Title: Electronic Diaries: Impact on Drug Development
1Electronic Diaries Impact on Drug Development
- Saul Shiffman, Ph.D.
- Chief Science Officer
- invivodata, inc.
- Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science
- 19-20 October, 2004
2Outline
- 25 of clinical trials use patient diaries
- Paper diaries
- Slow completion of clinical trials
- Fail to meet FDA data standards
- Electronic diaries
- Enhance efficiency and speed trials
- Meet FDA data standards
- Allow smaller, more efficient studies
- FDA can meet the goals of Critical Path
Initiative by - Applying standards for data quality to all
diaries - Removing doubt about acceptance of electronic
diary data
3Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs)
- Subjective states
- e.g., pain, dizziness
- Symptoms observed by the patient
- e.g., asthma attacks, bowel movements
4Paper Diaries Inefficient, Poor Data Quality
- Paper diaries
- Up to 80 of paper diary
cards contain
significant errors (Quinn et al., 2000) - Slows database lock
- eDiary
- 98 reduction in data cleaning
- Efficient data management
- On-line data edits
- Accelerated data lock
- eDiaries 1 day after LPO
- Paper diaries 4 weeks after LPO
5Paper Apparent Compliance
Based on patient time/date entries
Stone et al, BMJ, 2002 Stone et al, CCT, 2003
6Paper Test / Verify Apparent Compliance
Verify patient-entered completion times
7Paper Actual Compliance
Based on instrumented paper diary
Observed back-filling, hoarding, forward-filling
Stone et al, BMJ, 2002 Stone et al, CCT, 2003
8eDiary Actual Compliance
Based on electronic time stamp
Stone et al, BMJ, 2002 Stone et al, CCT, 2003
9Contribution of eDiary toClinical Development
Efficiency
- Decreases error
- Avoidance of back-filling, faked data
- Yields more definitive indication of drug effects
- Increased power
- Lower error rate
- Compared similar studies with paper diary vs.
eDiary
10Reduced Noise, Increased Validity More
Efficient Clinical Development
- eDiaries yielded (McKenzie et al, 2004 Pearson
et al, 2004) - 33 reduction in variability
- 50 reduction in sample size
- Smaller trials
- Fewer Trials
More efficient, faster, cheaper clinical
development
11Science, Technology Regulation are In Place
Proven
- Science Improves validity, enhances power gt100
published studies - Technology Over 18 years field experience in
clinical research - Regulation ALCOA, predicate rules
- Approved NDA (Allergan Acular LS)
12What Is Needed?
- Apply data quality regulations consistently to
paper and eDiary data - Promote adoption of modern, efficient,
scientifically valid methods for collection of
PROs - Make clear statement RE acceptance of electronic
diary data (remove FUD)
13Conclusions
- Paper diaries
- Slow completion of clinical trials
- Fail to meet FDA data standards
- Electronic diaries
- Enhance efficiency and speed trials
- Meet FDA data standards
- Allow smaller, more efficient studies
- FDA can meet the goals of Critical Path
Initiative by - Applying standards for data quality to all
diaries - Removing doubt about acceptance of electronic
diary data
14Innovation
Reporting Platforms
That it will ever come into general use,
notwithstanding its value, is extremely doubtful
because its beneficial application requires much
time and gives a good bit of trouble, both to the
patient and to the practitioner because its hue
and character are foreign and opposed to all our
habits and associations. The Source The
London Times, 1834 The Subject The Stethoscope
15(No Transcript)
16ALCOA and Diaries
eDiaries Paper Diaries
Attributable Patient passwords, code, and device identification Handwriting?
Legibility Digital recording, human-readable output Depends upon nature of diary and subject
Contemporaneous Time/date stamping enforcement of protocol sequencing Cannot verify no enforcement of protocol sequencing.
Original Patients cannot change the data once recorded Not clear if changes made to data.
Accurate Time/date stamping Cannot confirm when completed
April 1999 FDA Guidance for Computerized
Systems Used in Clinical Trials