Managing Urban Air Quality: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Managing Urban Air Quality:

Description:

Fine particulate matter is the pollutant of concern in ... Very few quantitative source apportionment studies. Not much is known about relative importance of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:95
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: wb15
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Managing Urban Air Quality:


1
Managing Urban Air Quality
  • Questions for Policy Appraisal

The World Bank 14 May 2002
2
Asking the Right Questions
  • Questions posed can channel policy in a specific
    direction
  • By limiting options for consideration from the
    outset
  • By implicitly assuming a policy response as being
    the best
  • Examples
  • What is the contribution of geological matter to
    SPM?
  • Control of road dust
  • What are the surest technical options for
    minimizing particulate emissions from heavy duty
    diesels?
  • Advanced exhaust control or alternative fuels

3
Question 1Is Outdoor Air Pollution Important?
  • Is the impact of outdoor air pollution on public
    health and lost productivity considerable
    compared to other threats
  • Lack of access to safe drinking water
  • Lack of adequate primary health care
  • Malnutrition
  • Extensive use of dirty fuels in households
  • Yes pursue mitigation policies in urban air
    pollution
  • No look for incremental policy opportunities in
  • individual sectors

4
Incremental Opportunities
  • If damage from other sources (lack of clean
    water, etc.) far exceeds damage from urban air
    pollution, then
  • It is not cost-effective to mount large and
    expensive government programs to combat urban air
    pollution
  • But there are many cases where, at small
    incremental cost, extending sector policies can
    improve urban air quality
  • Example road widening in Hyderabad where the
    entire road width is paved (no unpaved shoulders)

5
Question 2Which Pollutants Should We Care About?
  • Pollutants should be ranked according to
    toxicity, ambient concentrations and exposure.
  • Fine particulate matter is the pollutant of
    concern in India.
  • A common mistake is to rank on the basis of
    emissions in weight based on an emissions
    inventory.
  • Emission factors are uncertain or not available.
  • Toxicity is not taken into account.
  • Emissions in weight are not directly proportional
    to ambient concentrations or exposure.

6
Misuse of Emissions Inventory
  • CO dominates total emissions in weight.
  • CO is primarily from gasoline vehicles, and
    transport is identified as the culprit.
  • Once transport is identified as the main
    contributor, the focus shifts to black smoke.
  • Diesel vehicles are targeted as the highest
    polluter, although the technical basis was CO
    from gasoline vehicles.

7
Question 3 What Is Causing Air Pollution?
  • Need to identify sources contributing the most to
    the general populations exposure to fine
    particulate air pollution.
  • Large industrial plants.
  • Small and medium size industries, diesel
    generators.
  • Household consumption of solid fuels (biomass).
  • Vehicular emissions.
  • Leaf and informal refuse burning.
  • Re-suspension of road-dust.
  • Background and migration from other areas.

8
How Much Do We Know About Sources of Particulate
Pollution?
  • Little information on background particulate
    concentrations ? if background level is high,
    controlling human activities will be less
    effective.
  • Measured data have large uncertainties ?
    difficult to draw conclusions (e.g., correlation
    between NO2 and PM10 to judge traffic
    contribution).
  • Essentially no carbon analysis of particles.
  • Very few quantitative source apportionment
    studies.
  • ? Not much is known about relative importance of
    different sources.

9
Observations From Other Countries
  • Mexico city three-fold PM10 variations, with
    fugitive dust accounting for the differences. 50
    of PM10, but only 15 of PM2.5, is geological.
  • UK road traffic contributes 25 of primary PM10
    emissions, but 60 of PM0.1. Good correlation
    between NOx and PM10.
  • USA even in California, gasoline cars can emit
    as much as 1.5 g pm/km. A study in Colorado found
    that gasoline PM emissions were grossly
    under-estimated.

10
Lessons for India
  • Size of particles measured and examined drives
    policy.
  • If PM10, difficult to lower if geological
    contribution is substantial.
  • If sub-micron, efficient combustion processes
    such as motor exhaust will increase in
    importance.
  • Re-examine emission factors.
  • Poor correlation between NO2 and PM10 in Delhi in
    one study, but confirm data quality.
  • Need to quantify contributions from less studied
    sources.
  • Chemical (especially carbon) analysis and
    finger-printing.
  • Generating emission factors more suitable to
    India.

11
Question 4What Activities Do the Most Damage?
  • For the sources identified as significant
    contributors to the populations exposure to
    small particles, which activities do the most
    damage?
  • Examples
  • Which vehicle and fuel combination in the
    transport sector?
  • Which fuel and process combination in cottage
    industries?

12
Question 5What Policy Instruments Should Be
Used?
  • Guiding principles.
  • Recognize economic and financial constraints and
    incentives, and work with, rather than against,
    economic incentives as much as possible.
  • Better to have lax standards that are strictly
    enforced, than strict standards that are not
    enforced for the most part.
  • Different sectors have objectives that are not
    necessarily compatible?recognize that there are
    trade-offs.

13
Considerations for Ranking Priorities
  • Compatibility with other sector objectives
  • Do they go against, or reinforce, other sector
    objectives?
  • Cost of implementation
  • Which measures would be the most cost-effective
    (Rs / population exposure reduced)?
  • Ease of enforcement
  • How difficult would it be to carry out the
    proposed measures or to enforce them?
  • Political feasibility
  • Are there strong vested interest groups that
    would oppose the proposed measures vigorously?

14
Policy Options
  • Economic (differentiated) taxes, subsidies,
    pricing (congestion, parking)
  • Administrative emission, energy efficiency and
    fuel quality standards, restrictions on operation
    (factories, vehicles, parking), protection of
    non-polluting activities (NMT)
  • Technological fuel or technology mandates,
    traffic management

15
Linkages With Other Sectors
  • Transport urban transport policy
  • Municipal government municipal solid waste
    management, policy towards slums
  • Welfare employment opportunities for the urban
    poor
  • Urban planning zoning, densification
  • Fiscal tax policy
  • Energy supply and demand of oil and gas, power

16
Which Pollutants Cause the Most Damage?
Is the impact of outdoor air pollution serious
compared to the impacts from other sources?
Fine PM
Does sector X contribute significantly to fine PM?
Which activities contribute significantly to fine
PM?
Which policy instruments will minimize
distortions and achieve results cost-effectively?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com