Off-Road Status Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Off-Road Status Review

Description:

OffRoad Status Review – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: arb7
Learn more at: http://www.arb.ca.gov
Category:
Tags: review | road | status | trains

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Off-Road Status Review


1
Off-Road Status Review
October 24, 2002
2
Outline
  • Impacts of Off-Road Categories
  • Categories
  • Small Off-Road Engines(SORE)
  • Large Spark-Ignition (LSI) Engines
  • Compression-Ignition (Diesel) Engines
  • Recreational Marine
  • Past, Present, Future

3
Mobile Sources Statewide Emissions Inventory
HC
2000
2010
24
31
76
69
2020
752 TPD
37
1408 TPD
63
On-Road
Off-Road
482 TPD
4
Mobile Sources Statewide Emissions Inventory
NOx
2000
2010
27
24
58
15
65
11
2020
28
1803 TPD
2875 TPD
28
44
On-Road
Off-Road
Trains, Planes, Ships
1115 TPD
5
Diesel Mobile Sources Emissions Inventory
PM
67 TPD
38 TPD
6
Cleaner Off-Road Engines to Meet Our Public
Health Goals
  • Critical component of SIPs to attain the ozone
    and particulate matter standards
  • 8 off-road SIP measures
  • Included state and federal commitments
  • Preempt equipment

7
Category Contributions
HC
Tons per day
8
Category Contributions
NOx
Tons per day
9
Small Off-Road Engines
10
Status
  • 1990 Adopted standards
  • Tier 1 (1995-1999)
  • Enleanment
  • Engine modifications
  • Tier 2 (2000)
  • Handheld
  • Advanced 2-strokes
  • 2-stroke 4-stroke
  • Catalysts
  • Switch to electric equipment
  • Non-handheld
  • Side Valve Overhead Valve

11
Lower Emissions Levelslt 65cc Engines
HCNOx
g/bhp-hr
12
Lower Emissions Levelsgt 65cc Engines
HCNOx
Engine Displacement
g/bhp-hr
13
Small Engine Contribution Reduced
HCNOx
85 tpd
2000
2010
54 tpd
54 tpd
2020
Annual Average
14
Current StatusModel AvailabilitySmall Handheld
Engines
Survey Dates
15
Additional Reductions from Small Engines are
Possible
  • Evaporative reductions
  • Approximately 50 HC reduction by 2020
  • Further exhaust reductions
  • Catalyst durability demonstration
  • Expectation 50 HCNOx reduction
  • Propose new standards in 2003

16
Large Spark-Ignition Engines
17
Status
  • 1998 Adopted catalyst based standards
  • 2001-2003 Phased-in
  • 2004 Fully implemented with a durability
    requirement
  • No reported technical or availability issues
  • Manufacturers certified compliant engines
  • Most engines well below 3.0 g/bhp-hr standard

18
Reduced Emissions Contribution
HCNOx
2000
81 tpd
39 tpd
2010
42 tpd
49 tpd
32 tpd
2020
Annual Average
19
Additional Reductions from LSI Engines are
Feasible
  • ARB, SCAQMD, U.S. EPA, SwRI
  • Closed-loop/catalyst durability demonstration
  • Transient test cycle developed
  • More stringent emission standards feasible -
    adopted by U.S. EPA 9/02

20
Recreational Marine Engines
  • Spark-Ignition Vessels

21
Recreational MarineVessels
I N B O A R D S
22
Recreational MarineVessels
S T E R N D R I V E S
23
Recreational MarineVessels
OU T B O A R D S
24
Recreational MarineVessels
P E R S O N A L
W A T E R C R A F T
25
History
  • 1996 EPA - Outboards/PWCs
  • 1998 ARB - Outboards/PWCs
  • 2001 EPA 2006 standards
  • 2004 20 lower standards
  • 2008 65 lower standards
  • 2001 ARB - Inboards/Sterndrives
  • 2003 Emissions capped
  • 2007 Catalyst-based standards

26
Reduced Emissions ContributionOutboards and PWCs
HCNOx
Statewide Summer Weekend Inventory
27
Reduced Emissions ContributionInboards and
Sterndrives
HCNOx
Statewide Summer Weekend Inventory
28
Clean 2002 Models Available
29
Recent Events
  • 2002 EPA - (Proposed) Evap Controls
  • Covers Outboard - PWC - Inboard - Sterndrive
  • Reduce evap emissions by 80 in 2008 MY
  • 2002 ARB - Catalyst Demo Project
  • In Water demo of catalyst-equipped boats.
  • ARB, U.S. EPA, U.S. Coast Guard, NMMA, MECA
  • Report conclusions

30
Compression-Ignition (Diesel) Engines
31
Mobile Sources DieselEmissions Inventory
2010 NOx
35
48
17
On-Road
Off-Road
1165 TPD
Trains Ships
32
Mobile Sources DieselEmissions Inventory
2010 PM
56
23
21
On-Road
Off-Road
52 TPD
Trains Ships
33
Diesel Engine History
  • 1992 California adopts standards early for
    non-preempt engines
  • 1994 U.S. EPA asked to adopt standards for
    preempt engines
  • 1996 Statement of Principles signed by ARB, U.S.
    EPA, and engine manufacturers
  • 1998 Final U.S. EPA diesel rule approved
    consisting of 3 Tiers of diesel standards
  • 2000 California aligns with U.S. EPA

34
Regulatory Effects on Emissions
PM10
Statewide Annual Average
35
Regulatory Effects on Emissions
HCNOx
Statewide Annual Average
36
Current Diesel Status
  • Availability
  • Sales are virtually unaffected by regulations
  • Engine sales have mostly increased
  • Compliance
  • Tier 1 is already fully implemented
  • Tier 2 is in its second year
  • Many engines are ahead of schedule

37
Off-Road Diesel PM Emission Standards Lag
On-Road Standards
g/bhp-hr
Off-road 275 hp
On-road
38
Off-Road Diesel NOx Emission Standards Lag
On-Road Standards
Off-road 275 hp
g/bhp-hr
On-road
39
Issues - Reducing Off-Road Diesel Emissions
  • Future off-road standards will be patterned after
    existing 2007 on-road standards
  • PM aftertreatment nearly ready
  • NOx aftertreatment proceeding rapidly
  • 15 PPM sulfur diesel fuel required
  • Global harmonization of standards desirable

40
Conclusions
  • Emission standards have successfully been
    implemented for off-road engines
  • Compliant products are available in all
    categories
  • Emissions are being reduced
  • Staff continues to look for opportunities to
    further reduce emissions

41
Conclusions (contd)
  • Off-road diesel is the largest remaining category
    of PM and NOx emissions
  • On-road technologies are transferable
  • More stringent (Tier 4) standards will provide
    significant improvements in air quality
  • U.S. EPA action is necessary
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com