Spine and Spinal Trauma - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Spine and Spinal Trauma

Description:

Editorial: Recommendations regarding the use of methylprednisolone in acute spinal cord injury: Making sense out of the controversy. Spine 26(24S):S56-7. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:743
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 56
Provided by: calgaryem
Category:
Tags: cord | injury | spinal | spine | trauma

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Spine and Spinal Trauma


1
Spine and Spinal Trauma
  • Rebecca Burton-MacLeod
  • R1, Emergency Medicine
  • Aug 21, 2003

2
Numbers
  • 10,000 new cases each year in US
  • over 1 million pts with blunt trauma and
    potential c-spine injury seen in US EDs
  • of these pts, lt1 have acute or spinal injury
  • SIGNIFICANT CONSEQUENCES!

3
Who?
  • Age gt65
  • male
  • white or other ethnicity

4
How?
  • MVA 50
  • falls 20
  • sporting accidents 15
  • remainder from acts of human violence
  • predisposing factors--arthritic disease, OP, Ca

5
Anatomy.oh no!
  • 33 vertebrae--7cervical, 12thoracic, 5lumbar,
    5sacral (fused), 4coccyx (fused)
  • intervertebral discs separate them, and ligaments
    support
  • spinal cord goes from midbrain to L2 level
  • anterior column (vertebral bodies, discs,
    ant/post longitudinal ligs) and posterior column
    (pedicles, transverse processes, facets, laminae,
    spinous processes, spinal canal, nuchal/capsular
    ligs, ligamentum flavum)

6
Spinal column
7
Million question...
  • Stable--disruption of only one of ant/post
    columns
  • vs
  • unstable--disruption of both columns at same
    level OR c1/2

8
Classification of spinal column injuries
  • Flexion
  • extension
  • flexion-rotation
  • vertical compression

9
Flexion injuries
10
Flexion injuries
  • Wedge
  • teardrop

11
Flexion injuries
  • Clay shoveller (lat)
  • clay shoveller (AP)

12
Flexion injuries
  • Bilateral facet dislocation

13
Extension injuries
14
Extension injuries
  • Extension teardrop

15
Extension injuries
  • Hangmans

16
Flexion-rotation injuries
17
Flexion-rotation injuries
  • Unilateral facet disloc

18
Vertical compression injuries
19
Vertical compression injuries
  • Burst

20
Vertical compression injuries
  • Jefferson

21
Spinal cord injuries
  • Primary--mechanical disruption of axons as result
    of stretch, laceration, or vascular injury
  • vs
  • secondary--progressive injury caused by free
    radical formation, uncontrolled calcium influx,
    ischemia, lipid peroxidation

22
Secondary spinal cord injuries
  • Reversible/preventable factors
  • hypogylcemia
  • hypoxia
  • hypotension
  • hyperthermia
  • mishandling by medical personnel

23
Spinal cord injuries
  • Complete--total loss of motor power and sensation
    distal to lesion
  • vs
  • incomplete--3 syndromes (central cord, anterior
    cord, Brown-Sequard), SCIWORA

24
Complete spinal cord injuries
  • If lasts gt24hrs, 99 will have no functional
    recovery
  • must look for any evidence of cord function
  • sacral sparing is key!
  • Ddx spinal shock
  • cannot diagnose complete injury until
    bulbocavernosus reflex is elicited

25
Incomplete spinal cord injuries
26
Incomplete spinal cord injuries
  • Central cord syndrome
  • affect upper extremitiesgtlower extremities
  • 50 of patients with a severe central cord
    syndrome have a return of bowel and bladder
    control, become ambulatory, and regain some hand
    function
  • may mimic complete cord injury

27
Incomplete spinal cord injuries
  • Anterior cord syndrome
  • caused by
  • cervical flexion injuries causing cord contusion
  • protrusion of a bony fragment or herniated
    intervertebral disk into the spinal canal
  • laceration or thrombosis of the anterior spinal
    artery
  • systemic embolization or prolonged cross-clamping
    of the aorta

28
Anterior cord s/o contd
  • paralysis below level of injury
  • hypalgesia below the level of injury
  • preservation of posterior column functions
    (position, touch, and vibratory sensations)

29
Incomplete spinal cord injuries
  • Brown-Sequard syndrome
  • hemisection of spinal cord
  • often due to penetrating trauma, or may be due to
    of lat mass of c-spine
  • ipsilateral paralysis and contralateral sensory
    hypesthesia below level of injury
  • most retain bladder/bowel control

30
SCIWORA
  • Usually lt8yrs of age following c-spine injury
    no injury seen on complete plain radiographic
    series
  • possibly due to immature anatomy and increased
    ligamentous elasticity
  • causes transient spinal column subluxation,
    stretching of the spinal cord, and variable
    degrees of vascular compromise

31
SCIWORA contd
  • brief episode of upper extremity weakness or
    paresthesias, followed by the development of
    neurologic deficits that appear hours to days
    later

32
on exam
  • Vitals, GCS
  • inspection--facial contusions, head injuries,
    trunk contusions, obvious deformities/penetrating
    injuries
  • palpation--spine for step-off deformity, widened
    interspinous space
  • neuro exam

33
Motor exam
34
Deep tendon reflexes
  • UMN--present reflexes (but may be absent acutely
    during spinal shock)
  • LMN--absent reflexes

35
Sensory function
  • Light touch--posterior column function
  • painful touch--anterior spinothalamic function

36
Investigations
  • Plain radiography
  • CT
  • MRI

37
Radiography
  • NEXUS
  • 34,069 pts with blunt trauma
  • 818 pts with c-spine injuries
  • sensitivity 98.0-99.6, specificity 12.9
  • 23 pts (3 potentially unstable) had injuries not
    visualized on radiography (2.81 of all pts with
    radiography performed)

38
Radiography
  • NEXUS criteria for c-spine xrays
  • all 5 criteria must be met, or else xray
  • absence of midline tenderness
  • normal alertness
  • no evidence of intoxication
  • no focal neurological deficit
  • no painful distracting injuries
  • poorly reproducible

39
Radiography
  • Canadian C-spine rules
  • 8924 pts enrolled with trauma to head/neck,
    stable vitals, GCS15
  • excluded pts--lt16yrs, penetrating trauma, known
    vertebral disease
  • 151 clinically important c-spine injuries (1.7)
  • sensitivity 100, specificity 42.5
  • identified 27 of 28 unimportant c-spine injuries
    (missed c3 avulsion )
  • potential radiography rate 58.2 (down from
    68.9!!)

40
Radiography
  • Canadian c-spine rules for radiography
  • high risk factors? (gt65yrs, dangerous mechanism,
    paresthesias)
  • must have radiography
  • low risk factors? (simple rear-end MVC, sitting
    in ED, ambulatory since injury, delayed onset
    pain, absence midline c-spine tenderness)
  • then may assess range of motion
  • rotate neck to left and right? (45degrees both
    directions)
  • do not require radiography

41
Radiography
  • Standard trauma series (Carolines excellent
    review!!)
  • lateral
  • AP
  • open-mouth odontoid
  • oblique view--posterior laminar fracture, a
    unilateral facet dislocation, or a real
    subluxation
  • flexion-extension views--if severe pain but
    normal 3views

42
CT
  • Indications
  • inadequate radiography (as high as 25 for
    visualization of c7-t1)
  • suspicious radiography findings
  • fracture/displacement demonstrated by standard
    radiography
  • high clinical suspicion of injury, despite normal
    radiography
  • pts undergoing CT of head/abdomen may be
    considered

43
CT
  • Pros
  • evaluate spinal canal
  • evaulates paravertebral soft tissues
  • limited movement required
  • Cons
  • limited views of vert body displacement
  • poor visualization of horizontal
  • overcome by spiral CT

May eventually replace radiography, but not
current standard of care as initial investigation
44
CT
  • right lateral mass

45
MRI
  • Excellent for evaluation of neurological injury
  • useful for ligamentous injury, bony compression,
    epidural and subdural hemorrhage, and vertebral
    artery occlusion

46
MRI
  • C-spinal cord hemorrhage

47
Management Goals
  • Preservation of pts life
  • optimizing potential for recovery of neurologic
    function

48
Management
  • Prehospital
  • high index of suspicion
  • spinal immobilization--c-collar and backboard
    with sandbags and tape

49
ED Management
  • ABCs
  • above level of c3 often loss of resp drive
  • avoid hyperextension of neck if intubation
    necessary
  • above level of t6 often functional
    sympathectomy--systemic hypotension
  • treat with Trendelenburg position and crystalloid
    infusion

50
ED Management
  • Pharm (NASCIS II and III)
  • 487 pts--overall analysis negative
  • 193 pts--positive effect post hoc analysis
  • modest improvement in functional recovery at 1yr
  • loading dose 30mg/kg IV within 8hrs of injury
  • if loading dose started within 3hrs, then
    5.4mg/kg/h IV drip for 24hrs
  • if loading dose started 3-8hrs post-injury, then
    5.4mg/kg/h IV drip for 48hrs
  • no benefit if given gt8hrs after injury, or for
    penetrating injuries
  • Class II evidence (guideline)

51
ED Management
  • Other pharmacological agents suggested
  • lazaroid (lipid peroxidation inhibitor)
  • ganglioside
  • no clear benefit, if any

52
Complications of spinal cord injuries
  • Pulmonary edema
  • GI tract and bladder atonia
  • pressure necrosis on skin
  • DVT/PE

53
Disposition
  • Referral to spine injury centre
  • minor ligamentous injuries--outpt pain mgmt
  • minor --hospitalization for appropriate work-up
    and pain mgmt

54
?
55
References
  • Berlin. 2003. CT versus radiography for initial
    evaluation of c-spine trauma What is the
    standard of care? AJR 180911-5.
  • Fehlings, MG. 2001. Editorial Recommendations
    regarding the use of methylprednisolone in acute
    spinal cord injury Making sense out of the
    controversy. Spine 26(24S)S56-7.
  • Lowery DW et al. 2001. Epidemiology of cervical
    spine injury victims. Ann Emerg Med
    jul38(1)12-6.
  • Marx. 2002. Rosens Emergency Medicine
    Concepts and clinical practice, 5th ed. Mosby,
    Inc.
  • Mower WR et al. 2001. Use of plain radiography
    to screen for cervical spine injuries. Ann Emerg
    Med Jul38(1)1-7.
  • Nockels, RP. 2001. Nonoperative management of
    acute spinal cord injury. Spine 26(24S)S31-7.
  • Stiell IG et al. The Canadian c-spine rule for
    radiography in alert and stable trauma patients.
    JAMA 286(15)1841-8.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com