Unpacking the - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Unpacking the

Description:

As an inter/multi/trans-disciplinary field, ... Place branding can: ... although tourism is just one channel of communication for any location s image. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:93
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: ISD273
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Unpacking the


1
Unpacking the Project of Place
  • Professor Nigel Morgan, UWIC Inaugural and
    Professorial Lecture Series 2007-2008

2
Outline
  • Positioning myself
  • Locating tourism
  • The origins of critical tourism studies what is
    new about it?
  • The power of place critical perspectives on
    place marketing
  • An ongoing project where next?

3
The shift to positionality
  • Researcher positionality is a new trend in
    tourism enquiry
  • Exposing the researchers autobiographical ways
    of knowing allows the reader to contextualise and
    interpret their work
  • Provides a more honest and stronger account of
    how knowledge is constructed and used.

4
Positioning myself
  • Degrees in history and economic history
  • Early career in sports policy, tourism marketing
    and public relations
  • Spent 15 years teaching and researching
    destination development marketing and
    critical approaches to tourism studies
  • White, middle class, able-bodied, middle-aged man
    typical of the tourism professoriate.

5
Tourism an industry and a field?
  • The field is divided between business (tourism
    management) and social science (tourism studies)
    approaches
  • Tourism management is mainstream and dominated
    by objectivist and positivist management
    approaches
  • Tourism studies is fragmented dispersed across
    a variety of different disciplinary audiences.

6
Locating tourism programmes
  • Most tourism programmes world-wide were
    established in the early 1990s
  • The vast majority (over 70) are located in
    business not tourism schools and this has had a
    major impact on the fields research agenda
  • Tourisms doctoral landscape is dominated by a
    drive to provide useful contributions
    industry-specific questions or policy-oriented
    studies which provide safe rather than
    challenging scholarship.
  • Sources (Ateljevic and Hall, 2007 Botterill,
    Gale and Haven 2003)

7
The academys gatekeepers
  • Gatekeepers police knowledge creation.
  • They are leading scholars, tourisms
    professoriate - journal editors and manuscript
    reviewers, members of learned societies, doctoral
    examiners, book editors, conference organisers
    and members of university research degree and
    ethics committees.

8
Who are tourisms gatekeepers?
  • First-generation tourism scholars who made their
    reputations in the late 1970s many members of
    the International Academy for the Study of
    Tourism are emeritus or close to retirement age
  • Geographically concentrated in the USA, UK,
    Canada, New Zealand and Australia 75 of
    journal editors are based in these five
    countries
  • Men only 9 of the 74 IAST members are women,
    only 6 of UK tourism professors are female and
    there are none at all in New Zealand.
  • In essence, the tourism gatekeepers are first
    generation, white, male scholars grounded in
    Western, Anglo-centric research traditions.
  • Source Pritchard and Morgan, 2007.

9
The unchanging power of gatekeepers
  • Editorial board membership of leading tourism
    journals remains heavily gender imbalanced at a
    time when the academy is almost gender-balanced
  • Annals of Tourism Research (1973) 89 men
  • Tourism Management (1979) 84 men
  • Tourism Analysis (1996) 88 men
  • Tourist Studies (2000) 73 men
  • Journal of Sport Tourism (2006) 78 men.

10
The failure of tourisms orthodoxy
  • 40 years of business oriented work has not
    managed to establish tourism as a credible field
    with governments, industry or the wider social
    science academy - other fields see tourism as an
    intellectual lightweight
  • On the other hand the early pioneers of social
    science approaches to tourism study failed to
    significantly challenge this view (in contrast to
    fields like media and cultural studies).

11
Challenges to the existing orthodoxy
  • Tourist is ideally placed to contribute to
    analyses of social injustice, disenfranchisement,
    human and spatial marginalisation, globalisation,
    political representation and cultural
    commodification.
  • As an inter/multi/trans-disciplinary field, it
    has much to offer the study of identities,
    relationships, mobilities, consumption,
    embodiment and subjectivities.

12
Philosophically
  • New tourism enquiry moves beyond the Cartesian
    essentialist dualisms of subject-object
    mind-body feminine-masculine us-them
    self-Other, etc. It embraces both/and thought.
  • Through tourism we can explore the impacts of
    both structure ( the grand narratives of gender,
    race, class, etc.) and human agency (how
    individuals and groups experience and negotiate
    life).

13
Theoretically
  • New tourism research or critical tourism
    research embraces new ways of theorising tourist
    experiences, processes and phenomena
  • It takes tourism to the forefront of social
    science as a research context in which the
    questions of seeing, making and experiencing the
    world can be teased out at a local and global
    level. We seek to disturb and challenge points of
    privilege created through race, class, gender,
    etc.

14
Methodologically
  • The embodied tourist and her/his dwelling/
    involvement in the world and relational tourism
    mobilities becomes an innovative and progressive
    methodological point of entry to capture the
    spatiality of broader structures (both material
    and non-material).
  • Here, autoethnography and embodiment are central
    to such approaches.

15
Politically
  • It challenges the political agenda of
    traditional disembodied Western masculinist
    academic (and non-academic) knowledge.
  • It confronts Eurocentric discourses in academia
    as well as in the real world which privilege
    and are connected with capitalism and linear
    thinking and seeks to play an active role in the
    fight for equity and social justice.

16
A critical lens on place marketing
  • Place marketing can fuse public and private
    sector interests
  • Raise the economic value of produce and products
  • Increase pride and confidence in places and
    change how they are seen internally and
    externally.

17
  • Developing countries account for a third of all
    global international arrivals
  • Tourism is vitally important to the worlds
    poorest countries
  • National strategies promote private sector
    investment, macro-economic growth and foreign
    exchange earnings.

18
  • For peripheral and especially for poor and
    developing places, nation branding is not an
    indulgence but crucial statecraft.
  • The decision is not whether to brand but how to
    brand themselves.

19
Place branding can
  • Fuse public and private sector interests
  • Raise the economic value of produce and products
  • Increase pride and confidence in places and
    change how they are seen internally and
    externally.

20
The place-branding hexagon
  • After Anholt, S. (2006).

21
Where next?
  • Over 130 tourism scholars worldwide are
    associated with our Critical Tourism Studies
    Network launched in Split in June 2007
  • This is a collectivity of scholars who want
  • to produce social change in the academy
  • and society
  • We are gaining footholds in the field through
    networks, conference organisation, a growing
    group of emerging doctoral and post-doctoral
    students journal special issues and books.

22
  • Being a critical tourism scholar has an impact
    on every aspect of the research process from
    your choice of topic, through to your research
    framework, to choosing particular methods and
    disseminating the work.
  • Thinking about your research and those with whom
    you co-create knowledge (your participants,
    audiences, etc.) sharpens your approach in that
    your appreciation of the complexly spun web of
    academic power brings into focus the varied
    contexts in which research takes place.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com