Title: Using Data
1Using Data
- Tying together the threads without tripping over
2Walton High School Data UsePlaced in context 1
- 1996 Ofsted criticised management use of data.
- 1997 Headteacher creates new Leadership Group
post for promotion of use of data across the
school. JRC appointed, using ALIS project
formatively in Science. - 1998 school collaborates with Prof David Jesson
(University of York) working with data use.
Governors receive a presentation from Keith
Hedger (Shropshire LEA) on data use. - 1998 use of Jesson style analysis and ALIS
piloted across all KS4 and Post 16 courses both
summative and formative use.
3Walton High School Data UsePlaced in context 2
- 1998-2001 Use at KS4 and Post 16 refined,
involvement of individual staff targets trialled
and improved. - 1998-2001 Research on KS3 Core Subjects shows
introduction of targets and achievement analysis
for non-core to be useful in promoting
improvement. - 2001 Full subject target and evaluation process
introduced across all years and most subjects. - 2002 Borough school heads decide to hold a
Target Setting Day in October. Walton takes
the opportunity to involve all students in the
process of negotiating targets. Externally
evaluated by Nottingham Trent University - 2002 Reports to Parents updated to include
target and achievement data.
4Walton High School Data UsePlaced in context 3
- 2002 2004 Integrated system fully functional
- Student have targets and are involved in
personalising them by negotiation. - Departments have targets item 1 of DDP is to
maximise positive residuals. - Teaching staff have group targets.
- Information feeds into Performance Management and
UPS decisions. - Student tracking and progress chasing involves
Tutors, Parents and Subject staff. - Results fully evaluated, by Department and by set.
5Data use at Walton
6Does it deliver improvement in results? KS3
average level
7Does it deliver improvement in results? KS4
8Does it deliver improvement in results? KS4
PandA RPI
9Does it deliver improvement in results? Post
16.well, perhaps.
10Does it deliver improvement in results? Post 16
negative residuals
- 2004 AS No significant negative residuals.
- 2004 A2 Only Expressive Arts remains
significantly negative (6 students) - 1999 to 2004
- Geography, Maths, English Literature and DT
have all moved from significantly negative to
positive or in-line.
11What else has improved?
- KS3 Teacher Assessment procedures now yielding
more reliable, moderated results more clearly
related to criteria. - KS3 Stronger Teacher use of assessment criteria
has required student knowledge of them, now
harnessing self-assessment. - KS3 Report quality improved targets, current
achievement and negotiated targets reported with
improvement strategies.
12What else has improved?
- KS4 Form Tutor involvement in student progress
monitoring. Check cards, Y10 Exam follow-up,
Mentoring programme. Summative statements on
reports. - KS4 Report quality improved, comments in
agreement with what the data says! - KS4 Early intervention for lagging students Y10
Check cards by October half term pin-point
students for monitoring.
13What else has improved?
- AS and A2 Estimates and outcomes closer,
- AS Early intervention at AS for weak students,
allows time for action before January modules. - A2 Assists in provision of information to help
admission tutor counselling choices for Y13
entry. - AS and A2 Report quality greatly improved.
14What else has improved?
- Quality of Head of Departments report to
Governors. - Headteachers annual departmental reviews easier
to focus on main issues for improvement.
Staffing issues, Pedagogical issues more easily
identified. - UPS decisions facilitated. Staff can easily
present evidence and Headteacher can easily
verify.
15Walton High Specialist Science School
- Getting started with data use.
- JR Coope
- Assistant Headteacher
16Using Prior Achievement information
- KS3 At Walton we use
- KS2 point scores Fischer Family Trust MidYIS
tests. - KS2 points FFT provide KS3 indicators for Core
subjects - MidYIS (customised to Walton) provide the rest.
- Chances Graphs are used when negotiating targets
with students.
17Using Prior Achievement information
- KS4 At Walton we use
- KS3 point scores Fischer Family Trust YELLIS
tests. - KS3 points, Autumn Package FFT provide all KS4
indicators. - YELLIS is used for fillingin for students
joining with no prior achievement data in Y10. - Chances Graphs are used when negotiating targets
with students.
18Using Prior Achievement information
- Post-16 At Walton we use
- Average GCSE score and ALIS regression equations
to provide indicators for all subjects. - Chances Graphs are used when negotiating targets
with students.
19Target Minimum Score Indicators
- We use indicator, not predictor as we want to
emphasise the statistical nature of the data. - We recognise the existence of outliers,
students at the extremes, e.g. much better/weaker
than indicator suggests. - Chances graph use is crucial in gaining student
and parent confidence in the process. - We always try to regard the indicator as the
least level acceptable, and encourage positive
aspiration with suitable support.
20On-course monitoring
- All staff have set lists with indicators, prior
achievement data, Learning Styles information and
SEN alert within two weeks of start of term. - Check-cards by October half term.
- These carry Target Minimum data. Staff are asked
to consider if the student is likely to be on
target for the indicated outcome. - Tutor responsible for checking across subjects
and initiating suitable response where needed.
(Includes interview with student, report cards,
letter home, parent visit, setting up mentor
session.) - Half-termly Leadership-HoD link meetings check
progress of strategies to promote improvement.
21Walton High Specialist Science School
- Using Data in the reporting system.
- JR Coope Assistant Headteacher
22Reports as part of the Data - Year
- Reports form one element of the monitoring
process - Target Setting day.
- Check cards.
- Parents Consultation Evening.
- Subject/Pastoral Report.
- Order of latter two depends on year group.
23Report style we asked the parents what they
wanted
24Reports example from Y11
- Centrally electronically produced with data
merged in - Student name, Teaching group, Tutor group,
Numerical Target and Grade equivalent, Negotiated
target. - Departments can electronically add attainment
data (e.g. as available for modular courses) - Teachers type in personalised comments in
remaining sections. - Printing and collating is carried out by office
staff.
25Walton High Specialist Science School
- More advanced analysis and data use
- JR Coope Assistant Headteacher
26Subject Performance analysis
- Valuable for HoD monitoring success of a
programme. - Informs further development strategies by
suggesting need to target areas of under
achievement. - Can identify successful teaching and learning
schemes.
27Subject scatter graphs.
28Subject scatter graphs.
29Subject scatter graphs.
30Analysis by set
31Analysis by set a cautionary note.
- Doctoral research by Steve Rogers and John
Critchlow at University of Durham showed that set
residuals are only valid if groups are - mixed ability. OR
- Set strictly by test scores that serve as
baseline for Value-Added calculations
32Analysis by set showing bias effect caused by
setting by ability in a subject
33KS4 Whole School Modelling
- Do you want to know the likely effect of
groupings and subject performance on your likely
5A-C figure? - Or on your PandA RPI?
- Then try Notre Dame Exam Analysis
- It is intended as a post exam analysis tool but
works well from the start of Y10.
34KS4 Whole School Modelling
- Simple modification allows easy changes to be
made to expected residuals. - Shows the effect of department performance change
on whole school outcomes.
35Contact details
- Julian Coope
- Assistant Headteacher
- Walton High Specialist Science School
- The Rise
- Walton on the Hill
- Stafford ST17 0LJ
- 01785 356300
- lanuser14_at_walton.staffs.sch.uk