Sarbanes-Oxley and Corporate Compliance: What - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Sarbanes-Oxley and Corporate Compliance: What

Description:

Sarbanes-Oxley and Corporate Compliance: What s all the Fuss About? The Ranney School Constance H. Baker, Esq. Venable LLP June 18, 2004 chbaker_at_venable.com – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:153
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: chb1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sarbanes-Oxley and Corporate Compliance: What


1
Sarbanes-Oxley and Corporate Compliance Whats
all the Fuss About?
  • The Ranney School
  • Constance H. Baker, Esq.
  • Venable LLP
  • June 18, 2004
  • chbaker_at_venable.com

2
Corporate Scandals
  • We have heard about
  • Enron
  • Arthur Anderson
  • Worldcom
  • Document destruction
  • Misleading and restated financial statements
  • Employees losing their retirement funds
  • CEO misconduct

3
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  • Landmark legislation made sweeping changes in
    governing and managing companies
  • Officially American Competitiveness and
    Corporate Accountability Act of 2002
  • Aimed at publicly traded companies, imposes
    obligations to disclose and certify to true and
    accurate financial condition, increase financial
    transparency and accountability, design internal
    financial controls
  • Criminal penalties, 10 years in prison, 1-5
    million fine

4
Application to schools/other nonprofits
  • Most provisions dont apply to non-profits, but
    two provisions apply to all.
  • Other provisions that apply only to publicly
    traded companies will set new standards for
    corporate governance or best practices, some of
    which schools may consider adopting.

5
Agenda
  • Review school fraud case law
  • Calls for reform by NY AG, Mass. AG and IRS
  • Understand the two parts of Sarbanes-Oxley that
    apply to schools now
  • St. Pauls School case
  • Directors duty of care, duty of loyalty,
    intermediate sanctions
  • 8 points to consider as you define Best Practices

6
Blumenthal v. Barnes
  • Conn. AG in 2002 sued Pres, treasurer and
    director of Village Academy, a non-profit school,
    alleging she breached her fiduciary duties by
    engaging in self-enriching and unfair activities.
  • Leased property to school, had 2 employment
    contracts for short time periods at excessive
    salaries.

5 YEAR LEASE
7
Vacco v. Diamandopoulos
  • NY AG in 1998 sued former Pres, trustees of
    Adelphi U. alleging mismanagement of assets
    related to use of insurance brokerage services of
    former trustee, use of former trustees
    advertising firm without disclosing to Board the
    fees, failure of Pres. to disclose pertinent
    facts to audit committee, and failure of Board to
    take appropriate action once it was aware of
    conflicts of interest.

8
Vacco v. Diamandopoulos cont.
  • President traveled in first class with wife, but
    employment contract only provided for
    reimbursement for domestic travel.
  • Pres. reimbursed over 360,000 for travel and
    entertainment expenses for three years.
  • Pres. furnished and renovated Manhattan apartment
    at University expense and sought reimbursement
    for 4000 per year in holiday gratuities to
    apartment staff.
  • Court denied defs motion to dismiss, advance
    indemnification.

9
Caravel Academy, Inc. v. Campbell
  • Delaware school sued principal, wife for damages
    for breach of fiduciary duty
  • Purchased car with corporate funds for personal
    use
  • Purchased annuity with corporate funds for amount
    greater than authorized
  • Entered into employment contract with his wife
    for salary greater than authorized
  • Court found that defendants violated their
    fiduciary responsibilities

10
Court ruling in Caravel Academy
  • Defendants conduct must be measured against the
    requirements of fair dealing, honesty, loyalty
    and good faith imposed upon them by virtue of
    their position within the corporation.
  • Officers of a corporation owe the duties of
    honesty, loyalty, good faith and fairness.

11
NY AG Corporate Reform Proposals
  • NY AG Eliot Spitzer proposed reforms in 2003 to
    provide similar protections against abuses by
    non-for-profit organizations that have custody of
    billions of dollars in charitable funds.
  • Proposed legislation would apply the same
    Sarbanes -Oxley Act provisions to non-for-profit
    corporations to ensure that charities are held
    accountable for the millions of dollars that New
    Yorkers donate each year.

12
Mass. AG legislation
  • AG Tom Reilly introduced Act to promote the
    financial integrity of public charities
  • To strengthen publics trust in integrity of
    public charities by requiring them to certify
    accuracy of financial reports
  • Similar to Congress intent of SOA, to
    re-establish publics trust in public charities.
  • To deter mismanagement and misconduct in
    financial oversight

13
Mass AG legislation
  • Certifications of financial reports by managers
  • Audit committees, procedures for complaints and
    whistleblower protections
  • Related party transactions and compensation
  • New remedies for violations

14
IRS - Form 990
  • IRS has recommended changes to Form 990 due to
    need for veracity in public information used by
    contributions in making decisions regarding
    exempt organizations.
  • IRS considering measures to increase public
    confidence in integrity of disclosures by exempt
    organizations.

15
IRS Form 990 Possible Changes
  • Disclosure of adoption of conflicts of interest
    policies or independent audit committees
  • Disclose information about transactions with
    substantial contributors, officers, trustees and
    key employees

16
IRS to propose non-profit best practices guide
  • IRS will issue best practices for nonprofit
    organization governing boards in 2004 Work Plan.
  • Bright light of corporate governance spotlight
    focusing more on large tax-exempt organizations
  • Guidance will focus on educating boards on
    corporate compliance oversight obligations
    regarding audit, compensation review
  • Board members need to have expertise to
    understand financial statements or find someone
    who does to advise them

17
Document Destruction
  • Sarbanes-Oxley includes new criminal provisions
    regarding obstruction of justice by document
    destruction.
  • Applies to EVERYONE including schools.
  • Effect is to increase scope of potential criminal
    liability for a variety of conduct.

18
Document destruction (cont)
  • Crime to knowingly destroy document with intent
    to obstruct or influence investigation or proper
    administration of any matter within jurisdiction
    of any department of agency of U.S. or in
    relation to or contemplation of any such matter
    or case.
  • Any matter interpreted by courts to include
    almost every conceivable area of interest by
    feds. Same language as in Federal False
    Statements Statute, 18 U.S.C. 1001.

19
Just suppose...
  • School employee sends e-mail about school matter,
    stating If feds ever get wind of this,
    theyll be all over us like a ________. If
    subject matter of e-mail is properly within
    jurisdiction of federal agency, has school
    contemplated a matter under the Act?
  • E-mail is destroyed pursuant to routine document
    retention policy or otherwise.
  • Are school and employees exposed to criminal
    liability? We are virtually assured that this
    provision will be tested soon.

20
Whistleblower Protection
  • Sec. 1107 makes it a crime for anyone, with
    intent to retaliate, to take any action harmful
    to anyone for providing to law enforcement
    officer any truthful information relating to
    commission of any federal offense.

21
Whistleblower Protection
  • Maximum punishment is 10 years incarceration and
    fine.
  • Applies to everyone!
  • Law enforcement officer includes officer or
    employee of feds - includes IRS, EEOC, FTC, FBI,
    SEC, etc.

22
St. Pauls School, Concord, NH
  • WSJ article on compensation for Rector (524,000)
    and Vice Rector (316,000)
  • NH AG investigated School announced voluntary
    reductions in compensation for 2 years, then tied
    future increases to increases to faculty as a
    whole
  • School also established certain internal controls
    for Rectors Discretionary Fund

23
Experts for AG and School opined on
  • Committees
  • Term limits of trustees and officers
  • Investment management
  • Role of Exec. Committee
  • Board approval of committee appointments
  • Composition of certain Board committees
  • Audit oversight practices
  • Conflict of interest policy
  • Training and orientation of trustees

24
Other recommendations
  • SPS agreed to recommend that NAIS conduct seminar
    addressing importance of full disclosure on IRS
    Form 990 on industry-wide basis regarding
    reporting of non-salary compensation
  • School to meet annually for next five years with
    AG to discuss compliance issues

25
Points to consider eight recommendations
  • Consider certain recommendations as a thoughtful
    transition to a scheme of standards currently
    unfolding

26
1. Audit Committee
  • establish Audit Committee, or subcommittee of
    Board finance committee, or introduce new
    discipline to existing Finance Committee.
  • most members independent of school management
  • one member should be financial expert
  • appoint, recommend compensation for, hold
    auditors accountable
  • set up internal procedures to receive, react to
    complaints regarding accounting, internal control
    or auditing matters

27
2. Code of Ethics for financial matters
  • Consider adopting code of ethics for Head, senior
    financial officer
  • Unethical for any officer or director to
    fraudulently influence auditor in performance of
    audit for purpose of rendering financial
    statements misleading

28
3. Establish Document Management Policy
  • Establish document management policy to guide
    staff in handling and disposing of documents
    (including e-mail), focusing on document relating
    to matters within the jurisdiction of any
    agency of the federal government (e.g. tax
    matter of interest to IRS, employment matter of
    interest to EEOC, etc., or any grants or loans
    from federal agency.)

29
4. Establish policy for whistleblower protection
  • Adopt policy and procedure to prevent
    retaliation against employees who report problems
    or raise questions regarding school financial
    affairs.

30
5. Review corporate bylaws
  • Make sure that committees are functioning
    properly, that the board properly oversees head
    of school, that committees are constituted
    properly, update committee charges
  • Revise Bylaws as necessary, every 3 years.

31
6. Review duty of care
  • Act with care an ordinary person would exercise
    under similar circumstances -Informed, good
    faith (not perfect) decisions
  • -Regular attendance at board and committee
    meetings
  • -Can rely on reports and consultants, if
    reliable
  • -Delegation is permissible
  • -Monitor investments

32
and review duty of loyalty
  • -Act with undivided allegiance to the schools
    purpose
  • -Prohibit conflict of interest or self-dealing
    with school (typically arises when director has
    independent financial interest in proposed
    transaction)
  • -Conflict of interest policy/disclosure of
    conflicts should be routine.

33
7. Review other corporate compliance obligations
  • Lobbying restrictions, political activity
  • Unrelated business income tax (UBIT)
  • Liability protection (insurance, indemnification)
  • Fundraising issues (registration requirements,
    raffles and auctions, planned giving tools)
  • Structure issues (use of subsidiaries, LLCs,
    title holding companies, supporting
    organizations)
  • Filing and disclosure issues (Form 990, personal
    property tax returns, charitable substantiation
    rules)

34
8. Review intermediate sanctions
  • Intermediate sanctions designed to penalize
    people who receive unreasonable compensation or
    other disproportionate benefits from tax-exempt
    organization.
  • Impose a 25 tax on the self-dealer or
    disqualified person (who exercised substantial
    influence) who receives an excess benefit from
    the school (200 if not corrected)
  • 10 tax on the Board personally (up to 10,000)
  • Comply with 3-step safe harbor of independent
    board relying on comparable data adequately
    documented.

35
Thank God shes finished!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com