West Nile Virus Surveillance Training - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

West Nile Virus Surveillance Training

Description:

... 2 4 5 1 3 6 8 7 Rank Hotest States Fatalities Cases Year 934 23,895 Total ID, CO, CA 149 4,189 2006 CA, IL, SD 119 3,000 2005 CA, AZ, CO 100 2,539 2004 CO. NE ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:113
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: BenP8
Learn more at: https://www.afpmb.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: West Nile Virus Surveillance Training


1
DoD West Nile Virus Surveillance
Program Entomological Value, Implications,
Lessons Learned
Ben Pagac, Army Center for Health Promotion
Preventive Medicine, Fort Meade, MD
2
Most rapidly-spreading arboviral disease ever
documented
3
1999
4
2000
5
2001
6
2002
7
2003
8
2004
9
2005
10
2006
11
WNV Human Disease
Year Rank Cases Fatalities Hotest States
1999 7 62 7 NY
2000 8 21 2 NY, NJ, CT
2001 6 66 9 NY, NJ, FL
2002 3 4,156 284 IL, MI, OH
2003 1 9,862 264 CO. NE, SD
2004 5 2,539 100 CA, AZ, CO
2005 4 3,000 119 CA, IL, SD
2006 2 4,189 149 ID, CO, CA
Total - 23,895 934
Military-associated 2006 - 7AD 2004 - 3 (1
AD, 2 dep/ret)
12
DoD Installations/facilities
13
Since North American WNV Onset Key DoD
Surveillance Objectives
  • 1. Rapid, open communication
  • 2. Blend multi-agency efforts
  • 3. Early detection
  • 4. Implement PREVENTIVE vector management
  • 5. Implement measured response planning based
    on surveillance findings
  • 6. Reduce the human disease threat

14
Field, Lab, Data, Response, Collaboration,
Readiness
15
Field.
  • Trapping type, habitat, frequency
  • Specimen ID tools, keys, guides
  • Adjusted duties based on resources
  • (mosquito and dead bird collection)
  • Specimen handling cold-chain, shipping
  • Training - on site regional, with realistic
    expectations

16
Thats so yesterday
WOW! . A gravid Coquilletidia perturbans with
symbiotic acarines attached antepronotally
17
Lab.
  • Mission expansion Regional lab expansion
  • Specimen processing volume, tracking,
    cold-chain
  • ID verification spot check, reliability
    feedback (comm. loop)
  • Testing RT PCR
  • Turn-around Supplies for field
  • Turn-around Results (mosquito trap
    numbersimmediate!)
  • Average intervals
  • 2004 (73k fm / 10k pools) 10d post-collection /
    6d post-receipt
  • 2006 (6.5k fm / 890 pools) 9d post-collection /
    5d post-receipt

18
Data Reporting
19
Response..
20
Response..
21
VecTest Kit
-
-
22
Is abbreviated surveillance worth doing?
  • In 2006 guidance for 13 sensitive DC sites 2 - 4
    gravid traps, 1 night/week

Year Trap Nights Ave. Trap Nights Trap Index pos. pools MIR (X1000) positive installations Range positive pools per installation
2005 623 50 12.6 15 2.2 4/13 0-8
2006 534 41 11 27 4.0 8/13 0-6
14 reduction
23
Does intervention have an impact?
24
Collaboration.
  • Examples
  • Intra-DOD Military Services, DEH, MED, VET,
    CHPPM, GEIS, WRAIR, USAMRIID, AFIP
  • Inter-agency/institution NPS, USGS, CDC,
    States, COG, Academia

25

Current Mosquito Trapping Sites ( Each site 1
to 20 traps) NPS Nat. Zoo Army Navy Air
Force Arling/Alex. DC
N
26
Readiness.
West Nile Virus approximate geographic range
27
Conclusions
  • Military Med, Vet, and Engineering resources
    quickly adapted to the establishment of a
    comprehensive National surveillance and response
    program for a threat of unknown magnitude
  • Vocational boundaries were sometimes willingly
    stretched to accomplish mission
  • Military efforts blended with, bolstered, and
    sometimes were the sole source of National
    epidemiologic information on the WNV threat
  • Health threat response measures were data driven
  • Value of data was maximized by broad rapid
    distribution
  • Trap indices can be predictive of viral activity
  • Field-expedient wicking assays work
  • Targeted interventions work
  • 2006 Lean DoD Surveillance at sensitive
    Military (DC) sites proved valid valuable to
    continue in 2007
  • Principles experience gained are being applied
    OCONUS
  • Elevated diagnostic capabilities with quick
    turn-around, large sample capacity, great
    accuracy, appropriate equipment, and adaptability
    are poised to address other potential threats
  • Enhanced domestic military field vector
    surveillance experience, capability, and
    infrastructure are in place to tackle future
    potential threats (natural or malicious)

28
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
  • DOD Global Emerging Infectious Disease System
    (CDR Clara Witt)
  • Army Proponency Office for Preventive Medicine
    (LTC David West)
  • Centers for Disease Control Prevention (Drs. D.
    Gubler, C. Moore, R. Wirtz, R. Nasci)
  • US Geological Survey Nat. Wildlife Hlth. Ctr.
    (Drs. R. McLean, L. Glaser, E. Saito, G.
    McGlaughlin)
  • NY State Health Department (Dr. Dennis White)
  • State Municipal Health Departments
  • Collaborating Universities
  • DC Department of Health (Dr. Peggy Keller, Ms. J.
    Hinson)
  • US National Park Service (Ms. Jil Sweringen)
  • Smithsonian Institution National Zoological Park
    (Drs. R. Yates, R. Montalli)
  • Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (LTC J.
    Ryan)
  • Army/Navy/Air Force Preventive Medicine Personnel
  • Army/Navy/Air Force Public Works, Pest Management
    Personnel
  • Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious
    Diseases (MAJ J. Blow, Dr. Michael Turell)
  • Army Veterinary Clinics (MAJ Felicia Langel)
  • Army Veterinary Command Food Analysis and
    Diagnostic Lab
  • Air Force Institute of Env., Safety, Occ. Health
    Risk Analysis (Dr. Chad McHugh)
  • Navy Disease Vector Ecology Center (CDR David
    Claborn)
  • Army CHPPMN,S,W (E. Stanwix, D. Kuhr, W. Irwin,
    J. Harrison, M. Miller, S. Spring)

29
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com