The State of Michigans Review of a Work Readiness Credential - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

The State of Michigans Review of a Work Readiness Credential

Description:

CLEG is an advisory body within the Department of Labor & Economic Growth ... CLEG Work Readiness Credential Committee ... Charge to CLEG Committee ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:18
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: michig5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The State of Michigans Review of a Work Readiness Credential


1
The State of Michigans Review of a Work
Readiness Credential
  • Alisande Henry
  • Administrator for The Council for Labor
    Economic Growth

2
The Council for Labor Economic Growth (CLEG)
  • CLEG is an advisory body within the Department of
    Labor Economic Growth established to recommend
    innovative workforce development strategies for
    the State of Michigan

3
Why Consider a Statewide Credential?
  • Employer demand for qualified candidates
  • Educators and training providers using
    assessments
  • Regional transformation work helping to push the
    question

4
CLEG Work Readiness Credential Committee
  • Accelerating Reemployment
  • Matt Chambers, Three Rivers Health Chair
  • Increasing Educational Attainment
  • Michael Schmidt, Ford Motor Company Fund Chair
  • Additional input from DLEG, MEDC, and MDE staff
    members

5
Charge to CLEG Committee
  • Recommend whether Michigan should create/adopt a
    statewide Work Readiness Certificate (WRC) and,
    if so, help design and implement the new system

6
Summary of Research
  • Survey of Michigan Works! Agencies
  • Conversations with WIRED regions
  • Whats happening/has happened in other states
  • Survey of Michigan employers

7
Michigan Works! Agencies Survey Results
  • All 25 MWAs responded to the survey
  • 76 see value in creation or adoption of
    statewide WRC
  • 72 of MWAs are currently using some type of
    assessment tool
  • 80 of MWAs see soft skills as most important

8
WRC State Research Responses
  • Reasons for adopting a WRC
  • Promotes a common standard, uniformity,
    language
  • Used as an economic development tool
  • Ability to quantify and qualify skills of
    workforce
  • Means to measure the workforce
  • Verifies attainment of worker skills

9
WRC State Research Responses
  • Reasons for not adopting a WRC
  • Difficulty in employer buy-in and recognition of
    WRC
  • May label individuals
  • Disagreement among local areas
  • Areas with local WRC not in favor of statewide
    assessment due to success with locally developed
    tools

10
Employer Survey Responses
  • STATEWIDE
  • 161 responses to survey
  • 55 said they would find a statewide WRC valuable
  • More than half of survey (59) respondents not
    currently utilizing an assessment tool/test for
    hiring
  • WIRED REGIONS
  • 91 responses to survey
  • 45 said they would find a statewide WRC valuable
  • More than half of survey respondents (56) not
    currently utilizing an assessment tool/test for
    hiring

11
Employer Survey ResponsesMost important
criteria to consider
  • STATEWIDE
  • Cost to employers
  • Connection to employee retention or productivity
  • Ease of use by employers
  • Assessment of soft skills
  • WIRED REGIONS
  • Ease of use by employers
  • Cost to employers
  • Connection to employee retention or productivity
  • Statewide or national acceptance

12
Committee Recommendation
  • Adoption of a statewide work readiness
    certificate for economic development purposes
  • CLEG supported this recommendation

13
Next Steps
  • The committee is inviting vendors to answer
    questions about their tool
  • What skills does the tool assess?
  • What is the target population for the assessment?
  • Who is the issuing body for the results?
  • Are assessment results statistically valid and
    reliable?
  • How broadly is the tool used (both in terms of
    geography and the number of employers and
    educators users)?
  • What remediation training is included with this
    assessment?

14
Next Steps, continued
  • What accommodations are made for test-takers with
    disabilities?
  • Has there been a formal evaluation of the tools
    impact on employee retention or productivity and
    if so, what impact has there been?
  • What other feedback has been received from
    employers regarding the assessment?
  • How easy is it for employers to use this
    assessment tool?
  • What is the cost (to employers or other entities)
    of using this tool?
  • What vendor support, technical assistance (and
    associated costs) are offered with this
    assessment?

15
Questions for WorkKeys Users
  • Was it difficult learning how to use WorkKeys?
  • Was it difficult getting employers, individuals,
    and education training providers to understand
    the value of WorkKeys and a work/career readiness
    credential?
  • How did you get the word out to employers?
  • What questions still exist around soft skills
    assessments and how are these questions being
    addressed?

16
Questions, continued
  • Where is the testing being done within regions
    and local areas?
  • Who grades the assessment?
  • Who pays for the testing and how are costs
    managed?
  • What would you do differently?
  • What recommendations/advice do you have for the
    state if WorkKeys is selected as a statewide
    assessment tool?

17
Key Dates
  • November 7 Vendor Presentations
  • November 15 Committee Meeting
  • December 3 CLEG Quarterly Meeting

18
  • For More Information
  • Alisande E. Henry, Administrator
  • Council for Labor Economic Growth
  • MI Dept. of Labor Economic Growth
  • PO Box 30004
  • Lansing, MI 48909
  • Phone (517) 241-2336
  • Fax (517) 241-8493
  • aehenry_at_michigan.gov
  • http//www.michigan.gov/cleg
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com