Affymetrix vs. glass slide based arrays - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Affymetrix vs. glass slide based arrays

Description:

Affymetrix vs' glass based arrays – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: RobertB139
Learn more at: https://www.msu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Affymetrix vs. glass slide based arrays


1
Affymetrix vs. glass slide based arrays
  • Affymetrix
  • Short oligonucleotides
  • Many oligos per gene
  • Single sample hybridized to chip
  • Fixed platform.
  • Not universally available for each species.
  • EXPENSIVE!
  • Glass slide
  • Long oligonucleotides or PCR products
  • A single oligo or PCR product per gene
  • Two samples hybridized to chip
  • Flexible platform
  • LESS EXPENSIVE especially for small microbial
    genomes

2
Affymetrix Array With 8,000 Genes
Aharoni and Vorst, in press
3
Spotted Microarrays
  • DNA representing gene spotted on slide
  • Direct comparison between two fluorescent labeled
    RNA samples

4
Competitive hybridization is the key to two-color
DNA microarrays!
  • Competitive hybridization - both samples have the
    same opportunity to hybridize.

5
PCR vs oligo arrays
  • PCR (cDNA)
  • Double stranded
  • Less specificity
  • Significant cost and time involved in sample
    preparation.
  • PCR products less stable?
  • Increased signal strength
  • Intensity doesnt correlate with expression
    levels. Products all different sizes.
  • Long oligonucleotides
  • Single stranded
  • More specificity
  • Synthesized by company at significant cost.
  • Oligos stable over time.
  • Less signal strength
  • Intensity does correlate with expression levels.
    All oligos similar Tms.

6
Designing oligonucleotides for DNA microarrays
  • Free software available - OligoArray
  • Oligo characteristics
  • Length - governs specificity and sensitivity
  • No secondary structure
  • Fixed GC range
  • Melting temperature
  • Cost 10 per oligo
  • Which strand do you use?

7
Printing DNA microarrays
  • Focus on glass slide based arrays
  • Direct printing of pre-synthesized oligos on a
    glass surface.
  • Use robotics for precision printing.
  • Many slide chemistries used.
  • Building of oligonucleotides on a glass surface
  • Ink-jet methodology, micro mirrors.

8
Labeling RNA or DNA with Cy3 or Cy5.
  • Cy3 and Cy5 - most often used fluorescent
    molecules used to label samples for microarray
    analysis.
  • Absorb light at one wavelength and emit at
    another.
  • Emission and Excitation spectra do not overlap
    significantly.
  • In arrays Cy3 and Cy5 are usually false colored
    green (Cy3) and red (Cy5) for ease of
    visualization.

9
More labeling
  • Direct incorporation - incorporates Cy3-or
    Cy5-dNTP directly into cDNA
  • RNA to cDNA - reverse transcriptase
  • DNA to DNA - DNA polymerase
  • Big problem - Cy3 and Cy5 are not incorporated
    with same efficiency.
  • Indirect incorporation - preferred method.
  • Incorporate an aminoallyl-dUTP molecule during
    reverse transcription of RNA to cDNA.
  • Chemically couple Cy3 or Cy5 dye after cDNA is
    made.
  • Coupling is efficient with both dyes.

10
Image Analysis
  • GenePix (Axon)
  • Quantitate genes
  • Normalize data
  • 16 bit image

11
Data from DNA microarray experiments
  • Expressed as relative expression levels
  • Cy5/Cy3
  • Not absolute expression
  • Data must be normalized
  • Data is log2 transformed in most cases
  • Excel spreadsheets - 30 columns and 4300 rows of
    data per experiment.
  • Data storage and analysis issues.

12
What is a significant change in gene expression?
  • 2 fold? 5 fold?
  • Statistical representation of the data
  • Significance analysis for microarrays
  • Standard t-tests
  • Iterative outlier analysis
  • Biological replicates vs. technical replicates
  • Biological replicates are essential for
    generating significant data.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com