Vibrating Beam Modeling Results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Vibrating Beam Modeling Results

Description:

Vibrating Beam Modeling Results Prime (Group 7) Abby, Jacob, TJ, Leo The model and data We are attempting to use the ordinary differential equation model: The ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: ncsuEducr
Learn more at: http://www.ncsu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Vibrating Beam Modeling Results


1
Vibrating Beam Modeling Results
  • Prime (Group 7)
  • Abby, Jacob, TJ, Leo

2
The model and data
  • We are attempting to use the ordinary
    differential equation model

  • This is assuming that the beam behaves
  • like an under damped harmonic oscillator

3
C 0.68439333 standard error (C)
0.00897737 95 confidence interval (
0.66643859, 0.70234806 )
K 1525.693399 standard error (K)
0.350108 95 confidence interval (
1524.993183, 1526.393614 )
  • s2 1.0559e-010

4
  • notice the model only appears to estimate one
    frequency of the three that the data appears to
    contain.

5
The Optimization Algorithm
  • The data vector is massaged by truncating at the
    max and adding the average back into it 5000
    times
  • A loop using fminsearch adds random vectors to C
    and K. The values that produce the lowest
    least-squares cost are kept.

6
C1 -0.64450000 standard error (C1)
0.00908483 95 confidence interval (
-0.66266967, -0.62633033 )
K1 -1530.600000 standard error (K1)
0.354825 95 confidence interval
(-1531.309651, -1529.890349 )
s12 4.056e-011 compared to s2
1.0559e-010 cost11.9064e-007 cost
5.1366e-007
7
Residual Plots
New residual plot
Old residual plot
  • Ideally the plot should be random about zero
  • The occurrence of the diagonal pattern implies
    that there may be a better fit model

8
QQ Distribution
First QQ plot
Second QQ plot
The QQ or normal probability plot shows that the
function doesnt have a normal distribution.
9
Diagnostic Plots
First C, K values
Second C, K values
  • Exhibits non-constant variance

10
The ODE Model
  • The model appears to generally mimic the behavior
    of the system
  • It seems to only capture one out of three
    frequencies displayed
  • It shows residuals that are not evenly
    distributed or random about zero
  • An improved model should be attempted

11
PDE Model
  • Next, we attempted to fit the PDE model to the
    data


12
The PDE Model Initial parameter guesses
13
PDE ModelInitial parameter guess
  • The model catches the first two, but misses the
    third frequency

14
PDE ModelSecond Parameter Guess
15
PDE ModelSecond Parameter Guess
16
Further Improvements
  • Optimize the parameter selection
  • Use statistical analysis for the PDE model of our
    data
  • Attempt alternate statistical analysis techniques
  • Collect multiple data sets and improve laboratory
    settings
  • Research current literature for more accurate
    models
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com