Title: Measurement Systems Analysis
1Measurement Systems Analysis
2Dont Let This Happen To YOU!
3VariationThink of Measurement as a Process
4Definition
- Measurement
- The assignment of numbers to material things to
represent the relationships among them with
respect to particular properties. - C. Eisenhart (1963)
5Measurement Systems Analysis
- Basic Concepts of Measurement Systems
- A Process
- Statistics and the Analysis of Measurement
Systems - Conducting a Measurement Systems Analysis
- ISO - TC 69 is the Statistics Group
- Ensures high Data Quality (Think of Bias)
6Course Focus Flow
- Measurement as a Process
- Mechanical Aspects (vs Destructive)
- Piece part
- Continuous (fabric)
- Features of a Measurement System
- Methods of Analysis
- Gauge RR Studies
- Special Gauging Situations
- Go/No-Go
- Destructive Tests
7Place Timeline Here
8The Target Goal
Continuous Improvement
Production
Pre-Launch
Prototype
USL
LSL
9Key Words
- Discrimination
- Ability to tell things apart
- Bias per AIAG (Accuracy)
- Repeatability per AIAG (Precision)
- Reproducibility
- Linearity
- Stability
10Terminology
- Error ? Mistake
- Error ? Uncertainty
- Percentage Error ? Percentage Uncertainty
- Accuracy ? Precision
11Measurement Uncertainty
- Different conventions are used to report
measurement uncertainty. - What does 5 mean in m 75 5?
- Estimated Standard Deviation ?
- Estimated Standard Error ?m ?/vN
- Expanded Uncertainty of 2? or 3?
- Sometimes 1? (Why?)
- 95 or 99 Confidence Interval
- Standard Uncertainty u
- Combined Standard Uncertainty uc
12Measurement Uncertainty
13Measurement as a Process
- Basic Concepts
- Components of the Measurement System
- Requirements of a Measurement System
- Factors Affecting a Measurement System
- Characteristics of a Measurement System
- Features (Qualities) of a Measurement Number
- Units (Scale)
- Accuracy
- Precision (Consistency or Repeatability)
- Resolution (Reproducibility)
14Measurement Related Systems
- Typical Experiences with
- Measurement Systems
15Basic Concepts
- Every Process Produces a Product
- Every Product Possesses Qualities (Features)
- Every Quality Feature Can Be Measured
- Total Variation
- Product Variation Measurement Variation
- Some Variation Inherent in System Design
- Some Variation is Due to a Faulty Performance of
the System(s)
16The Measurement Process
- What is the Product of the Measurement Process?
- What are the Features or Qualities of this
Product? - How Can We Measure Those Features?
17Measurement Systems Components
- Material to be Inspected
- Piece
- Continuous
- Characteristic to be Measured
- Collecting and Preparing Specimens
- Type and Scale of Measurement
- Instrument or Test Set
- Inspector or Technician
- AIAG calls these Appraiser
- Conditions of Use
18Where Does It Start?
- During the Design (APQP) Stage
- The engineer responsible for determining
inspections and tests, and for specifying
appropriate equipment should be well versed in
measurement systems. The Calibration folks should
be part of the process as a part of a
cross-functional team. - Variability chosen instrument must be small when
compared with - Process Variability
- Specification Limits
19Typical Progression
Determine Critical Characteristic
Product Engineer
How will the data be used?
Determine Required Resolution
Product Engineer
Consideration of the Entire Measurement System
for the Characteristic (Variables)
Cross-Functional
Determine What Equipment is Already Available
Metrology
20Measurement Systems Variables
Fixture Eyesight Air Pressure Air Movement Fatigue
These are some of the variables in a measurement
system. What others can you think of?
21Determining What To Measure
External Requirements
- Voice of the Customer
- You Must Convert to Technical Features
- Technical Features
- Failure Modes Analysis
- Control Plan
Convert To
Internal Requirements
22Voice of the Customer
Customer may specify causes rather than output
- External and Internal Customers
- Stated vs Real and Perceived Needs
- Cultural Needs
- Unintended Uses
- Functional Needs vs. Technical Features
23Convert to Technical Features
- Agreed upon Measure(s)
- Related to Functional Needs
- Understandable
- Uniform Interpretation
- Broad Application
- Economical
- Compatible
- Basis for Decisions
Y
Functional Need
Z
Technical Feature
24Failure Modes Analysis
- Design FMEA
- Process FMEA
- Identify Key Features
- Identify Control Needs
Critical Features are Defined Here!
25Automotive FMEA
Leading to MSA. Critical features are determined
by the FMEA (RPN indicators) and put into the
Control Plan.
26Control Plan / Flow Diagram
- Inspection Points
- Inspection Frequency
- Instrument
- Measurement Scale
- Sample Preparation
- Inspection/Test Method
- Inspector (who?)
- Method of Analysis
27GM Process Flow Chart
28Standard Control Plan Example
This form is on course disk
29Fords Dimensional Control Plan (DCP)
30Measurement as a System
- Choosing the Right Instrument
- Instrument Calibration Needs
- Standards or Masters Needed
- Accuracy and Precision
- Measurement Practices
- Where
- How Many Places
- Reported Figures
- Significant Figures Rule
- 2 Action Figures
- Rule of 10
- Individuals, Averages, High-Lows
31Measurement Error
Measured Value (y) True Value (x)
Measurement Error
Deming says there is no such thing as a True
Value.
Consistent (linear)?
32Sources of Measurement Error
- Sensitivity (Threshold)
- Chemical Indicators
- Discrimination
- Precision (Repeatability)
- Accuracy (Bias)
- Damage
- Differences in use by Inspector (Reproducibility)
- Training Issues
- Differences Among Instruments and Fixtures
- Differences Among Methods of Use
- Differences Due to Environment
33Types of Measurement Scales
- Variables
- Can be measured on a continuous scale
- Defined, standard Units of Measurement
- Attributes
- No scale
- Derived Unit of Measurement
- Can be observed or counted
- Either present or not
- Needs large sample size because of low
information content
34How We Get Data
- Inspection
- Measurement
- Test
Includes Sensory (e.g.. Beer)
Magnitude of Quality
35Operational Definitions
- Is the container Round?
- Is your software Accurate?
- Is the computer screen Clean?
- Is the truck On Time?
36Different Method Different Results
Method 1
Method 2
In Spec
Out of Spec
37Measurement System Variability
- Small with respect to Process Variation
- Small with respect to Specified Requirements
- Must be in Statistical Control
- Measurement IS a Process!
- Free of Assignable Causes of variation
38Studying the Measurement System
- Environmental Factors
- Human Factors
- System Features
- Measurement Studies
39Standards
- National
- In the US - Kept or Tracked by NIST
- Primary
- Copied directly from National Standard using
State-of-the-Art Equipment - Secondary
- Transferred from Primary Standard
- Working
- Used to calibrate laboratory and shop instruments
40Environmental Factors
- Temperature
- Humidity
- Vibration
- Lighting
- Corrosion
- Wear
- Contaminants
- Oil Grease
- Aerosols
Where is the study performed? 1. Lab? 2. Where
used? 3. Both?
41Human Factors
- Training
- Skills
- Fatigue
- Boredom
- Eyesight
- Comfort
- Complexity of Part
- Speed of Inspection (parts per hour)
- Misunderstood Instructions
42Human Measurement Errors
- Sources of Errors
- Inadvertent Errors
- Attentiveness
- Random
- Good Mistake-Proofing Target
- Technique Errors
- Consistent
- Wilful Errors (Bad mood)
- Error Types (Can be machine or human)
- Type I - Alpha Errors risk
- Type II - Beta Errors risk
Unaware of problem
Good
Bad
OK!
beta
Accept
Training Issue
Reject
alpha
OK!
Process in control, but needs adjustment, False
alarm
43Measurement System Features
- Discrimination
- Ability to tell things apart
- Bias per AIAG (Accuracy)
- Repeatability per AIAG (Precision)
- Reproducibility
- Linearity
- Stability
44Discrimination
- Readable Increments of Scale
- If Unit of Measure is too course Process
variation will be lost in Rounding Off - The Rule of Ten Ten possible values between
limits is ideal - Five Possible Values Marginally useful
- Four or Less Inadequate Discrimination
45Discrimination
46Range Charts Discrimination
Indicates Poor Precision
47Bias and Repeatability
Precise
Imprecise
Accurate
Bias
Inaccurate
You can correct for Bias You can NOT correct for
Imprecision
48Bias
- Difference between average of measurements and an
Agreed Upon standard value - Known as Accuracy
- Cannot be evaluated without a Standard
- Adds a Consistent Bias Factor to ALL
measurements - Affects all measurements in the same way
Bias
Standard Value
Measurement Scale
49Causes of Bias
- Error in Master
- Worn components
- Instrument improperly calibrated
- Instrument damaged
- Instrument improperly used
- Instrument read incorrectly
- Part set incorrectly (wrong datum)
50Bias and QS9000
- Bias - The difference between the observed
Average of measurements and the master Average of
the same parts using precision instruments. (MSA
Manual Glossary) - The auditor may want evidence that the concept of
bias is understood. Remember that bias is
basically an offset from zero. Bias is linked
to Stability in the sense that an instrument may
be zeroed during calibration verification.
Knowing this we deduce that the bias changes with
instrument use. This is in part the concept of
Drift.
51Bias
- I choose a caliper (resolution 0.01) for the
measurement. I measure a set of parts and derive
the average. - I take the same parts and measure them with a
micrometer (resolution 0.001). I then derive the
average. - I compare the two averages. The difference is the
Bias.
52Repeatability
- Variation among repeated measurements
- Known as Precision
- Standard NOT required
- May add or subtract from a given measurement
- Affects each measurement randomly
Repeatability
Measurement Scale
5.15 99
Margin of Error Doesnt address Bias
53Repeatability Issues
- Measurement Steps
- Sample preparation
- Setting up the instrument
- Locating on the part
- How much of the measurement process should we
repeat?
54Using Shewhart Charts I
Repeatability
55Using Shewhart Charts II
56Evaluating Bias Repeatability
- Same appraiser, Same part, Same instrument
- Multiple readings (n10 with 20 to 40 better)
- Analysis
- Average minus Standard Value Bias
- 5.15 Standard Deviation Repeatability
- or /- 2.575 ? 99 repeatability
- or /- 2 ? 95 repeatability
- Histogram
- Probability
AIAG
True
57Repeatability Issues
- Making a measurement may involve numerous steps
- Sample preparation
- Setting up the instrument
- Locating the part, etc.
- How much of the measurement process should we
repeat? How far do we go?
58Bias Repeatability Histogram
Never include assignable cause errors
59Linearity
- The difference in the Bias or Repeatability
across the expected operating range of the
instrument.
60Plot Biases vs. Ref. Values
Linearity Slope Process Variation
0.13176.00 0.79 Linearity 100 Slope
13.17
61Causes of Poor Linearity
- Instrument not properly calibrated at both Upper
and Lower extremes - Error in the minimum or maximum Master
- Worn Instrument
- Instrument design characteristics
62Reproducibility
- Variation in the averages among different
appraisers repeatedly measuring the same part
characteristic - Concept can also apply to variation among
different instruments
Includes repeatability which must be accounted
for.
63Reproducibility Example
64Calculating Reproducibility (I)
- Find the range of the appraiser averages (R0)
- Convert to Standard Deviation using d2
- (m of appraisers g of ranges used 1)
- Multiply by 5.15
- Subtract the portion of this due to
repeatability
65Calculating Reproducibility
People variance
Times done
Trials
66Stability
- Variation in measurements of a single
characteristic - On the same master
- Over an extended period of time
- Evaluate using Shewhart charts
67Evaluate Stability with Run Charts
68Stability
Both gages are stable, but.....
69Importance of Stability
- Statistical stability, combined with
subject-matter knowledge, allows predictions of
process performance - Action based on analysis of Unstable systems may
increase Variation due to Tampering - A statistically unstable measurement system
cannot provide reliable data on the process
70Methods of Analysis
71Analysis Tools
- Calculations of Average and Standard Deviation
- Correlation Charts
- Multi-Vari Charts
- Box-and-Whisker Plots
- Run charts
- Shewhart charts
72Average and Standard Deviation
73Correlation Charts
- Describe Relationships
- Substitute measurement for desired measurement
- Actual measurement to reference value
- Inexpensive gaging method versus Expensive gaging
method - Appraiser A with appraiser B
74Substitute Measurements
- Cannot directly measure quality
- Correlate substitute measure
- Measure substitute
- Convert to desired quality
75Comparing Two Methods
- Two methods
- Measure parts using both
- Correlate the two
- Compare to Line of No Bias
- Investigate differences
Magnetic
Line of Perfect Agreement
Line of Correlation
Stripping
76Measurements vs. Reference Data
77Measurements vs. Reference Correlation
Disparity
78Comparing Two Appraisers
79Run Charts Examine Stability
80Multiple Run Charts
More than 3 appraisers confuses things...
81Multi-Vari Charts
- Displays 3 points
- Length of bar bar-to-bar Bar cluster to cluster
- Plot High and Low readings as Length of bar
- Each appraiser on a separate bar
- Each piece in a separate bar cluster
High Reading
Average Reading
Low Reading
82Multi-Vari Type I
- Bar lengths are long
- Appraiser differences small in comparison
- Piece-to-piece hard to detect
- Problem is repeatability
83Multi-Vari Type II
- Appraiser differences are biggest source of
variation - Bar length is small in comparison
- Piece-to-piece hard to detect
- Problem is reproducibility
84Multi-Vari Type III
- Piece-to-piece variation is the biggest source of
variation - Bar length (repeatability) is small in comparison
- Appraiser differences (bar-to-bar) is small in
comparison - Ideal Pattern
85Multi-Vari Chart Example
Normalized Data
86Multi-Vari Chart, Joined
Look for similar pattern
87Using Shewhart Charts
- Subgroup Repeated measurements,, same piece
- Different Subgroups Different pieces and/or
appraisers - Range chart shows precision (repeatability)
- Average chart In Control shows reproducibility
- If subgroups are different appraisers
- Average chart shows discriminating power
- If subgroups are different pieces
- (In Control is BAD!)
88Shewhart Charts
- This is not a good way to plot this data
- Too many lines
89Shewhart Chart of Instrument
90Gage RR Studies
91Gauge RR Studies
- Developed by Jack Gantt
- Originally plotted on probability paper
- Revived as purely numerical calculations
- Worksheets developed by AIAG
- Renewed awareness of Measurement Systems as Part
of the Process - Consider Numerical vs. Graphical Data Evaluations
92Terms Used in RR (I)
Minimum of 5. 2 to 10 To accommodate worksheet
factors
- n Number of Parts 2 to 10
- Parts represent total range of process variation
- Need not be good parts. Do NOT use consecutive
pieces. - Screen for size
- a Number of Appraisers
- Each appraiser measures each part r times
- Study must be by those actually using
- R - Number of trials
- Also called m in AIAG manual
- g ra Used to find d2 in table 2, p. 29 AIAG
manual
3
4
5
1
2
1 Outside Low/High 1 Inside Low/High Target
93Terms Used in RR (II)
- R-barA Average range for appraiser A, etc.
- R-double bar Average of R-barA, R-barB
- Rp Range of part averages
- XDIFF Difference between High Low appraiser
averages - Also a range, but R is not used to avoid
confusion - EV 5.15 Equipment variation (repeatability)
- EV 5.15 Equipment variation
(reproducibility) - PV Part variation
- TV Total variation
Process Variation
94RR Calculations
Left over Repeatability
Remember - Nonconsecutive Pieces
Left over Repeatability
Product Process Variation
Measurement System Variation
95Accumulation of Variances
96Evaluating RR
- RR100RR/TV (Process Control)
- RR100RR/Tolerance (Inspection)
- Under 10 Measurement System Acceptable
- 10 to 30 Possibly acceptable, depending upon
use, cost, etc. - Over 30 Needs serious improvement
97Analysis of Variance I
- Mean squares and Sums of squares
- Ratio of variances versus expected F-ratio
- Advantages
- Any experimental layout
- Estimate interaction effects
- Disadvantages
- Must use computer
- Non-intuitive interpretation
98Analysis of Variance II
- The nr measurements must be done in random
sequence a good idea anyway - Assumes that EV repeatability is normal and
that EV is not proportional to measurement
normally a fairly good assumption - Details beyond scope of this course
99Special Gauging Situations
- Go/No-Go
- Destructive Testing
100If Gauges were Perfect
101But Repeatability Means We Never Know The Precise
Value
102So - Actual Part Acceptance Will Look Like This
103The Effect of Bias on Part Acceptance
104Go/No-Go gauges
- Treat variables like attributes
- Provide less information on the process, but...
- Are fast and inexpensive
- Cannot use for Process Control
- Can be used for Sorting purposes
105Short Go/No-Go Study
- Collect 20 parts covering the entire process
range - Use two inspectors
- Gage each part twice
- Accept gauge if there is agreement on each of the
20 parts - May reject a good measuring system
106Destructive Tests
- Cannot make true duplicate tests
- Use interpenetrating samples
- Compare 3 averages
- Adjust using vn
107Destructive Tests Interpreting Samples
AIAG does not address
108Summary
109Measurement Variation
- Observed variation is a combination of the
production process PLUS the measurement process - The contribution of the measurement system is
often overlooked
110Types of Measurement Variation
- Bias (Inaccuracy)
- Repeatability (Imprecision)
- Discrimination
- Linearity
- Stability
111Measurement Systems
- Material
- Characteristic
- Sampling and Preparation
- Operational Definition of Measurement
- Instrument
- Appraiser
- Environment and Ergonomics
112Measurement Systems Evaluation Tools
- Histograms
- Probability paper
- Run Charts
- Scatter diagrams
- Multi-Vari Charts
- Gantt RR analysis
- Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
- Shewhart Control Charts
113Shewhart Charts
- Range chart shows repeatability
- X-bar limits show discriminating power
- X-double bar shows bias
- (if a known standard exists)
- Average chart shows stability
- (sub-groups overtime)
- Average chart shows reproducibility
- (sub-groups over technicians/instruments)
114Conclusion
- Rule of Ten
- Operating Characteristic Curve
- Special Problems
- Go/No-Go Gages
- Attribute Inspection
- Destructive Testing