Ancient%20Polyploidy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Ancient%20Polyploidy

Description:

Unbalanced gamete production *Ramsey & Schemske, 2002. Ancient vs. Neopolyploidy ... What is interesting about ancient polyploidy? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:325
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: alice72
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ancient%20Polyploidy


1
Ancient Polyploidy
  • Alice Ecker
  • February 27th, 2007

2
Ancient Polyploidy
  • Definition (ancient vs. neopolyploidy)
  • Importance of ancient polyploidy
  • Known ancient genome doublings
  • Saccharomyces
  • Arabidopsis

3
Ancient vs. Neopolyploidy
  • Neopolyploidy is characterized by...
  • Multivalent chromosome pairing
  • Multisomic inheritance
  • Unbalanced gamete production
  • Ramsey Schemske, 2002.

4
Ancient vs. Neopolyploidy
  • Ancient polyploidy can be difficult to detect
    because...
  • Disomic segregation is reestablished
  • Chromosomal synteny becomes scrambled by
    rearrangements
  • Changes in or loss of duplicate genes
  • Otto Whitton, 2000

5
What is interesting about ancient polyploidy?
  • ...polyploidy has contributed little to
    progressive evolution.
  • Stebbins, 1971
  • ...polyploidy, far from playing a secondary role
    in evolution, has provided the additional,
    uncommitted gene loci necessary for major steps
    in the evolution of animals.
  • Schultz, 1980
  • Selection of quotes by Otto Whitton, 2000.

6
What is interesting about ancient polyploidy?
  • Clearly, scientists feel differently about the
    role that polyploidy plays in shaping the
    eukaryotic tree of life!
  • By recognizing and studying paleopolyploidy, we
    can come closer to understanding the impact
    polyploidy has on the tempo and mode of evolution

7
Specific ancient polyploidizations
  • Detection made relatively easy by availability of
    sequenced genomes
  • Dating (or at least relative dating) made
    possible by availability of sequences from many
    taxa
  • Mode of polyploid formation often unclear (allo-
    or autopolyploidy)
  • Genome doublings have been detected in the human
    genome, but how many or when they occurred
    remains contentious

8
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
  • Wolfe and Shields (1997) and Seoighe and Wolfe
    (1999) presented evidence that Saccharomyces
    cerevisiae is a degenerate tetraploid

9
Ancient tetraploidy in S. cerevisiae
  • One duplication is proposed, but the method of
    polyploid formation is unclear
  • This hypothesis is supported by two lines of
    evidence
  • Large, duplicated chromosomal regions (Wolfe
    Shields, 1997)
  • Gene order and comparisons to closely related
    species (Seoighe Wolfe, 1997)

10
Evidence for ancient tetraploidy in S. cerevisiae
  • Duplicated chromosomal regions were detected by
    BLASTPing all yeast protein sequences against one
    another
  • Results were plotted duplicate regions are
    visible as diagonal series
  • Wolfe Shields, 1997

11
Evidence for ancient tetraploidy in S. cerevisiae
  • A total of 55 duplicated regions, containing 376
    pairs of homologous genes were identified
  • These regions are argued to have arisen by
    polyploidy because...
  • In a significantly non-random number of
    duplicated regions, both duplicates are oriented
    the same way relative to the centromere
  • 55 independent duplications would statistically
    be expected to result in 7 triplicate regions
    however, none were observed

12
  • Gene order as evidence for ancient tetraploidy in
    S. cerevisiae
  • Kluyveromyces is demonstrated to have diverged
    from the Saccharomyces lineage before the
    duplication event
  • Seoighe Wolfe, 1997

13
  • The date of tetraploid formation was estimated
    from the molecular clock date for the
    Kluyveromyces / Saccharomyces divergence
    (1.5x108 years)

14
Aftermath of the S. cerivisiae genome duplication
  • Roughly 12.9 of S. cerivisiae's genes are
    polyploidy derived duplicates
  • Wolfe Shields, 1997

15
  • Gene duplicates do not appear to have diverged
    greatly in function
  • Genes retained in duplicate are non-randomly
    partitioned between functional categories
  • This suggests that duplicates were retained to
    increase the efficiency of the processes they
    already controlled
  • Wolfe Shields, 1997

16
Aftermath of the S. cerivisiae genome duplication
  • High expression genes were preferentially
    retained in duplicate
  • Seoighe Wolfe, 1997

17
F.A.C. and the S. cerivisiae genome duplication
  • Saccharomyces is able to vigorously ferment
    sugars under anaerobic conditions, setting it
    apart physiologically from other yeasts
  • Several sets of duplicate genes encode sugar
    transporters or pairs of genes that are regulated
    differently in aerobic vs. anaerobic conditions

18
F.A.C. and the S. cerivisiae genome duplication
  • The proposed genome doubling event may have been
    crucial to Saccharomyces' ability to ferment
    rapidly in anaerobic conditions
  • It may also be significant that the doubling
    occurred around the time that angiosperms became
    abundant

19
Arabidopsis
  • Bowers, Chapman, Rong, and Peterson searched the
    Arabidopsis genome for duplicated regions
  • Three ancient duplications were identified

20
Arabidopsis genome analysis
  • A database of 26,028 protein sequences was
    searched for matches
  • 34 nonoverlapping chromosomal segment pairs were
    identified, encompassing 89 of the genes
    searched (23,117 genes)
  • The doubling event that formed these duplicate
    regions was dubbed a

21
(No Transcript)
22
Arabidopsis genome analysis
  • Using the duplicated regions, researchers next
    reconstructed the gene order of the diploid that
    gave rise to the a polyploid
  • Nested within 26 a regions were another 29
    duplications
  • These duplications fell into two groups based on
    degree of similarity between gene copies, termed
    ß and gamma, which represent another two ancient
    polyploidizations

23
The ß and ? duplications
  • The ß population consists of 22 non-overlapping
    duplicate regions and 13,449 genes (51.6 of the
    transcriptome)
  • The ? population conists of 7 duplicate regions,
    some of which overlap with ß duplicates, and
    5,287 genes (20.3 of the transcriptome)

24
Dating the Arabidopsis genome duplications
  • To date the a, ß, and ? duplications, Arabidopsis
    gene pairs were compared to genes from both
    distantly and closely related plants
  • If the two Arabidopsis gene copies had more in
    common with each other than with the heterologous
    genes, then the polyploidy that generated those
    copies post-dated divergence from the source of
    the heterologous sequence
  • Both rooted trees and PAM comparisons were used

25
Estimated duplication dates
  • a Sometime between the divergences from
    Brassica (14.5-20.4 mya) and Malvaceae (83-86
    mya)
  • ß After divergence from monocots (170-235mya)
    but before divergence from other dicots in the
    study
  • ? Possibly after divergence from gymnosperms
    (300mya), definitely before divergence from
    angiosperms included in the study

26
Implications of the Arabidopsis duplications
  • Most or all angiosperms are paleopolyploid
  • Synteny between Arabidopsis and other plants
    which diverged before the a polyploidization may
    have been underestimated
  • Inference of ancestral gene orders in model
    organisms has the potential to greatly aid
    mapping of large genomes in other organisms that
    may not be fully sequenced soon

27
  • Synteny in diploid
  • relatives of ancient
  • polyploids
  • Seoighe, 2003

28
Literature Cited
  • Bowers, John E., Brad A. Chapman, Junkang Rong,
    Andrew H. Peterson. 2003. Unraveling angiosperm
    evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromsomal
    duplication events. Nature, 422433-438.
  • Otto, Sarah P. and Jeannette Whitton. 2000.
    Polyploid Incidence and Evolution. Annu. Rev.
    Genet, 34401-37.
  • Ramsey, Justin and Douglas W. Schemske. 2002.
    Neopolyploidy in Flowering Plants. Annu. Rev.
    Ecol. Syst., 33 589-639.
  • Seoighe, Cathal. 2003. Turning the clock back
    on ancient genome duplication. Current Opinion
    in Genetics and Development, 13636-643.
  • Seoighe, Cathal and Kenneth H Wolfe. 1999.
    Yeast genome evolution in the post-genome era.
    Current Opinion in Microbiololgy, 2548-554.
  • Wolfe, Kenneth H. and Denis C. Shields. 1997.
    Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of
    the entire yeast genome. Nature, 387708-713.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com