Private Medical Insurance - Strategic Considerations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Private Medical Insurance - Strategic Considerations

Description:

John Gillman * Living strategy and the death of the five-year plan: is strategy dead? No, but strategy needs to be different! Source: Financial Times 27 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: kthor3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Private Medical Insurance - Strategic Considerations


1
Private Medical Insurance - Strategic
Considerations
  • John Gillman

2
  • Living strategy and the death of the
  • five-year plan is strategy dead?
  • No, but strategy needs to be different!
  • Source Financial Times 27 October 2009

3
  • The hedgehog approach corporate
  • hibernation only works if recessions are
  • short
  • BCG Organisations with adoptive advantage
    recognise the unpredictability of todays
    environment and the limits of deductive analysis.
    They

4
  1. Process relevant data quickly
  2. They see clearly how their business fits into a
    wider context
  3. They are alive to social change and shifting
    customer preferences
  4. They experiment effectively
  5. They draw on the talents of the best people they
    can find whether they employ them or not

5
  • McKinsey
  • You have to give up the pretence that you can
  • predict the future
  • Strategy is really an evolving idea which
    develops
  • over a long period on a long and winding road
  • . and this new world calls for just-in-time
  • decision making
  • While the eternal truths - market position,
    scale
  • and capabilities endure, a more dynamic
    and
  • adaptive approach is now needed.

6
  • Review of 2008/2009
  • Total people covered was 7,562,000 12.3 of the
    U.K. population with individuals the main
    contributors of market growth
  • PruHealths business grew by over 50
  • AXA/PPPs business added nearly 90m in premiums

7
  • Review of 2008/2009
  • Simply Healths market share grew to 2.5
  • Standard Life marketed heavily in 2008 (but lost
    market share)
  • The top 10 advertisers are focusing on direct
    mail
  • Top 5 competitors

BUPA, AXA/PPP Aviva control gt 75 of the
market Standard Life down slightly WPA
market share down
8
  • What was the main reason you purchased
    PMI?
  • Part of our financial planning 20
  • I consider it a financial priority 14
  • Death or illness of family friend persuaded me
    9
  • Bought it with mortgage/loan 4
  • Persuaded by a salesperson 3
  • Other 46
  • Source The Hannover Re (UK) Protection Review
    Consumer Survey 2009

9
  • Why did you purchase then and now?
  • Jumping the queue
  • Choice of specialist/surgeon
  • Hotel facilities
  • Now added
  • Fear of hospital acquired infections AXA PPP
    2009 Research
  • Cost of new drugs

10
  • Why didnt you buy PMI?
  • Cant afford it 37
  • The State will look after me 18
  • I havent thought about it 16
  • Other priorities 6
  • I dont trust insurers to pay claims 6
  • Other / dont know 17
  • Source The Hannover Re (UK) Protection Review
    Consumer Survey 2009

11
  • PMI Market share by subscription income 1992
    2007
  • 1992 2007
  • BUPA 44 42
  • AXA/PPP 28 24.5
  • Norwich Union 3.5 10
  • Standard Life 3 7.5
  • Cigna 3 3.5
  • WPA 5 3
  • Simply Health n/a 2.5
  • PruHealth n/a 2
  • Exeter Friendly lt1 1
  • CS Healthcare lt1 0.5
  • Source Laings Healthcare Market Review
    2008/2009

12
  • Protection Insurance Advisers Forecasts
  • For the next 12 months
  • Write more 43.9
  • Write less 7.4
  • Write the same 48.7

Source Protection Review, 985 PFS members
responding to an e-mail questionnaire April 2009
13
  • Tax Relief Research among
  • Members of Parliament
  • Conservative 49
  • Labour 1
  • Source BMI Healthcare Research 2009
  • Sample 44 members

14
  • Tax relief or tax incentives?
  • New funding models must pass the test of
  • EFFICIENCY and EQUITY
  • Efficiency will the proposal achieve its
    proposed
  • end and provide the greatest possible
  • improvement and healthcare within the funding
  • available?
  • Equity how will the proposal match financial
  • contributions to ability to pay, and how well
    would
  • it match healthcare to health needs?

15
  • Should tax incentives be offered to
  • individuals and employers?
  • The efficiency test fails it in four respects
  • Its effects are likely to be minimal without a
    strong level of compulsion
  • It diverts funds from the public healthcare
    system
  • It does not save the public sector money
  • It would inflate healthcare costs

16
  • It fails the equity test
  • Its uses taxpayer funds to expand two-tier access
    to healthcare
  • It shifts the burden of paying for healthcare
    from the healthy, young and wealthy to the
    unhealthy, old and poor

17
WELLNESSVTHE NATIONAL ILLNESS SERVICE
18
  • Health Wellness
  • Will wellness provision become an integral
  • part of private medical insurance offerings?

19
  • The health and wellness approach
  • The principle of risk pooling means that
  • people who are healthy, fit and well dont
  • see good value for their premiums. We see
  • rewarding people for taking care of
  • themselves as the key to breaking
  • through this and focusing on improving and
  • maintaining health as the mechanism
  • Source Mark Noble, Aviva, quoted in the 2009
    Protection Review

20
  • The health and wellness approach
  • The message is definitely getting across. Half
  • our policyholders agree that our unique Vitality
  • incentive programme has helped them to be
  • healthy.
  • Continued

21
  • The health and wellness approach
  • Vitality which rewards our policyholders for
  • participating in healthy activities is an even
    more
  • applicable model in this difficult economic
  • environment because the value of the incentives
  • and the rewards it provides means more
  • Source Shaun Matisonn, PruHealth, quoted in the
    2009 Protection Review

22
  • Is the risk of needing to pay for parents long
  • term care something you think about?
  • Yes, it is a major concern 17
  • No, they have funds to cover it 20
  • No, they can use house equity 10
  • No, the State will look after them 5
  • Other/dont know 15
  • Not applicable (parents deceased) 32

23
  • Prospects
  • Subscribers will fall in the short term
  • Growth will resume between 2011 and 2013 (but
    more slowly in the group market)
  • PMI usually rides out recessions quite well since
    it is considered an essential purchase

24
  • Business development what the
  • commentators say
  • Look out for more cancer drug top-up policies
  • Retention activity is more important than ever
  • Direct distribution is key to the individual
    market, but
  • Marketing via employers has a part to play

25
  • Business development what the
  • commentators say
  • Lower costs are needed to bring in customers
  • Adequacy of care for the over 60s is an issue
  • The NHS 18 week waiting time target is still seen
    as too long
  • Intermediary involvement may increase

26
  • Opportunities for the PMI market
  • Difficult to envisage the NHS getting all the
    resources it demands
  • Development of products that meet a range of
    perceived needs in partnership with culturally
    acceptable other providers
  • Public sector pensions and the emergence of flex
    plans?
  • Excesses, co-pays and deposit plans for a
    wealthier baby-boom clientele
  • Government policy and the Nudge strategy
  • Continued\......

27
  • Opportunities for the PMI market
  • Demographics and the worried well
  • Will the competition be slow to move?
  • Will wellness be the new trend?
  • Emergence of more specialised and better
    qualified advisers
  • Marketing through employers Flex and voluntary
    plans
  • Aggregate sites

28
  • Threats
  • NHS waiting lists are effectively addressed
  • The recession lingers and bites harder
  • Competitors launch a killer product aimed at
    market segment
  • Slow attrition as members age and premiums
    increase
  • Continued\....

29
  • Threats
  • Development of new expensive drugs and treatments
  • Emergence of more specialised and better
    qualified advisers
  • Competitors throw even more resources at
    distribution in a static market

30
  • Key Performance Indicators 2014
  • Customer satisfaction very satisfied is the
    only really safe place. Listening to the voice
    of the customer is even more critical and should
    drive product design. They need to know you value
    them even if they do not claim
  • New member growth what part will advisers and
    employers play in this objective. Is entering the
    group market feasible?
  • Operational efficiency essential, but remember
    that only claimants will know how great you are
  • Continued/.

31
  • Key Performance Indicators 2014
  • Financial performance the early warning
    system is important
  • Positive staff contribution empowerment and the
    correlation between staff satisfaction and
    customer satisfaction
  • Regulatory and governance regulatory best
    practice is often just good business practice

32
  • Is the future friendly?
  • Yes, as long as we remember that it starts right
    now!

33
Find out more at
  • www.prioryhouseconsulting.co.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com