Consonants - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Consonants

Description:

Contrastive distribution: The relation btw two speech sds in a lg. ... meeting', beating', hired, fired'; - hdphone advert. Complementary distribution: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:123
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: wind794
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Consonants


1
f?'n?I??? tu
Only for foxy people Readings Chpts 13,14
Roach, P (2000) References McMahon, A (2001), An
Introduction to English phonology. Ball Rahilly
(1999) Phonetics.The Science of Speech.

2

Schwa ?
Some preliminaries Contrastive versus
complementary distribution Contrastive
distribution The relation btw two speech sds in
a lg. which behave as follows replacing one of
them by the other one in a given word gives a
different meaning. Speech sds which are in contr.
distri. must be assigned to different phonemes.
For eg. if we replace f by v in fæt, we get
væt-diff meaning meeting, beating,hired,
fired - hdphone advert

3
Complementary distribution The relation btw two
linguistic forms (which are phonetically similar)
which can never occur in the same environment
may be assigned to a single phoneme sound
modified by the environment eg. allophones t, th
sit, thap dark l, clear l Clear l before a
vowel and dark l everywhere else Eg. lea eels
4
  • Some proposals w.r.t. ?
  • ? ? are not in contrastive distribution.
  • ? is a phoneme with ? and ? as allophones. Why?
  • ? only occurs in weak syllables, no minimal pairs
  • 2. ? is an allophone of other vowels
  • Of ?, in rel. to stress
  • economy ik ?n?mi
  • economic i k ?n?mik

5
Of i , also in relation to stress Germanic -
? ?mænik German ? ?m ?n
6
  • Distinctive features
  • Distinctive feature analysis phonemes not as
    independent indivisible units, but combinations
    of different features
  • Table- refer to next slide
  • teach learners particular feature or combination
    of features than absence/ presence of phonemes, v
    w (Tamil??), l r (Mandarin)

7
  • Binary Features (,-) Eg.
  • 2 sds have exactly the same s -s, not
    different phonemes

8
  • Phonological processes
  • Segmental phonological processes a.k.a. connected
    speech processes (CSPs)
  • Assimilation, elision, linking, intrusive r,
    syllable juncture
  • Largely, substitution, reduction, deletion
    processes
  • optional
  • meaning these processes do not occur for all
    speakers occur less freqly in formal situations
    in slower speed

9
What happens during rapid casual speech
(connected speech) Some exemplifications 1.
segmental weakenings (weak forms) such as
reduction of vowels to schwa ? , loss of
consonants , shortening of vowels (refer weak
forms) 2.assimilation regressive sit close,
tend to have medial kk, odd message bm- final
initial stops 3. Deletion - vowel deletion
connect knekt potato pteit ?u knpt
violates phonotactics of English
10
  • 4.Elision vowels consonants elided ,
    February
  • febri, veterinary ve ?nri
  • 5. r intrusion- across words, /r/ appears eg.
    the idea is ðiaidi?riz law and order
    l?r?n?d? within words drawring,
    magentarish
  • unusual fast speech process bcuz involves
    addition of segment no r in spelling, no
    etymological r
  • Conclusion These processes have similar
    rationale, allowing speech tempo to be kept
    consistently fast,ease articulation pressures

11
  • Obligatory phonological processes
  • -physiologically dictated,outside the control of
    speaker, some exemplifications
  • Eg. (Ball Rahilly)
  • vowel nasalization in the environments of a
  • nasal consonant
  • aspiration of a voiceless plosive where the
    plosive occurs in stressed word-initial,syllable-i
    nitial position

12
Mcmahon, A, Eg. Suffixes Within words
(word-internal morphophonological
processes) Suffix ity is added to electric, the
final k for electric becomes s in
electricity ilektrik ilektrisiti
Hard to see why they take place, creates an
alternation btw 2 independent phonemes, not
directly motivated by the phonological context.
13
Classification of phonological processes
  • Direction of influence between segments
  • Progressive assimilation- XY segments aspects
    of pronunciation of X overlap with or influence
    the pronunciation of Y then the influence is
    moving forward or left-to-right
  • Regressive assimilation- XY segments aspects of
    pronunciation of Y overlap with or influence X
    then the influence is moving backwards
    right-to-left
  • In English, the regressive direction of
    influence is more common than progressive.
  • 2. Aspects of articulation 3. Functional
    classification

14
  • Tutorial activities
  • Audio Units 19 20
  • Written exercises, those not completed Chpters 1-
    19
  • Consultation on your project
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com