Anti-infective Coatings - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Anti-infective Coatings

Description:

Anti-infective Coatings General strategies to Prevent Device-related Infections Minimize contact- Clean Room Conditions Kill every thing in contact-Sterilization ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:388
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: bioenUtah
Learn more at: https://my.bme.utah.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Anti-infective Coatings


1
Anti-infective Coatings
2
General strategies to Prevent Device-related
Infections
  • Minimize contact- Clean Room Conditions
  • Kill every thing in contact-Sterilization
  • Minimize binding at contact-Surface coating
  • Kill after contact-Anti-infective coatings

3
  • Medical Device
  • A device implanted permanently or temporarily in
    the body for a mechanical/structural purpose.
    Usually manufactured by extrusion or
    injection-molding (polymeric devices)
  • Drug Delivery Device
  • A device intended to deliver a drug for
    prophylactic or therapeutic purposes. Usually,
    such devices control the rate at which the drug
    is made available to the body (controlled release
    devices)
  • Hybrid device
  • A medical device with a primary
    mechanical/structural function and a secondary
    drug delivery function, either for device
    protection or targeted drug delivery.

4
Combining Local Drug Delivery and Implantable
Medical Devices
5
Anti-infective Coatings
  • In recent years, there have been numerous efforts
    to sequester antimicrobials and antibiotics on
    the surface of or within devices that are then
    placed in the vasculature or urinary tract as a
    means of reducing the incidence of device-related
    infections
  • The presence of active anti-infective agents in
    or on the device is secondary to the device's
    primary therapeutic or diagnostic function
  • We are not talking about the use of devices as a
    means of drug delivery to treat preexisting
    conditions but rather as a deterrent to device
    associated infections after implantation.

6
The Central Concept
  • Site-specific delivery-Locating active agents or
    drugs only at the surface of or in the vicinity
    of the device to reduce the incidence of
    device-related infections, which is preferable
    to administering the same drugs systemically
  • Systemic administration requires maintaining dose
    levels throughout the body, whereas local
    administration from the device surface
    concentrates the drug at the precise site where
    it is needed
  • There are increasing concerns about bacterial
    resistance due to chronic systemic antibiotic
    administration.

7
Effective Delivery
  • In order for local administration to be effective
    there must be sufficient amounts of the agent
    released from the device, and the duration of
    release must be appropriate for the condition. If
    there is good elution of drug from the device,
    drug concentration will be high at and near its
    surface, but will diminish with distance

8
Endotracheal Tubes from ICU at 4, 8 , 12 hrs.
9
Other Considerations
  • To be effective, device-based drugs must be
    available at and near the surface in sufficiently
    high concentration to preclude bacterial
    propagation
  • In other words, the device surface must serve as
    a reservoir for a large amount of drug and be
    capable of releasing it over time in appropriate
    quantities and,
  • It is also critical that the drug remain potent
    after sterilization.
  • For this reason, devices incorporating heat-,
    radiation-, or ethylene oxidesensitive
    antibiotics need to be tested carefully for
    efficacy after sterilization.

10
METHODS OF DRUG ATTACHMENT AND ENTRAPMENT
  • Much of the early work in the field focused on
    surface adsorption.
  • The simplest surface-adsorption technique is the
    immersion of the device in a solution of the
    drug.
  • This approach is limited by the short time the
    drug remains on the surface of the device
    because it is not bound to the surface or
    sequestered in any way, it washes away from the
    surface very quickly, generally less than a few
    hours
  • In addition, only a thin film is deposited on the
    surface, typically yielding, at best, only
    moderate release levels of drug.

11
Adding Positive Charges
  • It has long been recognized that many antibiotics
    have negative charges analogous to that of
    heparin.
  • This finding has led to a method of binding
    antibiotic molecules to the surface of prosthetic
    materials through the adsorption of positively
    charged surfactantssuch as benzalkonium or
    tridodecylmethylammonium chloride (TDMAC).
  • The bound surfactant acts as an anchor for
    subsequent binding of negatively charged
    antibiotic molecules, which include, for example,
    the penicillin and cephalosporin families of
    drugs.

12
Electrostatic interaction with positively charged
adsorbed species
  • The pharmacological agents are not irreversibly
    bound to the prosthesis, however, and after
    exposure to blood or body fluid are slowly
    released, resulting in a local environment of
    high drug concentration at the surface of the
    prosthesis, far in excess of what could be
    achieved by systemic administration.
  • This high concentration of antibiotic causes
    localized inhibition of bacterial growth.

13
Controlled Release Mechanisms
diffusion controlled
  • matrices (monoliths)
  • reservoirs (membranes)

chemically controlled
  • Bioerosion
  • degradation

14
Incorporation into the Polymer
  • The concept is that the device substrate can be a
    reservoir that allows the drug to elute,
    providing antimicrobial activity at and adjacent
    to the surface
  • A significant amount of drug can be entrapped
    within the device substrate by compounding the
    agent into the plastic prior to injection molding
    or extrusion, in the same manner that pigments,
    stabilizers, and strengtheners are added to the
    resin
  • There have been reports of good experimental
    results using this technique, with antimicrobial
    activity demonstrated up to 3 or 4 weeks.

15
Matrix (monolithic)
-drug uniformly distributed through polymer
matrix -no danger of drug dumping -first-order
kinetics
16
Sequestering Drugs into Device Coatings
  • the surface treatments can be applied without
    changing the basic properties of the device, and
    a sufficient quantity of drug can be
    incorporated
  • The several commercially available systems are
    generally prepared by one of two methods surface
    treating devices by cross-linking polymers that
    contain drugs, or coating devices with polymer
    solutions that contain antimicrobial agents.

17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Reservoirs system
-drug core surrounded by biodegradable
polymer -properties of drug and polymer govern
diffusion rate -drug-dumping if membrane
ruptures or degrades to quickly -zero-order
kinetics from constant activity source
20
Drawbacks and other considerations
  • The major drawback is the extensive RD effort
    necessary to determine commercial viability and
    the potential cost of the final product
  • Significant experimental work is required to
    qualify polymers appropriate for devicesresins
    whose molding integrity is not compromised by the
    addition of the drug
  • One must also determine appropriate drug-plastic
    combinations that will allow for controlled
    release at a sufficient level over the requisite
    time period
  • Because of the iterative nature of the testing
    and the complexity of the molding setups, the
    time and costs required to achieve adequate
    results may be daunting.

21
The Ideal Surface Treatment
  • BiocompatibilityThe full complement of
    biocompatibility tests should be considered for
    all devices that contact body fluids and tissues.
    (For general testing requirements, see the ISO
    10993/EN 30993 standard and the FDA Blue Book
    Memorandum G95-1.)
  • Drug AvailabilityThe amount of drug available is
    obviously critical. Any surface-modification
    system that cannot provide drug in sufficient
    quantities over the needed time period allows for
    unnecessary exposure to infection.
  • AdhesionThe selected surface treatment cannot
    shed or peel. Loss of large particles from the
    surface could create emboli or distribute the
    drug to nontargeted areas of the body.

22
The Ideal Surface Treatment-continued
  • DurabilityThe surface treatment must be able to
    withstand the rigors of the insertion process and
    any subsequent device manipulation after
    placement.
  • FlexibilityAny surface treatment that measurably
    adds to the diameter of the device can be
    expected to add some stiffness. Minimizing this
    added stiffness can be crucial for devices such
    as small-diameter catheters and guidewires that
    rely on very flexible tips to minimize the risk
    of perforation.
  • CoverageThe selected treatment should entirely
    cover whatever surfaces of the device are exposed
    to body fluids, so as to reduce the risk of
    exposure to bacteria.

23
-continued
  • SterilizabilityThe device must be presented
    sterile. For commercial products, this means that
    it must be packaged and sterilized without
    diminishing the efficacy of the antibiotic,
    antimicrobial, or antithrombogenic agent.
  • StabilityThe surface treatment and drug must
    remain stable under normal storage and use
    conditions and must have a reasonable shelf life.
    Radiation sterilization and some types of surface
    treatmentsfor example, exposure to UVmay cause
    cross-linking. In many polymers, cross-linking
    reactions will continue even after the exposure
    to radiation or UV has been terminated. Products
    that rely on cross-linking as a surface treatment
    or that are radiation sterilized should be tested
    for this continuation of the cross-linking
    process, which can cause embrittlement.

24
-Continued
  • Ease of UseTo be clinically viable, the treated
    device must be relatively easy to use. This
    presents a drawback for devices to which the drug
    must be added during the clinical procedure.
  • CostAn obvious consideration in all product
    development decisions. Do the benefits generated
    justify the costs?

25
Emerging Technologies
  • Coatings for enhanced imaging
  • Cell coated grafts for tissue engineering
  • Coating to enhance regenerative processes
  • Coatings for drug delivery

26
Coating Companies
  • Polymer Technology GroupSurModicsCarmedaHydrom
    er Inc.AST Products Inc.STS BiopolymersBiocoat
    Richard James Inc.Biocompatibles
    Ltd.BioChromSurface Solutions
    LaboratoriesSpire Corp.Implant Sciences
    Corp.Advanced Polymer Systems Inc.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com