Technology Effectiveness: Current Status and Future Planning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Technology Effectiveness: Current Status and Future Planning

Description:

Committee of Advisors on Sci and Tech. Negroponte, 'Being Digital' ... Box Scores and Meta Analyses. LP. SL. LP. SL. Is technology worth it? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: MJH50
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Technology Effectiveness: Current Status and Future Planning


1
Technology EffectivenessCurrent Status and
Future Planning
  • Michael Hannafin
  • University of Georgia

2
Lifes important questions...
  • Is man basically good or evil?
  • Has the stock market peaked?
  • Who shot JR?
  • Want fries with that order?

3
Then There Are Technology Questions
  • 1) Does technology work?
  • 2) Is technology worth it?

4
What some critics say...
  • Lawrence Baines Future Schlock
  • Todd Oppenheimer, Computer Delusion
  • Postman, The End of Education
  • Congress, Bloatedfunding programs
  • Larry Cuban, Computers meet classroom
  • State legislators?
  • Local schools boards/parents?

5
What some advocates say
  • Cummins Sayers Brave New Schools
  • Lewis Perleman, Schools Out
  • Committee of Advisors on Sci and Tech
  • Negroponte, Being Digital
  • Coley et al Computers and Classrooms
  • Blaschke, Federal Policy..Ed. Tech.
  • Glennan Melmed, Elements of Natl

6
So, does technology work?
LP SL
  • Absolutely, positively yes
  • Absolutely, positively no
  • Absolutely, positively maybe
  • Absolutely, positively, huh?

7
What IS the question...
  • Improve learning?
  • Improve retention?
  • Create new learning opportunities?
  • Prepare students for new opportunities?
  • Write your question here

8
The evidencelearning
LP SL
  • Case Studies
  • Impact in Disciplines
  • Audit Approaches
  • Individual Studies
  • Methods v. Whole Effect Studies
  • Box Scores and Meta Analyses

9
Is technology worth it?
LP SL
  • Absolutely, positively yes and no
    and maybe and definitely, HUH?

10
Refining the question...
  • Compared to what?
  • Cheaper?
  • Add more value?
  • Avoid recurring costs?
  • Insert your question here

11
More evidence...
LP SL
  • Learning Time Studies
  • Learning Efficiency Studies
  • Return on Investment?
  • Cost Saving? Cost Shifting? Cost Adding? Cost
    Control?
  • Recurring Costs?

12
Our kinds of questions...
  • Harnessing, unleashing, transforming?
  • New areas of study?
  • New kinds of learning/performing?
  • Logistical differences?
  • Extending access?
  • Crossing cultural and geographic borders?

13
Their Questions About Technology
LP SL
  • How much spent thus far?
  • What value has been realized?
  • What impact has been demonstrated?
  • How long is the public willing to wait for the
    right answers to THEIR questions?
  • How much more is public willing to spend?

14
Four Risky Scenarios
LP SL
  • Scenario 1 Public doesnt askyet
  • Scenario 2 Public asks the question and accepts
    the data we provideso far
  • Scenario 3 Public asks the question and does
    not like the data we provide
  • Scenario 4 Public asks the question and decides
    what should have been realized

15
1 Public doesnt askyet
LP SL
  • New effortswhen times are good
  • Blind trust?
  • Expectations tacit, but they exist
  • Expectations unspecifiedor very broadly
    specifiedso far
  • Like all honeymoons, it will end

16
2 Asks and acceptsso far
LP SL
  • Medical field model
  • pressures exist, but not severe
  • Trust based
  • Were the expertswe must know what were doing
  • Satisfied that we have an answer--that we have
    thought seriously about what were providing

17
3 Asks and doesnt like answers
LP SL
  • Political and/or skeptical motives
  • May or may not be related
  • Trust lowered
  • Adversarial in nature
  • Allocations at risk

18
4 Asks and decides what should be
LP SL
  • Worst possible outcome
  • Lacking convincing argument/data, others decide
    what differences should have been realized
  • Heavily politically/agenda based
  • Virtually impossible to show impact
  • Resources in extreme peril

19
Are there alternatives?
LP SL
  • What visions drive our education and technology
    planning and investments?
  • What value SHOULD technology provide?
  • What impact SHOULD we expect?
  • What measures are appropriateand acceptable to
    the public?
  • Can we get control of our destinies/futures?

20
Reframing questions
  • Can technology improve learning?
  • Domain knowledge? Which, why?
  • Skills? Strategies?
  • Did technology improve learning?
  • Can technology be cost-effective?
  • Save ? Increase productivity?
  • Shift/avoid near/long-term costs?
  • Was technology cost-effective?

21
The Challenge...
  • Get ahead of the issue--seize control and create
    focus
  • Accept the legitimate need for measures that are
    widely understood or expected
  • Identify values that are also important
  • Identify measures that really address concerns,
    priorities
  • Marshal resources according to above
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com