Title: Complexity and the age of languages X X X
1Complexity and the age of languagesXXX
- Umberto Ansaldo Sebastian Nordhoff
- ACLC/ Theoretical LinguisticsUniversiteit van
Amsterdam
2Background issues
- Is age related to morphological type?
- Age and the Creole Prototype
- Does speed matter?
- The role of adstrate typology
- The role of community type
3Sri Lanka Malay - community and language
- Migrations to SL from Indonesian/ Malaysia
Portuguese rule (until 1656) - Slave Island?
Dutch rule (1656-1796) political exiles, slaves,
soldiers. British rule (1796-1948) soldiers - Tight-knit, open social network type
- The Lexifier Malay LF, predominant around
15thC, along trade routes between S China and NW
India - The adstrates Sinhala, Tamil. Social equality
among L1-L2-L3 speakers. (No substrate-superstrate
in SLM) - Typological dominance in the feature pool
Sinhalese SL Tamil (congruence) - Malay LF -
(some Dutch, English, Port. elements - mostly
lexicon)
4Case system of Kirinda Java
Universiteit van Amsterdam We could present
sedang as portmanteau and thus leave out the
discussion of dang here
5Case marking in KJ, Sinhala and Tamil
6Universiteit van Amsterdam Ex (3) Are you sure
that this is not a relative clause (The rifle
that the man possesses is good?). This would
explain the SVO, and also the N Adj order. We
might get in trouble if we claim somewhere else
that SLM is rigid SOV Ex(4) As a sidenote, I
wonder about the function of negation here. -O
- (1) go-dang Mr. Jalaldeen-yang kutumun
- I-DAT Mr. J-ACC see
- I see Mr. Jalaldeen
- (2) goppe tumman go-yang e-tolak
- IPOSS friend I-ACC PAST-push
- My friend pushed me
- nembak orang-ka ada snapan bae
- hunt man-LOC have rifle good
- The hunter has a good rifle
- market-ring ais thra baaru
ikkang billi bawa - market-INST/ABL ice NEG new fish buy
bring - Get me some fresh fish from the market
7Evolution of case systems
- Typically diachronically stable
- Imply gradual development (ca. 600 years?)
- Evidence of mature systems
8Evolution of dative and accusative case in SLM
Universiteit van Amsterdam In Kandy, suka
governs NOM. Interesting for variation
- From possessive marker to Experiencer/ Goal
- Reanalysis of -nya structures in Malay
- (a) Buku ini Lisa-nya (Malay)
- Book this Lisa-POSS
- This is Lisas book but also this book
is of/ for Lisa - (b) Lisa-nang buku suka
- Lisa likes (a/the) book
- Nya gt nang by ng insertion under typological
pressure - (highly frequent Lankan feature found in SLM)
9Universiteit van Amsterdam Kandy uwangprize I
suppose this is StdM?
- From Experiencer/ Goal to Definite Object
- Split of Dat/Acc functions
- nang gt yang
- Note that in Malay -nya is frequently used as a
marker of definiteness (and/or Focus) in
non-possessive constructions, e.g. -
- (c) uang-nya tidak cukup
- money-DEF NEG enough
- The/ this money is not sufficient
10Reminder
- Is structural type a reflection of age?
- Is structural type related to rate of change?
- NOW TO PART II
11Upcountry M. verbal system
Universiteit van Amsterdam I underlined the
agglutinating words for better orientation. Not
sure that this is a good idea.
- I. Agglutinative morphology
- (5) jiiva salba-king-na n?-laari
- life save-CAUSE-DAT PST-run
- 'They ran to save their lives'
- Â
- (6) Rani-pe thaandak-an-nale
Farook-pe nyaani - Rani-POSS dance-NMLZR-DATASSOC Farook-POSS
song - m?-dingar-nale suuka
- INF-hear-DATASSOC like
- 'I like Rani's dancing and to hear Farook sing'
- (7) lorang-na m?-draiv-king-na
se thi-luppas - 2s.HONOR-DAT INF-drive-CAUS-DAT 1s IRR-allow
- I will let you drive
12Universiteit van Amsterdam Maybe use godang
instead of goppe. Dang is not attested outside
the pronominal system, pe is. So things involving
dang are more portmanteau-y
- II. Fusional morphology
- mannari lt mana dhari from where
- panna lt pada nang PL.DAT
- drampe lt derang pe 3PL.POSS
- goppe 1SG.POSS
13Agreement
Universiteit van Amsterdam Added example without
agreement
- (8) piisang s-ara-maakang
- banana 1s-PROG-eat
- I am eating a banana'
- se piisang s-ara-makang
- se piisang ara-makang
- (9) paama awuliya se-jaarispaama
- 3.HONOR saint PST-become3.HONOR
- 'he became a saint'
14Irregularity/ complexity
- Universiteit van Amsterdam
- - I put some colors
- I changed the () to (-)
- I suggest deleting the last row because it
weakens our point
15Opaque compositions
- pisang janthong
- banana darling
- 'banana flower'
16Conclusions I
Universiteit van Amsterdam I suggest a less
suggestive conclusion (3).
- SLM is to be considered old because of its
complexity - 350 years are enough to build up this complexity
- Languages older than 350 years can no longer be
called young - Most  Atlantic Creoles cannot be called young ?
- (1) What generalizations can be made about
languages younger than 350years? - (2) Is there a different minimum age for
complexity? 200yrs, 100 yrs, 50yrs, 1 yr? - (3) Is there a flaw in our current understanding
of language birth and age of languages?
17Conclusions II
- The Feature Pool determines the structural output
- The type of community determines the rate of
change - Evolution of full case system in SLM gradual but
efficient - Distinction between instantiation of change
immediate - and diffusion gradual (Lightfoot
1999). Speed is a manifestation of diffusion (or
propagation), i.e. social shift in a small,
tight community happens more efficiently, i.e.
may be perceived as fast (cp. Nettle, Trudgill,
Ansaldo)
18The Tamil bias
- (a) Hussainmiya 1987
- Malay-Moor intermarriage a number of, next
to Malay-Ambonese/ Malabarese/ Sinhalese - Language SLM is influenced by Sinhala, Tamil
or both - (b) Hussainmiya 1990 religious affinity between
Moors and Malays relates episodes of religious
exchange to suggest frequent exchanges - (c) Bakker 2000 SLP gt SLM analogy
- (d) Smith 2001 on ACC we can only argue for
lack of Sinhala evidence, rather than positive
Tamil influence - (e) Smith et al 2004 in between claiming
influence from Tamil (based on (d) and claiming
general Lankan influence - (g) Heine Kuteva 2005 SLM is heavily
restructured Tamil. -