Title: Taste the edge of sound
1Cavitus Pty. Ltd. ACN 112 372 488 www.cavitus.com
THE CAVITUS HIGH POWER ULTRASONIC SYSTEM FOR
CLEANING AND DISINFECTING WINE BARRELS
2Cavitus Pat. Pend. Barrel Cleaning and
Disinfection System Works Using High-Power
Ultrasound
- Produces microscopic cavitation bubbles in
liquids - Bubble formation collapse occurs thousands of
times per second - Very high temperatures pressures (5000K, 2000
bar) upon collapse - Pressure shear destroys tartrate and microbial
membranes - Liquid present in oak pores allows subsurface
cavitation
3FIELD VALIDATION TRIALS AT CALIFORNIAN WINERIES
WITH BETA PROTOTYPEQ4 2008 AND Q1 2009
- Disclaimer Results illustrated are based on
Beta trial field operations and independent
validation however, your results may vary
depending on barrel conditions, operating
environment and other factors Cavitus cannot
control
4Field Validation 1 Superior Cleaning Performance
- Objective
- To compare the efficacy of Cavitus HPU System in
removing tartrates, compared to high pressure
hot water cleaning (HPHW) - Method
- 2004/05/07 red barrels cleaned
- 2004 barrels cleaned by HPHW treated with 180oF
water _at_ 300 psi (4-5 mins) ozone (4 minutes) - Cleaning times for HPU 2007 (5 mins) 2005
(6-7mins) 2004 (8 mins) - Visual inspection of opened barrels before
after cleaning - Summary of findings
- The Cavitus System consistently provided better
cleaning than HPHW - 100 reduction in tartrates in 2007 barrels
cleaned by HPU vs. 0 - 20 removed by HPHW - 84 - 94 reduction in tartrates in 2005 barrels
cleaned by HPU vs. 0 - 29 removed by HPHW - 70 - 100 reduction in tartrates in 2004 barrels
cleaned by HPU vs. 25 - 75 removed by HPHW
5Comparative Cleaning Efficacy -- Cavitus System
vs. HPHW Ozone 2007 Red Wine Barrels
Trial conducted at Monterey County, California,
winery in Q4 2008
6Comparative Cleaning Efficacy -- Cavitus System
vs. HPHW Ozone 2005 Red Wine Barrels
Trial conducted at Monterrey County, California,
winery in Q4 2008
7Comparative Cleaning Efficacy Cavitus System
vs. HPHW Ozone 2004 Red Wine Barrels (Trial
conducted at Napa Valley Winery)
8Field Validation 2 Increased Oak Flavour
Extraction
- Objective
- To compare the ability of Cavitus HPU System to
extend barrel life versus high pressure hot water
cleaning (HPHW) - Method
- Unoaked red wines put into barrels post HPU-
HPHW-treated 1-, 3- and 5-year old barrels - 5 month aging of red wines in treated barrels
- Concentration of oak compounds in wine measured
at monthly intervals - Scarcest toast compounds (furfurals) used as
performance metric - Summary of findings
- Cavitus system increased furfural extraction at
all barrel ages - HPHW did not realise the full flavour potential
of the barrel - Conclude that HPHW either insufficiently cleaned
the toast surface or indiscriminately destroyed
the toast layer
9Desirable Wine Flavours Originating from Oak
Barrels
7 out of 10 flavour compounds are found in the
toast layer, which are eroded or destroyed
during HPHW cleaning, shaving or barrel
blasting. HPU cleaning preserves the compounds.
10Extraction of Furfural into Red Wine in 1-Yr Old
Barrels
11Extraction of Furfurylalcohol into Red Wine in
1-Yr Old Barrels
12Extraction of 5-Methylfurfural into Red Wine in
1-Yr Old Barrels
13Cavitus Improves Furfural Yield in 1- 3-Year
Old Barrels
14Cavitus Improves Furfurylalcohol Yield in 1-
3-Year Old Barrels
15Field Validation 3 Complete Inactivation of
Brettanomyces cells
- Objective
- To compare the efficacy of Cavitus High Power
Ultrasonics (HPU) Cleaning System and high
pressure hot water in killing viable
Brettanomyces cells in infected barrels - Method
- Twenty-four highly Brett-infected 2005/06/07
barrels were used in the trial - Initial viable cell numbers ranged from 80,640 to
1.2 million cells per mL in 2L rinse (model wine)
solution - Control barrels cleaned with HPHW at 300
psi/180oF (4-5 mins) Ozone (4 min) - HPU treatment time 5-8 mins at 140C
- Plating DNA-based method (Scorpion Microbial
Assay) were used to determine viable cell numbers
in rinse solution placed in bbl suctioned - Results of findings
- Cavitus HPU system inactivated 100 of viable
cells in all the barrels - gt 300 viable cells/mL were detected in 8 of the
12 infected barrels (67) after HPHW cleaning
ozone treatment - Cleaning cycle times for the two methods were
comparable
16Field Comparison of Brett Kill in 2007/06/05
Infected Red Wine Barrels Cavitus vs. HPHW
Ozone
Trial conducted at Napa Valley, California,
winery in 2009
17Summary of Field Validation Trials in California
- High pressure hot water cleaning and ozone
treatment are ineffective - Removes too little tartrate or too much toast
- Incidence of Brett infection still increases with
each re-use - Dramatic reduction in oak flavour impact with
each re-use - Cavitus pat. pend. cleaning disinfection
system is a unique solution - Uses High Power Ultrasound (HPU) delivered
through the bung-hole into a water-filled barrel
at 140oF - Produces cavitation which simultaneously cleans
disinfects - Independently validated cleaning efficacy (up to
5x better than HPHW) - Independently validated surface/subsurface Brett
kill (100) - Significantly increased toast flavour extraction
- Recent studies by winery customers support
Cavitus claims - In-depth field validations by three major US
wineries
- Cavitus HPU solution is a power tool to combat
Brett infection - of wines and extend barrel life
18How is Cavitus System Superior to Existing /
Competing Solutions?
- Simultaneous and effective cleaning and
disinfection of barrel surface and subsurface - Destroys Brettanomyces and other spoilage
microorganisms - Superior tartrate removal without damaging barrel
surface - Little effect on toasted surfaces
- Low energy consumption (1 kWh or less)
- Low water consumption (c. 1 gal / barrel)
- Competitive cycle time vs. conventional high
pressure hot water ozone - No additives or chemicals
- Low labor cost
- Mobile options skid or trailer mount
- Can be retrofitted into cleaning line