Title: HUMAN DEVELOPMENT 1 PSYCHOLOGY 3050: Problem Solving Ch 12
1HUMAN DEVELOPMENT 1PSYCHOLOGY 3050Problem
Solving (Ch 12)
Dr. Jamie Drover SN-3094, 737-8383 e-mail --
jrdrover_at_mun.ca Winter Semester 2009
2Problem Solving and Reasoning
- Four basic components of problem solving
- 1. Goal
- desired object, state
- 2. Obstacles
- cant attain goal -- blocked
- 3. Strategies for overcoming obstacles
- deliberate solutions, plans
- 4. Evaluation of results
- Did the strategy work?
- Why or why not?
- Reorganize
3The Development of Problem Solving
- When does it begin?
- Basic cognitive requirements
- some sense of goal-directed behavior
- Need precedes action
- Not fortuitous discovery
- Beginning of cause and effect (means-end)
understanding - intentionality make a response to produce an
effect - If I remove the cloth, I can get the keys
4The Development of Problem Solving
- Piaget said by about 8 months
- Beginning of the coordination of secondary
circular reactions - Substage 4 of the sensorimotor period
- Infants use one behavior strategically in the
service of another - Remove a cloth to get hidden toy
5Last Class
- Nativist Perspective
- Universal Grammar Representational innateness
- Critical Period
- Socially isolated, age of exposure, exposure to
sign language, brain plasticity. - Social interactionist perspective
- Social pragmatic view of language
- Motherese, Infant-Directed Speech
- Universal, infants prefer it, eases word
discrimination, aids in syntactic development - Lockes theory of neurolinguistic development
- Vocal learning, utterance acquisition, analysis
and computation, integration and elaboration
6Last Class
- Problem Solving
- Goal, obstacle, strategy, evaluation
- Starts at about 8 months
- Substage 4 of sensorimotor period
- Goal precedes the act
7The Development of Problem Solving
- Some earlier signs of ability to control the
environment - e.g., operant conditioning (Lewis et al., 1990)
- Lever pulling, foot kicking, head turning
- No obstacle, no strategy
- making an association rather than seeing a
problem - no deliberate intention to reach a goal
- preliminary problem-solving
8The Development of Problem Solving
- Willatts (1990) tested 6-8 month-olds with a
means-end problems solving task. - distant toy on cloth out of reach
- pull cloth, toy moves within reach, get toy
- All infants pulled cloth
- 6 mo lost interest in toy, play with cloth
- 8 mo ignore cloth, retrieve toy
9The Development of Problem Solving
- Bullock Lutkenhaus (1988) -- 15 to 35 mo.
- build a house by stacking blocks
- copy adult-built model
- Youngest infants little goal directed activity
- Random stacking
- No reference to the model
- Older children goal directed
- Monitored performance, self-correction (85)
- Showed pleasure at outcome (e.g., smiling)
10The Development of Problem Solving
- Knowledge of the problem domain and context
factors enhance problem solving - Ceci (1996)
- Defined context as the way in which a problem is
represented in long-term memory - Includes knowledge about the task and reason for
doing it - 10-yr-olds asked to use a joystick to predict
where (on a computer screen) a target would land - Dull version (shapes, colors)
- Fun version video game (capture prey)
- Algorithm to solve problem identical
- Poor performance on the dull task, excellent
performance on the game task
11Problem Solving as Inducing and Using Rules
- PS involves rule discovery and use --
- rules specify relations among two or more
variables - Two aspects to understanding, using rules
- Formal logic if then
- if condition A exists then make response B
format - Inducing or discovering rules in situ and using
them to solve problems
12When Can Children Induce Rules?
- Can be assessed using the oddity problem
- Overman (1996) 16 mo to 6 yr-olds rewarded
(food) for selecting odd item in 3-item set - no verbal instructions
- Difficult for 16 to 31 mo (hundreds of trials to
solve) - Very difficult for 32 to 60 mo
- Easy for 6 yr-olds
- With verbal instruction -- all can solve
13When Can Children Induce Rules?
- Why was the nonverbal version harder for
preschoolers? - Best guess is that children at different ages
approaches PS differently - Depends on other cognitive factors
- E.g., preschoolers highly language dependent
- Makes rule use based on behavior difficult
- Preschoolers are less flexible than older
children - Can induce verbal or nonverbal rules, solutions
14Rule-Assessment Approach
- Siegler (1981) believed that cognitive
development is about learning and applying
increasingly complex rules - Balance scale problem Dowels on each side of a
fulcrum, weights added to dowels, child predicts
which side falls - To succeed, child must consider weights (number)
and distance (dowels) from fulcrum - Weights farther from fulcrum will have greater
impact on movement of the scale than weights
closer to the midpoint
15Rule-Assessment Approach
16Rule-Assessment Approach
- Rule 1 child considers one dimension
- E.g., number of weights
- Side with most weights falls, regardless of
distance - will sometimes be right
- Rule 2 side with most weights falls, but if
weights are equal, child consider distance - Rule 3 considers both weight and distance
- Predict that most weight or most distance goes
down - If one side has more weight and the other more
distance guess - Rule 4 Considers weight and distance
appropriately - Compute torque wt x distance on each side
greatest falls
17Rule-Assessment Approach
- Age changes
- 3 to 4 years no rule guess 5 yrs rule 1 9
yrs rule 2 or 3 13-17 rule 3 - very few use rule 4
- Similar rule use progression has been found with
other task - E.g., conservation, judging projection of shadows
- Development appears stage-like, but is not
- At any one time, multiple rules available and
used - Overlapping waves theory
- Adaptive strategy choice model
18Rule-Assessment Approach
19Learning to Follow Rules
- Indicates conscious awareness and cognitive
self-control - Zelazo Reznick (1997)
- 31 to 36 mo given a 2-choice sorting task
- Photos of things from inside house Box A
- Photos from outside house Box B
- knowledge question Is this found inside or
outside? - all can do knowledge task -- only 36 mo-olds can
sort
20Learning to Follow Rules
- Younger children failed to sort in spite of (1)
object labeling (2) reminding of location (3)
feedback, rewards - Have difficulty following rules in spite of
knowing the rules
21Learning to Follow Rules
- Rule switching follow one rule, then change to
another rule - Dimensional card-sorting task
- Sets of cards that vary on 2 dimensions
- E.g., shape, color
- Sample yellow car, green flower
- yellow cards go here, green go here
- Easy
- Switch game sort by shape
- 36-mo-olds
- can do basic sorting, but cant switch rule (from
color to shape) - Keep using old rule
- can verbalize new rule knowledge
- By 4 to 5 yrs -- can switch rules successfully
22Learning to Follow Rules
- So why do we see these age differences.
- (1) poor inhibitory control
- preservative errors
- (2) age related increase in the complexity of
rule systems that children can represent - Developmental increase in reflection, increased
control over behavior and cognition - Reflection a process whereby the contents of
consciousness become the objects of consciousness - Become operated on, modified
- simple rules early -- coordinating rules later
23Tool Use
- Common in problem solving forks, pens, hammers,
etc. - Non-humans also use tools to solve problems
24The Development of Tool Use in Young Children
- Piaget speculated that infants could use tools by
their first birthday. - 9- to 12 mo-old infants learn to solve
lure-retrieval problems - E.g., can use a stick to reach toy outside
playpen - Chen and Siegler (2000) systematic study of tool
use in toddlers 18- to 30-mo - Child seated across from out-of-reach toys
- Several tools available
- Only one will retrieve the toy
- Three trials encouraged to get toy
- Hint and modeling conditions given
25The Development of Tool Use in Young Children
26The Development of Tool Use in Young Children
27The Development of Tool Use in Young Children
- 30 mo no instruction
- more likely to use tools to get toy than
20-mo-olds without instruction (15 vs. 0) - With instructions (hint) or modeling (social
learning) - 30-mo improved some 20-mo use tool to get toy
- Type of strategies used
- Forward lean forward to get toy
- Indirect ask for help
- Tool use use one of the tools
- Strategy use changed across trials
- Tool strategy increased but forward and indirect
continued to be used - Adaptive choice model again!
28Planning
- Planning requires representation of means-end
solution in advance - Toddlers are poor at this
- E.g., Bullock study house building with blocks
- Must plan which block is next
- Difficult before 3 yrs old
- Develops slowly
- Preschoolers find planning difficult in many
everyday situations because - 1. May require inhibiting ongoing activity
- Prefrontal cortex slow to develop
- 2. Takes time
29Planning
- 3. Can be difficult and unpleasant -- effortful
- 4. Plans dont often work, so why bother?
- 5. More fun to wing it -- trial and error
- However, approach to PS not entirely random
- Often combine trial-and-error with a plan
- Rarely show the forward-looking approach of older
kids, adults