A Comparison of Still-Image Compression Standards and Proposed Methods for Improving Lossy Image Quality - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

A Comparison of Still-Image Compression Standards and Proposed Methods for Improving Lossy Image Quality

Description:

A Comparison of Still-Image Compression Standards and Proposed Methods for Improving Lossy Image Quality MDDSP Literature Survey Presentation Eric Heinen – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:371
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: Eric219
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Comparison of Still-Image Compression Standards and Proposed Methods for Improving Lossy Image Quality


1
A Comparison of Still-Image Compression Standards
and Proposed Methods for Improving Lossy Image
Quality
  • MDDSP Literature Survey Presentation
  • Eric Heinen

2
Project Goals
  • Investigate existing methods for improving JPEG
    image quality
  • Consider adapting these methods to JPEG2000
  • Novel approaches?
  • Compare image quality of JPEG and JPEG2000 (with
    without improvements) across
  • Image set
  • Compression ratios

3
Joint Thresholding and Quantizer Selection for
JPEG Encoding(M. Crouse and K. Ramchandran, 1997)
  • Optimize encoding without affecting decoding
  • Rate-Distortion optimization framework

4
Improved JPEG Compression Using Human Visual
System (HVS) Model(G. Sreelekha and P. S.
Sathidevi, 2005)
  • Exploits contrast sensitivity of HVS
  • Sinusoid at given frequency requires certain
    amount of contrast to elicit a response
  • HVS is insensitive to very low and very high
    frequencies
  • Contrast Sensitivity Function (CSF)
  • CSF Thresholding
  • Discard DCT coefficients below CSF value

5
Improved JPEG Compression Using Human Visual
System (HVS) Model(G. Sreelekha and P. S.
Sathidevi, 2005)
  • Also exploits masking property of HVS
  • Vision less sensitive to local variation in
    brighter regions
  • Compute luminance masking threshold based on
    blocks DC coefficient
  • DCT coefficients below this threshold discarded
  • Quantization after thresholding
  • different from JPEG standard
  • incompatible with JPEG standard decoder

6
JPEG2000 vs. JPG
  • Arbitrary rectangular tile size allowed
  • Color space transformation can be
  • Lossless (YUV)
  • or lossy (YCbCr)
  • Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)
  • More sophisticated entropy encoding
  • Improvements to JPEG can be applied

7
Image Quality Assessment
  • Full-reference image quality metrics (IQM)
  • Estimate DMOS
  • Convenient
  • Popular IQMs
  • Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR)
  • Universal Image Quality Index
  • Structural Similarity (SSIM)

8
Statistical Evaluation of Recent IQMs(H. R.
Sheikh, M. F. Sabir, and A. C. Bovik, 2006)
  • Image database
  • Set of distortions
  • JPEG, JPEG2000, White Noise, Gaussian Blur,
    simulated wireless channel
  • Collect mean opinion scores
  • 3 different performance metrics
  • RMSE between IQM score and DMOS after non-linear
    regression

IQM RMSE
PSNR 13.4265
JND 10.2649
DCTune 16.2150
PQS 10.4221
NQM 11.4698
Fuzzy S7 15.3544
BSDM (S4) 9.7934
SSIM (MS) 9.3691
IFC 9.0007
VIF 8.2459
9
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com