The relationship of pH to plant distribution in nature - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The relationship of pH to plant distribution in nature

Description:

The relationship of pH to plant distribution in nature Dr Herman Kurz The American Naturalist, Vol. 64, No. 693. (Jul. - Aug., 1930), pp. 314-341 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: Alana84
Learn more at: http://nsmn1.uh.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The relationship of pH to plant distribution in nature


1
The relationship of pH to plant distribution
in nature
  • Dr Herman Kurz
  • The American Naturalist,
  • Vol. 64, No. 693.
  • (Jul. - Aug., 1930), pp. 314-341

2
Overview
  • Part A pH and Plant Distribution
  • Part B Ecology
  • Part C Plant Distribution in General

3
pH
  • Sörenson (1909) was involved in work testing the
    acidity of beer and the pH symbol rooted in the
    French "pouvoir hydrogene" (power of hydrogen)
  • pH -logH

4
pH and Plant Distribution
  • pH as a factor in plant distribution?
  • Wherry (1916) was first to consider pH as an
    explanation for plant distribution
  • Scientists divided (as of 1930)between
    considering pH the factor a factor or
    unimportant in their species

5
pH and Plant Distribution
  • Members of the plant kingdom investigated
  • Seed plants
  • - ericads and orchids found in acidic soils
  • - trees and herbaceous flowering plants of
    forests tolerate a wide range
  • Ferns
  • - tolerate wide range of acidity
  • - there is a relationship between soil acidity
    and geographic range but there are also
    other factors at work (Wherry and Steagall)
  • Mosses and liverworts
  • - are not sensitive to reactions and general
    conclusions not warranted

6
pH and Plant Distribution
  • Algae
  • Wehrle (1927) 4 classifications of algal habitats
  • High constant acidity ? species ? individuals
  • High constant alkalinity ? species ?
    individuals
  • Weakly acidic conditions (pH 5-7) ? species
  • Varied alkalinity (without lime) ? species
  • Some species with narrow ranges and some with
    wide ranges

7
pH and Plant Distribution
  • acidity in these habitats changes spatially and
    temporally (unless strongly buffered) and is due
    to CO2
  • Reaction CO2 H2O ? H2CO3
  • H2CO3 ? HCO3- H
  • Stratification is due to
  • more photosynthesis occurring in surface layers
    throughout the day
  • more respiration occurring at lower layers (mud
    organisms)

8
pH and Plant Distribution
9
pH and Plant Distribution
  • Ulehla (1923) performs experiments algae with
    psychohormia
  • 2 treatments for 30 minutes
  • 1. Light exposure pH changed from 6.9-7.0
  • 2. Dark pH changed from 5.85-6.18
  • after algae was kept in the dark for 48 hrs they
    died
  • In nature algae are often found on shell animals
    (where their calcareous shells keep the
    environment locally neutralized)

10
pH and Plant Distribution
  • Lichens
  • pH is considered a secondary factor in
    distribution (found in narrow ranges) to ammonium
    content

11
pH and Plant Distribution
  • Special pH correlations
  • pH, leaching and successions
  • Salisbury (1921) showed that leeching and removal
    of carbonates results in increased acidity
  • Seen in oak forest invading hill tops as humus
    and acidity develop
  • Leeched soil may be deposited at slope base
    (encouraging acid loving vegetation)
  • In general he saw forests advancing downward
    progressive downward leeching

12
pH and Plant Distribution
13
pH and Plant Distribution
  • pH and soil profiles
  • Braun-Blanquet and Jenny (1926) showed 4 stages
    of humus development along with successional
    vegetation
  • Geisler (1926) saw no relationship between pH and
    plant successions and found that climax
    communities had a wider range of acidity than the
    pioneer

14
pH and Plant Distribution
15
pH and Plant Distribution
  • Influence of plants on pH
  • plants alter the soil they are in
  • Arrhenius (1926) thought that plants change their
    environment to what is most suitable for them
  • Chodat (1924) thought that each plant alters its
    environment by making it more favorable for
    successors (agrees with other successional
    theories)

16
pH and Plant Distribution
  • pH and Species Characters
  • Clausen (1922) found 2 species to grow at
    intermediate forms in neutral soils
  • pH and Concomitants
  • other factors need to be considered
  • pH constant but other factors variable
  • pH varied and other factors constant

17
pH and Plant Distribution
  • Kotilainen (1927) found good correlation between
    pH and plant distribution but still considers pH
    and secondary or unimportant
  • although certain vegetation occurs within narrow
    ranges, acidity itself is an indicator of other
    edaphic conditions
  • critical of other studies that alter acidity, as
    this changes other factors as well

18
pH and Plant Distribution
  • Kotilainen (1927) continued
  • Sphagnum can stand alkaline soil water if its low
    in nutrient salts
  • Water level, electrolyte concentration, calcium
    ions and oxygen content are more direct factors
    (are often the producers of acidity)

19
pH and Plant Distribution
  • Salt and water and pH
  • Montfort and Brandrup (1927) looked at the
    distribution of salt marsh plants
  • other factors (salinity and flooding) outweigh
    and pH is not important

20
Ecology
  • Plant Ecology
  • G. E. Nichols.
  • Ecology, Vol. 9, No. 3. (Jul., 1928), pp.
    267-270.
  • Ecology was 1st introduced in 1885 (by zoologist
    Reiter)
  • clearly defined the following year (by zoologist
    Haeckel)
  • " the science treating of the reciprocal
    relations of organisms and the external world."
  • " If the botanists persist in appropriating the
    term ecology as synonymous with plant ecology,"
    we are warned, " we shall be forced to
    domesticate the new term bio-ecology to take its
    place as referring to the whole field.

21
Ecology
  • The student of plant ecology and the student of
    animal ecology have many points of interest in
    common. They consider their material from
    essentially the same points of view. Up to a
    certain point, they may work with the same
    materials. Each, in his own field, may contribute
    much to supplement the work of the other. But,
    after all is said and done, with rare exceptions,
    the modern ecologist, both by training and
    experience, is either a botanist or a zoologist.
    In other words, just as the general biologist of
    the past generation has given way to the plant
    scientist and the animal scientist, so the modern
    ecologist almost inevitably is either a plant
    ecologist or an animal ecologist.

22
Ecology
  • Plant ecology has made great progress during the
    past twenty-five years. Formerly looked upon as a
    helpless infant, and later as the playful child
    (in the opinion of some, the bad boy) among the
    plant sciences, it has grown to be an
    active-minded, healthy youth. It has even
    acquired a certain amount of dignity and
    self-respect, although it is still far from
    mature.

23
Ecology
  • Ecology Theories and Applications 4th Ed
  • Peter Stiling, 2002
  • Life is not evenly distributed on Earth and
    ecology seeks to explain this phenomenon
  • Ecology is the study of interactions among
    organisms and their environment, including the
    study of individuals, populations, communities
    and ecosystems
  • 4 broad areas behavioral, population, community
    and ecosystems

24
Ecology
  • Physical Environment
  • Physical variables commonly limit the abundance
    of plants and animals and are divided into 2
    groups
  • those used as resources (nutrients, CO2, H2O)
  • Those which are not used but are critical to
    survival (temperature, wind, pH)

25
Ecology
  • Robert Whittaker, 1967 (plant ecologist)
    formalized the concept that community is governed
    by physical variables (physical factors affect
    distribution patterns, species abundance and
    species richness)
  • considered an environmental gradient

26
Ecology
  • Examined vegetation along an elevation gradient
    in mountain ranges (western US), along with
    various abiotic factors
  • Whittaker observations agreed with the principle
    of species individuality (asserted by Gleason in
    1926)
  • Concluded that composition of species at any one
    point in the environment was determined largely
    by physical factors
  • What about biotic factors?

27
Ecology
  • Assembly rules were first introduced by Diamond
    (1975)
  • How are communities assembled from species
    pools?
  • looked at bird species on islands (niche space
    and competition)
  • physical environment did not change (but
    resources did due to changes in island size)

Speciation
Extinction
POOL
?
COMMUNITY
28
Ecology
  • Centrifugal organization in a salt marsh
  • simple habitats
  • stressful
  • display strict zonation patterns

29
Ecology
30
Ecology
  • Pennings, Grant and Bertness (2005) showed that
    stress tolerant species survived when moved into
    a less stressful zone ONLY if neighbors were not
    present
  • species in less stressful zones could not survive
    when moved to stressful zones
  • Do trade-offs between competitive ability and
    stress tolerance exist within the plant species
    of a salt marsh community?

31
Ecology
  • Where is the science now?
  • How Do Communities Come Together?
  • Nicholas J. Gotelli (1999)
  • - 25 years after publication, Diamonds ideas on
    assembly rules are still studied and hotly debated

32
Ecology
  • The Influence of Environmental Factors on the
    Distribution of Freshwater Algae An Experimental
    Study II. The Role of pH and the Carbon
    Dioxide-Bicarbonate System
  • Brian Moss (1973)
  • Contrasted levels of several common ions present
    in different freshwaters could help to explain
    the differential distribution of eutrophic and
    oligotrophic algae noted in Part I (Moss 1972)

33
Ecology
  • Bicarbonate levels increase markedly from those
    in the softest oligotrophic waters to those in
    the eutrophic waters of soft rock areas, and pH
    tends to increase with bicarbonate level.
  • The availability of free CO2 decreases, at
    constant bicarbonate level, with increasing pH
    and increases, at constant pH, with increasing
    bicarbonate
  • The combined effect is usually an overall
    decrease in availability of free CO2, with
    increasing hardness of natural waters.

34
Ecology
  • Looked at growth rates of species in relation to
    pH
  • No pattern was found in the minimum pH tolerated.
  • Most would not grow at pH values lower than
    4.5-5.1, though the exact minima lay somewhere
    above pH 3.8
  • Distinct differences were found in the maximum pH
    tolerated by the eutrophic and oligotrophic
    groups
  • Most oligotrophic species would not grow at pH
    values above 8.85, and the actual maxima recorded
    were 8.6 or less.
  • This contrasts with growth of
  • typical eutrophic algae where very high rates
    were maintained between pH 8.4 and 9.3 or above.

35
Ecology
  • There are several ways in which high pH might
    exclude oligotrophic algae from eutrophic waters
  • (1) an intrinsic effect of pH on enzymes, in the
    cell wall or membrane,
  • responsible for uptake of one or more essential
    nutrients
  • inability of oligotrophic species to absorb trace
    elements present in low concentration at high pH
  • a toxic effect of relatively high total dissolved
    ion content associated with high pH
  • Coprecipitation of phosphate with calcium,
    magnesium, and carbonate at high carbonate
    levels
  • a direct toxic effect of carbonate or of
    hydroxide ions, levels of which increase with
    increasing pH
  • differential availability of different inorganic
    carbon compounds for photosynthesis.

36
Ecology
  • Current work on pH in ecology
  • Local plant diversity patterns and evolutionary
    history at a regional scale
  • Meelis Partel 2002
  • Used published studies
  • positive relationships between species richness
    and pH were significantly more probable when
    evolutionary centers were on high pH soils
  • negative relationships between species richness
    and pH were significantly more probable when
    evolutionary centers were on low pH soils
  • soil pH increases with latitude, so there is also
    a positive relationship between richness and pH
    at high latitudes and negative at low latitudes

37
Ecology
38
Ecology
  • Implications? Why study at all?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com