Title: 269B class organizational meeting
1269B class organizational meeting
2LHC and Geneva
Main CERN Campus ATLAS
CMS
3Today (good timing ?)
- 7 TeV collisions, but miniscule luminosity (50 Hz
of proton-proton collisions)
4Tomorrow
5Classes of Topics
- Fundamental physics
- E.g. Higgs, Supersymmetry, large extra dimensions
- Phenomenology the interplay between theory
and experiment - E.g. partons in protons, hard scattering,
ordinary particles, jets - General experimental issues
- E.g. accelerators, measuring momentum and energy
- Specific experimental issues
- E.g. pixel detectors, CMS versus ATLAS
- The future of physics at the energy frontier
- E.g. muon colliders, plasma wakefield acceleration
6More detailed list of topics
- Fundamental physics
- Higgs
- Supersymmetry (several types)
- Z and W particles
- Techniparticles
- Large extra dimensions, Kaluza-Klein particles,
black holes - Compositeness
- Magnetic monopoles
- b and t quarks
- Massive charged stable particles
- Phenomenology the interplay between theory
and experiment - Partons in protons
- Elastic and diffractive scattering
- Hard scattering
- ordinary particles
- Heavy quarks (b and t)
- jets
- General experimental issues
- Accelerators
- Luminosity
- Measuring momentum(tracking)
- Measuring energy (sampling calorimeters)
- -Muon systems
- Particle flow
- Specific experimental issues
- Pixel, Si strip tracking detectors
- CMS versus ATLAS
- Data analysis techniques
- Examine past discoveries, measurements
- The future of physics at the energy frontier
- Upgrades to LHC
- ILC and CLIC electron positron colliders
- muon colliders
- plasma wakefield acceleration
7Organizational issues
- What is expected?
- Kind of apprenticeship experience, tailored to
individual - Grading scheme (attendance, participation, talk
or paper) - Who is enrolled?
- When to meet?
8A Superficial Introduction
9Known Particle Physics
- Assume relativistic quantum mechanics (field
theory) - The Standard Model (1974) has two basic
principles - Symmetry at every point in space-time
- Symmetry breaking
- Only the 1st principle is beautiful
10Symmetry
- aka SU3xSU2xU1 a rotation symmetry at every
point in space-time - Explains the Strong (SU3) and weak (SU2) nuclear
forces - Explains Electromagnetism (U1)
11Symmetry breaking
- Simple classical example vertical pencil
- Introducing the Higgs mechanism
- A special particle that has a strange potential
energy function in the vacuum
Massive electrons, quarks, neutrinos, W and Z,
and other particles
12Standard Model (too much) Success!
- 1974 Standard Model emerged with the November
revolution - 1979 I became a grad student
- For 34 years no discrepancy has been found ??
- All of the known fundamental particles are listed
below. - The Higgs is the fundamental particle that allows
Electroweak unification. The only missing piece.
The only scalar (Spin 0) particle.
12
13Tevatron vs. LHC Higgs
LEP-TeV working group fit mHlt 157 GeV (95 CL)
- Low-mass (lt130 GeV)
- Favored by precision data fits
- Experimentally very difficult
14Heres what a Higgs particle might look like (H
?ZZ?4?)
- A simulation
- Muons in green.
- The golden discovery mode for H mass gt135 GeV
15Technicolor
- Theories beyond the Standard Model (sometimes,
but not always, GUTs) which do not have a scalar
Higgs field. - Details (see Wikipedia)
- Instead, they have a larger number of fermion
fields than the Standard Model and involve a
larger gauge group. - This larger gauge group is spontaneously broken
down to the Standard Model group as fermion
condensates form.
15
16GUTs and the Higgs particle
- GUTsGrand Unified Theories
- Einstein tried but failed
- The SU3xSU2xU1 symmetries come from one big
symmetry - A beautiful idea
- Forces of nature merge into one force eventually
(at high energy)
?
16
17GUTs seem incompatible with Higgs
- Fine corrections to the Higgs mass tend to
become huge (1015 GeV/c2 or more), this cannot
be - Known as the hierarchy problem
17
18Supersymmetry (SUSY)
- SM particles have supersymmetric partners
- Differ by 1/2 unit in spin
- Sfermions (squarks, selectron, smuon, ...) spin
0 - Gauginos (chargino, neutralino, gluino,) spin
1/2
18
19Supersymmetry
- A symmetry that relates spins (fermions to
bosons) - One new superpartner for every known elementary
particle. - The superpartner differs only by half a unit of
spin, and its mass. - The lightest supersymmetric particle is the best
candidate for Dark Matter - If supersymmetry exists close to the TeV energy
scale, it - Solves the hierarchy problem
- The early universe should have produced just
about the right amount of Dark Matter - Supersymmetry is also a consequence of most
versions of string theory - though it can exist in nature even if string
theory is wrong.
19
20SupersymmetryParticles Galore
Mass GeV
Example a whole new spectrum waiting at a few
hundred GeV mass?
20
21SUSY also fixes GUTs details
22Large extra dimensions, R-S
- Large extra dimensions (1998)
- To explain the weakness of gravity relative to
the other forces. - Fields of the Standard Model are confined to a
four-dimensional membrane, while gravity
propagates in several additional spatial
dimensions that are large compared to the Planck
scale - Production of black holes at the LHC??
- Randall-Sundrum models (1999)
- our Universe is a five-dimensional anti de Sitter
space and the elementary particles except for the
graviton are localized on a (31)-dimensional
brane or branes
22
23Modern Particle Accelerators
The particles are guided around a ring by strong
magnets so they can gain energy over many cycles
and then remain stored for hours or days
The particles gain energy by surfing on the
electric fields of well-timed radio oscillations
(in a cavity like a microwave oven)
24CERN Accelerator Complex
- LHC is designed for 14 TeV energy (7 TeV per
proton in each beam)
25Add gt1500 dipole and quadrupole magnets, liquid
helium services
26..and Two Large Detectors
ATLAS
CMS
- Beams collide 40 million times producing 1
billion proton-proton collisions every second - Typical data run will last 9 months
27Context
- See http//www.nature.com/nature/journal/v448/n715
1/full/nature06076.html - 1987 (Reagan) the U.S. proposed to build a 40 TeV
collider (the SSC) in Texas. - 1991 CERN proposed to re-use an existing
accelerator tunnel to build a wimpy 14 TeV
collider. - UCLA Prof. Dave Cline was one of a handful of
(unfunded) U.S. physicists involved in LHC. - 1993 the SSC was killed by Congress (Clinton)
- 1994 UCLA and other U.S. institutions joined the
LHC effort - Then gt14 years of planning, prototyping, and
construction - Dec. 2009 collisions at 0.9 2.36 TeV
- Mar. 2010 collisions at 7 TeV (Fermilab 1.96 TeV)