Nobuyuki Kawai Tokyo Tech - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Nobuyuki Kawai Tokyo Tech

Description:

z~6-20, by first stars/quasars? need to study z 6 !!! How and when ... GRB vs. quasar. White, R.L. et al., AJ 126, 1 (2003) GRB 050904. z=6.295. Subaru FOCAS ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:173
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Kaw2
Category:
Tags: kawai | nobuyuki | quasar | tech | tokyo

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nobuyuki Kawai Tokyo Tech


1
GRBs as a probe for the Universe in the
re-ionization Era
  • Advantage of GRB as a probe for high-z Universe
  • Science goals of high-z GRBs
  • Instrument requirements
  • Nobuyuki Kawai (Tokyo Tech)

2
The Big Question
How and when the Universe was formed?
  • IGM was re-ionized by the first generation
    luminous objects
  • reionization at (Page et
    al. 2006)
  • the universe reionized twice? (e.g. Cen 03)
  • rapid increase of tIGM at z5 (QSO spectra)
    indicates the end of reionization at z6 (e.g.,
    Fan et al. 2006)
  • z6-20, by first stars/quasars?
  • need to study zgt6 !!!

3
Objects at high redshifts
  • AGN and galaxies
  • Sample of only luminous objects
  • massive systems (BH or stellar)
  • special condensed region in the Universe
  • large ionizing flux in X-ray (AGN) or UV (LAE)
  • strong effects on ISM and IGM
  • Difficult to find
  • Require wide field survey
  • not only rare, but also cosmic variance
  • Less than 10 QSOs at zgt6 out of 200 million
    objects in SDSS (1/6 sky)

4
GRB advantage at high redshifts
  • GRBs
  • No luminosity bias for the host galaxy
  • more ordinary galaxy population
  • simply tracing SFR
  • No proximity effects
  • Easy to detect in X/g
  • gt15 at zgt5 out of 100 Swift GRBs/yr
  • AGN and galaxies
  • Sample of only luminous objects
  • massive systems (BH or stellar)
  • large ionizing flux in X-ray (AGN) or UV (LAE)
  • Difficult to find
  • Require wide field survey
  • Less than 10 QSOs at zgt6 out of 180 million
    objects in SDSS (1/6 sky)

5
Record redshifts
(just relatively uncontroversial ones)
quasars
galaxies
Tanvir 2005
6
GRB vs. quasar
weak Ly a emission
GRB 050904 z6.295 Subaru FOCAS
White, R.L. et al., AJ 126, 1 (2003)
7
not-so-luminous host galaxy
i-band (24 ks)
NB921 (56.7 ks)
gt 26.4 AB mag (3s) M1260 gt -20.4 mag ? LltL SFR lt
7.5 Msun/yr
Dec 27 05--Jan 01 06 (t0115119d)
Aoki et al. 2006 (in preparation)
8
Swift is detecting more high-z GRBs
  • Swift is detecting 100 GRBs/yr
  • 50 with optical/NIR afterglow
  • 25 has known redshifts
  • out of 42 with known z
  • 7 at zgt4
  • 3 at zgt5
  • 1 at zgt6
  • 15 (or more) of detected GRBs likely at zgt5

pre-Swift ázñ 1.4
Swift ázñ 2.8
Lamb, Venice conference (2006)
9
GRB 050904X-ray afterglow
Watson, D. et al. astro-ph/0509640
Watson, D. et al. astro-ph/0509640
10
GRBs probe
  • Metallicity
  • S/H -1.3 for GRB050904 at z6.3
  • xHI IGM neutral hydrogen fraction
  • consistent with 0.0 at z6.3 (lt0.6 at 3s)
  • SFR as a function of z
  • need large sample with known redshift
  • Nature of the pop-III stars
  • how do they explode?
  • SN products (Fe, a-elements) similar to low-z
    thermonuclear/core-collapse SNe?

11
GRB 050904 at t3.4 d
z 6.3
Log NHI21.6
z 6.2950.002
S/H-1.3
Kawai et al. (2006) Totani et al. (2006)
Subaru FOCAS 4.0 hrs, l/Dl1000
12
Metalicity vs. Redshift
GRBs DLAs D GRB hosts
M/H
GRB 050904 Kawai et al. 2006
Fynbo et al. 2006 Prochaska et al. 2003 Sollerman
et al. 2005
13
X-ray vs. optical/NIR
  • Optical/NIR afterglow detection rate only 50
  • X-ray afterglow detection 100
  • optical metallicity measurements affected by
    dust
  • some elements condensed in dusts
  • X-ray NH tend to be larger than those derived
    from optical extinction
  • low dust formation? metallicity effects?
  • Difficult to cover the right wavelengths
  • no early NIR spectroscopy of afterglow yet
  • e.g. GRB 050904 (S, Si, C, O, but no Fe)

14
X-ray observation goals
  • absorption ? Fe/O, redshift
  • low-E absorption vs. Fe edge
  • low-E NH1022 ? 1-2 keV restframe
  • Fe edge 7 keV rest ? 1 keV at z6
  • Energy coverage 0.2 keV 1.2 keV
  • DE/E 1 eV or less desirable for Fe edge
  • Fe line ? redshift, GRB physics, progenitor and
    environment
  • need extremely special setting(geometry, Fe
    abundance, )

15
simulation with XRS RMF
0.8
1.2
0.5
2.0
  • photon statistics (GRB 050904 with XRS ) 10
  • photon index2
  • NH 1023 cm-2
  • E.W10 eV
  • solar abundance

16
GRB070828 ASCA
Yoshida et al. 1999, 2001
Emission-like 5keV
  • Consistent z, if interpreted as the radiation
    recombination edge

17
GRB970508 Fe line(?)
Piro et al. 1999
E3.400.3 keV (6.20.6 keV at source)
  • 97.3 confidence level
  • Consistent with optical redshift z0.835
  • Before reburst
  • Mmin 0.5 Mo AFe1

18
Fe line
  • fluorescence from spherical medium

continuum
Fe line
EW 10 (NH/1022) eV (Zsun, 6.4 keV)
1.5 (NH/1022) eV (at z6)
Makino, Leahy and Kawai 1985
19
Fe line
  • fluorescence from spherical medium
  • Maybe detectable
  • at a late phase
  • as a orphan afterglow(Fe line transient)

beaming factor 1/100
EW 1.5 (NH/1022) eV x(1/100) (at z6)
20
orphan afterglow event rate
  • 2 GRB/day/sky

21
Instrument requirements
  • Burst detector
  • Trigger capability for long, low-flux, soft
    bursts
  • Spacecraft
  • Slew time lt 100 s
  • prompt communication to/from ground (lt10 s)
  • Anti-sun poiting desirable for ground coverage
  • Focal place detector
  • lower energy threshold lt0.2 keV (NH at z6)
  • upper energy threshold gt1.2 keV (Fe edge at z6)
  • DE/E 1 eV (Fe edge and Fe line)
  • measurable flux gt 100 mCrab or 1 c/s/cm2 at 1 keV
  • low background (for extended observation)
  • large W gt 1 deg2 (orphan Fe line transient)
  • additional detector (optical/NIR camera?)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com