consolidated programs can be found at
• www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/esea/conapp/default.html

26
Title II Part D - Ed Tech
Wisconsin Three Year Total 23,176,462
27
Title II Part D - Ed Tech

• 2005 2006 Funding Reduced
• Total funds - 5,737,752 (7,936,270 last year)
• Formula funds - 2,868,876
• Competitive funds - 2,868,876
• Program changes in response to reporting
• Professional development tied to NSDC Standards
• Evaluation of project more prescriptive
• Suggested resources
• Select projects from approved list (SBR)
• Looking ahead to student assessment

28
Evaluating States Educational Technology Programs

• Research Grant
• Funded 2003-2006
• Title II, Part D

29
Evaluating States Educational Technology Programs
30
Evaluating States Educational Technology Programs

• Purpose Evaluate the impact of using technology
  on student achievement
• 31 Districts
• 34 Middle Schools
• 85 Teachers
• 4300 Students
• Design and Implementation
• Big 6 Model
• 61 Traits Writing Model
• Control Group

31

Evaluating States Educational Technology Programs

• Evaluation Tools/Analysis
• Teacher On-Line Survey Instrument (Becker)
• Student On-Line survey
• Terra Nova 7th Grade assessment
• 8th Grade WKCE (science and social studies)
• Classroom Observations
• Student Work Samples

32
Evaluating States Educational Technology Programs

• Partners
• DPI
• UW-Milwaukee
• State Educational Technology Directors
  Association (SETDA)
• National Business Education Alliance NBEA(LoTI)
• Learning Point Associates NCREL and NCRTEC
  (enGauge)
• U. S. Department of Education

33
Update Briefs

• Information and Technology Planning

34
Information Technology Plans

• Quick reminders
• Check plan outline and the criteria for
  evaluation
• www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/dltcl/imt/downloads.html
• Make sure you include
• Needs Assessment
• Review of Student and Staff Proficiencies and
  Attitudes
• Review of your Alignment Integration of ITL
  Standards
• One Budget for Each School Year
• Flows from the Goals/Implementation Plan
• Shows all Expenditures, E-rate Requests for
  Reimbursements and All Funding Resources,
  including E-rate
• Copies of all (6) school board policies
• Copies (hard or electronic) of required
  inventories

35
Information Technology Plans

• Conditional Approval
• Occurs when the plan meets all requirements
  necessary for E-rate, but still lacks some
  elements required by NCLB and/or Wisconsin
  Statutes for plan certification and ESEA
  consolidated application approval
• Allows for districts to keep E-rate timeline
  continuity
• Provides time for districts to make required
  revisions to meet all criteria before
  certification is awarded
• Certification
• Notice emailed to district contacts
• Letter sent to District Administrator
• Watch Plan Expiration E-rate Addendum
  Timelines!

36
E-Rate Changes - Expiration Revisions
37
Information Technology Plans
38
Information Technology Plans

• To initiate Plan Approval Process for a NEW plan,
  send one (1) paper copy of the plan to
• Information Technology Plans
• Wisconsin DPI - Instructional Media Technology
  Team
• 125 South Webster Street
• PO Box 7841
• Madison, WI 53707-7841
• Sending Appendices on a CD is a plus!

• When submitting paper copies of updates,
  revisions, or additional documentation, send them
  to
• lt Your DPI Contact
• Stuart Ciske or
• Donna Steffan gt
• Wisconsin DPI - Instructional Media Technology
  Team
• 125 South Webster Street
• PO Box 7841
• Madison, WI 53707-7841

39
Information Technology Plans

• Next Round of Workshops
• When Spring or Fall 2005
• Where Regional Conference Centers, BadgerNet
  Centers or CESAs
• How Face-to-Face or Distance
• Time Whole or Half day
• Include Information on Feedback Cards
• Watch Website for Announcement

40
E-rate, Virtual Schools, i-SAFE, wetech List
41
E-rate Changes this year

• Funding stopped and resumed (Thanks to all who
  helped!)
• 2 of 5 year rule for Internal Connections only
  in effect in 2005
• Revisions to Forms 470, 471, 486
• Need to get FCC Registration Number
• Guidance on DPIs E-rate Website
• Technology Plans receive more emphasis

42
E-Rate Technology Plans

• Not required for basic phone service -(Rule of
  thumb- if you dial a 9 or any number to get out,
  it is probably not basic.)
• Technology plans must be developed before the
  Form 470 is filed.
• Plans must be approved before service begins.
• Technology plans must cover the entire funding
  year for which service is being sought.

43
E-Rate Technology Plans

• Technology plans approved for the Ed Tech (EETT)
  program are acceptable for E-rate with one
  qualification
• The plan must also include documentation that
  the applicant is aware of and will be able to
  secure the financial resources it will need to
  achieve its technology aims, including technology
  training, software, and other elements outside
  the coverage of the Commissions support
  program.

44
Technology Plan E-Rate Addendum
You may need to bring your existing plan
up-to-date if

• Your technology plan expires before June 30, 2006
  and you do not have your new plan written (does
  not need approval until service starts).
• You are missing any E-rate required elements (see
  previous slide and/or handout)

www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/dlcl/pld/doc/techplanupdat
e.doc
45
(No Transcript)
46
Official Public Virtual Schools in Wisconsin
47
(No Transcript)
48
Virtual Courses in Traditional School Districts

• AP Courses (1950 student courses 24,700 exam
  reviews)
• Wisconsin Virtual School

• Dane Districts Online
• Milwaukee Area Technical College Virtual High
  School Program

49
i-SAFE is dedicated to 1) implementing a
standardized Internet safety program throughout
the nation that provides kids and teens with
essential reduce the risk of their being
victimized while engaged in activities via the
Internet and 2) launching an Outreach Campaign
that empowers students take control of their
online experiences and make educated, informed,
knowledgeable decisions as they actively engage
in cyber activities.
50
About the Organization MISSION i-SAFE is a
non-profit foundation whose mission is to educate
and empower youth to safely and responsibly take
control of their Internet experience. GOAL The
i-SAFE program provides students with the
awareness and knowledge they need in order to
recognize and avoid dangerous, destructive,
unlawful online behavior and to respond
appropriately.
51
Training Coming to Wisconsin in March 9 AM 3
PM March 18 CESA 10, Chippewa Falls March 17
Distance Network (Monona Public Library) CESA 7,
Green Bay LaCrosse Area? Ashland? March 15 or
16 Southeastern Wisconsin
52
wetech Listserv

• The wetech list is designed to facilitate
  interactive, electronic communication among
  persons interested in PK-12 educational
  technology.
• Technology coordinators, technology integrators,
  technicians, administrators, teachers and anyone
  else interested in improving education through
  the use of technology is welcome.
• Both technical and educational issues can be
  addressed.
• To subscribe
• send an email message to majordomo_at_badger.state.w
  i.us
• in the body of the message (leave the subject
  line blank) enter subscribe wetech

53
Update Briefs

• Assessment and Accountability
• NCLB 8th Grade Technology Literacy

54
Assessment Accountability

• Requirements
• All students must be technologically literate by
  8th grade by 2006
• Performance reporting annually

55
Assessment Accountability

• How meet Requirements?
• Performance reporting
• Proof of 8th grade literacy

56
Assessment Accountability

• National
• ISTE
• Rigorous, affordable, scalable 8th grade tech
  literacy assessment anchored in NETS
• USDoE
• Partnership for 21st Century Skills
• Evaluating States Education Technology Programs
  grants (ESETP)
• Onsite Monitoring
• SETDA Data Collection Committee (DCC)
• NETTS Study
• Learning Point Associates (LPA) rubric

57
21st Century Skills
www.21stcenturyskills.org
58
Assessment Accountability

• Onsite Monitoring
• For both SEA LEA
• Will include
• the subgranting process
• grant review process
• evaluation accountability measures
• program activities
• use of funds

59
Assessment Accountability

• ESETP
• Purpose
• To evaluate value of federal technology funding
  already distributed to SEAs and LEAs relative to
  improved student achievement

60
Assessment Accountability

• SETDA
• Data Collection Committee
• Common Data Elements Task Force
• Policy Committee
• Collaboration
• Profiling Educational Technology Integration
  (PETI)
• www.setda-peti.org
• www.iassessment.com

61
Assessment Accountability

• NETTS
• National Educational Technology Trends Study
• All 50 states, District of Columbia and Puerto
  Rico
• Select six case study states
• Random sampling
• Site visits to 12 18 subgrantee districts
• School level - teachers

62
Assessment Accountability

• Regional
• Learning Point Associates
• Technology Literacy Assessment Rubric
• www.learningpt.org/

63
Assessment Accountability

• State
• LoTI
• Annual technology survey (Statute 120.18(1)(i)
• enGauge
• others

64
Jody McCannDepartment of AdministrationDivision
of Enterprise Technology

• Overview of the NEW BadgerNet

65
BadgerNet II Presentation Topics

• Converged Network Services
• BadgerNet-Managed and User-Managed Services
• Video Network Management
• TEACH subsidy
• Scenarios

66
Looking to the Future

• Teach to the Future
• Curriculum Resource Center
• 21st Century Skills
• From Vision to Practice3
• Attendee Input - What are your needs?

67
Looking to the Future

• INTEL Teach to the Future
• www97.INTEL.com/education/Teach/us_program.htm

68
21st Century Skills
Partnership for 21st Century Skills
www.21stcenturyskills.org
69
The Current National Debate
21st Century Skills
70
21st Century Skills
71
Assessment Accountability

• Next State Event
• From Vision to Practice3 Digital Evaluation
• August Institute (Aug. 16-19, 2005)
• 16-17 Mosinee
• 18-19 Oconomowoc

72
Looking to the Future

• Help identify initiatives or topics
• What do you need?
• What does your district need?
• Use the index cards to list
• Topics
• Initiatives
• Concerns