Using Data - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Using Data

Description:

... KS2 point scores + Fischer Family Trust + MidYIS tests. KS2 points + FFT provide KS3 indicators for Core subjects MidYIS (customised to Walton) provide the rest. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:162
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: lanus
Category:
Tags: data | midyis | using

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Using Data


1
Using Data
  • Tying together the threads without tripping over

2
Walton High School Data UsePlaced in context 1
  • 1996 Ofsted criticised management use of data.
  • 1997 Headteacher creates new Leadership Group
    post for promotion of use of data across the
    school. JRC appointed, using ALIS project
    formatively in Science.
  • 1998 school collaborates with Prof David Jesson
    (University of York) working with data use.
    Governors receive a presentation from Keith
    Hedger (Shropshire LEA) on data use.
  • 1998 use of Jesson style analysis and ALIS
    piloted across all KS4 and Post 16 courses both
    summative and formative use.

3
Walton High School Data UsePlaced in context 2
  • 1998-2001 Use at KS4 and Post 16 refined,
    involvement of individual staff targets trialled
    and improved.
  • 1998-2001 Research on KS3 Core Subjects shows
    introduction of targets and achievement analysis
    for non-core to be useful in promoting
    improvement.
  • 2001 Full subject target and evaluation process
    introduced across all years and most subjects.
  • 2002 Borough school heads decide to hold a
    Target Setting Day in October. Walton takes
    the opportunity to involve all students in the
    process of negotiating targets. Externally
    evaluated by Nottingham Trent University
  • 2002 Reports to Parents updated to include
    target and achievement data.

4
Walton High School Data UsePlaced in context 3
  • 2002 2004 Integrated system fully functional
  • Student have targets and are involved in
    personalising them by negotiation.
  • Departments have targets item 1 of DDP is to
    maximise positive residuals.
  • Teaching staff have group targets.
  • Information feeds into Performance Management and
    UPS decisions.
  • Student tracking and progress chasing involves
    Tutors, Parents and Subject staff.
  • Results fully evaluated, by Department and by set.

5
Data use at Walton
6
Does it deliver improvement in results? KS3
average level
7
Does it deliver improvement in results? KS4
8
Does it deliver improvement in results? KS4
PandA RPI
9
Does it deliver improvement in results? Post
16.well, perhaps.
10
Does it deliver improvement in results? Post 16
negative residuals
  • 2004 AS No significant negative residuals.
  • 2004 A2 Only Expressive Arts remains
    significantly negative (6 students)
  • 1999 to 2004
  • Geography, Maths, English Literature and DT
    have all moved from significantly negative to
    positive or in-line.

11
What else has improved?
  • KS3 Teacher Assessment procedures now yielding
    more reliable, moderated results more clearly
    related to criteria.
  • KS3 Stronger Teacher use of assessment criteria
    has required student knowledge of them, now
    harnessing self-assessment.
  • KS3 Report quality improved targets, current
    achievement and negotiated targets reported with
    improvement strategies.

12
What else has improved?
  • KS4 Form Tutor involvement in student progress
    monitoring. Check cards, Y10 Exam follow-up,
    Mentoring programme. Summative statements on
    reports.
  • KS4 Report quality improved, comments in
    agreement with what the data says!
  • KS4 Early intervention for lagging students Y10
    Check cards by October half term pin-point
    students for monitoring.

13
What else has improved?
  • AS and A2 Estimates and outcomes closer,
  • AS Early intervention at AS for weak students,
    allows time for action before January modules.
  • A2 Assists in provision of information to help
    admission tutor counselling choices for Y13
    entry.
  • AS and A2 Report quality greatly improved.

14
What else has improved?
  • Quality of Head of Departments report to
    Governors.
  • Headteachers annual departmental reviews easier
    to focus on main issues for improvement.
    Staffing issues, Pedagogical issues more easily
    identified.
  • UPS decisions facilitated. Staff can easily
    present evidence and Headteacher can easily
    verify.

15
Walton High Specialist Science School
  • Getting started with data use.
  • JR Coope
  • Assistant Headteacher

16
Using Prior Achievement information
  • KS3 At Walton we use
  • KS2 point scores Fischer Family Trust MidYIS
    tests.
  • KS2 points FFT provide KS3 indicators for Core
    subjects
  • MidYIS (customised to Walton) provide the rest.
  • Chances Graphs are used when negotiating targets
    with students.

17
Using Prior Achievement information
  • KS4 At Walton we use
  • KS3 point scores Fischer Family Trust YELLIS
    tests.
  • KS3 points, Autumn Package FFT provide all KS4
    indicators.
  • YELLIS is used for fillingin for students
    joining with no prior achievement data in Y10.
  • Chances Graphs are used when negotiating targets
    with students.

18
Using Prior Achievement information
  • Post-16 At Walton we use
  • Average GCSE score and ALIS regression equations
    to provide indicators for all subjects.
  • Chances Graphs are used when negotiating targets
    with students.

19
Target Minimum Score Indicators
  • We use indicator, not predictor as we want to
    emphasise the statistical nature of the data.
  • We recognise the existence of outliers,
    students at the extremes, e.g. much better/weaker
    than indicator suggests.
  • Chances graph use is crucial in gaining student
    and parent confidence in the process.
  • We always try to regard the indicator as the
    least level acceptable, and encourage positive
    aspiration with suitable support.

20
On-course monitoring
  • All staff have set lists with indicators, prior
    achievement data, Learning Styles information and
    SEN alert within two weeks of start of term.
  • Check-cards by October half term.
  • These carry Target Minimum data. Staff are asked
    to consider if the student is likely to be on
    target for the indicated outcome.
  • Tutor responsible for checking across subjects
    and initiating suitable response where needed.
    (Includes interview with student, report cards,
    letter home, parent visit, setting up mentor
    session.)
  • Half-termly Leadership-HoD link meetings check
    progress of strategies to promote improvement.

21
Walton High Specialist Science School
  • Using Data in the reporting system.
  • JR Coope Assistant Headteacher

22
Reports as part of the Data - Year
  • Reports form one element of the monitoring
    process
  • Target Setting day.
  • Check cards.
  • Parents Consultation Evening.
  • Subject/Pastoral Report.
  • Order of latter two depends on year group.

23
Report style we asked the parents what they
wanted
24
Reports example from Y11
  • Centrally electronically produced with data
    merged in
  • Student name, Teaching group, Tutor group,
    Numerical Target and Grade equivalent, Negotiated
    target.
  • Departments can electronically add attainment
    data (e.g. as available for modular courses)
  • Teachers type in personalised comments in
    remaining sections.
  • Printing and collating is carried out by office
    staff.

25
Walton High Specialist Science School
  • More advanced analysis and data use
  • JR Coope Assistant Headteacher

26
Subject Performance analysis
  • Valuable for HoD monitoring success of a
    programme.
  • Informs further development strategies by
    suggesting need to target areas of under
    achievement.
  • Can identify successful teaching and learning
    schemes.

27
Subject scatter graphs.
28
Subject scatter graphs.
29
Subject scatter graphs.
30
Analysis by set
31
Analysis by set a cautionary note.
  • Doctoral research by Steve Rogers and John
    Critchlow at University of Durham showed that set
    residuals are only valid if groups are
  • mixed ability. OR
  • Set strictly by test scores that serve as
    baseline for Value-Added calculations

32
Analysis by set showing bias effect caused by
setting by ability in a subject
33
KS4 Whole School Modelling
  • Do you want to know the likely effect of
    groupings and subject performance on your likely
    5A-C figure?
  • Or on your PandA RPI?
  • Then try Notre Dame Exam Analysis
  • It is intended as a post exam analysis tool but
    works well from the start of Y10.

34
KS4 Whole School Modelling
  • Simple modification allows easy changes to be
    made to expected residuals.
  • Shows the effect of department performance change
    on whole school outcomes.

35
Contact details
  • Julian Coope
  • Assistant Headteacher
  • Walton High Specialist Science School
  • The Rise
  • Walton on the Hill
  • Stafford ST17 0LJ
  • 01785 356300
  • lanuser14_at_walton.staffs.sch.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com