Title: Spine and Spinal Trauma
1Spine and Spinal Trauma
- Rebecca Burton-MacLeod
- R1, Emergency Medicine
- Aug 21, 2003
2Numbers
- 10,000 new cases each year in US
- over 1 million pts with blunt trauma and
potential c-spine injury seen in US EDs - of these pts, lt1 have acute or spinal injury
- SIGNIFICANT CONSEQUENCES!
3Who?
- Age gt65
- male
- white or other ethnicity
4 How?
- MVA 50
- falls 20
- sporting accidents 15
- remainder from acts of human violence
- predisposing factors--arthritic disease, OP, Ca
5Anatomy.oh no!
- 33 vertebrae--7cervical, 12thoracic, 5lumbar,
5sacral (fused), 4coccyx (fused) - intervertebral discs separate them, and ligaments
support - spinal cord goes from midbrain to L2 level
- anterior column (vertebral bodies, discs,
ant/post longitudinal ligs) and posterior column
(pedicles, transverse processes, facets, laminae,
spinous processes, spinal canal, nuchal/capsular
ligs, ligamentum flavum)
6Spinal column
7Million question...
- Stable--disruption of only one of ant/post
columns - vs
- unstable--disruption of both columns at same
level OR c1/2
8Classification of spinal column injuries
- Flexion
- extension
- flexion-rotation
- vertical compression
9Flexion injuries
10Flexion injuries
11Flexion injuries
- Clay shoveller (lat)
- clay shoveller (AP)
12Flexion injuries
- Bilateral facet dislocation
13Extension injuries
14Extension injuries
15Extension injuries
16Flexion-rotation injuries
17Flexion-rotation injuries
18Vertical compression injuries
19Vertical compression injuries
20Vertical compression injuries
21Spinal cord injuries
- Primary--mechanical disruption of axons as result
of stretch, laceration, or vascular injury - vs
- secondary--progressive injury caused by free
radical formation, uncontrolled calcium influx,
ischemia, lipid peroxidation
22Secondary spinal cord injuries
- Reversible/preventable factors
- hypogylcemia
- hypoxia
- hypotension
- hyperthermia
- mishandling by medical personnel
23Spinal cord injuries
- Complete--total loss of motor power and sensation
distal to lesion - vs
- incomplete--3 syndromes (central cord, anterior
cord, Brown-Sequard), SCIWORA
24Complete spinal cord injuries
- If lasts gt24hrs, 99 will have no functional
recovery - must look for any evidence of cord function
- sacral sparing is key!
- Ddx spinal shock
- cannot diagnose complete injury until
bulbocavernosus reflex is elicited
25Incomplete spinal cord injuries
26Incomplete spinal cord injuries
- Central cord syndrome
- affect upper extremitiesgtlower extremities
- 50 of patients with a severe central cord
syndrome have a return of bowel and bladder
control, become ambulatory, and regain some hand
function - may mimic complete cord injury
27Incomplete spinal cord injuries
- Anterior cord syndrome
- caused by
- cervical flexion injuries causing cord contusion
- protrusion of a bony fragment or herniated
intervertebral disk into the spinal canal - laceration or thrombosis of the anterior spinal
artery - systemic embolization or prolonged cross-clamping
of the aorta
28Anterior cord s/o contd
- paralysis below level of injury
- hypalgesia below the level of injury
- preservation of posterior column functions
(position, touch, and vibratory sensations)
29Incomplete spinal cord injuries
- Brown-Sequard syndrome
- hemisection of spinal cord
- often due to penetrating trauma, or may be due to
of lat mass of c-spine - ipsilateral paralysis and contralateral sensory
hypesthesia below level of injury - most retain bladder/bowel control
30SCIWORA
- Usually lt8yrs of age following c-spine injury
no injury seen on complete plain radiographic
series - possibly due to immature anatomy and increased
ligamentous elasticity - causes transient spinal column subluxation,
stretching of the spinal cord, and variable
degrees of vascular compromise
31SCIWORA contd
- brief episode of upper extremity weakness or
paresthesias, followed by the development of
neurologic deficits that appear hours to days
later
32on exam
- Vitals, GCS
- inspection--facial contusions, head injuries,
trunk contusions, obvious deformities/penetrating
injuries - palpation--spine for step-off deformity, widened
interspinous space - neuro exam
33Motor exam
34Deep tendon reflexes
- UMN--present reflexes (but may be absent acutely
during spinal shock) - LMN--absent reflexes
35Sensory function
- Light touch--posterior column function
- painful touch--anterior spinothalamic function
36Investigations
37Radiography
- NEXUS
- 34,069 pts with blunt trauma
- 818 pts with c-spine injuries
- sensitivity 98.0-99.6, specificity 12.9
- 23 pts (3 potentially unstable) had injuries not
visualized on radiography (2.81 of all pts with
radiography performed)
38Radiography
- NEXUS criteria for c-spine xrays
- all 5 criteria must be met, or else xray
- absence of midline tenderness
- normal alertness
- no evidence of intoxication
- no focal neurological deficit
- no painful distracting injuries
- poorly reproducible
39Radiography
- Canadian C-spine rules
- 8924 pts enrolled with trauma to head/neck,
stable vitals, GCS15 - excluded pts--lt16yrs, penetrating trauma, known
vertebral disease - 151 clinically important c-spine injuries (1.7)
- sensitivity 100, specificity 42.5
- identified 27 of 28 unimportant c-spine injuries
(missed c3 avulsion ) - potential radiography rate 58.2 (down from
68.9!!)
40Radiography
- Canadian c-spine rules for radiography
- high risk factors? (gt65yrs, dangerous mechanism,
paresthesias) - must have radiography
- low risk factors? (simple rear-end MVC, sitting
in ED, ambulatory since injury, delayed onset
pain, absence midline c-spine tenderness) - then may assess range of motion
- rotate neck to left and right? (45degrees both
directions) - do not require radiography
41Radiography
- Standard trauma series (Carolines excellent
review!!) - lateral
- AP
- open-mouth odontoid
- oblique view--posterior laminar fracture, a
unilateral facet dislocation, or a real
subluxation - flexion-extension views--if severe pain but
normal 3views
42CT
- Indications
- inadequate radiography (as high as 25 for
visualization of c7-t1) - suspicious radiography findings
- fracture/displacement demonstrated by standard
radiography - high clinical suspicion of injury, despite normal
radiography - pts undergoing CT of head/abdomen may be
considered
43CT
- Pros
- evaluate spinal canal
- evaulates paravertebral soft tissues
- limited movement required
- Cons
- limited views of vert body displacement
- poor visualization of horizontal
- overcome by spiral CT
May eventually replace radiography, but not
current standard of care as initial investigation
44CT
45MRI
- Excellent for evaluation of neurological injury
- useful for ligamentous injury, bony compression,
epidural and subdural hemorrhage, and vertebral
artery occlusion
46MRI
47Management Goals
- Preservation of pts life
- optimizing potential for recovery of neurologic
function
48Management
- Prehospital
- high index of suspicion
- spinal immobilization--c-collar and backboard
with sandbags and tape
49ED Management
- ABCs
- above level of c3 often loss of resp drive
- avoid hyperextension of neck if intubation
necessary - above level of t6 often functional
sympathectomy--systemic hypotension - treat with Trendelenburg position and crystalloid
infusion
50ED Management
- Pharm (NASCIS II and III)
- 487 pts--overall analysis negative
- 193 pts--positive effect post hoc analysis
- modest improvement in functional recovery at 1yr
- loading dose 30mg/kg IV within 8hrs of injury
- if loading dose started within 3hrs, then
5.4mg/kg/h IV drip for 24hrs - if loading dose started 3-8hrs post-injury, then
5.4mg/kg/h IV drip for 48hrs - no benefit if given gt8hrs after injury, or for
penetrating injuries - Class II evidence (guideline)
51ED Management
- Other pharmacological agents suggested
- lazaroid (lipid peroxidation inhibitor)
- ganglioside
- no clear benefit, if any
52Complications of spinal cord injuries
- Pulmonary edema
- GI tract and bladder atonia
- pressure necrosis on skin
- DVT/PE
53Disposition
- Referral to spine injury centre
- minor ligamentous injuries--outpt pain mgmt
- minor --hospitalization for appropriate work-up
and pain mgmt
54?
55References
- Berlin. 2003. CT versus radiography for initial
evaluation of c-spine trauma What is the
standard of care? AJR 180911-5. - Fehlings, MG. 2001. Editorial Recommendations
regarding the use of methylprednisolone in acute
spinal cord injury Making sense out of the
controversy. Spine 26(24S)S56-7. - Lowery DW et al. 2001. Epidemiology of cervical
spine injury victims. Ann Emerg Med
jul38(1)12-6. - Marx. 2002. Rosens Emergency Medicine
Concepts and clinical practice, 5th ed. Mosby,
Inc. - Mower WR et al. 2001. Use of plain radiography
to screen for cervical spine injuries. Ann Emerg
Med Jul38(1)1-7. - Nockels, RP. 2001. Nonoperative management of
acute spinal cord injury. Spine 26(24S)S31-7. - Stiell IG et al. The Canadian c-spine rule for
radiography in alert and stable trauma patients.
JAMA 286(15)1841-8.