Episode 3 Operational Concept Detailing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Episode 3 Operational Concept Detailing

Description:

... Episode 3 proposed set of conditions New Roles and Descriptions of Responsibilities Airport ... Extent and meaning of CDM in execution phase 222/D.2 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:145
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: nih87
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Episode 3 Operational Concept Detailing


1
Episode 3 Operational Concept Detailing
Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event
Ros Eveleigh Eliana Haugg EUROCONTROL
DFS Episode 3
Brussels, 13 14 Oct 2009
2
Content
  • Objective of Concept Detailing
  • Documentation Produced
  • Concept Detailing Process
  • Example results
  • Operational Scenario example
  • OS-35 High density TMA Arrival Flying CDA
    Merging
  • Lessons Learnt
  • Conclusions

3
Objective of Concept Detailing
  • Support implementation of SESAR Target Concept
  • Production of specifications
  • Need comprehensive coverage
  • Sufficient level of detail
  • Future OSED production

DODs
Process Model
Detailed Operational Descriptions
  • Supporting validation activities
  • Concept descriptions for exercises

Operational Scenarios
Storyboards
4
The ATM Process Model
SESAR Operational Concept
Detailed Operational Descriptions
OSED Template
5
Scope of DODs
POST
Cooperative planning
EXECUTION
FLIGHT
MID/ SHORT TERM
LONG TERM
General and Lexicon
Long Term Planning
Network Management in Execution
Short/Medium Network Planning
Collaborative Airport Planning
DODs
Conflict Management in En Route
Years to 6 months
6 months to 15 min
6
DOD Development Process

SESAR sources e.g. Concept of Operations (D3),
Operational Improvement Steps (D5)
Initial DODs (Jan 08)
Expert Reviews
Exercise Needs
Interim DODs (Jan 09)
DODs
Expert Reviews
Exercise Results
Final DODs (Dec 09)
7
Review Process
  • DODs Reviewed by Experts
  • Current Operations in ANSPs, ATFCM, Airlines,
    Military
  • SESAR Definition Phase CONOPS (222)
  • Some new material added through review
  • Early user of Review Room
  • Allowing potentially contradictory comments to be
    easily identified
  • Hot topics identified debated
  • Via Email difficult to record transparency v
    spam effect
  • Via Discussion Room good
  • Answers by Exercises or escalated to
    Co-ordination Cell
  • Development of a Lexicon
  • Developed agreed definitions for over 20 SESAR
    terms
  • Available as document and on www.episode3.aero

8
Additional Concept Detail
  • Lexicon Definitions
  • Paraphrasing text from 222
  • Target Time of Arrival, Shared Business
    Trajectory, Revision
  • Proposed in Episode 3
  • Arrival Management, Constraint, Tolerance Window
  • New text in the DODs
  • SBT to RBT agreement
  • 222 gives time, Episode 3 proposed set of
    conditions
  • New Roles and Descriptions of Responsibilities
  • Airport driver role, complexity manager
    responsibilities
  • Hot Topics deferred for S-JU activities
  • Successive authorisation v increased workload
    AUO-0302
  • Extent and meaning of CDM in execution phase
    222/D.2

9
DODs, Scenarios Storyboards
  • DODs
  • Specifications of main ATM processes
  • Operational Scenarios
  • Descriptions of how processes work together in an
    operation
  • Operational scenarios fundamental to expert
    groups, prototyping and gaming
  • Importance increased over time v Use Cases
  • Storyboards
  • Diagrammatic representation of parts of ATM
    operations
  • Developed or reviewed in Expert Groups
  • New in Episode 3

10
  • Concept wide view
  • now
  • Zoom in to the TMA

11
General Development Process
  • Operational Scenarios primarily developed to meet
    Episode 3 Validation Exercise needs
  • Update with Episode 3 validation exercise results
    and Episode 3 Expert Group comments where
    available

12
Operational Scenario Example
  • OS-35 High density TMA Arrival Flying CDA
    Merging
  • Input from SESAR
  • Section F3.5 of SESAR ConOps refers to aircraft
    that "as far as possible, fly their individual
    optimum descend profiles" in medium/low
    complexity TMAs
  • Section H2.3 of SESAR ConOps refers to high
    complexity TMAs where a trade-off between
    throughput, punctuality and environmental
    performances will be made
  • The Operational Improvement steps (OI-steps)
    addressed are
  • AOM-0701 Continuous Descent Approach (CDA)
  • AOM-0702 Advanced Continuous Descent Approach
    (A-CDA)

13
Operational Scenario Example
  • Input from early interim DOD G-General
  • Contained initial high level CDA scenario Flying
    CDA merging without Structured Routes
  • Input from additional sources used (EUROCONTROL
    and ICAO documents, European and international
    studies)
  • Operational Scenario was composed
  • The TMA described in this scenario consists of
    medium/low complexity and high traffic density
  • Aircraft have ATM Service and Capability Level 2,
    scenario is set around 2015 time frame

14
Operational Scenario Example
  • The CDA scenario is set in a Point Merge airspace
    structure
  • Scenario describes the processes and interactions
    between human actors and systems for the
    following cases
  • Nominal CDA procedure
  • CDA procedure with tactical ATC controller
    intervention
  • CDA procedure with wind impact

IAF
IAF
15
Operational Scenario Example
  • Scenario was updated with Episode 3 Validation
    Exercise results and comments from Episode 3 TMA
    Expert Group
  • Scenario contains hop topic discussion boxes with
    open issues. Example from case with tactical
    intervention
  • Hot Topic How can the CTA and RTA of an aircraft
    be revised?
  • Expert discussion Next generation of AMAN tools
    should dynamically and continuously compute
    revised CTA and a place in the arrival sequence
  • Scenarios will be disseminated as an annex of
    Detailed Operational Descriptions

16
  • Zoom from the detail
  • to
  • Big Picture

17
Lessons Learnt
  • No Concept Authority
  • Same topic discussed repeatedly
  • But discussion needed for understanding
  • Difficult to integrate exercise results
  • Process defined, but difficult to agree
    responsibilities
  • Consistency across DODs, Scenarios Storyboards
  • In progress at the moment
  • Hot Topics identified described
  • Difficult, contentious or ambiguous problems
  • Resolution, escalation or deferred for SESAR-JU
  • Review Room and Discussion Room
  • Management of discussion
  • Debates recorded

18
Conclusions
  • Developed a Concept Detailing Process
  • ATM Process Model DODs
  • Operational Scenarios Storyboards
  • Checks for completeness coherence
  • Identification of Hot Topics
  • Concept detailing started from SESAR D3
  • Input from operational experts (incl airlines)
  • DODs, Scenarios and Storyboards available
  • Lessons Learnt
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com