What is Science - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

What is Science

Description:

(from Issues in Science and Religion by Ian Barbour) Science combines three ... Reductionism ('nothing-buttery'): The misconception that an explanation of a ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: srpc
Category:
Tags: science

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What is Science


1
What is Science?
  • Kirk Bertsche
  • January, 2008

2
What is Science?
  • As Scientists View it
  • Classic scientific method
  • Examples
  • Pathological science
  • Philosophical Considerations
  • Kuhn, et al
  • Limits of science

3
The Scientific Method
4
The Scientific Method
  • Scientific Theories
  • NOT Provable!
  • Testable (disprovable, falsifiable, repeatable)
  • Predictive Value
  • Simplicity Elegance (Ockhams Razor)
  • DEscription, not PREscription
  • Scientific Attitudes
  • Respect for Natural world
  • Curiosity
  • Appeal to Experiment, not to Authority
  • Abstraction
  • Honesty with the Facts
  • Skepticism
  • Willingness to Change Mind

(from The Clockwork Image by Donald M. MacKay)
5
Historical Contributions
  • Francis Bacon (1561-1626)
  • empiricism, experimentalism
  • inductive approach
  • Kepler (1571-1630)
  • mathematical description (causation)
  • Galileo (1564-1642)
  • abstraction, creativity
  • science of description, not purpose

(from Issues in Science and Religion by Ian
Barbour)
6
Science combines three logical approaches
  • Deduction
  • Consequences of a theory
  • Induction
  • Implications of repeated experiments
  • Abduction
  • Inference to best explanation

7
Example of Science in ActionLouis Alvarez
  • Problem unknown sedimentation rate at KT
    boundary
  • Approach use cosmic dust as clock
  • New problem unaccountably high concentrations
  • Hypotheses
  • Supernova--no cosmogenic isotopes
  • Volcano--doesnt account for enough
  • H2 cloud--too slow
  • Meteor/Asteroid--plausible
  • Further studies
  • found at other locales
  • found at 3 other extinctions
  • shocked quartz, microtectites
  • Yucatan peninsula site

8
Pathological Science
  • Pseudoscience, or the science of things that
    arent so
  • Defined by Langmuir, 1953
  • Examples
  • N-rays
  • ESP
  • Cold Fusion

(from Pathological Science by Langmuir, Physics
Today, xx)
9
Symptoms of Pathological Science
  • Cause-effect relationship
  • maximum effect from cause of barely detectable
    intensity
  • magnitude of effect substantially independent of
    cause intensity
  • Magnitude of effect close to limit of
    detectability
  • Claims of great accuracy
  • Fantastic theories suggested
  • Criticisms met by ad hoc excuses
  • Ratio of supporters to critics
  • rises to near 50, then falls gradually to
    oblivion

10
Views of Philosophers of Science
  • Karl Popper
  • Thomas Kuhn
  • Paul Feyerabend
  • (Michael Polanyi)

11
Karl Popper (1902-1994)
  • Falsifiability is key to scientific theory
  • Psychoanalysis, Marxism not scientific
  • Theories only indirectly testable
  • Problem of induction
  • Why believe past behavior will continue?

12
Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
  • Structure of Scientific Revolutions
  • Science in three phases
  • Prescience (no central paradigm)
  • Normal science (enlarging central paradigm)
  • Revolutionary science (paradigm shift)
  • Paradigm choice
  • Difficult to compare different paradigms
  • Fundamentally irrational and relativistic??
  • Yes--Kuhns disciples
  • No--Kuhn (3d ed), working scientists

13
Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
  • Has increased awareness of paradigms in
    scientific community
  • Over-states differences between normal and
    revolutionary science
  • Critique of Kuhn by Freeman Dyson
  • Kuhn describes paradigm shift through new
    concepts
  • Paradigm shift from within field
  • Example quantum mechanics
  • Kuhn ignores paradigm shift through new tools
  • Paradigm shift from outside field
  • Example Galileos telescope

14
Paul Feyerabend (1924-1994)
  • Student of Popper, disagreed with teacher
  • Science doesnt follow scientific method
  • Falsification is problematic
  • Theories often not consistent with all data
  • Science is anarchic

15
Limits of Science
  • Origins vs operational science
  • Methodological naturalism
  • Not all truth is found in science

16
Forensic vs Empirical Science
  • Origins (forensic, historical) science
  • Event occurred in past, cannot be repeated
  • Present effects can be tested and observed (and
    tests can be repeated)
  • Operational science
  • Event can be repeated in present
  • Testing is often indirect or remote
  • Differences are more quantitative than qualitative

17
Methodological Naturalism
  • Implicit agreement among scientists
  • Science only deals with naturalistic phenomena
  • Miracles, spiritual world are outside realm of
    science
  • Spiritual world vs science
  • Science--not the only or best avenue to all truth
  • Spiritual--not scientific, not lesser or false

18
Limits of Science
  • The existence of a limit to science is, however,
    made clear by its inability to answer childlike
    elementary questions having to do with first and
    last things questions such as How did
    everything begin? What are we all here for?
    What is the point of living?. Sir Peter
    Medawar, Nobel laureate,

19
Limits of Science
  • I am very astonished that the scientific picture
    of the real world around me is very deficient.
    It gives us a lot of factual information, puts
    all of our experience in a magnificently
    consistent order, but it is ghastly silent about
    all and sundry that is really near to our heart,
    that really matters to us. It cannot tell us a
    word about red and blue, bitter and sweet,
    physical pain and physical delight it knows
    nothing of beautiful and ugly, good or bad, God
    and eternity. Science sometimes pretends to
    answer questions in these domains, but the
    answers are very often so silly that we are not
    inclined to take them seriously. Erwin
    Schroedinger, pioneer of quantum mechanics

20
Scientific LawDEscriptive, not PREscriptive
  • Scientific laws do not prescribe what must
    happen they describe what has happened. The
    earth does not go round the sun because Newton's
    (or Einstein's) law makes it, or tells it to.
    The earth goes its own way, and the scientific
    laws are our generalized way of describing how it
    goes. All that they prescribe are our
    expectations.
  • D.M. MacKay, The Clockwork Image (Downers Grove
    IVP, 1974), p.31.

21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
Philosophical Errorsin Relating Science and Faith
  • Reductionism (nothing-buttery) The
    misconception that an explanation of a phenomenon
    using the language of a specific field of study
    represents a complete explanation of the
    phenomenon. (e.g. A textbook may be described
    chemically in great detail, but this does not
    completely describe the book!)
  • God-of-the-Gaps The misconception that Gods
    activity is restricted to the things which are
    not understood by science.
  • God vs Chance The misconception that things
    which occur by chance are not controlled by God
    (Prov. 1633)
  • Scientism (often Evolutionism) An anti-religious
    philosophy, extending beyond the realm of
    science, which puts science or nature in the
    place of God. Scientific theories (e.g.
    relativity, quantum mechanics, evolution) are
    often applied out of context in an attempt to
    provide support.
  • Catastrophism/Uniformitarianism A historical
    issue for geology.

(partly from The Clockwork Image by Donald M.
MacKay)
24
Apologetic Approaches
  • Science is wrong
  • Science is limited
  • Science points toward God

25
Invalid Scientific Arguments for a Young Earth
are Based On
  • Radioactive Dating
  • Second Law of Thermodynamics
  • Dust on Moon
  • Dinosaur Footprints
  • Speed of Light Variation
  • Earth's Magnetic Field Decay
  • Salinity of Ocean
  • Recession of Moon
  • Polonium Halos
  • Shrinking of Sun
  • Etc.

26
Recommended Organizations
  • American Scientific Affiliation
  • http//www.asa3.org/
  • Reasons to Believe
  • http//www.reasons.org/
  • Interdisciplinary Biblical Research Institute
    (IBRI)
  • http//www.ibri.org
  • Bible and Science
  • http//www.bibleandscience.com/
  • Origin Science
  • http//www.originscience.com/

27
My Background
  • PhD Physics, UC Berkeley, 1989
  • Designed small cyclotron for radioisotope
    analysis
  • Associated with
  • Luis Alvarez (dinosaur extinctions)
  • Rich Muller (solar companion star theory)
  • National Laboratories
  • Radiocarbon dating-- LLNL, Livermore CA
  • Large particle accelerators--SSC Lab, Dallas TX
    Fermilab, Batavia IL SLAC, Stanford University
  • Industry
  • Designed small medical accelerators--Siemens
    Medical Systems, Concord CA
  • Designed electron microscopes--KLA-Tencor, San
    Jose, CA

28
Gods Revelation to Man
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com