Transcription in Eukaryotes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 80
About This Presentation
Title:

Transcription in Eukaryotes

Description:

Require General Txn Factors (or GTFs) Txn in chromatin/nucleosomes complex ... an excess of nonspecific sites to adsorb proteins in crude lysates that will ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 81
Provided by: MarkM3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Transcription in Eukaryotes


1
Transcription in Eukaryotes
2
Txn in Eukaryotes
  • More complex
  • Multiple Rpol (I,II,III)
  • Require General Txn Factors (or GTFs)
  • Txn in chromatin/nucleosomes complex
  • Mediators, various DBP
  • More complex promoter structures

3
Rpol II Promoters
  • Core minimal set of consensus elements to drive
    txn on in vitro templates.
  • Ca. 40 bp long, 5 and 3 of start

Note usually a core has only 2 or 3
Consensus sequences shown for each of these
elements.
4
Regulatory element overview
  • Promoter proximal
  • UAS
  • Enhancers
  • Slincers
  • Boundary elements
  • Insulators

10s to 100s kb away
5
Initiation by Rpo II in eukarya
  • GTFs are like sigma factor
  • Help find promoter
  • Assist in forming closed/open complex
  • Assist in escape of Rpol from initiaion to
    elongation phase
  • Complete set of GTFs on promoter pre-initiation
    complex

6
Pre-initiation
  • Starts at TATA box (-30)
  • TATA recognized by TFIID
  • Multiptn complex
  • Includes TBP TATA binding ptn
  • Recognizes and binds TATA site
  • TFIID also includes TAFs
  • TBP associated factors

7
TBP-DNA Complex
  • Platform to recruit all factors of GTF and Rpol
    II.
  • Order of assembly studied extensively
  • After binding complete melting of template at
    promoter occurs
  • Melt out requires TFIIH ATP energy
  • Helicase like activity drives melt

8
  • The process Txn initiation Rpol II promoter
  • DNA/TBP disorts DNA forms plaform
  • GTF Assemble IIAgtIIBgtIIF/mediator complex
    (chromatin remodeling)
  • IIEgtIIF then melting
  • Abortive initiation/txn (short aborts)
  • Rpol II escapes via Phosphorylation of CTD
  • Extends tail of RpolI _at_ heptapeptide repeats
    (also TFIIH is phosphorylated)
  • Phosphates alter charge of complex GTFs
    dissociate
  • Other post-tln phos takes place (?)

X52
9
TBP Binds/Distorts DNA via b-sheet insert into
minor groove
  • TBP binds to TATA via beta-sheet
  • Strange! Most DBP are alpha-helices
  • TBP widens/flattens TATA minor groove
  • BENDS the DNA big time!
  • AT pairs favored in the bending event
  • residues in beta sheet interact with
    sugar-phosphates in DNA further promotes bending

10
Beta sheet
DNA BEND
11
GTFs
  • TAFs TBP associates with ca. 10 TAFs
  • Some bind specific DNA sequences (TATA, Inr, DPE)
  • Some are like histone ptns (bind similarly)

12
TFIIB
  • Binds complex AFTER TBP to BRE

Sequence specific binding Ptn bridges BRE and
TATA and Rpol II homology to sigma
13
TFIIF
  • Two subunit complex
  • Recruited to promoter along with Rpol II
  • Stabilizes DNA-TBP-TFIIB complex
  • Required for IIE and IIH antecedently

14
TFIIE and IIH
  • 2 subunits in IIE
  • Regulates helicase of IIH
  • IIH controls transition to open complex
  • IIH has many (9) subunits and rivals complexity
    of Rpol II
  • Potent ATPase activity assoc. with TFIIH

15
In vivo mediator complex
  • GTFs describe Rpol action on naked DNA
  • In vivo Nucleosomes
  • Chromatin structure requires more factors
  • Including MEDIATOR COMPLEX
  • Various modifying factors
  • Effects are different depend on promoter
  • Mediator and modifier factors are very complex

16
In vivo mediator complex
  • GTFs and Txn activators bind to recruit
    nucleosome modifiers/remodeling complexes
  • Plus Mediator complex helps form the
    pre-initiation structure

17
Various Mediators
  • Variable subunit constituents
  • Highly modular modules may dissociate
  • Depending on physiological setting
  • Due to complexity some question of whether
    artifacts or not.
  • Rpol II holoenzyme like coli?
  • A complex can be isolated rpol, GTFs, mediator,
    but NOT TFIID
  • Not clear if actually a holoenzyme
  • Note that absence of TFIID raises some concern

18
Elongation
  • Transition to Elongation Shed GTF/mediator
    factors.
  • Elongation factors recruited (TFIIS)
  • Stimulate processive elongation
  • Some RNA processing factors enter
  • Factors recruited _at_ CTD of Rpol II
  • CTD of pol is now phosphorylated
  • Phosphorylated form drives exchange of initiation
    factors and elongation factors

19
  • RNA Processing Recruitment strongly localized to
    CTD
  • CTD localized at RNA exit channel up to 800
    Angs. Away!

Kinases (P-TEFb) recruited stimulate elongation
CTD
CTD Phos. Domain showing Serine targets Ser 5
Phos splicing factorsSer 2 Phos Capping
factors
20
Elongation efficiency
  • TFIIS reduces pausing of Rpol at certain
    sequences
  • Not all DNA seq. read by pol at same rate!
  • Such sites induce stalling
  • TFIIS minimizes this stalling
  • TFIIS also contributes to proofreading
  • RNase (intrinsic to pol) removes misincorporated
    NTPs
  • Similar to hydrolytic processing via GRE in coli

21
ELONGATION AND PROCESSING ARE LINKED
  • Euk. RNA processed as primary transcript
  • Capping 5
  • Poly A addition 3
  • Splicing
  • Elong. Factors can play roles in processing
  • hSPT5 recruits 5 capping enzyme
  • TAT-SF1 recruits splicing machinery

Elongation, termination, Processing ALL connected
Ensures proper coordination!
22
Capping
  • 5 cap is first key modification in transcipt
  • Modified G base (methylated) via a weird 5-5
    linkage and 3 phosphates

Mechanism of Capping
23
  • RNA triphosphatase removes g Phos.
  • Guan. Trans. Links up GTP as shown
  • PPi leaving group helps drive rxn
  • Methylation at 7 position of G carried out

PPi
cleaved
24
5' Caps added when transcript 20-40 nt long
25
Poly A and Termination
  • Two processes are linked closely
  • Rpol CTD recruits factors
  • At end of gene Rpol encounters sequences that
    attract enzymes for poly A addition at 3 end of
    transcript
  • 3 steps
  • Cleavage of transcript
  • Addition of poly A
  • Termination of txn

26
  • Two factors
  • CPSF (cleavage poly A specificity factor)
  • CstF (cleavage stimulation factor)
  • Poly A signal seq. stimulates transfer of factors
    to RNA
  • After CPSF/CstF bind other factors recruited
  • RNA CLEAVAGE and POLY A FOLLOWS as shown in
    Figure left
  • Rpol continues for few hundred nt after cleavage
    of transcript, then stops and extra bit RNA
    degraded

Ca. 200 ATemplate independent(only pol II RNA
is poly A)
27
Rpol I and III act at distinct promoters and
different sets of Txn factors still need TBP
  • Read subset of specialized genes for RNA
  • Pol I rRNA
  • Single Gene high copy number
  • Expressed at VERY high rates
  • Explains why dedicated Rpol is required
  • Pol III tRNA
  • Many different tRNA genes
  • High rates of txn still important

28
Pol I promoter
2 parts Core and UCE
Recruits Pol I to promoter core
  • Txn requires Pol I, UBF and SL1 (includes TBP)

29
Pol III promoter
  • Unique Feature promoter actually downstream
    from start site!
  • Most have 2 regions (box A,B)
  • Some have TATA box as well
  • Txn requires TFIIIB, TFIIIC
  • TFIIIC binds, recruits B (has TBP) which then
    recruits pol III
  • Thought that IIIC dissociated as Rpol III moves
    thru

Pol
30
How does Rpol find a promoter?
  • Consider 3-D Structure of DNA in nucleo
  • Trying to locate a promoter in real time is very
    difficult
  • But cell does so. Here is how

Rpol
31
Rpol must find promoter in context of DNA/protein
structure of genome
  • Assume promoter is ca. 60 bp (E. coli)
  • Genome 4 x 106 bp
  • Selectivity Pol must specifically locate
    0.0000002 of genome
  • Stated differently Genome has 4Mbp
  • This 4million possible binding sites for Rpol
  • Technically must find efficiently one out of
    4 million!
  • In reality its much less since promoters are
    redundant (consensus based) and Rpol molecules
    are as well.

32
  • Rpol distribution in cell (in vivo)
  • Core and holoenzyme are all thought to be DNA
    bound
  • VERY little is free
  • Excess core is in loose complexes (scanning)

33
Rpol has general/weak affinity for normal B-form
DNA
  • For Rpol to find promoter it must
  • Dissociate from site 1Find site 2
  • Bind site 2
  • Movement of Rpol is DIFFUSION LIMITED (for a 60
    bp site rate constant MUST be less than
    10-8M-1sec-1 (max diffusion rate for a molecule
    to move through medium is less than 10-8M-1sec-1)
  • Actual rate in vitro is greater than this (or
    equal to this value).
  • If this applies in vivo time required for
    successive cycles of dissoc/assoc. is too great
    to account for txn responses

34
Conceptually Holoenzyme must release and rebind
to find promoter. The rate is limited by
diffusion ie, how fast a macromolecule can
migrate at random through a physiological
solution at 37oC. BUT. This process is MUCH
MUCH faster! Thus Diffusion cannot explain how
Rpol finds a target promoter inside the cell
35
Rpol searches are NOT diffusion limited
36
  • Rpol locating binding sites.
  • Significantly speeded up if the initial target
    for RNA polymerase is the whole genome,
  • Not just a specific promoter sequence.
  • By increasing the target size (genome) rate
    constant for diffusion to DNA increases
  • No longer limiting.
  • MODEL one bound sequence directly displaced by
    another sequence.
  • Thus, enzyme exchanges one sequence with another
    sequence very rapidly
  • Continues to exchange sequences until a promoter
    is found.

37
  • Searching much faster
  • WHY?
  • - Association/dissociation virtually
    simultaneous
  • - NO time wasted commuting between sites

38
Rpol binds VERY rapidly to random DNA sites
Could find promoter by direct displacement of
bound sequence
39
Protein exchange of DBP (DNA binding proteins)
  • Could be linear diffusion
  • Could be 3-D intersegment transfer
  • Most probably 3-D transfer
  • Important point
  • All sequence specific DNA binding proteins bind
    DNA in a non-specific (non-seq) dependent mode
    first.
  • This initiates the search for specific site

40
What Drives intersegment transfer of DBP in the
search mode?
ENTROPY
HOW?
41
Search is entropically driven
  • FIRST DNA has an ion atmosphere rich in
    counterions depleted in co-ions

42
Ligand binds DNA
DPBx



Release of Z counterions upon binding creates
disorder entropy This is a favorable reaction
43
Ligand binds DNA
Moves
Rebinds
Ptn exchanges to new site Counterions rearrange
back to ion cloud Upon binding to new contact
site, counterions in cloud get redistributed
44
Ligand finds DNA specific sequence
DPBx


  • Rapid exchange between sites stops when DPBx
    finds a high affinity, sequence specific site it
    likes
  • Usually involves base specific contacts that
    either alter structure of protein or (more
    likely) bring specific domains of ligand into
    play at DNA target sequence.

45
Reaction
Add Counterions
Dissociate
46
METHOD How one finds DBPs?
  • Goal Find whether a protein binds a specific
    sequence you believe is regulatory site
  • You have a 10 bp sequence (in a 100 bp fragment
  • Carry out Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay
    (EMSA)

47
EMSA
  • The EMSA technique proteinDNA complexes
    migrate more slowly than free DNA in
    non-denaturing gel electrophoresis ( low ionic
    strength gels)
  • Complexes Shift (retarded) upon protein binding
    assay also referred to as a gel shift or gel
    retardation assay.
  • Early expts on proteinDNA interactions
    primarily used nitrocellulose filter-binding
    assays
  • Advantages of EMSA
  • resolves complexes of different stoichiometry
    (and conformation).
  • Works with crude extracts purified preparations
  • Can be used in conjunction with mutagenesis
    identify key binding sequence in any regulatory
    region.
  • EMSAs can also be utilized quantitatively to
    measure thermodynamic and kinetic parameters.
  • Combined with antibodies to characterize
    specificity

48
EMSA
  • Ability to resolve complexes depends on stability
    of the complex during the brief time
    (approximately 30 minutes) it is migrating into
    the gel.
  • Sequence-specific interactions are stabilized by
    low ionic strength
  • Upon entry into the gel, proteins quickly
    resolved from free DNA
  • Freezing the equilibrium between bound and free
    DNA.
  • In the gel, the complex may be stabilized by
    caging effects of the gel matrix, meaning that
    if the complex dissociates, its localized
    concentration remains high, promoting prompt
    reassociation.
  • Even labile complexes can often be resolved by
    this method.

49
Critical EMSA Reaction Parameters
50
Target DNA (probe)
  • Linear DNA fragments containing binding
    sequence(s) used in EMSAs.
  • Labeling Probe
  • 5 end label with g-32P-ATP and polynucleotide
    kinase
  • 3 end label with Fill-in reactions a-32P-
    dXTP.
  • Need to have high specific activity probe (at
    least 1 x 106 cpm/ug)
  • EMSA binding expts use about 5 -10 ng of DNA
    probe (ca. 10,000 cpm)
  • Non-Radioactive detection DNA biotinylated then
    probe with chemiluminescent substrate.
  • If the target DNA is short (20-50 bp) oligo
    bearing the specific sequence work well (annealed
    to form a duplex).

51
Target DNA (probe)
  • Some DNA/ptn complexes involve multiprotein
    complexes
  • Requires multiple proteins and often longer DNA
    fragments to accommodate multiprotein complexes
  • Larger DNA probes (100-500 bp) a restriction
    fragment or PCR product is used to prepare probe
  • DNA/Ptn complexes result in retarded mobility in
    the gel.
  • Circular DNA probes (e.g., minicircles of 200-400
    bp) complexes may migrate faster than the free
    DNA.
  • Gel shift assays are also good for resolving
    altered or bent DNA conformations that result
    from the binding of certain protein factors.
  • Gel shift assays work with RNAprotein
    interactions and peptideprotein interactions.

52
Non-Specific Competitor DNA


Limiting
Excess
Nonspecific competitor DNA poly(dIdC) or
poly(dAdT) minimizes binding of nonspecific
proteins to the labeled target DNA. These
repetitive polymers do the following -provide an
excess of nonspecific sites to adsorb proteins in
crude lysates that will bind to any general DNA
sequence. -provide a 3-D intersegment transfer
structure for the specific DBP to
act Non-competitor is usually present in
100-1000 fold excess Example 10 ng of labeled
probe 1000-5000ng ng of cold competitor
53
Real Data
  • Shows self competition
  • Rxn contains 1 -2 ng of EBNA DNA probe (32P
    Label) and 1 ug polydI-dC cold competitor.
  • Self competition in lane 3 added 2 ng of cold
    EBNA DNA (loss of complex)
  • Adding 2 ng of heterologous DNA (Oct-1) no
    dissociation

54
Competition Expt
Heterologous cold DNA
Complex amount
Homologous probe cold probe
DNA Concentration
55
Binding Reaction Components
  • Factors that affect the strength and specificity
    of the proteinDNA interactions
  • Ionic strength
  • pH
  • Nonionic detergents, glycerol or carrier proteins
    (e.g., BSA),
  • Divalent cations (e.g., Mg2 or Zn2)
  • Concentration and type of competitor DNA present,
  • Temperature and time of the binding reaction.
  • If a particular ion, pH or other molecule is
    critical to complex formation in the binding
    reaction, it is often included in the
    electrophoresis buffer to stabilize the
    interaction prior to its entrance into the gel
    matrix.

56
Ionic strength
Add Counterions
Dissociate
Usually Keep ionic strength (total z)
LOW. Note Preparing a crude extract from
nuclei, requires HIGH SALT EXTRACTS WHY?
57
Applications
  • Supershift Reactions To identify ligand and DNA
  • Antibody Binds ligand in complex and
    supershifts
  • Antibody may disrupt the proteinDNA interaction
  • Proper controls will reveal such negative
    results.
  • Supershifts could include other secondary or
    indirectly bound proteins as well.
  • An alternative identification process would be to
    perform a combination Shift-Western blot.
  • Transfer complexes to stacked nitrocellulose and
    anion exchange membranes as blots.
  • Blot probed with a specific antibody (Westerm)
    while autoradiography or chemiluminescent
    techniques can detect the DNA captured on the
    anion-exchange membrane/

58
AB
59
SPLICING
60
Rate 40nt/sec
Poly A, 5 cap
  • Eukaryotic genes are mosaics of Int (non coding)
    and Exons (coding)
  • Exons typically small (150 bp average)
  • Introns can be small or huge and MANY
  • DHFR Gene 31 kb, 6 exons, 2 kb mRNA (coding DNA
    lt10)

61
RNA Splicing
  • Primary transcript pre-mRNA
  • Must be processed
  • Splicing converts pre-mRNA to mRNA
  • Alternative splicing can increase gene diversity
  • Estimated 60 of genes are alt. spliced!
  • One gene could encode 1000s of splice variants!
  • Accuracy is CRITICAL, mistakes not tolerated

62
Mechanisms
  • Consensus sequences in the transcript are key to
    precise splicing outcomes

Consensus site _at_ splice junctions HIGHLY
conserved especially GU and AG
Branch point mid intronnear poly Pyr tract
Donor site
Acceptor Site
NOTE THAT THE CONSENSUS ELEMENTS ARE IN INTRONS
AND NOT EXONS (CONSTRAINED BY CODING SEQUENCE)
63
Intron excision involves formation of a lariat
structure
  • Splicing is a continuum
  • 2 successive transesterifications
  • Phosphodiester linkages break/reseal in a coupled
    reaction
  • Rxn can be visualized as a 2-step process
  • 1st is 2OH at conserved A residue
  • 2nd is formation of lariat and splice product

64
Nucleophilic attack _at_ P
Result Freed 5 end of intron joins A to make
the branch site in lariat
1st rxn
3 way junction2 OH Link at A
Nucleophilic attack _at_ P in splice site junction
2nd rxn
2 Products are made as a result
65
Key points
  • No net increase in phosphodiester bonds
  • 2 bonds are broke and 2 are made
  • No energy input required in transesterification
    reactions
  • However, ATP is consumed
  • Required for maintenance/assembly of splicing
    machinery in vivo

66
If no net energy input, what makes splicing
reaction irreversible?
  • Entropically driven by
  • Breaking a single RNA transcript in two creates
    disorder (favorable)
  • Rearrangement of ion clouds in process
  • Exicised intron rapidly degraded
  • Thus, cannot go back or reverse the splicing
    reaction

67
Trans-splicing
  • Exons from different transcripts are fused
  • Rare in animals but does occur
  • More common in C. elegans, trypanosomes

No lariat a Y structure is formed instead
68
Splicesomes
  • Large complexes or molecular machines carry out
    splicing in vivo

69
Splicing machines RNPs
  • gt150 proteins
  • 5 RNAs
  • Small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) U1,2,4,5,6
  • Ca. 100 and 300 nt long complexed with protein
    (snRNP or snurps)
  • RNPs and misc. ptns come and go in process
  • Process mediated primarily by RNA catalysis with
    protein support
  • Akin to a ribosome

70
snRNP Roles
  • Recognize 5 splice site and branch site
  • Bring these sites into proximity
  • Catalyze the splicing reaction

Discuss in detail
RNA-RNA RNA-protein Protein-Protein
71
  • Different snRNPs recognize same (or overlapping)
    sites in transcript
  • Here U1 and U6 shown to bind to splice site
    (donor)

72
  • snRNP U2 binds branch site

73
  • RNA pairing between snRNP U2 amd U6 is shown
  • Brings 5 splice site and branch site into
    proximity

74
Branch point binding protein
  • Here BBP (not part of splicesome) recognizes A
    region and is displaced by U2 during the reaction
    sequence

75
Other protein roles
  • U2AF binds poly-pyr tract helps BBP bind to
    branch
  • RNA-annealing factors
  • Help load snRNPs onto transcript
  • DEAD Box helicases
  • Use ATPase to dissociate RNA duplexes
  • Facilitate alternative RNA-RNA interactions

76
  • Mechanistic overview
  • U1 snRNP binds 5 splice site
  • U2AF binds Pyr tract and 3 splice site (U2AF has
    2 subunits)
  • U2AF interacts with BBP to help stabilize this
    interaction
  • U2 snRNA binds A branch site and displaces BBP
    A complex
  • A residue extrudes and made available to bond w.
    5 splice site
  • A complex reorganized to bring together all 3
    splice sites
  • U4 and U6 snRNAs along with U5 join to form the
    tri-snRNP complex
  • Entry of tri-snurp complex defines formation of
    B complex
  • 7. U1 exits and is replaced by U6 ( C complex)
    or active site.

A complex
B complex
U4 exits and U2 takes over to complete
order not well known
77
How did splicing evolve?
  • Its complicated lots of players
  • Probably evolved from self splicing mechanisms
    with catalytic RNA
  • Summary of 3 classes of RNA Splicing

78
Nuclear pre-mRNA
  • Abundance
  • Very common used in most eukarya
  • Mechanism
  • Transesterifications branch A site
  • Catalytic mechanism
  • Major spliceosome

79
Group II Introns
  • Abundance
  • Rare some eukaryotic genes from organelles
  • Prokaryotic mechanism
  • Mechanism
  • Transesterifications branch A site
  • Catalytic mechanism
  • RNA encoded by intron ( Ribozyme mediated)

80
Group I Introns
  • Abundance
  • Rare nuclear rRNA in some eukaryotes
  • Organelles genes
  • A few prokaryotic genes
  • Mechanism
  • Transesterifications branch G site
  • Catalytic mechanism
  • RNA encoded by intron ( Ribozyme mediated)
  • NOTE Not a true enzyme catalytic event!
    mediate only one round of events
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com