Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription

Description:

Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:223
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: deke8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription


1
Computerized Physician Order Entry a focus on
medication prescription
  • Nicolette de Keizer Saeid Eslami
  • Dept Medical Informatics
  • University of Amsterdam

2
Outline
  • Definition and context
  • Advantages of CPOE
  • Disadvantages of CPOE
  • Outcome measures and examples
  • Same system other outcome

3
What is Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE)?
  • Ordering of tests, medications, and treatments
    for patient care using computers
  • Involves electronic communication of the orders
  • Often use rules-based methods for checking
    appropriateness of care

4
CPOE, EHR and DSS
Documentation
DSS
Medication
EHR
Test reports (EKG, PFT)
Radiology, lab results
CPOE
5
CPOE
  • Has a positive influence on patients outcome
  • Has a negative influence on patients outcome

6
CPOE Advantages
  • Automate ordering process
  • Reduces Order Errors
  • Standardized, legible complete orders
  • DSS/Alerts
  • Data collected on variances in practice

7
Case Example
  • Metformin is prescribed to a patient with an
    elevated creatinine level.
  • A drug-lab interaction alert warns that use of
    this medication could result in an increased risk
    of fatal lactic acidosis.

8
Case Example
  • A physician prescribes warfarin for a patient
    with chronic atrial fibrillation.
  • System
  • vitamin K rich food likely to interfere with the
    efficacy of the drug.
  • Specific patient information

9
Example DSS in CPOE medication prescription
  • Allergy
  • Age (check drug name and dose)
  • Duplicate drugs on active orders, not one-time
  • Severe drug interactions
  • Drug-drug, drug-food
  • Dose maximum
  • Drugs with opposite actions

10
CPOE Disadvantages
  • Errors still possible
  • Alerts
  • Multiple steps
  • Access

11
PubMed indexed papers on CPOE
12
CPOE
  • Has a positive influence on patients outcome
  • Has a negative influence on patients outcome
  • On which outcome measure?

13
Outcome measures
  • Adherence to guideline
  • Alerts - user response
  • Time
  • Safety
  • Medication errors
  • ADEs (mortality)
  • Cost and Efficiency
  • Medication costs
  • Pharmacists interventions
  • Satisfaction, usage and usability

14
(No Transcript)
15
Example CPOE improves adherence to guideline
Teich JM et al. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Oct
9160(18)2713-4.
16
Example CPOE reduce errors
  • Potts studied ADE rates in 13,828 medication
    orders before/after CPOE implementation at
    Vanderbilt Childrens PICU

Potts AL, Barr FE, et al. Pediatrics. 2004
Jan113(1 Pt 1)59-63.
17
Example CPOE introduces errors
  • Brigham and Womens' Hospital, Boston introduced a
    CPOE
  • After implementation, the rate of intercepted
    Adverse Drug Events (ADE) doubled!
  • Reason The system allowed to easily order much
    too large dosages of potassium chloride without
    clear indicating that it be given in divided
    doses.
  • Bates et al The impact of computerized physician
    order entry on medication error prevention. JAMIA
    1999, 6(4), 313-21.

pre period1 period2 period3
Potential ADEs/1000 pt-days 15.8 31.3 59.4 0.5
18
Example CPOE introduces errors
  • Association with increased PICU mortality
  • 2.8 14 months before CPOE
  • 6.4 5 months after CPOE

Han YY, Carcillo JA, et al. Pediatrics. 2005
Dec116(6)1506-12.
19
Example CPOE reduce costs
Brigham and Womens Experience Cost-Effective
  • Cost
  • 3.7 million implementation
  • 600,000 to 1.1 million operational costs
  • Results
  • Decreased drug costs
  • ADE cost is approximately 4,700

Kausal R et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006
13(3) 365-7
20
CPOE and cost
  • Huge variation in actual costs based on hospital
    size and complexity of system
  • Hardware and Software 1-5 million
  • Staff training
  • Ongoing maintenance
  • Total costs for large, fully integrated systems
    could be up to 60 million
  • Costs will decrease when DSS is geared to cost
    reduction

21
Usability Problems
  • Potential selection errors
  • Similar medication names
  • Similar patient names
  • Overly trust default values
  • Influence workflow and communication
  • Physician resistance
  • Frequent data entry required
  • Must not require additional time
  • Most decision-support steps must be turned off to
    encourage use
  • Not-invented-here syndrome

22
CPOE as a Sociotechnical intervention
  • Health information systems has to deal with the
    actors, the artefacts, and their interaction.

CPOE socio-technical systems
23
Same system other outcome
  • Upperman vs. Han
  • same hospital Pittsburgh Childrens Hospital
  • other outcome measure ADE vs mortality
  • Han vs. Del Beccaro
  • Same CPOE
  • Different hospitals
  • Same outcome measure (mortality)

Upperman et al. J Pediar Surg. 2005405759
Han et al. Pediatrics. 2005 Dec116(6)1506-12
Del Beccaro. Pediatrics 2006118290-295.
24
Upperman et al
Pre-CPOE Post-CPOE
Verbal order regulatory compliance 80 95
All ADEs 0.3 0.37
Harmfull ADEs 0.05 0.03
plt0.05
25
Han et al
Pre-CPOE Post-CPOE
Mortality 2.80 6.57
plt0.05
26
Del Becarro et al
Pre-CPOE Post-CPOE
Mortality 4.22 3.46
  • Same results for
  • transported patients
  • congenital cardiovascular disease patients

27
Upperman vs Han
  • Surrogate outcome measures such as medication
    errors and ADEs are not sufficient
  • More studies on mortality are necessary

28
Han vs. Del Beccaro
  • Methodological differences
  • Han used unbalanced before after periods
  • Del Beccaro did not correct for case mix
    differences in before vs after period
  • Populations Han vs. Del Beccaro were not
    comparable

29
Han vs. Del Beccaro
  • Pittsburgh implemented too fast without pilot and
    usability testing
  • Order entry only allowed when patient physically
    entered hospital
  • All medication in central pharmacy
  • Pharmacy processed order only after complete
    activation by nurse
  • Go live without necessary order sets

30
Han vs. Del Beccaro
  • Seattle hospital learned from Pittsburgh
  • Factors influencing successful implementation
  • response time and user time
  • meeting information needs (e.g.using order sets)
  • multidimensional integration with workflow
  • Involvement leaders, support staff, clinicians
  • training
  • improvement through evaluation and learning

31
Will a CPOE improve quality of care?
  • Yes if you implement it the right way!!

32
Successful CPOE implementation
  • Technical Infrastructure
  • EHR
  • Drug information database
  • DSS
  • Sociotechnical implementation strategy
  • Usability pilots
  • Teams of informaticians, physicians, nurses,
    clerks, therapists
  • Strong leader and good project management
  • Training and support
  • R. Gardner implementation is 90 organizational
    and political and 10 technical
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com