The fall of Classical Physics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 52
About This Presentation
Title:

The fall of Classical Physics

Description:

The fall of Classical Physics Classical physics: Fundamental Models Particle Model (particles, bodies) Motion in 3 dimension; for each time t, position and speed are ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 53
Provided by: Alessandr102
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The fall of Classical Physics


1
The fall of Classical Physics
2
Classical physics Fundamental Models
  • Particle Model (particles, bodies)
  • Motion in 3 dimension for each time t, position
    and speed are known (they are well-defined
    numbers, regardless we know them). Mass is known.
  • Systems and rigid objects
  • Extension of particle model
  • Wave Model (light, sound, )
  • Generalization of the particle model energy is
    transported, which can be spread (de-localized)
  • Interference

3
Classical physics at the end of XIX Century
  • Scientists are convinced that the particle and
    wave model can describe the evolution of the
    Universe, when folded with
  • Newtons laws (dynamics)
  • Description of forces
  • Maxwells equations
  • Law of gravity.
  • We live in a 3-d world, and motion happens in an
    absolute time. Time and space (distances)
    intervals are absolute.
  • The Universe is homogeneous and isotropical time
    is homogeneous.
  • Relativity
  • The physics entities can be described either in
    the particle or in the wave model.
  • Natura non facit saltus (the variables involved
    in the description are continuous).

4
Something is wrongRelativity, continuity,
wave/particle (I)
  • Maxwell equations are not relativistically
    covariant!
  • Moreover, a series of experiments seems to
    indicate that the speed of light is constant
    (Michelson-Morley, )

A speed!
5
Something is wrong Relativity, continuity,
wave/particle (IIa)
  • In the beginning of the XX century, it was known
    that atoms were made of a heavy nucleus, with
    positive charge, and by light negative electrons
  • Electrostatics like gravity planetary model
  • All orbits allowed
  • But electrons, being accelerated, should radiate
    and eventually fall into the nucleus

6
Something is wrong Relativity, continuity,
wave/particle (IIb)
  • If atoms emit energy in the form of photons due
    to level transitions, and if color is a measure
    of energy, they should emit at all wavelengths
    but they dont

7
Something is wrong Relativity, continuity,
wave/particle (III)
  • Radiation has a particle-like behaviour,
    sometimes
  • Particles display a wave-like behaviour,
    sometimes
  • gt In summary, something wrong involving the
    foundations
  • Relativity
  • Continuity
  • Wave/Particle duality

8
Need for a new physics
  • A reformulation of physics was needed
  • This is fascinating!!! Involved philosophy,
    logics, contacts with civilizations far away from
    us
  • A charming story in the evolution of mankind
  • But just a moment I leaved up to now with
    classical physics, and nothing bad happened to
    me!
  • Because classical physics fails at very small
    scales, comparable with the atoms dimensions,
    10-10 m, or at speeds comparable with the speed
    of light, c 3 108 m/s
  • Under usual conditions, classical physics makes
    a good job.
  • Warning What follows is logically correct,
    although sometimes historically inappropriate.

9
ILight behaves like a particle, sometimes
10
1) Photoelectric Effect
  • The photoelectric effect occurs when light
    incident on certain metallic surfaces causes
    electrons to be emitted from those surfaces
  • The emitted electrons are called photoelectrons
  • When the system is kept in the dark, the ammeter
    reads zero
  • When plate E is illuminated, a current is
    detected by the ammeter
  • The current arises from photoelectrons emitted
    from the negative plate (E) and collected at the
    positive plate (C)

11
Photoelectric Effect, Interpretation
  • Electrons are trapped in the metal, by a
    potential V gt Ve
  • Light might give to the electrons enough energy
    Eg to escape
  • Electrons ejected possess a kinetic energy
  • K Eg - eV
  • Kmax Eg f
  • f eVe is called the work function
  • The work function represents the minimum energy
    with which an electron is bound in the metal
  • Typically, f 4 eV

12
  • At large values of DV, the current reaches a
    maximum value
  • All the electrons emitted at E are collected at C
  • The maximum current increases as the intensity of
    the incident light increases
  • When DV is negative, the current drops
  • When DV is equal to or more negative than DVs,
    the current is zero

13
Photoelectric Effect Feature 1
  • Dependence of photoelectron kinetic energy on
    light intensity
  • Classical Prediction
  • Electrons should absorb energy continually from
    the electromagnetic waves
  • As the light intensity incident on the metal is
    increased, the electrons should be ejected with
    more kinetic energy
  • Experimental Result
  • The maximum kinetic energy is independent of
    light intensity
  • The current goes to zero at the same negative
    voltage for all intensity curves

14
Photoelectric Effect Feature 2
  • Time interval between incidence of light and
    ejection of photoelectrons
  • Classical Prediction
  • For very weak light, a measurable time interval
    should pass between the instant the light is
    turned on and the time an electron is ejected
    from the metal
  • This time interval is required for the electron
    to absorb the incident radiation before it
    acquires enough energy to escape from the metal
  • Experimental Result
  • Electrons are emitted almost instantaneously,
    even at very low light intensities
  • Less than 10-9 s

15
Photoelectric Effect Feature 3
  • Dependence of ejection of electrons on light
    frequency
  • Classical Prediction
  • Electrons should be ejected at any frequency as
    long as the light intensity is high enough
  • Experimental Result
  • No electrons are emitted if the incident light
    falls below some cutoff frequency, ƒc
  • The cutoff frequency is characteristic of the
    material being illuminated
  • No electrons are ejected below the cutoff
    frequency regardless of intensity

16
Photoelectric Effect Feature 4
  • Dependence of photoelectron kinetic energy on
    light frequency
  • Classical Prediction
  • There should be no relationship between the
    frequency of the light and the electron maximum
    kinetic energy
  • The kinetic energy should be related to the
    intensity of the light
  • Experimental Result
  • The maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectrons
    increases with increasing light frequency

17
Cutoff Frequency
  • The lines show the linear relationship between K
    and ƒ
  • The slope of each line is independent of the
    metal
  • h 6.6 10-34 Js
  • The absolute value of the y-intercept is the work
    function
  • The x-intercept is the cutoff frequency
  • This is the frequency below which no
    photoelectrons are emitted

Kmax hƒ f
18
Photoelectric Effect Featuresand Photon Model
explanation
  • The experimental results contradict all four
    classical predictions
  • Einstein interpretation All electromagnetic
    radiation can be considered a stream of quanta,
    called photons
  • A photon of incident light gives all its energy
    hƒ to a single electron in the metal
  • h is called the Planck constant, and plays a
    fundamental role in Quantum Physics

19
Photon Model Explanation
  • Dependence of photoelectron kinetic energy on
    light intensity
  • Kmax is independent of light intensity
  • K depends on the light frequency and the work
    function
  • The intensity will change the number of
    photoelectrons being emitted, but not the energy
    of an individual electron
  • Time interval between incidence of light and
    ejection of the photoelectron
  • Each photon can have enough energy to eject an
    electron immediately
  • Dependence of ejection of electrons on light
    frequency
  • There is a failure to observe photoelectric
    effect below a certain cutoff frequency, which
    indicates the photon must have more energy than
    the work function in order to eject an electron
  • Without enough energy, an electron cannot be
    ejected, regardless of the light intensity

20
Photon Model Explanation of the Photoelectric
Effect, final
  • Dependence of photoelectron kinetic energy on
    light frequency
  • Since Kmax hƒ f, as the frequency increases,
    the maximum kinetic energy will increase
  • Once the energy of the work function is exceeded
  • There is a linear relationship between the
    kinetic energy and the frequency

21
Cutoff Frequency and Wavelength
  • The cutoff frequency is related to the work
    function through ƒc f / h
  • The cutoff frequency corresponds to a cutoff
    wavelength
  • Wavelengths greater than lc incident on a
    material having a work function f do not result
    in the emission of photoelectrons

22
2) The Compton Effect
  • Compton dealt with Einsteins idea of photon
    momentum
  • Einstein a photon with energy E carries a
    momentum of E/c hƒ / c
  • According to the classical theory,
    electromagnetic waves of frequency ƒo incident on
    electrons should scatter, keeping the same
    frequency they scatter the electron as well

23
  • Comptons experiment showed that, at any given
    angle, only one frequency of radiation is
    observed
  • The graphs show the scattered x-ray for various
    angles
  • Again, treating the photon as a particle of
    energy hf explains the phenomenon. The shifted
    peak, lgt l0, is caused by the scattering of free
    electrons
  • This is called the Compton shift equation (wait
    the relativity week)

24
Compton Effect, Explanation
  • The results could be explained, again, by
    treating the photons as point-like particles
    having
  • energy hƒ
  • momentum hƒ / c
  • Assume the energy and momentum of the isolated
    system of the colliding photon-electron are
    conserved
  • Adopted a particle model for a well-known wave
  • The unshifted wavelength, lo, is caused by x-rays
    scattered from the electrons that are tightly
    bound to the target atoms
  • The shifted peak, l', is caused by x-rays
    scattered from free electrons in the target

25
3) Blackbody radiation
  • Every object at T gt 0 radiates electromagnetically
    , and absorbes radiation as well
  • Stefan-Boltzmann law
  • Blackbody the
  • perfect absorber/emitter

Black body
  • Classical interpretation atoms in the object
    vibrate since ltEgt kT, the hotter the object,
    the more energetic the vibration, the higher the
    frequency
  • The nature of the radiation leaving the cavity
    through the hole depends only on the temperature
    of the cavity walls

26
Experimental findings classical calculation
  • Wiens law the emission peaks at
  • Example for Sun T 6000K
  • But the classical calculation (Rayleigh-Jeans)
    gives a completely different result
  • Ultraviolet catastrophe

27
Experimental findings classical calculation
  • Classical calculation (Raileigh-Jeans) the
    blackbody is a set of oscillators which can
    absorb any frequency, and in level transition
    emit/absorb quanta of energy
  • No maximum a ultraviolet catastrophe should
    absorb all energy

Experiment
28
Plancks hypothesis
  • Only the oscillation modes for which
  • E hf
  • are allowed

29
Interpretation
  • Elementary oscillators can have only quantized
    energies, which satisfy Enhf (h is an universal
    constant, n is an integer quantum- number)
  • Transitions are accompanied by the emission of
    quanta of energy (photons)
  • The classical calculation is accurate for large
    wavelengths, and is the limit for h -gt 0

30
Which lamp emits e.m. radiation ?
  • 1) A
  • 2) B
  • 3) A B
  • 4) None

31
4) Particle-like behavior of lightnow smoking
guns
  • The reaction

has been recorded millions of times
32
Bremsstrahlung
  • "Bremsstrahlung" means in German "braking
    radiation it is the radiation emitted when
    electrons are decelerated or "braked" when they
    are fired at a metal target. Accelerated charges
    give off electromagnetic radiation, and when the
    energy of the bombarding electrons is high
    enough, that radiation is in the x-ray region of
    the electromagnetic spectrum. It is characterized
    by a continuous distribution of radiation which
    becomes more intense and shifts toward higher
    frequencies when the energy of the bombarding
    electrons is increased.

33
Summary
  • The wave model cannot explain the behavior of
    light in certain conditions
  • Photoelectric effect
  • Compton effect
  • Blackbody radiation
  • Gamma conversion/Bremsstrahlung
  • Light behaves like a particle, and has to be
    considered in some conditions as made by single
    particles (photons) each with energy
  • h 6.6 10-34 Js is called the Plancks constant

34
IIParticles behave like waves, sometimes
35
Summary of last lecture
  • The wave model cannot explain the behavior of
    light in certain conditions
  • Photoelectric effect
  • Compton effect
  • Blackbody radiation
  • Gamma conversion
  • Light behaves like a particle, and has to be
    considered in some conditions as made by single
    particles (photons) each with energy
  • h 6.6 10-34 Js is called the Plancks constant

36
Should, symmetrically, particles display
radiation-like properties?
  • The key is a diffraction experiment do particles
    show interference?
  • A small cloud of Ne atoms was cooled down to T0.
    It was then released and fell with zero initial
    velocity onto a plate pierced with two parallel
    slits of width 2 mm, separated by a distance of
    d6 mm. The plate was located H3.5 cm below the
    center of the laser trap. The atoms were detected
    when they reached a screen located D85 cm below
    the plane of the two slits. This screen
    registered the impacts of the atoms each dot
    represents a single impact. The distance between
    two maxima, y, is 1mm.
  • The diffraction pattern is consistent with the
    diffraction of waves with

37
Diffraction of electrons
  • Davisson Germer 1925
  • Electrons display diffraction patterns !!!

38
de Broglies wavelength
  • What is the wavelength associated to a particle?
  • de Broglies wavelength
  • Explains quantitatively the diffraction by
    Davisson and Germer
  • Note the symmetry
  • What is the wavelength of an electron moving at
    107 m/s ?
  • (smaller than an atomic length note the
    dependence on m)

39
Atomic spectra
  • Why atoms emit according to a discrete energy
    spectrum?

Balmer
  • Something must be there...

40
Electrons in atoms a semiclassical model
  • Similar to waves on a cord, lets imagine that
    the only possible stable waves are stationary
  • 2 ??r n ??
    n1,2,3,

gt Angular momentum is quantized (Bohr
postulated it)
41
Hydrogen (Z1)
  • NB
  • In SI, ke (1/4pe0) 9 x 109 SI units
  • Total energy lt 0 (bound state)
  • ltEkgt -ltEp/2gt (true in general for bound states,
    virial theorem)

Only special values are possible for the radius !
42
Energy levels
  • The radius can only assume values
  • The smallest radius (Bohrs radius) is
  • Radius and energy are related
  • And thus energy is quantized

43
Transitions
  • An electron, passing from an orbit of energy Ei
    to an orbit with Ef lt Ei, emits energy a photon
    such that f (Ei-Ef)/h

44
Level transitions and energy quanta
  • We obtain Balmers relation!

45
Limitations
  • Semiclassical models wave-particle duality can
    explain phenomena, but the thing is still
    insatisfactory,
  • When do particles behave as particles, when do
    they behave as waves?
  • Why is the atom stable, contrary to Maxwells
    equations?
  • We need to rewrite the fundamental models,
    rebuilding the foundations of physics

46
Wavefunction
  • Change the basic model!
  • We can describe the position of a particle
    through a wavefunction y(r,t). This can account
    for the concepts of wave and particle (extension
    and simplification).
  • Can we simply use the DAlembert waves, real
    waves? No

47
Wavefunction - II
  • We want a new kind of waves which can account
    for particles, old waves, and obey to Fma.
  • And they should reproduce the characteristics of
    real particles a particle can display
    interference corresponding to a size of 10-7 m,
    but have a radius smaller than 10-10 m
  • Waves of what, then? No more of energy,
  • but of probability
  • The square of the wavefunction is the intensity,
    and it gives the probability to find the particle
    in a given time in a given place.
  • Waves such that Fma? Well see that they cannot
    be a function in R, but that C is the minimum
    space needed for the model.

48
SUMMARY
  • Close to the beginning of the XX century, people
    thought that physics was understood. Two models
    (waves, particles). But
  • Quantization at atomic level became
    experimentally evident
  • Particle-like behavior of radiation radiation
    can be considered in some conditions as a set of
    particles (photons) each with energy
  • Wave-like property of particles particles behave
    in certain condistions as waves with wavenumber
  • Role of Plancks constant, h 6.6 10-34 Js
  • Concepts of wave and particle need to be unified
    wavefunction y (r,t).

49
Lequazione di Schroedinger
50
Proprieta della funzione donda
51
Lequazione di S.
52
Laboratorio virtualeOrigini della Meccanica
Quantistica
  • Radiazione termica del corpo nero
  • Diffrazione degli elettroni
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com