Kant and Kantian Ethics: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Kant and Kantian Ethics:

Description:

Kant's ethics is called formalistic (or formal) ... Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Can reason actually discover eternal, absolute ethical principles, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:556
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: PaulSh70
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Kant and Kantian Ethics:


1
Kant and Kantian Ethics
  • Is it possible for reason to supply the
    absolute principles of morality?

2
Can reason actually discover eternal, absolute
ethical principles, principles of universal truth
that can be known with rational certainty just
reason can guide us to universal truths of
mathematics and geometry?
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)
3
  • Kantianism is a deontological formalistic moral
    theory which claims that the right action in any
    given situation is determined by the Categorical
    Imperative.
  • What is a deontological moral theory?
  • What does formalistic mean?
  • What is the Categorical Imperative?

4
What does Formalistic mean?
  • Kant's ethics is called formalistic (or formal)
    because it focuses on the form or structure of a
    moral judgment.
  • All moral directives have the prescriptive form
    "you ought to do X") they are imperatives.
  • The fundamental aim of Kant's ethical theory is
    to determine how a command can be a moral command
    with a particularly necessary and obligating
    character.

5
What is the Categorical Imperative?
  • First, he is arguing that when one acts
    voluntarily one always acts on a formulizable
    maxim or rule
  • One is choosing and judging the moral point of
    view if and only if one is or would be willing
    to universalize ones maxim, that is, if he is or
    would be willing to see his rule acted on by
    everyone who is in a situation of a similar kind,
    even if he himself turns out to be on the
    receiving end on occasion and third, that an
    action is morally if right and/or obligatory if
    and only if one can consistnetly will that the
    maxim or rule involved

6
First Formula Universal Law
  • 1. The Formula of Universal Law/Formula of
    Universal Law of Nature
  • "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can
    at the same time will that it should become a
    universal law."
  • "Act as if the maxim of your action were to
    become through your will a universal law of
    nature." p. 30

7
Second Formula Formula of Humanity as An End in
Itself
  • 2. Formula of Humanity a.k.a. Formula of
    Humanity as an End in Itself, Formula of the End
    in Itself
  • "Act in such a way that you treat humanity,
    whether in your own person or in the person of
    another, always at the same time as an end and
    never simply as a means." p. 36

8
3rd Formula Kingdom of Ends
  • 3. Formula of Autonomy / Formula of the Kingdom
    of Ends a.k.a. Formula of the Autonomy of the
    Will as Universal Legislator
  • "Act from the maxim of such a will as could at
    the same time have as its object only itself
    regarded as legislating universal law." / "Act
    in accordance with the maxims of a member
    legislating universal laws for a merely possible
    kingdom of ends." pp. 39, 43

9
What is a deontological moral theory?
  • A deontological theory claims that the right
    action is determined by what the agent's duty is.
    It is a duty-centered theory.
  • The first task of ethics is to determine what we
    are obligated to do.
  • It further claims that one should always do what
    it is one's duty to do.
  • By doing our duty, we do what is valuable.
  • Deontological ethics denies Consequentialism
    (outcome based models of ethics like Egoism or
    Utilitarianism) the morally right action is
    determined by its consequences.

10
Some Kantian Problems with Consequentialism
  • 1. No act is right or wrong in itself (no matter
    how horrific or evil)
  • 2. We are not morally responsible, autonomous, or
    free if we naturally seek to produce good
    consequences. If that is the case, then we are
    not morally responsible.

11
Kantian Problems with Consequentialism
  • 3. Because of various contextual reasons (e.g.,
    education background psychology etc), there is
    vast disagreement on what counts as good
    consequences.
  • 4. How can we be held responsible for
    consequences that are often out of our control?
    We cant even control the long-range
    consequenceswe dont even know what they may
    become? Moreover, where do we draw the line of
    responsibility?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com