Title:
1 Industrial Policy for Africa East Asian
Lessons and TheirApplicability
- Ha-Joon ChangFaculty of Economics, University of
Cambridgehjc1001_at_cam.ac.uk
2Theoretical justifications for policies
increasing productive capabilities through
public intervention
- the infant industry argument
- various Neoclassical theories of market failure,
especially those related to knowledge
generation and the capital market - the Big Push argument
- Hirschmans linkages theory
- Arrows theory of learning-by-doing
- neo-Schumpeterian arguments on National
Systems of Innovation - even the Austrian theory of tacit knowledge may
be re-formulated to justify industrial policy,
especially in relation to developing
countries
3Industrial Policy beyond East Asia I
- Successful industrial policy experiences in the
late 20th century are not confined to East Asia - national industrial policies in France, Finland,
Norway, and Austria - regional industrial policies in Italy and
Germany - industrial policy under another name in the US
through government RD funding - between the 1950s and the 1980s, the US federal
government financed anywhere between 47 and 65
of national RD spending, as against around 20
in Japan and Korea and around 30 in Europe).
4Kicking away the ladder- picture
5 6Industrial Policy beyond East Asia II
- In the 19th and the early 20th centuries, all of
todays rich countries, except for the
Netherlands pre-WWI Switzerland, practised
protectionism and other forms of industrial
policy (subsidies, state ownership, regulation on
FDI). - Interestingly, Britain and the US the supposed
homes of free trade had the worlds highest
levels of tariff protection during their
respective catch-up periods.
7Table 1. Average Tariff Rates on Manufactured
Products for Selected Developed Countries in
Their Early Stages of Development (weighted
average in percentages of value)1
Average Tariff1 Rates
18202 18752 1913 1925 1931 1950
Austria3 R 15-20 18 16 24 18
Belgium4 6-8 9-10 9 15 14 11
Canada5 5 15 n.a. 23 28 17
Denmark 25-35 15-20 14 10 n.a. 3
France R 12-15 20 21 30 18
Germany6 8-12 4-6 13 20 21 26
Italy n.a. 8-10 18 22 46 25
Japan7 R 5 30 n.a. n.a. n.a.
Netherlands4 6-8 3-5 4 6 n.a. 11
Russia R 15-20 84 R R R
Spain R 15-20 41 41 63 n.a.
Sweden R 3-5 20 16 21 9
Switzerland 8-12 4-6 9 14 19 n.a.
United Kingdom 45-55 0 0 5 n.a. 23
United States 35-45 40-50 44 37 48 14
8Is Cold Climate Better?
- Those who live in a cold climate and in Europe
are full of spirit, but wanting in intelligence
and skill and therefore they retain
comparative freedom, but have no political
organization, and are incapable of ruling over
others. Whereas the natives of Asia are
intelligent and inventive, but they are
wanting in spirit, and therefore they are
always in a state of subjugation and slavery. But
the Hellenic race, which is situated between
them, is likewise intermediate in
character, being high-spirited and also
intelligent. Hence it continues free, and is the
best governed of any nation, and if it could
be formed into one state, would be able to
rule the world. - (Aristotle, Politics, Book VII, chapter 7).
9Undoubtedly, many factors played a role, but
culture had to be a large part of the
explanation. South Koreans valued thrift,
investment, hard work, education, organisation,
and discipline. Ghanaians had different values.
In short, cultures count.Samuel Huntington on
culture and development
10The Germans are a plodding, easily contented
people endowed neither with great acuteness of
perception nor quickness of feeling It is long
before a German can be brought to comprehend
the bearings of what is new to him, and it is
difficult to rouse him to ardour in its pursuit.
John Russell, an English traveller, on the
Germans in 1828.
11My impression as to your cheap labour was soon
disillusioned when I saw your people at work. No
doubt they are lowly paid, but the return is
equally so to see your men at work made me feel
that you are a very satisfied easy-going race who
reckon time is no object. When I spoke to some
managers they informed me that it was impossible
to change the habits of national heritage. An
Australian engineer after visiting Japan in 1915
12The Koreans are 12 millions of dirty, degraded,
sullen, lazy and religionless savages who slouch
about in dirty white garments of the most inept
kind and who live in filthy mud huts. Beatrice
Webb on the Japanese and the Koreans during her
1911-12 tour of East Asia
13Natural Resources and Industrial Policy I
- Most African countries are actually not that well
endowed with natural resources. - In fact, fewer than a dozen African countries
have any significant mineral deposits. - Only South Africa and the DRC are exceptionally
well endowed with more than one mineral
resources. - Most African countries may have low population
density, but only a handful of them are
exceptionally well-endowed with arable land. - Niger, Liberia, DRC, Chad, Senegal, Sierra Leone,
and the Central African Republic
14Natural Resources and Industrial Policy II
- No country, not even the US, Canada, and
Australia, has been blessed by nature to such an
extent that they can become rich only by doing
things that come naturally. - Moreover, it is not even as if all natural
products are really natural. Many of them are
products of colonialism. - For example, many African countries export
cocoa and tea, which were brought from,
respectively, Central America and China to
Africa by the colonisers
15Natural Resources and Industrial Policy III
- When it comes to high-productivity activities
whose existence determines whether a country is
economically developed or not, countries become
good at something only because they deliberately
decide to become so. - Why should the Japanese should be good at
building cars (Toyota) and the Finns at making
mobile phones (Nokia)? - Why should Korea be good at making steel, when
the it does not even produce any relevant raw
materials - iron ore or coking coal? (POSCO)
16Natural Resources and Industrial Policy IV
- Now, these high-productivity activities do not
develop naturally in developing countries, if you
left things to the market, because you already
have superior competitors in more economically
developed countries. - - This is the logic of infant industry
promotion, which was behind the successful
industrial policy experiences of most of todays
rich countries, ranging from 18th Britain through
to 19th century US and 20th Korea.
17Political Economy Questions I
- Successful industrial policy requires right
political conditions the commitment of the
leadership to economic development, the coherence
of the state machinery, and the ability of the
state to discipline the recipients of its
supports. - When considering the political realities of many
African countries, it seems difficult to imagine
how industrial policy, even if it were correct,
can be implemented well in those countries.
18Political Economy Questions II
- But we should not let the best be the enemy of
the good. - In the real world, successful countries are the
ones that have managed to find good enough
solutions to their political economy problems and
went on to implement policies, rather than
sitting around bemoaning the imperfect nature of
their political system.
19Bureaucratic Capabilities I
- No basis for the assumption that industrial
policy is more difficult than other policies. - Industrial policy does not require sophisticated
knowledge of economics, as often believed. - The industrial policy-makers of East Asia were
not economists (lawyers in Japan and Korea,
engineers in Taiwan and China today), and what
little economics they knew was usually the
wrong kind Marx, the German Historical
School, Schumpeter. - High-quality bureaucracies are not as impossible
to build as people think. - France, Korea and Taiwan in the post-WWII period
20Bureaucratic Capabilities II
- There is also learning-by-doing in policy.
- Without trying out difficult policies,
capabilities cannot be improved. - The fact that something is difficult cannot be
a reason not to recommend it. - After all, developing countries are routinely
told to adopt best practice or global
standard institutions used by the richest
countries, when many of them clearly do not have
the capabilities to effectively run such
institutions.
21Changes in the Rules of the Global Economy I
- WTO rules not as restrictive as believed.
- Tariffs are only bound, rather than banned, and
the poorer countries have found only a limited
number of tariffs - Infant industry protection allowed (although only
up to 8 years) - Emergency tariffs allowed (sectoral surge,
overall BOP problems) - Subsidies for environment, agriculture, RD,
regional policies, and (for LDCs, which include
many African countries) export subsidies allowed - TRIPS constraining but not for older technologies
that African countries need - TRIMS constraining but performance requirements
for local labour, technology transfer, RD, etc.
allowed.
22Changes in the Rules of the Global Economy II
- Having said that, there do exist bigger
constraints, especially in the case of the poorer
countries, including many in Africa, in the forms
of aid/loan conditionalities and
bilateral/regional trade/investment agreements. - However, all these rules are man-made and can
be changed if deemed necessary.