Occupational Hygiene and the implementation of REACH - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Occupational Hygiene and the implementation of REACH

Description:

Format of REACH Risk assessment under REACH How does COSHH fit in? Useful sources of information An introduction to BOHS A multidisciplinary, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:154
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: HughWo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Occupational Hygiene and the implementation of REACH


1
  • Occupational Hygiene and the implementation of
    REACH
  • IOSH Exhibition Conference
  • Hugh Wolfson
  • Thanks to Andy Gillies for format and some of the
    content

2
REACH Timetable
  • July 06 common position agreed between
    Parliament and Commission
  • 18 Dec 06 adoption of Regulation by European
    parliament and EU Council
  • April 07 entry into force in Member States
  • 2007/08 European Chemical Agency start-up,
    Helsinki
  • 2008 2018 phase-in for existing substances

3
Summary of Presentation
  • BOHS an introduction
  • Substance information - existing situation
  • REACH - Whats new?
  • Format of REACH
  • Risk assessment under REACH
  • How does COSHH fit in?
  • Useful sources of information

4
An introduction to BOHS
  • A multidisciplinary, learned and professional
    society established in 1953 merged with the
    British Institute of Occupational Hygienists
    (BIOH) in 2003
  • Faculty of Occupational Hygiene is its
    professional arm
  • The voice of the occupational hygiene community
    in the UK
  • An unrivalled source of information and
    expertise for members and non-members alike
  • An examining board, through the Faculty of
    Occupational Hygiene, awarding qualifications in
    occupational hygiene and allied subjects

5
The BOHS
  • The Societys aim
  • To help to reduce work-related ill-health
  • resulting in
  • A healthy worker in a healthy
  • working environment
  • www.bohs.org

6
they wouldnt be allowed to sell it if it
wasnt safe
  • Industrial products
  • Commercial products
  • Sale to the public

7
they wouldnt be allowed to sell it if it
wasnt safe
Objective since the 1960s - ensure enough safety
information is available with products. 40 years
after Directive 67/548/EEC on classification,
packaging labelling In UK, HSWA 1974 section
6. CPL Regulations 1978 15 years after Directive
92/32/EEC (New Substances) In UK, NONS
Regulations 1993 Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of
the European Parliament Council and
Directive 2006/121/EC
8
Why is a new policy needed?
  • The old system isnt working
  • The 1992 Regulation excluded existing
    substances on the market before 1982 - 100,000
    substances, 99 (by volume) sketchy information
    on properties, uses risks
  • NONS a drag on research and innovation
  • Information required for new substances far
    greater than for existing
  • Programme on Existing Chemicals (ESR) slow and
    costly would take many years
  • REACH transfers main burden of proof from
    authorities to manufacturers and formulators

9
REACHthe new EU chemicals policy
  • Information on all substances
  • Physicochemical properties relevant to safety
    and environmental risk
  • Sufficient toxicity by any relevant route
  • Typical exposure scenarios and exposure
    estimates
  • Risk management advice
  • Enhanced Safety Data Sheet

10
Elements of REACH
  • Registration By industry
  • Document that human health environmental risks
    are adequately controlled in all identified uses
  • Evaluation By ECA or CA
  • Review of registration dossiers for compliance
    and animal testing proposals
  • Authorisation By ECA or CA
  • For substances of very high concern (CMR class 1
    and 2, PBT, vPvB, others, e.g. endocrine
    disrupters)
  • Restriction By ECA or CA
  • for substances where risks are unacceptable
  • ECA new European Chemicals Agency, Helsinki
  • CA National Competent Authority (HSE in UK)

11
Who has duties?
  • Any company producing, importing, using or
    placing on to the EU market a substance,
    preparation or article.
  • Not just the Chemical Industry sector
  • Manufacturers, importers, formulators, suppliers
  • Estimated about 30,000 substances will be
    registered
  • Some exemptions
  • e.g. radioactive substances, non-isolated
    intermediates, wastes, polymers, minerals, ores,
    LPG, biocides, medicinal products
  • Downstream users use the information for their
    local Risk Assessment

12
REACH downstream users
  • Most of REACH is about manufacturers and
    importers to EU
  • Downstream users
  • have rights obligations
  • can join a Substance Information Exchange forum
    during the registration process
  • have a right to request that suppliers CSA
    covers their use(s)
  • are obliged to use risk reduction measures in the
    CSA
  • may have to do a local risk assessment for their
    particular use of the chemical if they do not
    disclose to the forum

13
Registration timetable
  • All substances (approx 30,000) manufactured/import
    ed over 1te/year ( existing substances, unless
    new registration pending)
  • For new substances, registration is essential
    before manufacture
  • For existing substances on EINECS and ELINCS,
    phase-in period over 11 years (to 2018)
  • Notify intention by 1/12/2008 (pre-registration)
  • Phase 1 gt1000 tonnes/year CMR, PBT (by
    1/12/2010)
  • Phase 2 100 1000 tonnes/year (by 1/6/2013)
  • Phase 3 10 100 and 1 10 tonnes/year (by
    1/6/2018)

14
Registration
  • CMR, PBT on previous slide means
  • Carcinogenic, mutagenic, or reproductive-toxic
    cat 1 or 2 above 1 tonne per year
  • Persistent bio-accumulative toxic
    (Environmental risk) R 50-53 above 100 tonnes per
    year
  • Substances very persistent and very
    bio-accumulative (vPvB) included in above
  • Also substances of equivalent concern, eg
    endocrine disruptors

15
Authorisation
  • Authorisation required for all uses of substances
    of very high concern (eg CMR, PBT vPvB
    substances)
  • Authorisation granted if risks are under
    adequate control
  • adequate control allows authorities to prioritise
    action to haz subst that cannot be so controlled
  • If adequate control not possible, authorisation
    may still be granted on socio-economic grounds
    (i.e. no suitable safer alternative)
  • Companies required to make efforts to find safer
    alternative as part of their application for
    authorisation
  • Any substitute must be feasible and deliver
    lower overall risks

16
Registration documents
  • Technical dossier for all substances
  • Info. on properties, uses and classification
  • Animal test data or proposals for testing
  • Guidance on safe use
  • gt10 tonnes/year Chemical Safety Report
  • Hazard classification
  • Chemical Safety Assessment (human health, safety
    environmental risk assessment)
  • Exposure scenarios for all identified uses

17
REACH and Small Medium Establishments
  • 20,000 of the 30,000 substances are supplied
    between 1 and 10 tonnes per year, mostly by SMEs
  • Special provisions in REACH to help SMEs
  • Greatly reduced information requirement for 1 to
    10 te/yr substances
  • 11 years (to June 2018) to register 1 to 10 te/yr
    substances
  • Reduced fees for SMEs in all areas of REACH
  • The Helsinki Chemical Safety Agency will take
    particular account of SMEs needs in preparing
    technical guidance and enforcement strategy

18
Registration documents
  • Technical dossier and Chemical Safety Report
  • Direct to new European Chemical Agency in
    Helsinki
  • 100 check for completeness
  • 5 detailed verification
  • UK lead body in negotiation was DEFRA
  • UK Competent Authority is Health Safety
    Executive
  • Enforcement in UK may lie with various authorities

19
Substance Evaluation
  • In addition, EU Member States Commission
  • can nominate and agree on annual list of
  • substances for in-depth evaluation
  • Competent Authorities carry out the evaluation
  • May lead to new control measures or to no
  • further action

20
Chemical Safety Assessmenthazard assessment
  • Human health
  • Evaluate data (animal data, epidemiology)
  • Decide on classification and labelling
  • Establish Derived No-Effect Level (DNEL)
  • Safety (physico-chemical)
  • Explosivity, flammability, oxidising potential
  • Environmental
  • Evaluate data, including PBT and vPvB assessment
  • Decide on classification and labelling
  • Establish Predicted No-Effect Concentration (PNEC)

21
Chemical Safety Assessmentexposure assessment
  • Exposure scenarios
  • Cover manufacture and intended uses throughout
    substance life cycle, incl. waste
    disposal/recycling
  • Describe processes and tasks
  • Operational conditions
  • Risk management measures required
  • Included as an appendix to enhanced SDS

This is where Occupational Hygiene input is
really needed!
22
Human health risk characterisation
  • For each exposure scenario and
  • for each human population exposed (as workers,
    consumers, indirectly via the environment, or a
    combination)
  • Residual risk (after RMM implemented) and
  • comparison of exposure with relevant DNEL

23
Communication up down the supply chain
  • Multi-directional information flow
  • Enhanced Safety Data Sheets
  • Hazard data, exposure scenarios, approved uses,
    restrictions on supply

CUSTOMERS/SUPPLIERS (formulators)
CUSTOMERS (downstream users)
PRIMARY SUPPLIERS (manufacturers, importers)
24
Exposure scenariossome questions
  • Should ES be generic or specific?
  • Can COSHH Essentials help?
  • And, based on the suppliers scenarios.
  • How does the ES fit with a COSHH risk ?
    Downstream User assessment? What if the
    conclusions are different?
  • What if my use isnt covered by an ES? ?
    Downstream User
  • How can a supplier estimate the exposure levels
    at my site? ? Downstream User
  • Did the downstream user contribute to the forum?

25
Risk Management Measures some questions
  • Will control banding schemes like COSHH
    Essentials help?
  • A different mix of control options may achieve
    the same result are both options valid?
  • How effective are RMM? Do I need to measure
    exposure? ? Downstream User
  • Do I have to use the recommended RMM from my
    supplier? ? Downstream User
  • What if different suppliers give conflicting
    recommendations? ? Downstream User

26
COSHH and REACH
  • Did the downstream user contribute to the forum?
  • And meanwhile..
  • Until REACH deals with a product, COSHH is fully
    required, and downstream user contributes to
    forum
  • When REACH sheets established, am I using it
    exactly as described in the REACH sheet?
  • If not, full COSHH assessment needed (and
    possibly added to the data base for REACH)
  • The REACH sheets may specify quantity limits, or
    numerical ventilation provisions, so a use can
    easily be outside the exact specification

27
REACH and Occupational Hygiene
  • REACH is about protecting human health and the
    environment. Major role for HS professionals
  • Multi-disciplinary team to address all the issues
    (commercial, technical, PR)
  • Occupational hygiene at the heart of REACH
  • Exposure Scenarios
  • Risk Management Measures
  • Exposure monitoring and modelling
  • Data interpretation and use of exposure limits
  • Risk communication

28
BOHS and REACH
  • REACH Steering Group reporting to Council
  • REACH pages on website
  • Workshops/Seminars planned for 2007
  • Statement of the value of OH

29
Useful information sources
  • Handy websites
  • European Chemical Bureau http//ecb.jrc.it/REACH/
  • CEFIC http//www.cefic.be/
  • DG Enterprise http//ec.europa.eu/enterprise/re
    ach
  • CIA REACH Ready http//www.reachready.co.uk/
  • British Occupational Hygiene Society http//www.bo
    hs.org.uk/
  • DEFRA http//www.defra.gov.uk/environment/chemic
    als/reach/
  • HSE (Competent Authority) or phone helpdesk
    http//www.hse.gov.uk/chemicals/reach/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com