Quality Indicators: Past and Present - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Quality Indicators: Past and Present

Description:

Chair, Program Office for Laboratory Quality Management ... Cervical cytology/biopsy correlation (analytic) Critical Values Reporting ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: Mich970
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Quality Indicators: Past and Present


1
Quality IndicatorsPast and Present
Part D
  • Michael A Noble MD FRCPC
  • Professor
  • Medical Microbiology and Infection Control,
    Vancouver Coastal Health
  • and
  • Chair, Clinical Microbiology Proficiency Testing
    program,
  • Chair, Program Office for Laboratory Quality
    Management
  • Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
  • University of British Columbia

2
Assessing Quality Indicators
  • Importance Potential for Improvement
  • Scientific Acceptability Reliability and Validity
  • Feasibility Implementation and cost
  • Usefulness Comprehensive

Having Quality Quality Indicators
3
Total Testing Cycle forMedical Laboratories
Post-Analytic
Pre-Analytic
Analytic
Analysis Quality Control
4
IQLM Indicators
  • Diabetes monitoring (system)
  • Hyperlipidemia screening (system)
  • Test Order Accuracy and Appropriateness
  • Patient Identification (pre-analytic)
  • Adequacy and Accuracy of Specimen Information
    (pre-analytic)
  • Blood Culture Contamination (pre-analytic /
    system)
  • Accuracy of point-of-care testing (analytic)
  • Cervical cytology/biopsy correlation (analytic)
  • Critical Values Reporting
  • Turnaround time (postanalytic)
  • Clinician satisfaction (system/postanalytic)
  • Clinician followup (system/postanalytic)

5
Quality Inventory 1US Medical Laboratories2004
  • In 2004 the Institute for Quality in Laboratory
    Medicine (IQLM) and the Clinical Laboratory
    Managers Association (CLMA) undertook an on-line
    quality inventory of laboratories with CLMA
    members.
  • Approximately 400 laboratories responded.
  • The study was voluntary, self-reported, with a
    validated questionnaire.
  • Information provided was not verified by a second
    method

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com