Interpretations of the Orleanist Monarchy (aka Louis Philippe) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Interpretations of the Orleanist Monarchy (aka Louis Philippe)

Description:

... the elite actually point to the strength of their dominance rather than at any weakness Regime presided over most rapid industrialisation despite the fact it ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: andy151
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Interpretations of the Orleanist Monarchy (aka Louis Philippe)


1
Interpretations of the Orleanist Monarchy (aka
Louis Philippe)
  • www.educationforum.co.uk

2
Traditional Interpretation
  • The traditional interpretation has been an
    adapted Marxist one
  • LPs regime seen as a bourgeois monarchy
  • 1830 seen as the final victory for the
    bourgeoisie after a short Indian summer for the
    Aristocracy 1815-30
  • Capitalism and industrialisation allowed to
    develop and thrive under LPs policies and France
    run like a massive joint stock company by a
    narrow oligarchy of capitalists

3
Revisionism
  • Revisionists have put forward a very different
    model.
  • Pinkney suggests that 1830 was a victory for
    lawyers, bureaucrats and Bonapartists NOT a
    recognisable capitalist class only a change of
    personnel at the top not a seismic shift
  • Cobban points out that leading figures in the
    regime were actually landowners not
    industrialists and that Guizot followed an
    economic policy of protectionism not free trade

4
Revisionism 2
  • Revisionists like Pinkney have also challenged
    the idea of a vibrant and growing capitalist
    economy sluggish economic growth and patchy
    industrialisation
  • Also that Orleanist elites behaved like
    aristocrats mimicking their chateaux and
    lifestyles not a assertive new ruling class at
    all
  • Also that the bourgeoisie was too heterogeneous
    to be recognised as a class with class interests
    intra class conflicts between different sectors
    financiers clashed with railway capitalists
    iron, coal and cotton producers wanted protection
    from foreign trade silk wine and shipping
    capitalists wanted free trade

5
Arguments for Marxist Interpretation
  • Ruthless repression of socialism and trade
    unionism reveals true class nature of the regime
  • Divisions within the elite actually point to the
    strength of their dominance rather than at any
    weakness
  • Regime presided over most rapid industrialisation
    despite the fact it may have appeared sluggish
    when compared to GB

6
Reading
  • Read Magraw pages 51-63
  • Rally write robin on a large sheet of display
    paper evidence supporting Marxist interpretation
    and evidence supporting revisionist
    interpretations
  • By the end of the lesson be prepared to state and
    justify which interpretation you favour
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com