Title: U'S' Telecom Policy
1U.S. Telecom Policy
- CWA Presentation
- Debbie Goldman
- Chicago , Illinois USA
- August 23, 2005
2Outline
- U.S. Regulatory Policy A Brief History
- Fiber Deployment by Major Wireline Companies
- U.S. Regulatory Policy Current Issues
3U.S. Regulatory Policy. 1920s 1970s Private
Sector Regulated
- Private sector, regulated monopolies
- Bell system (ATT). One long-distance network
local Bell operating companies cover 80 of
population - Smaller local network systems thousands of
small local companies cover other 20 of
population - Regulation
- Federal regulation - long-distance service
- State regulation - local service price, quality,
interconnection - Universal service
- 1950. 50 telephone penetration
- By 1980s. 97 telephone penetration
- How?
- Price regulation. Cross-subsidies urban to rural,
business to consumer - Universal Service Fund. Subsidies to rural
carriers and poor
4U.S. Regulatory Policy. Before 1996Emerging
Competition Union Response
- Regulation
- 1970s. Competition enters long-distance,
equipment markets. - 1984. ATT Divestiture
- ATT. Long-distance, equipment manufacturing,
research. Deregulation and competition in these
markets - 7 Bell local network companies. States regulate
prices, quality, consumer protection,
interconnection - CWA
- 1935 Wagner Act. Company-dominated unions
declared illegal - 1947. CWA founded. Union growth accelerates
- 1974. CWA achieves national bargaining for
400,000 ATT workers - 1984. Government break-up of ATT. CWA expands
- CWA maintains industry pattern bargaining with
national telecom councils bargaining for
organizing rights expands. - New wireless units.
5U.S. Regulatory Policy.1996 Telecommunications
Act
- Opens local market to competition
- Bells must resell unbundled network elements at
regulated rates - Competitors can build their own facilities
- No regulation of competitors, but regulation of
incumbent - Bell companies can get into long-distance after
local market is open to competition - Universal Service Fund
- 2.25 billion program of subsidies to schools and
libraries for Internet access - Rural and low-income subsidies support telephone
service, not broadband. Contributions to fund
based on of long-distance revenue - Prohibits rate regulation of cable, wireless
services - Wireless. Multiple networks competing
technologies
6U.S. Regulatory Policy. 1996 2005 More
Deregulation, Local Competition
- Local consumer market.
- Unbundling resale at below-cost prices. Bells
lose lines to resellers refuse to invest in
"last mile" fiber - 2004. Courts reject resale and unbundling rule
regulators exempt advanced networks from
unbundling - Bells announce "last mile" fiber build-out
- Long-distance market. Overcapacity. Price wars.
Fraud. Bankruptcies. (MCI WorldCom) - Local/long-distance mergers (SBC/ATT VZ/MCI)
- CWA gains broader organizing rights, employment
security. With UNI, blocks MCI-Sprint merger
7Fiber Deployment Plans Verizon
- Fiber to the home
- Current offer 5, 15, or 30 Mbps capacity up to
- 100 Mbps
- Now offered in 250 communities in 14 of Verizon's
29 states - Target 3 million Verizon homes by year-end 2005
10-15 years to deploy everywhere - 20-30 billion total investment (1,000 per home)
- Analysts worried about payback on huge investment
- Cable-like system. All channels delivered to
set-top box in home. 300 digital TV channels plus
video-on-demand, voice, Internet access
8Fiber Deployment Plans SBC Project Lightspeed
- Fiber to the node, then copper wire last few
thousand feet - Capacity 20-25 Mbps
- Target 18 million, or 50 of SBC homes, by 2008
- 4 billion projected capital investment (250 per
customer) - IP-TV. Consumers request channel, delivered from
server - Analysts worry about untested Microsoft IP-TV
software
9U.S. Telecom Policy Challenges
- U.S. 16 in broadband deployment
- 29 million or 26 of households have "advanced
services" (200 kbps in 2 directions.). Cable
beating DSL 2 to 1 - Slow speeds
- No national broadband policy
- Digital divide
- Competing networks regulated differently. Cable
and wireless not regulated, but wireline
telephone is - Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) competing
over these multiple networks - Conservative political climate and rapid
technological change favor deregulation
10U.S. Telecom Policy Today Voice over Internet
Protocol (VoIP) and IP-Enabled Services
- Federal regulators (FCC) have already decided
- Federal jurisdiction over IP-Enabled services
- VoIP carriers must provide Emergency 911
- To be determined. Will IP-enabled services/VoIP
- Contribute to Universal Service Fund (10 of
revenue) - Pay for use of network
- Meet other obligations of telecom carriers such
as consumer protections, wiretapping, access for
disabled
11U.S. Telecom Policy Today Universal, Affordable
Service
- Universal Service Fund
- How to make it sustainable? Contributions from
all carriers voice, data, local, long-distance - Will it support broadband deployment and access?
- Universal broadband deployment
- How to encourage high-speed deployment and
affordable access everywhere, especially
high-cost rural and poor communities - Options
- Tax credits, low-interest loans
- Deployment timetables
- Expand schools and libraries fund police, fire,
etc. - Universal Service Fund subsidies for broadband
- Require measurement of network speed and
reliability - State and local planning commissions aggregate
demand - Leverage funding in other public subsidies
housing, health care
12U.S. Telecom Policy Other Issues
- Economic regulation
- Video franchising
- Municipal networks
- Network neutrality
- Carriers cannot block consumer access to any
website or end-user - Consumers can attach any equipment to network
13CWA Telecom Reform Policy UNI Framework
- Universal, affordable service
- Quality service, quality jobs
- Financial equity and transparency