Title: Public sector performance
1Public sector performance
- Productivity and performance management in the
public sector - PROFESSOR GEERT BOUCKAERT (Leuven, Belgium)
- Public Administration Institute for Turkey and
the Middle East (TODAIE), Ankara, Turkey - 17 October, 2006
2- PERFORMANCE AND MANAGEMENT MODELS
- DEFINING KEY RELATIONS IN GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE
MACRO, MESO AND MICRO - CONDITIONS FOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT MEASURING,
INCLUDING, USING
3- 1. PERFORMANCE AND MANAGEMENT MODELS
4Four Models of Performance (Bouckaert
Halligan,2006)
5Performance and Management
6Ideal Types and OECD Country Systems
7- 2. DEFINING KEY RELATIONS IN GOVERNMENT
PERFORMANCE MACRO, MESO AND MICRO
82. DEFINING KEY RELATIONS IN GOVERNMENT
PERFORMANCE MACRO, MESO AND MICRO
9- Education
- Health
- Law and Order
- Public Administration
- Overall Performance
- Methodological Problems
10- EDUCATION
- Overall effectiveness of education systems
- -Achievement tests
- -Reading skills
- -Mathematical skills
- -Scientific literature
- -Educational attainment, 25-34 age group
- -Lower secondary or non (negative weight)
- -Higher
- (Social and Cultural Planning Office, The Hague,
2004)
11 12 13HEALTH
Several composite indices
(SCP, 2004)
14HEALTH
15 16LAW AND ORDER
17LAW AND ORDER Composite crime per 100 and
confidence
18PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Subjective quality in
government (2003) and expenditure per capita on
general public services (2001, in Euro)
19PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Confidence in the Civil
Service (2000) and expenditure per capita on
general public services (2001, in Euro)
20OVERALL PERFORMANCE Overall performance of
countries and corrected government expenditures
21GENERAL PROBLEMS IN MEASURING AND COMPARING
- Institutional differences
- -differences in definitions
- -differences in registration procedures
- -longitudinal inconsistencies
- -incorrect data
- -preliminary data
- -inconsistent data
- -incomplete data
22GENERAL FRAMEWORK TO DEFINE LINKS BETWEEN
RESOURCES, OUTPUTS AND EFFECTS
232. DEFINING KEY RELATIONS IN GOVERNMENT
PERFORMANCE
- Efficiency or Productivity as expressions of
Input-Output relations - What is the difference between productivity and
efficiency
242. DEFINING KEY RELATIONS IN GOVERNMENT
PERFORMANCE
- Five ways to improve the productivity numbers
252. DEFINING KEY RELATIONS IN GOVERNMENT
PERFORMANCE
26DETERMING LEVELS OF ANALYSIS TO ASSESS PERFORMANCE
- Macro government wide
- Meso policy field or level
- Micro single organisation
- -Macro versus Meso versus Micro Levels
27PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE THE MICRO LEVEL
28PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE MESO
29 - Output, effects and causality at meso-level
30PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE MACRO
31DETERMING LEVELS OF ANALYSIS TO ASSESS PERFORMANCE
32ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH PUBLIC SERVICES, DO YOU
TRUST THE PUBLIC SECTOR? (WADO IV, 2006)
33- 3. CONDITIONS FOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
- MEASUREMENT
- INCLUSION
- USE
- PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT POLICY
343. CONDITIONS FOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
35PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT POLICY
- Measurement Policy Question cluster one
- -1.Shall you focus on productivity, or on input
or output inefficiency, on effectiveness, on
trust? And why? How are they related? - -2.What are comparable clusters to compare
efficiency/effectiveness/trust data? - -3.How does this connect to responsibility/account
ability profiles? - Measurement Policy Question cluster two
- -4.Which level will you focus upon
(micro/meso/macro) and for what reason? Who is
responsible/accountable? How are these levels
audited? - -5.How do you integrate the different levels? Who
is responsible/accountable? How is the
integration audited?
36- Measurement Policy Questions cluster three
- -6.What are the minimal features of a good
indicator? Do you have performance auditing? - -7.What is the strategy to improve the
performance measurement system? Who is
responsible for performance auditing? - -8.How are you coping with the most important
(potential) pathologies of measurement? - Measurement Policy Question cluster four
- - 9.Are you going to integrate performance
information in financial documents, contracts,
policy documents? - - 10.How are you going to use this information as
part of an improvement process?
37- Measurement Policy Questions cluster five
- -11.On what issues are you not ready to measure
performance? Is this subject to audit? - -12.What concrete strategy and tactics will you
use in your organization to start measuring
performance? Who is accountable for this? - Performance Management Policy
- Measurement policy Inclusion Policy Policy of
Using
38SOME REFERENCES
- Bouckaert Geert, Halligan John (2006,
forthcoming) Performance and Performance
Management. Peters B. Guy and Pierre Jon (Eds)
Handbook of Public Policy. Sage London. - Pollitt Christopher, Bouckaert Geert (2004)
Public Management Reform A Comparative Analysis.
Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 345. - Bouckaert Geert (2004) Institutionalising
Monitoring and Measurement Systems in the Public
Sector. In Benz Arthur, Siedentopf Heinrich,
Sommermann Karl-Peter (Hrsgb) Institutionenwandel
in Regierung und Verwaltung, Duncker Humblot,
Berlin, 2004, pp.455-466. - Van de Walle Steven, Sterck Miekatrien, van
Dooren Wouter, Bouckaert Geert, and Pommer Evert
(2004) Public Administration. In SCP (Social and
Cultural Planning Office). Public Sector
Performance. SCP, The Hague, p.234-270 - Bouckaert Geert, van Dooren Wouter (2003)
Performance Measurement and Management in Public
Sector Organisations. In Bovaird Tony Löffler
Elke (Eds) Public Management and Governance.
Routledge, London, p.127-136. - Bouckaert Geert, B. Guy Peters (2002) Performance
Measurement and Management The AchillesHeel in
Administrative Modernization. In Public
Performance Management Review (Sage, London)
25(2002)4359-362.
39- Bouckaert Geert (1998) Public Sector Performance
Measurement in a Principal Agent Context. In
Halachmi A. Boorsma P. (1998) Inter and Intra
Government Arrangements for Productivity, An
Agency Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers
Boston, p.137-145. - Bouckaert G. and Halachmi A.(1996) The Range of
Performance Indicators in the Public Sector
Theory vs Practice. In Halachmi A. and Grant D.
(Eds.) Reengingeering and Performance Measurement
in Criminal Justice and Social Programmes. IIAS,
Ministry of Justice, Perth (Western Australia),
1996, 91-106. - Bouckaert G. (1996) Measurement of Public Sector
Performance Some European Perspectives. In
Halachmi A. and Bouckaert G. (Eds.)
Organizational Performance and Measurement in the
Public Sector. Greenwood Publishing Group,
Westport, 1996, 223-238. - Bouckaert G. (1995) Improving Performance
Measurement. In Halachmi A. and Bouckaert G.,
(Eds.) The Enduring Challenges in Public
Management, Surviving and Excelling in a Changing
World. Jossey Bass, San Fransisco, 1995,
p.379-412. - Bouckaert G. (1995) Measuring Quality (Ch.2),
Concluding reflections (Ch.12). In Pollitt Chr.
and Bouckaert G., (Eds.) Quality Improvement in
European Public Services, Concepts, Cases and
Commentary. Sage, London, 1995, p.20-32,
p.162-173.
40- Bouckaert G. (1995) Remodeling Quality and
Quantity. In Halachmi A. and Bouckaert G., (Eds.)
Public Productivity through Quality and Strategic
Management. IOS, Rotterdam/ IIAS, Brussels, 1995,
p.21-38. - Bouckaert Geert (1994) New information
technology (NIT) and productivity measurement
Changes and consequences. International Journal
of Public Administration, (Jossey Bass, San
Fransisco). 17(1)59-82. - Bouckaert G. (1993) The History of the
Productivity Movement. Holzer, M., Halachmi, A.
(Eds.) Competent Government Theory and Practice.
The Best of Public Productivity Management
Review 1985-1993. Chatelaine Press, Burke, 1993,
p. 361-397. - Bouckaert Geert (1993) Efficiency measurement
from a management perspective a case of the
Civil Registry Office in Flanders. International
Review of Administrative Sciences, (Sage,
London), 59(1)11-27. - Bouckaert Geert (1993) Measurement and
Meaningful Management. Public Productivity and
Management Review, 17(1)31-43. - Bouckaert G. (1992) Productivity Analysis in the
public sector the case of the fire service.
International Review of Administrative Sciences,
(Sage, London), Vol.58, 1992, 175-200.