Presentation by: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Presentation by:

Description:

... Y2H Method ORFs selected from published sequences Amplified by nested PCR Made primer sets of ends of ORFs Y2H bait and prey vectors Vectors transformed ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: PhysicsA8
Learn more at: https://www.biol.wwu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Presentation by:


1
Presentation by Kyle Borge, David Byon, Jim
Hall
Herpesviral Protein Networks and Their
Interaction with the Human Proteome
reconstruction of a Herpes Virus capsid
Presentation by Kyle Borge, David Byon, Jim
Hall
2
Introduction to the Herpesvirus
  • Large double-stranded DNA genomes
  • Eight different strains
  • Causes diseases ranging from cold sores to
    shingles
  • Vaccine available for Varicella-Zoster Virus
    (VZV)
  • Little known about protein interactions

3
Types of Herpesviruses Investigated
  • Kaposis Sarcoma-associated Herpesvirus (KSHV)
  • In the gamma (?) herpes virus phylogenetic class
  • Causes cancerous tumors
  • Mostly associated with HIV patients
  • Sequenced in 1996
  • Genome is roughly 165 kbs
  • 89 open reading frames (ORFs)
  • 113 ORFs used in experiment (included 15
    cytoplasmic and 5 external domains derived from
    transmembrane proteins)
  • Varicella-Zoster Virus (VZV) , in the alpha (a)
    herpesvirus phylogenetic class
  • Causes chicken pox in children and shingles in
    adults
  • Sequenced in 1986
  • Genome is roughly 125 kbs
  • 69 open reading frames (ORFs)
  • 96 ORFs used in experiment (Included 13
    cytoplasmic
  • and 10 external domains derived from
    transmembrane proteins)

4
Methods of Investigating Protein Protein
Interactions (PPI)
  • Many Methods
  • The Y2H technique is one of the top techniques
    for detecting protein-protein interactions
  • This article used Y2H to investigate
    protein-protein interactions

5
Y2H Advantages
  • http//www.dnatube.com/video/993/Plasmid-Cloning
  • Relatively simple (automated)
  • Quick
  • Inexpensive
  • Only need the sequenced genome (or sequence of
    interest)
  • Scalable, its possible to screen for interactions
    among many proteins creating a more
    high-throughput screen (ex. viral genome)
  • Protein/polypeptides can be from various sources
    eukaryotes, prokaryotes, viruses and even
    artificial sequencesallows the comparison of
    interactomes w/in and between different
    speciesin this paper, eukaryote (human)
    interactome vs. viral interactome

6
Y2H Limitations
  • http//www.dnatube.com/video/993/Plasmid-Cloning
  • The Y2H system cant analyze some classes of
    proteins
  • Transmembrane proteins, specifically their
    hydrophobic regions which may prevent the protein
    from reaching the nucleus
  • Transcriptional activators may activate
    transcription w/out any interaction
  • False-negatives
  • Y2H screen fails to detect a protein-protein
    interactions
  • False-positives
  • Y2H screen produces a positive result
    (characterized by reporter gene activity) where
    no protein-protein interaction took place
  • Ex. bait proteins activate, transcribing the
    reporter gene, w/out the binding of the AD (bait
    proteins act as transcriptional activators)

7
Yeasts GAL4 transcriptional activator
  • GAL4 transcriptional activator which splits into
    two separate fragments a binding domain (BD) and
    an activating domain (AD)

8
Y2H Method
  • ORFs selected from published sequences
  • Amplified by nested PCR
  • Made primer sets of ends of ORFs
  • Y2H bait and prey vectors
  • Vectors transformed into Y187 and AH109 haploid
    yeast cells creating pools a bait pool and a
    prey pool
  • Bait and prey mated in quadruplicates
  • Positive diploid yeasts are selected

9
Open Reading Frames (ORFs)
  • Every ORFs of both KSHV VZV were cloned
    ligated into both a bait and prey GAL4 vector
  • Bait
  • protein of interest
  • the protein is fused to the yeast Gal4
    DNA-binding domain (DBD)
  • Prey
  • a protein/ORF fused to the Gal4 transcriptional
    activation domain (AD)
  • interacting protein
  • Physical interaction between the bait and prey
    brings the DNA-BD and an AD of Gal4 together,
    thus re-creating a transcriptionally active Gal4
    hybrid
  • Gal4 activity can be assayed by the expression of
    reporter genes and selectable markers

10
(1-2) ORFs cloned into vectors via Nested PCR
  • KSHV
  • 113 full-length and partial ORFs
  • including 15 cytoplasmic and 5 external domains
    derived from transmembrane proteins
  • VZV
  • 96 full-length and partial ORFs
  • including 13 cytoplasmic and 10 external domains
    derived from transmembrane proteins

11
Yeast-Two-Hybrid
  • Prey pool (target)
  • Each individual ORF sequence is cloned into the
    prey vector (down stream of the GAL4 AD gene)
    and is essentially fused to the GAL4 AD gene
  • Ampr for selection
  • Hemagglutinin
  • Bait pool
  • Each individual ORF sequence is also cloned into
    the bait vector (down stream of the GAL4 DBD
    gene) and is essentially fused to the GAL4 DBD
    gene
  • vector conveys Kanr for selection

12
Yeast-Two-Hybrid Background
13
Viral Protein Interactions in KSHV
  • 12,000 Viral Protein Interactions tested
  • Identified 123 nonredundant interacting protein
    pairs
  • 118/123 were novel
  • 7/123 were previously reported
  • Screen captures 5/7 (71) of previously reported
    interactions
  • 50 of Y2H interactions confirmed by
    coimmunoprecipitation (CoIP)

14
Viral Protein Interactions in KSHV
15
Previously Reported Protein Interactions of KSHV
16
Coimmunoprecipitation
17
Verification of Predicted Interactions in other
Herpesvirus Species
18
Correlation Between Viral Protein Interaction and
Expression Profile
  • Average expression correlation AECwas
    calculated
  • For random pairs of ORFs 0.804
  • For interacting pairs of ORFs 0.839
  • Correlation between AEC and clustering
    coefficient
  • Used to propose static or dynamic interaction for
    viral hubs

19
Protein Interaction Networks
20
Network Terminology
  • Node represents a protein
  • Edge represents interaction between two nodes
  • Average (node) degree the average number of
    neighbors or connections that any given node has
  • Power coefficient (g) derived from an
    approximate power law degree distribution plotted
    on a bilogarithmic scale and fitted by linear
    regression
  • P value - (significance under linear regression)
    as fitted by a power-law degree distribution
    (scale-free property)
  • Characteristic path length the distance between
    two nodes
  • Diameter (d) - describes the interconnectedness
    of a network defined as the average length of
    the shortest paths between any two nodes in the
    network
  • Clustering coefficient A value given to depict
    the number of fold enrichment over comparable
    random networks (small-world property)
  • Small world property/network Any network that
    has characteristics of a relatively short path
    and dense cluster (high cluster coefficient)

21
Topology of KSHV and VZV Interaction Network
KSHV protein interaction network
VZV protein interaction network
22
Comparison of Protein Interaction Networks
23
Power Law Distribution Comparison
  • http//www.dnatube.com/video/993/Plasmid-Cloning

24
Removal of Nodes in KSHV Network
25
Protein Interaction KSHV Sequence Conservation
to EBV
26
Correlation Between Functional and Phylogenetic
Herpesviral Classes
27
Viral protein interactions between functional
classes
  • http//www.dnatube.com/video/993/Plasmid-Cloning

28
Viral Protein Interactions Between Phylogenetic
Classes
29
View of the Human-Herpesviral Networks
Varicella-Zoster Virus
Kaposi Sarcoma-associated Herpesvirus
30
Power Coefficient of KSHV-Human Network
31
Interplay between KSHV and Human Network
32
Viral Host Network / Random Network Comparison
33
Conclusions
  • Virus and host interactomes possess distinct
    network topologies
  • Integration of viral and host protein network
    may lead to better understanding of viral
    pathogenicity
  • Future interactome data from other viruses may
    improve understanding of functions of viral
    proteins and their phylogeny
  • Understanding networks may help to develop future
    therapies
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com