Title: Week 02C
1Week 02C Management of Quality (Ch 2)
- Dimensions, determinants, definition, pioneers,
Cost of Quality, awards, ISO registration, TQM,
process improvement methodology, quality tools,
PDCA (PDSA) cycle, Quality Circles, Six Sigma
2Whats your definition of quality?
- High price?
- Reliable?
- Attractive?
- Durable?
- Other?
3Dimensions of Quality
- Performance
- Aesthetics
- Special features
- Safety
- Reliability
- Durability
- Perceived quality
- Service after sale
4Quality - a Definition - 1
- Fitness for use - Juran
- Based on various factors reliability,
durability, performance, usefulness, aesthetics,
price, etc. - Various - Meets customer requirements Various
- Consistently meets or exceeds customer
expectations Stevenson - Ability of a product or service to meet customer
needs - Heizer
5Quality - a Definition - 2
- Consistently meets or exceeds customer
requirements Bentley - Emphasis on requirements
- Includes understanding of expectations
- Implies an agreement
- explicit or
- Implicit
- Concept Do it right the first time and every
time
6Determinants of Quality
- How well a product satisfies its intended purpose
based on 4 factors - Design
- Conformance to the design
- Ease of use
- Service after delivery
7Case Study a personal experience
- Program introduction
- General manager kickoff talk
- Key question What do we do at the end of the
month if were not sure that a product meets
quality requirements? - The answer That all depends
- Possible consequences
- Program results
8Quality Gurus / Pioneers - 1
- Frederick Taylor (1856-1915)
- Inspection
- Gauging
- Walter Shewhart (Bell System) (1891-1967)
- Developed Statistical control charts
- Mentored Deming
- PDCA cycle (shared with Deming)
- Identified 2 causes of variation chance and
assignable
9Quality Gurus / Pioneers - 2
- H.G. Romig (????-????) and Harold Dodge
(1893-1976) (Bell System) - Acceptance sampling tables
- W. (William) Edwards Deming (1900-1993)
- Trained in engineering, mathematics, and physics
- Physics professor, U.S. Census Bureau, USDA,
consultant - Taught SQC to Japanese QC people (1947-1965)
- PDCA cycle (shared with Shewhart)
- Honored by Japanese prize in his name
10Quality Gurus / Pioneers - 3
- W. (William) Edwards Deming (contd.)
- 14 points based on
- Constancy of purpose
- Continual improvement
- Profound knowledge
- Appreciation for a system
- A theory of variation
- A theory of knowledge
11Quality Gurus / Pioneers - 4
- Joseph M. Juran (Bell System) (1904-2008)
- Also lectured in Japan
- Authored/Edited Quality Control Handbook
- Built on Pareto concept
- Quality Trilogy concept
- Quality planning
- Quality control
- Quality improvement
12Quality Gurus / Pioneers - 5
- Armand Feigenbaum (GE, General Systems Company)
(1922- ) - Cost of nonconformance
- Total quality control concept
- Authored Total Quality Control
- 40 steps in quality principles
- TQC is system for integration Standards,
appraisal, corrective action - Technological and human factors
- 4 categories of quality costs
- Control quality at the source
13Cost of Quality (Juran/Feigenbaum)
TRADITIONAL CoQ CURRENT CoQ
Â
External Failure
Â
 External Failure
Internal Failure Â
 Internal Failure
 Â
Prevention Â
 Â
 Prevention
 Â
Appraisal Â
 Â
 Appraisal
14Quality Gurus / Pioneers - 6
- Philip Crosby (Martin Marietta, ITT, PCA)
(1926-2001) - Zero Defects
- Authored Quality is Free, Quality Without
Tears - Started Quality College (multiple sites)
- Company teams trained
- Emphasized behavioral change
15Quality Gurus / Pioneers - 7
- Kaoru Ishikawa (1915-1989)
- Quality Circles
- Cause and effect fishbone or
- Ishikawa diagram
- Promoted statistical methods
- Recognized internal customer
- Conceived company wide quality control
16 Quality Gurus / Pioneers - 8
- Genichi Taguchi (1924- )
- Emphasized variation reduction
- Taguchi loss function
- Shigeo Shingo (1909-1990)
- Not focused on quality but had significant impact
- Setup standardization
- Poka-yoke
- Source inspection systems
17Awards Prizes
- Deming Prize
- Awarded by Union of Japanese Scientists
Engineers - First awarded in 1951
- Named after W. Edwards Deming
- Malcolm Baldrige Award
- Awarded by US Department of Commerce
- 1987 legislation
- Named after Malcolm Baldrige
18Awards Prizes (contd)
- European Quality Award
- Award for organizational excellence
- Originally one per year
- Now several categories
- Other awards
- Most developed nations have some form of Quality
awards or prizes
19Value of Awards Prizes
- Shows effort
- Largely dependent on money spent
- Used in advertising
- Doesnt reflect customer view
20ISO
- International Standards Organization
21Current ISO Standards
- ISO 9000 family Quality management
- ISO 90012008 (QMS - Requirements)
- ISO 14000 family Environmental management
- ISO 140012004 (EMS - Requirements)
- ISO 190112002 (Guidelines on Quality and/or
Environmental Management Systems Auditing)
22ISO Registration
- Whats been good
- Focus on quality
- Demonstrates effort
- What was bad (mostly fixed in ISO 90002000
- Became mechanical
- Emphasized conformance to documentation, not
meeting QUALITY - Didnt include customer view
23Quality Today
- Reflects a blend of concepts and contributions
from the pioneers (gurus) - Stresses organization-wide TQM
- Emphasizes the role of the front-line worker
(authority and responsibility) - Seeks to recognize achievement through prizes and
certification
24TQM Approach
- Know customer requirements and wants
- Design a product to delight the customer
- Design a process to do the job right (the first
time and) every time - Apply fail-safing techniques (poka-yoke
devices) - Monitor and record results for improvement ideas
- Work with suppliers and customers
25Poka-Yoke(Mistake-Proofing)
- Developed by Shigeo Shingo
- An approach for mistake-proofing processes using
automatic devices or methods to avoid simple
human or machine error, such as forgetfulness,
misunderstanding, errors in identification, lack
of experience, absentmindedness, delays, - or malfunctions
26Poka-Yoke Examples (from John Grouts Poka-Yoke
Page)(refer to www.campbell.berry.edu/pokayoke)
mod. 09/15/02 DAB
27Other TQM Points
- Continual improvement (kaizen)
- Competitive benchmarking
- Employee enablement
- Use of teams
- Training
- Extension to suppliers
- Traditional vs. TQM cultures
28Process Improvement Tools
- Process flowcharts
- Check sheets
- Scatter diagrams
- Histograms
- Pareto analysis (charts)
- Cause-and-effect diagrams (Ishikawa/Fishbone)
- Control charts
- Run charts
29Flowcharts
- Shows unexpected complexity, problem areas,
redundancy, unnecessary loops, and where
simplification may be possible - Compares and contrasts actual versus ideal flow
of a process - Allows a team to reach agreement on process steps
and identify activities that may impact
performance - Serves as a training tool
30Check Sheet
- Creates easy-to-understand data
- Builds, with each observation, a clearer picture
of the facts - Forces agreement on the definition of each
condition or event of interest - Makes patterns in the data become
- obvious quickly
xx xxxxxx x
31Scatter Diagram
- Supplies the data to confirm a hypothesis that
two variables are related - Provides both a visual and statistical means to
test the strength of a relationship - Provides a good follow-up to cause and effect
diagrams
32Histogram
- Displays large amounts of data that are difficult
to interpret in tabular form - Shows centering, variation, and shape
- Illustrates the underlying distribution of the
data - Provides useful information for predicting future
performance - Helps to answer the question Is the process
capable of meeting requirements?
33Pareto Diagram
- Helps a team focus on causes that have the
greatest impact - Displays the relative importance of problems in a
simple visual format - Helps prevent shifting the problem where the
solution removes some causes but worsens others
34Cause and Effect Diagram
- Enables a team to focus on the content of a
problem, not on the history of the problem or
differing personal interests of team members - Creates a snapshot of collective knowledge and
consensus of a team builds support for solutions - Focuses the team on causes, not symptoms
Effect
Cause
35Control Chart
- Focuses attention on detecting and monitoring
process variation over time - Distinguishes special from common causes of
variation - Serves as a tool for on-going control
- Provides a common language for discussion process
performance
36Run Chart
- Monitors performance of one or more processes
over time to detect trends, shifts, or cycles - Allows a team to compare performance before and
after implementation of a solution to measure its
impact - Focuses attention on truly vital changes in the
process
37Process Improvement Sequence - 1
- Management responsibility
- Develop process improvement plan
- Determine process or area to examine
- Form and train Process/Quality Improvement Team
38Process Improvement Sequence - 2
- Team use coarse tools
- Process flowchart
- Check sheets and histograms
- Pareto analysis lt--- (iterative
- Fishbone chart ---gt steps)
39Process Improvement Sequence - 3
- Team use fine tools
- Process control charts
- Run diagrams
- Scatter diagrams
- Failsafing
40Process Improvement Sequence - 4
- Team
- Determine process changes
- Implement pilot process improvement
- Measure and evaluate results
- Repeat if results unsatisfactory deploy full
implementation if results satisfactory
41PDCA (or PDSA) Cycle
- Also known as the Deming wheel, or
Deming/Shewhart cycle or wheel - 4 parts to the cycle
- Plan - document and analyze
- Do - implement improvement
- Check (or Study) - compare to desired state
- Act - correct or standardize
42Quality Circles vs. QITs
- Quality Circles
- Limited authority
- Focus within department
- Often seen as added work
- Ongoing
- Quality Improvement Teams
- Greater authority
- Focus on total process
- Recognized as important part of job
- End when process improvement complete
435W2H Approach
- What? Subject
- Why? Purpose
- Where? Location
- When? Timing/sequence
- Who? People involved
- How? Method
- How much? Cost/impact
44Six Sigma
45Six Sigma Quality
- Latest popular approach to Quality
- 6 standard deviations (6?) from the process
mean 0.0003 defects - Represents a goal
- Certification from ASQ on processes to support
Six Sigma - Many consulting and training firms on how to
implement Six Sigma
46Six Sigma at GE
- The central idea behind Six Sigma is that if you
can measure how many defects you have in a
process, you can systematically figure out how to
eliminate them and get as close to zero defects
as possible. - Making Customers Feel Six Sigma Quality
47Six Sigma Evolution
- Started as a simple quality metric at Motorola in
1986 (Bill Smith) - Concept migrated to Allied Signal
- (acquired Honeywell and took its name)
- Picked up by General Electric
- Commitment by CEO Jack Welch in 1995
- Grown to be an integrated strategy for attaining
extremely high levels of quality
48What is Six-Sigma?
Sigma (?) is a Greek letter used to designate a standard deviation (SD) in statistics Six refers to the number of SDs from the specialized limit to the mean. Six sigma is a fairly recent umbrella approach to achieve quality
49Percent Not Meeting Specifications
- 1S 32
- 2S 4.5
- 3S 0.3
- 6S 0.00034
50Six-Sigma Levels
Sigma Level Long-term ppm defects
1 691,462
2 308,538
3 66,807
4 6,210
5 233
6 3.4
51Statistics - DPU
- Defect
- Six Sigma any mistake or error passed on to the
customer ??? - General view any variation from specifications
- DPU (defects per unit)
- Number of defects per unit of work
- Ex 3 lost bags 8,000 customers
- .000375
52Statistics dpmo (defects per million
opportunities)
- Process may have more than one opportunity for
error (e.g., airline baggage) - dpmo (DPU 1,000,000)
- opportunities for error
- Ex (.000375)(1,000,000) 1.6 234.375
- or (3 lost bags 1,000,000) (8,000
customers 1.6 average bags) - 234.375