Global Public Goods: The Case of Global Warming - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Global Public Goods: The Case of Global Warming

Description:

A global public good is an activity that involves large ... It is the absence of such a focal policy that makes it ... or laissez-faire approach ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:73
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: andre4
Category:
Tags: case | global | goods | public | warming

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Global Public Goods: The Case of Global Warming


1
Global Public Goods The Case of Global Warming
2
Examples of Global Public Goods
  • Global warming and climate change
  • Transnational terrorism
  • Public health (AIDS)
  • Intellectual property rights
  • International financial crises
  • Proliferation of nuclear weapons

3
Global Public Goods
  • A global public good is an activity that involves
    large numbers of economic agents in a large
    number of countries.
  • Sometimes there exists an obvious focal policy
    such as no nuclear war, no financial collapses or
    no trade barriers that appear obvious to most
    people.
  • It is the absence of such a focal policy that
    makes it difficult to deal with most global
    public goods.

4
Mechanisms and Treaties
  • Non-coorperative or laissez-faire approach
  • Non-binding voluntary agreements (e.g. clean-up
    of North Sea in 1980s)
  • Specific and Binding Treaties (Kyoto Protocol)
  • Agreements embedded in broader arrangement
    (intellectual property rights)
  • Limited Delegation of regulatory or fiscal
    authority to supranational body (WTO, IMF, ECB)

5
International Law and Consent
  • Global Public Goods need global decision making
    or at least global policy coordination.
  • Under international law obligations may be
    imposed on a sovereign state only with its
    consent.
  • Treaties thus require for all practical purposes
    unanimity.

6
Difficulties to Reach Agreements
  • With Global Public Goods it is usually difficult
    to reach an agreement on efficient policies since
    policies involve estimating and balancing costs
    and benefits where neither are easy to measure.
  • Reaching agreement also often requires
    complicated distributional concerns.

7
What is global warming?What are its leading
causes?What did the Kyoto Treaty propose?Why
did it fail?
8
Global Warming
  • Global warming is the observed increase in the
    average temperature of the Earth's atmosphere and
    oceans in recent decades.
  • The Earth's average near-surface atmospheric
    temperature rose 1.3 0.3 Fahrenheit in the
    20th century. The prevailing scientific opinion
    on climate change is that at least some of the
    warming observed over the last 50 years is
    attributable to human activities.
  • The increased amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) and
    other greenhouse gases (GHGs) are the primary
    causes of the human-induced component of warming.
    They are released by the burning of fossil fuels,
    land clearing and agriculture, etc. and lead to
    an increase in the greenhouse effect.
  • The greenhouse effect is the process in which the
    absorption of infrared radiation by an atmosphere
    warms a planet.

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Projections for Global Warming
  • The measure of the response to increased GHGs is
    climate sensitivity. It is found by observational
    and model studies.
  • This sensitivity is usually expressed in terms of
    the temperature response expected from a doubling
    of CO2 in the atmosphere. The current literature
    estimates sensitivity in the range 2.78.1 F.
  • Models referenced by the Intergovernmental Panel
    on Climate Change (IPCC) project that global
    temperatures may increase between 2.5 to 10.5 F
    between 1990 and 2100.
  • The uncertainty in this range results from both
    the difficulty of estimating the volume of future
    greenhouse gas emissions and uncertainty about
    climate sensitivity.

14
(No Transcript)
15
What mechanisms do you know that could be used to
reduce the emissions of GHGs?
16
Tax versus Quantity Mechanisms
  • Quantity limits are troubling in a growing
    economy with uncertain technological change.
  • Quantity regulations are likely to cause large
    price fluctuations for tradable permits
  • Quantity-type systems are more likely to be
    subject to corruption and cheating since tradable
    permits are valuable assets.
  • Taxbased systems do not create any assets but
    raise revenues which can be used to lower other
    taxes.
  • A tax-based system may be harder to administer
    since a country may have incentive to off-set the
    tax with less stringent regulation.

17
Major Issues in Designing a Climate-Change Regime
  • The level and trajectory of emission reduction.
    Climate change only depends on total cumulative
    emissions.
  • The distribution of emission reductions across
    countries.
  • The need for transfers to induce low-income
    countries to participate.

18
The Kyoto Protocol
  • The KP is an agreement on the UNs Framework
    Convention on Climate Change and was negotiated
    in 1997 and came into force in 2005.
  • The KP is underwritten 163 countries and covers
    65 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Developed countries have adopted strict GHG
    emission reduction obligations. Developing
    countries have adopted no obligations.
  • Developed countries have to reduce GHG emissions
    to on average 5.2 percent below 1990 level.
  • Kyoto includes a linking mechanism that allows
    countries to meet targets by purchasing
    reductions elsewhere.
  • The KP encourages the creation of emission
    reducing projects in developing countries. If
    these projects are approved, they receive
    Certified Emission Reduction Credits that can be
    traded and purchased by developing countries.

19
Problems with the Kyoto Protocol
  • The US seems unlikely to ratify the Kyoto
    Protocol.
  • To the extend that an economic rational lies
    behind the U.S. rejection of the Kyoto Protocol,
    several studies have suggested that the US will
    bear a disproportionate share of the burden of
    adjustment.
  • These simulations suggest that the costs to the
    US of the Kyoto Protocol far outweigh the
    benefits.
  • The Kyoto Protocol omits some of the largest
    emitters (China, India).
  • The targets in the KP are arbitrary and not
    directly connected to any ultimate policy
    objective.

20
Transfers in the Kyoto Protocol
  • The Kyoto Protocol uses 1990 as a base year when
    setting targets. Consequently those countries
    that had high emissions in 1990 (Russia, Ukraine,
    Britain) will be advantaged and those that have
    grown rapidly since then (such as the US, Korea)
    or were relatively efficient in 1990 (Sweden,
    Netherlands) will be disadvantaged.
  • Since developing countries are omitted, they are
    overlooked in the transfers.
  • The Kyoto Protocol thus amounts to a large
    transfer from the US to countries like Russia and
    other eastern European countries.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com