Title: Management of PONV
1Management of PONV
- Dr. Jay A. Avila
- Staff Anesthesiologist
- PACU Medical Officer
- USNH Camp Pendleton
2Objective
- To apply newest evidence-based-medicine to our
management of PONV - To increase patient satisfaction
- To maximize cost effectiveness
- To speed up patient discharge from PACU and SDSU
3Current Practice Pre-operatively
- Patient stratification ranges from none or
minimal to appropriate - Bicitra and Reglan for all pregnant or GERD
patients - Prophylaxis ranges from none or minimal to triple
combination - Anesthetic plan modification based on patient
stratification ranges from none to appropriate
4Current Practice Pre-operatively
- Agents used
- Ondansetron 4 mg IV
- Metoclopramide 10 mg IV
- Dexamethasone 4-10 mg IV
- Vistaril 25 mg IM and IV
- Scopolamine Patch
5Current Practice - Intraoperatively
- Propofol induction
- Adequate hydration and avoidance of hypotension
- Ondansetron pre-induction, at induction or
shortly after - Ondansetron at the end of surgery
- Metoclopramide initially and/or at the end
- Droperidol 0.625-1.25 mg IV at the end
- Dexamethasone 4-10 mg IV initially or at the end
- Reversal usage considerations
- Propofol before emergence (20 mg IV)
- TIVA(Propofol) with or w/o volatile agent with or
w/o NO
6Current Practice - Postoperatively
- Hydration Crystalloid 1000 cc at 100cc/hr
- Rescue medications
- Zofran 4 mg IV initially and/or repeat
- Reglan 10 mg IV initially and/or repeat
- Phenergan 12.5-25 mg IV
7Pathophysiology of Nausea and Vomiting
8Pathways in CTZ/Emetic Center Stimulation
Antagonist
5-HT3
Anticholinergics
Antidopaminergics
Antihistamine
Agonist
Muscarinic/Cholinergic
Dopamine (D2)
5-HT3
Histamine
Receptor Site
m
CTZ
Area Postrema
Adapted from Watcha MF et al. Anesthesiology.
199277162-184.
9Agonists and Antagonists Associated with Nausea
and Vomiting
10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12Socio-economic Aspects of PONV
- Common complication of surgery
- Limiting factor in early discharge
- Leading cause of unanticipated hospital admission
- Increased recovery room time, increased nursing
care and potential hospital admission All
increase Total Health Costs
13Socio-economic Aspects of PONV
- High Levels of Patient disconfort and
dissatisfaction - PONV may be of greater concern than post-op pain
- Patients willing to spend up to 100 out of
pocket for effective antiemetic
14Socio-economic Aspects of PONV
- 25-30 of surgical patients experience nausea
and/or vomiting post-operatively - Intractable PONV about 0.18
- High risk patients may have 70-80 incidence of
PONV - Emphasis shift from in-patient to out-patient
surgery has increased interest in prevention and
treatment of PONV
15Socio-economic Aspects of PONV
- Optimal approach to PONV remains unclear
- Treat all high risk patients?
- Ideal rescue therapy
- Published evidence suggests universal PONV
prophylaxis in not cost-effective - AIMS (Anesthesia Information Management Systems)
have been created to stratify and predict and
prevent PONV - Guidelines for prevention of PONV have been
published
16Socio-economic Aspects of PONV
- Guidelines previously published have been based
on data taken from systematic reviews of
randomized trials - Evidence from single studies or logistic
regression data (identifying risks factors for
PONV) had not been included either
17Consensus Guidelines for Managing PONV
- Multidisciplinary expert panel reviewed available
literature up to 02/2002 - Recommendations based on best available evidence
regarding prevention and rescue therapy of PONV
18Goals of Guidelines
- Identify primary risks factors for PONV in adults
and children - Reduce baseline risks
- Identify optimal approach to PONV prevention and
therapy in various patient populations - Determine optimal choice and timing of
anti-emetic administration - Identify most effective mono-therapy and
combination therapy regimes
19Strength of Evidence
- Panel analyzed and evaluated pertinent medical
literature using widely used Evidence Rating
Scales - In the absence of published data, recommedations
were based on expert opinion
20Evidence Rating Scale
- Level of Evidence based on Study design
- I Large, randomized, controlled trial, n 100
per group - II Systematic review
- III Small randomized, controlled trial, n 100
per group - IV Non-randomized, controlled trial or case
report - V Expert opinion
- Strength of recommendation based on expert
opinion - A Good evidence to support recommendation
- B Fair evidence
- C Insufficient evidence to recommend for or
against
21Consensus Guidelines
- The following factors were considered
- PONV risk level
- Potential morbidity associated with PONV
- Suture dehiscence
- Esophageal rupture
- Hematoma formation
- Aspiration pneumonitis
- Potential adverse events
- QT prolongation, fatal arrhythmias
- Efficacy of antiemetics
- Cost of therapy
- Increased health care costs associated with PONV
22Consensus Guidelines
- Not all patients should receive prophylaxis
- Low risk patients unlikely to benefit
- Unnecessary risk from potential side effects
- Prophylaxis should be reserved for moderate to
high risk patients
23Guideline 1
- Identify adults at high risk for PONV
24Adults at High Risk for PONV
- Apfel et al. identified four primary risk factors
in patients receiving balanced anesthesia - Female gender IA
- Non-smoking status IVA
- Prior history of PONV/Motion sickness IVA
- Use of opioids Intra-op/Post-op IIA/IVA
25Incidence of PONVApfel et al.
- No factors 10
- One factor 20
- Two factors 40
- Three factors 60
- Four factors 80
26Type of Surgery and PONV
- Sinclair et al. study of 18,000 ambulatory
patients suggests PONV risk gt 15 - Breast augmentation IVB
- Dental surgery IVB
- Orthopedic shoulder procedures IVB
- Gynecologic laparoscopy IVB
- Varicose vein stripping IVB
- Strabismus repair IVB
27Duration of Surgery and PONV
- Each 30-minute increase in surgery time increases
PONV incidence by 60, thus, - A baseline risk of 10 is increased to 16 after
30 minutes - IVA evidence
28Guideline 2
- Identify Children at high risk for POV
29Children at High Risk for PONV
- Only POV studied
- Leading post-operative complaint from parents
- Leading cause of re-admission
- POV increases as age increases
- Rare lt 2 yrs
- 40 if gt 3 yrs (2x as frequent as adults)
- Incidence tapers at puberty
- No sex difference before puberty
- Risk increases more specifically with certain
surgeries TA, strabismus, hernias, orchiopexy,
penile procedures
30Guideline 3
- Reduce baseline risk factors for PONV
31Baseline Risk Factor Reduction
- Scuderi et al. tested a multimodal approach to
reducing PONV in a randomized controlled clinical
trial of women undergoing outpatient laparoscopy - Multimodal
- Pre-operative anxiolysis
- Aggressive hydration
- Oxygen
- Droperidol Dexamethasone at induction
- Ondansetron at the end
- TIVA with propofol remifentanil
- Ketorolac
- No nitrous oxide or muscle relaxation
32Baseline Risk Factor Reduction
- Patients who received multimodal therapy had 98
complete response rate - Antiemetic monotherapy 76
- Saline placebo 59
- Level of satisfaction was the same between
multimodal and monotherapy respondents
33Baseline Risk Factor Reduction
- Regional anesthesia IIIA
- Induction/maintenance with Propofol IA
- Intra-op supplemental O2 IIIB
- Aggressive hydration IIIA
- Avoidance of Nitrous Oxide IIA
- Avoidance of volatile anesthetics IA
- Minimization of intra-op/post-op opioids IIA/IVA
- Minimization of neostigmine IIA
34Guideline 4
- Antiemetic therapy for PONV prophylaxis in adults
35Antiemetic Therapy for Adults
- Serotonin receptor antagonists
- Steroids
- Butyrophenones
- Phenothiazines
- Anticholenergics
- Benzamides
- Antihistamines
- Others
36Antiemetic Therapy for Adults
- Serotonin receptor antagonists
- No profile difference between them
- FDA approved ondansetron at 4 mg IV prior to
induction - Leeser and Scuderi in 91 and 93 respectively
determined optimal dose at 4 mg at start of
anesthesia - Sun et al. For ENT surgery is more effective at
end of surgery - Tang et al. and Graczyk et al. For gynecologic
outpatient surgery more effective at the end of
surgery
37Antiemetic Therapy for Adults
- Serotonin receptor antagonists
- Ondansetron more effective as antiemetic than
antinausea (NNT 7 vs 6) - NTH 36 for HA
- NTH 31 for increased liver enzymes
- NTH 23 for constipation
- MOA specific and selective 5-HT3 antagonism
38Antiemetic Therapy for Adults
- Dexamethasone
- Henzi et al. found that 8-10 mg IV effectively
prevents nausea and vomiting with NNT of 4 - Liu and Wang found 2.5-5 mg just as effective
- Most effective when used before induction
- Dreaded side effects common with long term
administration (increased wound infection,
adrenal suppression, etc.)have not been noted
after a single bolus dose
39Antiemetic Therapy for Adults
- Dexamethasone
- MOA unknown
- Prostaglandin antagonism
- Release of endorphins
- Anti-inflammatory and membrane stabilizing effect
40Antiemetic Therapy for Adults
- Droperidol (Butyrophenones)
- Efficacy equivalent to ondansetrons
- NNT 5
- Most effective when given at the end of surgery
- Black Box Warning
- ..may cause death or life-threatening events
associated with QT prolongation and torsades de
pointes - Based on 10 reported cases after over 30 years of
use - Dolasetron and ondansetron in combo with
metoclopramide have also been involved in QT
prolongation - McCormick (2002) and Scuderi (2003) currently
performing studies to define effect of droperidol
on QTc interval
41Antiemetic Therapy for Adults
- Droperidol
- MOA strong D2 antagonism acting at the CTZ and
area postrema - Effective dose 0.625-1.25 mg IV IA
42Antiemetic Therapy for Adults
- Phenothiazines
- Act as sedatives and counter effect of opioids at
CTZ (Howat, 1960 Dundee et al. 1965, Wood 1979) - Limited use in ambulatory setting due to sedation
effects - In 1999 Khalil et al. found promethazine
effective for middle ear surgery antiemesis when
used along or in combo with ondansetron
43Antiemetic Therapy for Adults
- Phenothiazines
- MOA direct blocking of D2 receptors in CTZ
- Extrapyramidal effects possible
- Neuroleptic malignant syndrome is rare but
possible - promethazine 12.5-25 mg IV and prochlorperazine
5-10 mg IV at the end of surgery effective
44Antiemetic Therapy for Adults
- Anticholinergics
- Atropine, glycopyrrolate and scopolamine have all
been tested as antiemetics. - Cerebral cortex and ponds rich with cholinergic
and muscarinic receptors - Dundee et al. found atropine and scopolamine
better than glycopyrrolate to counter action of
opioids
45Antiemetic Therapy for Adults
- Scopolamine transdermally was found to prevent
PONV effectively (Kranke et al. meta-analysis
2002) however, incidence of side effects was
inexcusably high - Side effects visual disturbances, sedation, dry
mouth, dizziness and memory dysfunction are common
46Antiemetic Therapy for Adults
- Benzamides
- Metoclopramide most effective in this class
- MOA
- Specific D2 antagonism in CTZ
- High dose antagonizes 5-HT3
- Cholinergic action in stomach increases LES tone
and decreases transit time increasing peristaltic
motility - Opioid induced PONV treated as gastric stasis is
reversed - Extrapyramidal side effects, cardiac
dysrhythmias, dysphoria
47Antiemetic Therapy for Adults
- Should metoclopramide be used?
- Metoclopramide has been used for over 40 years
- Wilson et al. studied 230 patients (2001) found
metoclopramide 10 mg IV as effective as
ondansetron 4 mg for prophylaxis of PONV after
lap chole - Quaynor et al. (2002) found same equivalence
with 20 mg metoclopramide and 8 mg ondansetron
during same same surgical procedure
48Antiemetic Therapy for Adults
- Should metoclopramide be used?
- Henzi et al. in 1999 did systematic review of 66
studies and 3260 patients No evidence of
dose-responsiveness with oral, intranasal or IV
in either adults or children - Panel of experts convened in march 2003
- Although most members agreed that it could not
be recommended as an antiemetic, agreement was
not unanimous
49Antiemetic Therapy for Adults
- Should metoclopramide be used?
- Continued use at 10 mg is clearly inadequate
- Chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting is
treated with 2 mg/Kg- This regimen is better than
placebo with only minor side effects - Cholinergic action may justify its use in
conjunction with opioids
50Antiemetic Therapy for Adults
- Antihistamines
- MOA Block Acetyl-ch in vestibular apparatus and
H1 in nucleus of solitary tract - Act mainly in vomiting center and vestibular
pathways - Kranke et al. 2002 meta-analysis showed
dimenhydranate prevented PONV in early phase with
NNT 8 - Significant side effects limits outpatient use
51Antiemetic Therapy for Adults
- Ephedrine
- As early as 1991 ephedrine was shown to have
similar antiemetic effects as droperidol both
compared to placebo - Short acting- only 90 min.
- No benefit following next 24 hrs
- Hagemann (2000) et al. found IM Ephedrine was
effective in reducing emesis during the first
three hours after abdominal hysterectomy - No change in BP between groups Thus antiemetic
effect is specific
52Antiemetic Therapy for Adults
- Non-pharmacological techniques
- Acupuncture
- TENS
- Acupressure
- Hypnosis
- Bispectral monitoring
- Supplemental O2
- Maintainance of BP
- Intraoperative fluids
- NNT approximately 5
53Guideline 5
- Antiemetic therapy for POV prophylaxis in children
54Antiemetic Therapy for Children
- POV twice as frequent
- Unable to assess Nausea
- 5-HT3 antagonists most studied in peds due to
being better antiemetics than antinausic - Ondansetron 50-100 mcg/Kg- NNT 2-3
- Dolasetron 350 mcg/Kg
- Dexamethasone 150 mcg/Kg- NNT 4
- Droperidol 50-75 mcg/Kg- NNT 5
55Guideline 6
- Use prophylaxis in patients at high risk for PONV
and consider prophylaxis in patients at moderate
risk for PONV
56Algorithm for management of postoperative nausea
and vomiting (PONV)
57Prophylaxis
- Prophylaxis likely useful only for patients in
moderate to high risk for PONV - Patients at low risk get prophylaxis only if at
risk for medical sequelae from vomiting, - i.e. wired jaws, increased ICP,
fundoplication,etc. - Generally, combination therapy superior to
monotherapy - Different MOA optimize efficacy
58Prophylaxis
- 5-HT3 antagonists having better antivomiting
effect but association wit HA can be effectively
combined with droperidol which has better
antinausea profile and protective effect against
HAs - 5-HT3 and dexamethasone
- 5-HT3 and promethazine
59Guideline 7
- Provide antiemetic treatment to patients with
PONV who did not receive prophylaxis or in whom
prophylaxis failed
60Failed or absent prophylaxis
- First response should be bedside exam to exclude
inciting medication or mechanical factor - MSO4 PCA
- Blood draining down the throat
- Abdominal obstruction
- Hypotension, hypovolemia
61Failed or absent prophylaxis
- Tramer et al., (1997)If patient has received no
prophylaxis, generally, 5-HT3 treatment doses are
ΒΌ of prophylactic doses - 1.0 mg ondansetron
- 12.5 mg dolasetron
- 0.1 mg granisetron
- 0.5 mg tropisetron
62Failed or absent prophylaxis
- Droperidol no different from ondansetron as
therapy for established PONV - Promethazine as effective in the general surgical
population - If prophylaxis with 5-HT3 blocker ineffective
do not initiate rescue tx with 5-HT3 within 6 hrs
after surgery as it confers no additional
benefit, Kovac et al. 1999 - As a general rule, failure of one drug class
should be treated with a different class (V)
63Failed or absent prophylaxis
- Triple therapy regimes have not been tested
- If triple therapy prophylaxis fails, it should
not be repeated within the first 6 hrs (IIIA) - Rescue therapy with propofol 20 mg as needed can
be considered (IIIB) - Dexamethasone should not be used more often than
q8hrs
64Conclusion
- First step in reducing PONV is to reduce baseline
risk factors among patients at risk - Adult prophylaxis at moderate risk treated with
either mono or combination therapy - Double and triple combo recommended for patients
at high risk - Children at moderate to high risk should be
treated with combo therapy that includes 5-HT3
antagonists
65Conclusion
- Antiemetic therapy should be used with all
patients who have an emetic episode after surgery - PONV occurring within six hours of surgery should
not receive a repeat dose of the same antiemetic - PONV occurring more than 6 hours after surgery
may be treated with any antiemetic except
dexamethasone and transdermal scopolamine
66References
- Gan TJ, et al,. Consensus guidelines for managing
PONV. Anesth Analg 2003 9762-71 - Jokela R, Prevention of PONV Studies on
different antiemetics, their combinations and
dosing regimes. Academic Dissertation, Department
of anesthesiology, University of Oulu, Finland
20031-66 - Kovac AL. Antiemetic use in PONV- online
monograph. www.ponvupdate.org.online_monograph.asp
- Ku CM, Ong BC. PONV A review of current
literature. Singapore Med J 20344(7)366-374 - Henzi I, et al,. Metoclopramide in the prevention
of PONV A quantitative systematic review of
randomized, placebo-controlled studies. British
Journal Anesth 199983(5)761-71 - Scuderi PE et al,. Multimodal antiemetic
management prevents early postoperative vomiting
after outpatient laparoscopy. Anesth Analg.
200091(6)1408-14 - Sanchez-Ledesma MJ. A comparison of three
antiemetic combinations for the prevention of
PONV. Anesth Analg 200295(6)1590-5 - Nelskyla KA. Sevoflurane titration using
bispectral index decreases postoperative vomiting
in phase II recovery after ambulatory surgery.
Anesth Analg 200193(5)1165-9 - Goll V. Ondansetron is no more effective than
supplemental intraoperative oxygen for prevention
of PONV. Anesth Analg 200192(1)112-7 - Purhonen S. Supplemental oxygen does not reduce
the incidence of PONV after ambulatory
gynecological laparoscopy. Anesth Analg
200396(1)91-6 - Moretti EW. Intraoperative colloid administration
reduces PONV and improves postoperative outcomes
compared with crystalloid administration. Anesth
Analg 200396(2)611-7 - Pusch F. The effects of systolic arterial blood
pressure variation on PONV. Anesth Analg
200294(6)1652-5. - Kovac AL et al,. Efficacy of repeat intravenous
dosing of ondansetron in controlling PONV A
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
multicenter trial. J Clin Anesth 199911(6)453-9
67References- continuation.
- Kazemi-Kjellberg F et al,. Treatment of
established PONV A quantitaive systematic
review. BMC Anesthesiol 20011(1)2 - Junger A, et al,. The use of an anesthesia
information management system for prediction of
antiemetic rescue treatment at the PACU. Anesth
Analg 200192(5)1203-9