J9 JCD

1

• United States Joint Forces Command
• Joint Concept Development and Experimentation
  (JCDE)
• Tidewater Association
• of
• Service Contractors
• (TASC)

DistributionFor Official Use Only Not
Approved for Public ReleaseAdministrative/Operati
onal Use 14 November 2008Other requests for
this document shall be referred toJoint Concept
Development and ExperimentationU.S. Joint Forces
Command115 Lake View ParkwaySuffolk, VA
23435-2697 Attn Mr. Kelly Mayes, Phone
757-203-3191
Name Title Joint Concept Development
Experimentation USJFCOM, J9
1
2
Joint Experimentation Evolution

• JCDE Enterprise approach
• In-theater experimentation
• Reach-back reach-out
• Practical solutions
• Increased use of focused events

2009
MNF-I support CSE MNE-5 ISAF support
2008

• Distributed Environment
• Expanding Interagency and Multinational
  participation
• Advanced MS
• Integrated Joint and Service Experiments

2007
Noble Resolve Urban Resolve MNE-4
2006
2005

• Building Partnerships
• Establishing Joint Context
• Fielding Prototype Solutions

2004
Unified Quest Unified Course Unified
Engagement Joint Urban Warrior
2003

• Evolving Mission
• Team Building
• Identifying Required Authorities

2002
2001
Millennium Challenge
2000
1999
1998
Birth of JFCOM Joint Concept Development
Experimentation
3
Experiment Vs. Exercise
Experiment
Exercise

• Explores NEW WAYS OF OPERATING
• Often employs MS as primary tool
• Develops emerging capabilities definition while
  applying new technologies
• Establishes discovery environment
• Stimulates creation of new tactics, techniques
  and procedures

• Examines EXISTING WAYS OF OPERATING to improve
  readiness
• Typically live forces centric with simulation
  support
• Training education focused
• Reinforces established processes, procedures,
  benchmarks
• Facilitates warfighter certifications

4
Focusing on DoDs Biggest Challenges
5
Joint Concept Development and Experimentation
Problem Statement The Department of Defense
requires the ability to focus and synchronize
experimentation efforts to ensure the most
important security challenges, now and in the
future, are being addressed while ensuring a
focus on customers a focus on outcomes and a
return on investment

• Experimentation
• Design conduct and enable comprehensive,
  innovative and objective joint experimentation to
  examine validity of concepts and capabilities to
  satisfy needs of the Joint Force Commander.

• Concepts
• Innovative
• Intellectually Rigorous
• Clearly Written
• Concise and
• Defendable

• Capabilities
• Define
• Experiment
• Transition
• For the future Joint Force Commander

Enterprise Approach Collaboratively and
transparently lead JCDE Enterprise efforts to
synchronize concept, capability and
experimentation efforts across the Department of
Defense.
6
Addressing Strategic Priorities
Shaping Countries at Strategic Crossroads (15)
Preventing WMD Acquisition or Use (8)

• Guidance for Development of the Force
• Established guidance of focus for DOD joint
  experimentation
• Defeat Terrorist Networks
• Combating WMD
• Shaping countries at the crossroads
• Defending the homeland
• Directed balance in JCDE portfolio
• Near, Mid, Far-Term
• Strategic, operational tactical levels

Defending the Homeland in Depth (9)
Defeating TerroristNetworks (24)
GDF Focus Areas(Number of Projects)
Temporal Balance
7
FY09 Summary Defeating Terrorist Networks (IW)

• Problem The Joint Force Commander requires the
  ability to dissuade, deter, and defeat irregular
  adversaries who are adaptive and networked.
• Key outcomes/deliverables
• Support SOCOM USMC for IW JICs (COIN, UW, DTN,
  FID) CBAs
• Wargame Hybrid Threat (IDF) and Phase 0 CT
  solutions
• Synchronize coalition IW
• Evaluate IW small-unit training, personnel
  suppression and urban recon capabilities
• Identify/refine C2/DA processes, tools and
  architectures to support and synchronize IW
• Develop offensive and defensive cyber ops
  capabilities
• Enable distributed ops through decentralized and
  resilient C2 for fires and maneuver
• Develop rules, tools and processes to
  support/enable whole-of-government approach
• Identify/refine requirements for IA/MN sharing of
  decision-quality info

• FY09 Projects
• Irregular Warfare Concepts Support (IWC SPT)
• Support to SOCOM IW Experimentation (SOCOM Spt)
• Multinational Experiment 6 (MNE6)
• Counter-Personnel Warning and Suppression Systems
  (CPWSS)
• Enhanced Urban Reconnaissance (EUR)
• Small Unit Decision Making LOE (SUDM LOE)
• IWC/Joint Urban Operations ST (IWC/JUO ST)
• IWC/Joint Urban Operations CBA (IWC/JUO CBA)
• IWC/Joint Urban Operations MS (IWC/JUO MS)
• Hybrid Threat Experimentation w/IDF (IDF Exp)
• Joint Urban Warrior (JUW)
• Joint Force Commander Command Control (JFC C2)
• Joint Force Commander Domain Awareness (JFC DA)
• Joint Integrated Persistent Surveillance (JIPS)
• Cyberspace Operations (CYBEROPS)
• Joint Distributed Operations (JDO)
• Cooperative Security (CS) Experimentation
• Deployable Security Sector Reform (DSSR)

8
FY09 Summary Preventing WMD

• Problem The Joint Force Commander requires the
  ability to prevent the spread of weapons of mass
  destruction detect, track, interdict, and
  eliminate these weapons and their delivery
  systems, and coordinate consequence management
  activities in support of civil authorities in
  case of attack.

• Key outcomes/deliverables
• Develop a systems approach to detection,
  characterization, interdiction and disablement of
  RN and BIO threats
• Identify near- and mid-term capabilities and
  recommend technologies for acceleration to fill
  CWMD gaps
• Identify/refine C2/DA processes, tools and
  architectures to support CWMD ops
• Streamline tipping, cueing and communications to
  optimize effectiveness of surveillance ops
• Develop processes, tools and architectures to
  improve CI/HUMINT integration
• Develop TTPs for recognizing and operating in a
  denied/degraded GPS environment

• FY09 Projects
• Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction
  Radiological Nuclear (CWMD RN)
• Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction
  Biological (CWMD Bio)
• Joint Force Commander Domain Awareness (JFC DA)
• Joint Force Commander Command Control (JFC C2)
• Joint Integrated Persistent Surveillance (JIPS)
• Joint Distributed Operations (JDO)
• Joint Counterintelligence/Human Intelligence
  Integration (JCHI2)
• Global Positioning System (GPS) Sustainability

9
FY09 Summary Shaping Countries at Strategic
Crossroads

• Problem The Joint Force Commander must be able
  to affect the perceptions, will, behavior, and
  capabilities of partner, competitor, or adversary
  leaders, military forces, and relevant
  populations to further U.S. national security or
  shared global security interests.
• Key outcomes/deliverables
• Examine adequacy and supportability of CCJO
• Identify/refine C2/DA processes, tools and
  architectures to support joint ops
• Define integrate offensive/defensive cyber ops
  capabilities
• Define capability gaps requirements for air
  access against advanced/hybrid threats
• Revise Conventional Warfare Concept
• Define capabilities required for Seabasing
• Develop TTPs for recognizing and operating in a
  denied/degraded GPS environment
• Improve ability to plan, integrate, and conduct
  SC activities with USG and coalition partners
• Identify/refine requirements for IA/MN sharing of
  decision-quality info

• FY09 Projects
• Capstone Concept for Joint Operations (CCJO)
  Experimentation
• Joint Force Commander Command Control (JFC C2)
• Joint Force Commander Domain Awareness (JFC DA)
• Joint Integrated Persistent Surveillance (JIPS)
• Cyber Operations (CYBEROPS)
• Assured Air Access (AAA)
• Conventional Warfare Joint Operating Concept (CW
  JOC)
• Irregular Warfare Concepts Support (IWC SPT)
• Seabasing
• Global Positioning System (GPS) Sustainability
• Cooperative Security (CS) Experimentation
• Strategic Communication (SC) Experimentation
• Interagency Shared Common Operational Picture
  (IACOP)
• Joint Distributed Operations (JDO)

10
FY09 Summary Defending the Homeland

• Problem The Joint Force Commander requires the
  ability to protect United States sovereignty,
  territory, domestic population, and critical
  infrastructure against external threats and
  aggression, natural disasters or other threats.

• Key outcomes/deliverables
• Develop requirements and processes for
  integration of national missile defense assets
• Identify/refine C2/DA processes, tools and
  architectures to support joint ops
• Define integrate offensive/defensive cyber ops
  capabilities
• Identify/refine requirements for IA/MN sharing of
  decision-quality info
• Improve ability to plan, integrate, and conduct
  SC activities with USG and coalition partners
• Develop rules, tools and processes to
  support/enable whole-of-government approach

• FY09 Projects
• Global Integrated Air and Missile Defense (GMD)
• Joint Force Commander Command Control (JFC C2)
• Joint Force Commander Domain Awareness (JFC DA)
• Joint Integrated Persistent Surveillance (JIPS)
• Interagency Common Operational Picture (IA COP)
• Cyberspace Operations (CYBEROPS)
• Strategic Communication (SC) Experimentation
• Unified Action 09 (UA09)

11
FY09 Summary Other

• Logistics Projects
• USCENTCOM Joint Logistics Transformation Build a
  Joint logistics construct designed around a
  Service-based organization that will coordinate,
  integrate, and synchronize theater logistics.
• Multinational Experiment 6 Logistics Deliver
  interoperability standards for multinational
  users of the beta NATO Logistics Functional
  Services (LOG FS) systems, to better facilitate
  information sharing.
• USSOUTHCOM Joint Interagency Security Command
  Provide solutions that enable military deployment
  and logistics processes to support interagency
  led operations.
• USSOCOM Joint Special Operations Warfighting
  Capability Integrate Geographic Combatant
  Commands (GCC) Theater Special Operations
  Command (TSOC) requirements with General Purpose
  forces logistics at the operational level when
  deployed into the GCC AOR.
• KORCOM Provide a joint logistics construct for
  Korean theater of operations to enable transition
  to a supporting (US)/supported (ROK) command
  relationship

• Title Ten
• Unified Quest
• Unified Engagement
• Trident Warrior
• Global Game 09
• Joint Urban Warrior 09
• Expeditionary Warrior 09

• Armed Private Security Contractors (JFCOM CoS
  Task J00-0154U-08)
• Integrate and deconflict APSC activities with
  joint force operations
• Planning Assessment and Decision Support System
  (Formerly TEBO - ACTD in transition)
• Complete MUA and transition

12
Initial Look at FY-10

• Logistics consultancy moves to J3/4
• Joint Urban Operations Office aligned to
  Irregular Warfare Center
• Continuing focus on War Fighter Challenges in
  definition
• Small amount of FY-08 project close out
• Irregular Warfare as a core competency
• Minimal to no capability development
  (hardware/software)
• New administration priorities

13
(No Transcript)