Title: The fall of Classical Physics
1The fall of Classical Physics
2Classical physics Fundamental Models
- Particle Model (particles, bodies)
- Motion in 3 dimension for each time t, position
and speed are known (they are well-defined
numbers, regardless we know them). Mass is known. - Systems and rigid objects
- Extension of particle model
- Wave Model (light, sound, )
- Generalization of the particle model energy is
transported, which can be spread (de-localized) - Interference
3Classical physics at the end of XIX Century
- Scientists are convinced that the particle and
wave model can describe the evolution of the
Universe, when folded with - Newtons laws (dynamics)
- Description of forces
- Maxwells equations
- Law of gravity.
-
- We live in a 3-d world, and motion happens in an
absolute time. Time and space (distances)
intervals are absolute. - The Universe is homogeneous and isotropical time
is homogeneous. - Relativity
- The physics entities can be described either in
the particle or in the wave model. - Natura non facit saltus (the variables involved
in the description are continuous).
4Something is wrongRelativity, continuity,
wave/particle (I)
- Maxwell equations are not relativistically
covariant! - Moreover, a series of experiments seems to
indicate that the speed of light is constant
(Michelson-Morley, )
A speed!
5Something is wrong Relativity, continuity,
wave/particle (IIa)
- In the beginning of the XX century, it was known
that atoms were made of a heavy nucleus, with
positive charge, and by light negative electrons - Electrostatics like gravity planetary model
- All orbits allowed
- But electrons, being accelerated, should radiate
and eventually fall into the nucleus
6Something is wrong Relativity, continuity,
wave/particle (IIb)
- If atoms emit energy in the form of photons due
to level transitions, and if color is a measure
of energy, they should emit at all wavelengths
but they dont
7Something is wrong Relativity, continuity,
wave/particle (III)
- Radiation has a particle-like behaviour,
sometimes - Particles display a wave-like behaviour,
sometimes - gt In summary, something wrong involving the
foundations - Relativity
- Continuity
- Wave/Particle duality
8Need for a new physics
- A reformulation of physics was needed
- This is fascinating!!! Involved philosophy,
logics, contacts with civilizations far away from
us - A charming story in the evolution of mankind
- But just a moment I leaved up to now with
classical physics, and nothing bad happened to
me! - Because classical physics fails at very small
scales, comparable with the atoms dimensions,
10-10 m, or at speeds comparable with the speed
of light, c 3 108 m/s - Under usual conditions, classical physics makes
a good job. - Warning What follows is logically correct,
although sometimes historically inappropriate.
9ILight behaves like a particle, sometimes
101) Photoelectric Effect
- The photoelectric effect occurs when light
incident on certain metallic surfaces causes
electrons to be emitted from those surfaces - The emitted electrons are called photoelectrons
- When the system is kept in the dark, the ammeter
reads zero - When plate E is illuminated, a current is
detected by the ammeter
- The current arises from photoelectrons emitted
from the negative plate (E) and collected at the
positive plate (C)
11Photoelectric Effect, Interpretation
- Electrons are trapped in the metal, by a
potential V gt Ve - Light might give to the electrons enough energy
Eg to escape - Electrons ejected possess a kinetic energy
- K Eg - eV
- Kmax Eg f
- f eVe is called the work function
- The work function represents the minimum energy
with which an electron is bound in the metal - Typically, f 4 eV
12- At large values of DV, the current reaches a
maximum value - All the electrons emitted at E are collected at C
- The maximum current increases as the intensity of
the incident light increases
- When DV is negative, the current drops
- When DV is equal to or more negative than DVs,
the current is zero
13Photoelectric Effect Feature 1
- Dependence of photoelectron kinetic energy on
light intensity - Classical Prediction
- Electrons should absorb energy continually from
the electromagnetic waves - As the light intensity incident on the metal is
increased, the electrons should be ejected with
more kinetic energy - Experimental Result
- The maximum kinetic energy is independent of
light intensity - The current goes to zero at the same negative
voltage for all intensity curves
14Photoelectric Effect Feature 2
- Time interval between incidence of light and
ejection of photoelectrons - Classical Prediction
- For very weak light, a measurable time interval
should pass between the instant the light is
turned on and the time an electron is ejected
from the metal - This time interval is required for the electron
to absorb the incident radiation before it
acquires enough energy to escape from the metal - Experimental Result
- Electrons are emitted almost instantaneously,
even at very low light intensities - Less than 10-9 s
15Photoelectric Effect Feature 3
- Dependence of ejection of electrons on light
frequency - Classical Prediction
- Electrons should be ejected at any frequency as
long as the light intensity is high enough - Experimental Result
- No electrons are emitted if the incident light
falls below some cutoff frequency, ƒc - The cutoff frequency is characteristic of the
material being illuminated - No electrons are ejected below the cutoff
frequency regardless of intensity
16Photoelectric Effect Feature 4
- Dependence of photoelectron kinetic energy on
light frequency - Classical Prediction
- There should be no relationship between the
frequency of the light and the electron maximum
kinetic energy - The kinetic energy should be related to the
intensity of the light - Experimental Result
- The maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectrons
increases with increasing light frequency
17Cutoff Frequency
- The lines show the linear relationship between K
and ƒ - The slope of each line is independent of the
metal - h 6.6 10-34 Js
- The absolute value of the y-intercept is the work
function - The x-intercept is the cutoff frequency
- This is the frequency below which no
photoelectrons are emitted
Kmax hƒ f
18Photoelectric Effect Featuresand Photon Model
explanation
- The experimental results contradict all four
classical predictions - Einstein interpretation All electromagnetic
radiation can be considered a stream of quanta,
called photons - A photon of incident light gives all its energy
hƒ to a single electron in the metal
- h is called the Planck constant, and plays a
fundamental role in Quantum Physics
19Photon Model Explanation
- Dependence of photoelectron kinetic energy on
light intensity - Kmax is independent of light intensity
- K depends on the light frequency and the work
function - The intensity will change the number of
photoelectrons being emitted, but not the energy
of an individual electron - Time interval between incidence of light and
ejection of the photoelectron - Each photon can have enough energy to eject an
electron immediately - Dependence of ejection of electrons on light
frequency - There is a failure to observe photoelectric
effect below a certain cutoff frequency, which
indicates the photon must have more energy than
the work function in order to eject an electron - Without enough energy, an electron cannot be
ejected, regardless of the light intensity
20Photon Model Explanation of the Photoelectric
Effect, final
- Dependence of photoelectron kinetic energy on
light frequency - Since Kmax hƒ f, as the frequency increases,
the maximum kinetic energy will increase - Once the energy of the work function is exceeded
- There is a linear relationship between the
kinetic energy and the frequency
21Cutoff Frequency and Wavelength
- The cutoff frequency is related to the work
function through ƒc f / h - The cutoff frequency corresponds to a cutoff
wavelength - Wavelengths greater than lc incident on a
material having a work function f do not result
in the emission of photoelectrons
222) The Compton Effect
- Compton dealt with Einsteins idea of photon
momentum - Einstein a photon with energy E carries a
momentum of E/c hƒ / c - According to the classical theory,
electromagnetic waves of frequency ƒo incident on
electrons should scatter, keeping the same
frequency they scatter the electron as well
23- Comptons experiment showed that, at any given
angle, only one frequency of radiation is
observed - The graphs show the scattered x-ray for various
angles - Again, treating the photon as a particle of
energy hf explains the phenomenon. The shifted
peak, lgt l0, is caused by the scattering of free
electrons - This is called the Compton shift equation (wait
the relativity week)
24Compton Effect, Explanation
- The results could be explained, again, by
treating the photons as point-like particles
having - energy hƒ
- momentum hƒ / c
- Assume the energy and momentum of the isolated
system of the colliding photon-electron are
conserved - Adopted a particle model for a well-known wave
- The unshifted wavelength, lo, is caused by x-rays
scattered from the electrons that are tightly
bound to the target atoms - The shifted peak, l', is caused by x-rays
scattered from free electrons in the target
253) Blackbody radiation
- Every object at T gt 0 radiates electromagnetically
, and absorbes radiation as well - Stefan-Boltzmann law
- Blackbody the
- perfect absorber/emitter
Black body
- Classical interpretation atoms in the object
vibrate since ltEgt kT, the hotter the object,
the more energetic the vibration, the higher the
frequency - The nature of the radiation leaving the cavity
through the hole depends only on the temperature
of the cavity walls
26Experimental findings classical calculation
- Wiens law the emission peaks at
- Example for Sun T 6000K
- But the classical calculation (Rayleigh-Jeans)
gives a completely different result - Ultraviolet catastrophe
27Experimental findings classical calculation
- Classical calculation (Raileigh-Jeans) the
blackbody is a set of oscillators which can
absorb any frequency, and in level transition
emit/absorb quanta of energy -
- No maximum a ultraviolet catastrophe should
absorb all energy
Experiment
28Plancks hypothesis
- Only the oscillation modes for which
- E hf
- are allowed
29Interpretation
- Elementary oscillators can have only quantized
energies, which satisfy Enhf (h is an universal
constant, n is an integer quantum- number) - Transitions are accompanied by the emission of
quanta of energy (photons)
- The classical calculation is accurate for large
wavelengths, and is the limit for h -gt 0
30Which lamp emits e.m. radiation ?
314) Particle-like behavior of lightnow smoking
guns
has been recorded millions of times
32 Bremsstrahlung
- "Bremsstrahlung" means in German "braking
radiation it is the radiation emitted when
electrons are decelerated or "braked" when they
are fired at a metal target. Accelerated charges
give off electromagnetic radiation, and when the
energy of the bombarding electrons is high
enough, that radiation is in the x-ray region of
the electromagnetic spectrum. It is characterized
by a continuous distribution of radiation which
becomes more intense and shifts toward higher
frequencies when the energy of the bombarding
electrons is increased.
33Summary
- The wave model cannot explain the behavior of
light in certain conditions - Photoelectric effect
- Compton effect
- Blackbody radiation
- Gamma conversion/Bremsstrahlung
- Light behaves like a particle, and has to be
considered in some conditions as made by single
particles (photons) each with energy - h 6.6 10-34 Js is called the Plancks constant
34IIParticles behave like waves, sometimes
35Summary of last lecture
- The wave model cannot explain the behavior of
light in certain conditions - Photoelectric effect
- Compton effect
- Blackbody radiation
- Gamma conversion
- Light behaves like a particle, and has to be
considered in some conditions as made by single
particles (photons) each with energy - h 6.6 10-34 Js is called the Plancks constant
36Should, symmetrically, particles display
radiation-like properties?
- The key is a diffraction experiment do particles
show interference? - A small cloud of Ne atoms was cooled down to T0.
It was then released and fell with zero initial
velocity onto a plate pierced with two parallel
slits of width 2 mm, separated by a distance of
d6 mm. The plate was located H3.5 cm below the
center of the laser trap. The atoms were detected
when they reached a screen located D85 cm below
the plane of the two slits. This screen
registered the impacts of the atoms each dot
represents a single impact. The distance between
two maxima, y, is 1mm. - The diffraction pattern is consistent with the
diffraction of waves with
37Diffraction of electrons
- Davisson Germer 1925
- Electrons display diffraction patterns !!!
38de Broglies wavelength
- What is the wavelength associated to a particle?
-
- de Broglies wavelength
- Explains quantitatively the diffraction by
Davisson and Germer - Note the symmetry
- What is the wavelength of an electron moving at
107 m/s ? - (smaller than an atomic length note the
dependence on m)
39Atomic spectra
- Why atoms emit according to a discrete energy
spectrum?
Balmer
- Something must be there...
40Electrons in atoms a semiclassical model
- Similar to waves on a cord, lets imagine that
the only possible stable waves are stationary - 2 ??r n ??
n1,2,3,
gt Angular momentum is quantized (Bohr
postulated it)
41Hydrogen (Z1)
- NB
- In SI, ke (1/4pe0) 9 x 109 SI units
- Total energy lt 0 (bound state)
- ltEkgt -ltEp/2gt (true in general for bound states,
virial theorem)
Only special values are possible for the radius !
42Energy levels
- The radius can only assume values
- The smallest radius (Bohrs radius) is
- Radius and energy are related
- And thus energy is quantized
43Transitions
- An electron, passing from an orbit of energy Ei
to an orbit with Ef lt Ei, emits energy a photon
such that f (Ei-Ef)/h
44Level transitions and energy quanta
- We obtain Balmers relation!
45Limitations
- Semiclassical models wave-particle duality can
explain phenomena, but the thing is still
insatisfactory, - When do particles behave as particles, when do
they behave as waves? - Why is the atom stable, contrary to Maxwells
equations? - We need to rewrite the fundamental models,
rebuilding the foundations of physics
46Wavefunction
- Change the basic model!
- We can describe the position of a particle
through a wavefunction y(r,t). This can account
for the concepts of wave and particle (extension
and simplification). - Can we simply use the DAlembert waves, real
waves? No
47Wavefunction - II
- We want a new kind of waves which can account
for particles, old waves, and obey to Fma. - And they should reproduce the characteristics of
real particles a particle can display
interference corresponding to a size of 10-7 m,
but have a radius smaller than 10-10 m - Waves of what, then? No more of energy,
-
- but of probability
- The square of the wavefunction is the intensity,
and it gives the probability to find the particle
in a given time in a given place. - Waves such that Fma? Well see that they cannot
be a function in R, but that C is the minimum
space needed for the model.
48SUMMARY
- Close to the beginning of the XX century, people
thought that physics was understood. Two models
(waves, particles). But - Quantization at atomic level became
experimentally evident - Particle-like behavior of radiation radiation
can be considered in some conditions as a set of
particles (photons) each with energy - Wave-like property of particles particles behave
in certain condistions as waves with wavenumber - Role of Plancks constant, h 6.6 10-34 Js
- Concepts of wave and particle need to be unified
wavefunction y (r,t).
49Lequazione di Schroedinger
50Proprieta della funzione donda
51Lequazione di S.
52Laboratorio virtualeOrigini della Meccanica
Quantistica
- Radiazione termica del corpo nero
- Diffrazione degli elettroni