The Role of Gestures in Mathematical Discourse: Remembering - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

The Role of Gestures in Mathematical Discourse: Remembering

Description:

Deictic: 'pointing movement [that] selects a part of the gesture space' ... portion, all gestures except one were deictic, pointing at written algorithm. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: MetaT8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Role of Gestures in Mathematical Discourse: Remembering


1
The Role of Gestures in Mathematical Discourse
Remembering Problem Solving
  • Laurie D. Edwards
  • St. Marys College of California
  • ledwards_at_stmarys-ca.edu

2
Theoretical context
  • Cognition is embodied, at multiple levels
  • In the moment (microgenetically), through gaze,
    gesture, speech, imagery
  • Developmentally (ontogenetically), through
    individual experiences, for example, with our own
    bodies, physical objects, electronic artifacts,
    inscriptions
  • Biologically (phylogenetically) through
    constraints and capabilities developed through
    evolutionary time.
  • The only mathematics we have access to is the
    mathematics we are physiologically capable
  • of understanding (Lakoff Núñez)

3
Gesture and multimodality
Pervasive Multimodality (Nathaniel Smith)
Gesture is integrated with speech, writing and
drawing in the construction and communication of
mathematical ideas. General research goal To
investigate the form and functions of gestures in
the context of talking about and doing
mathematics.
4
McNeills Typology/Dimensions
  • Iconic gestures close formal relationship to
    the semantic content of speech
  • Metaphoric gestures the pictorial content
    presents an abstract idea
  • Beat indexes the word or phrase ... as being
    significant
  • Deictic pointing movement that selects a part
    of the gesture space

5
Adequacy of McNeills Framework
  • McNeills typology was produced using data
    gathered in a specific context subjects
    producing a narrative describing a cartoon they
    have just seen.
  • Additional research goal To determine whether
    McNeills categories/dimensions are adequate for
    describing gesture produced in mathematical
    situations.

6
Methodology
  • 14 women, college sophomores, enrolled in math
    content course for prospective elementary school
    teachers
  • Interviewed in pairs about fractions
  • (note not a learning situation, not involving
    motion or graphing)
  • Solved five problems involving operations with
    fractions, with questions fractions before and
    after the problem-solving portion
  • Interviews videotaped, transcribed, gestures coded

7
Interview Questions
  • How were you first introduced to the idea of
    fractions?
  • Do you remember anything difficult about learning
    fractions?
  • Have you ever used fractions in everyday life, or
    in other classes?
  • How would you introduce fractions to children?
  • How would you define a fraction to children?

8
Fraction Problems
  • Which is larger 3/4 or 4/5?
  • 2/3 1/2
  • 1 1/4 3/8
  • 7/10 x 5/9
  • 3/5 1/10

9
Data
  • 6 half-hour interviews, 3 hours total of
    videotape
  • A total of 86 gestures
  • Ranging from 3 - 21 gestures per student in
    half-hour sessions (mean7.7)
  • During problem solving portion, all gestures
    except one were deictic, pointing at written
    algorithm. These deictics were not included in
    the current analysis.

10
Gestures when remembering
  • Four salient kinds of gestures when asked to
    describe how they learned about fractions
  • Iconic gestures referring to physical
    manipulatives or actions
  • Iconic gestures referring to inscribed
    representations of physical manipulatives
  • Iconic gestures referring to specific written
    algorithms
  • Metaphoric gestures referring to generic or
    abstract mathematical actions or objects
    (formulas, comparisons, etc.)

11
Iconic gestures referring to physical
manipulatives or actions
KP I think we did, like, just a stick or a
rod (went on to talk about dividing it again
and again, using a repeated chopping motion)
12
SS one portion colored in
13
Iconic gestures referring to inscribed
representations of physical manipulatives
JB I know we did the pie chart
14
Iconic gestures referring to specific written
algorithms (iconic-symbolic)
  • Algorithms in the air
  • Gestures that index a remembered image of a
    written mathematical algorithm or procedure
  • The motions and pointing refer to a remembered
    physical inscription (kinesthetically and via
    visual imagery)
  • Yet the inscription refers to an abstract
    mathematical procedure (chain of signification)

15
R Remember anything about multiplying
and dividing with fractions? KG Isnt
that GG Dont you like cross them? KG Yeah you
cross like GG The bottom. KG The bottom and
the top of the opposite.
16
MB I remember learning that you put one under
the other, the fractions and adding and
subtracting and then finding the least common
denominator, or multiple, and then put it under
there and then having to multiply it out to
figure it out, but mostly we would have to figure
it out and then just adding it together.
17
Metaphoric gestures referring to generic or
abstract mathematical actions or objects
SS like the different formulas
18
KG And according to their statistics and
depending on like whether or not your team was
going to win
19
KG If it was more than what the bottom
was then it would become, like, one and...
(one other example of more to the right, and
one example of less to the left)
20
Gestures in communicationg about problem solving
  • Only one student used a gesture sequence in
    explaining her thinking when she solved one of
    the fraction problems
  • Problem was
  • Which is larger, 3/4 or 4/5?

21
AT Well, I mean its like Im thinking if I had
a pie and I had 5 people versus 4 people then,
R Ah. you know, were each kinda getting less
of a piece R Ah. because theres a fifth piece
we have to like, put out to the other four
people.
22
  • Except for initial emblem (Im thinking),
    ATs gestures highlighted important aspects of
    the task and her reasoning about it.

23
Highlights relative size of denominators (fourth
vs fifth)
  • were each kinda getting less of a piece

24
Highlights number of pieces, i.e., the numerators
  • because theres a fifth piece

25
Highlights sharing operation
  • we have to like, put out to the other four
    people.

26
Discussion/Conclusion
  • Gestures are not epiphenomenal to thinking, but
    rather an integral part of embodied
    understanding.
  • Gestures may refer to remembered physical
    objects, actions with these objects, written
    inscriptions, as well as more abstract
    mathematical relationships, procedures and
    objects.

27
Manipulatives
  • The physical objects we call mathematical
    manipulatives do not embody or represent
    mathematical ideas.
  • Instead, students actions with these objects,
    linked to speech/labels provided by the teacher,
    are the source of construction of mathematical
    ideas (through the creation of semiotic nodes).
  • Gesture can re-evoke these actions and assist in
    the reconstruction of these ideas

28
Remembering Algorithms
  • Students kinesthetic actions and visual memory
    of written symbolic algorithms are an essential
    part of their knowledge of these algorithms or
    procedures.
  • The way students describe functions shows deep
    traces of their actions and interactions with
    instruments and representations. Such traces are
    not complementary to the concept but are an
    essential component of its meaning.
  • Robutti, O. (2003) Approaching Algebra through
  • Motion Experiences PME 27 Proceedings, p. 1-113

29
A New Framework for Gestures in Mathematics?
  • In everyday discourse, concrete objects do not
    typically refer to anything beyond themselves
  • By contrast, in mathematics, concrete objects
    have been designed to refer to mathematical
    ideas
  • And symbols compress many layers of previous
    sign/symbol construction (chains of signification)

30
  • Furthermore, outside of mathematics, written
    symbols are not usually manipulated as if they
    were objects
  • Thus, there is a need for a more sensitive
    framework for describing the form and function of
    gesture in mathematical contexts.
  • Initially, created new category
  • Iconic-Symbolic

31
Other referents in fraction data
32
  • We need to develop a framework that attends (at a
    minimum) to
  • Form
  • Referent
  • Speech genre (narrative, explanation,
  • instruction, proof)
  • Setting (classroom, interview,
  • group homework session)
  • Involvement of artifacts

33
  • And, most importantly, a framework that can help
    us understand the
  • Function
  • of gesture within mathematical discourse,
    learning and teaching
  • Gestures may be
  • rhetorical/conversational/pragmatic
  • assist in developing the mathematical content
  • assist at a meta-content level (structuring an
  • argument, guiding reasoning, etc.)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com