Backend electronics for radioastronomy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Backend electronics for radioastronomy

Description:

Backend electronics for radioastronomy G. Comoretto Data processing of a radioastronomic signal Receiver (front-end) Separates the two polarizations Amplifies the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: iraInafIt
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Backend electronics for radioastronomy


1
Backend electronics for radioastronomy
  • G. Comoretto

2
Data processing of a radioastronomic signal
  • Receiver (front-end)
  • Separates the two polarizations
  • Amplifies the signal by 108
  • Limits the band to a few GHz
  • Translates the sky frequency to a more manageable
    range
  • The resulting signal is then processed by a back
    end


Electric field E(t) Power density S(f)
to backend
3
Data processing of a radioastronomic signal
  • Measure S as a function of time, frequency,
    polarization status, baseline
  • Total power
  • Polarimetry
  • Spectroscopy
  • Interferometry
  • Pulsar (search and timing)
  • Record the instantaneous field E(t) for further
    processing
  • VLBI/ Remote interferometry
  • Radio science
  • Composite of the above (e.g. spectropolarimetric
    interferometry)


4
Signal conversion
  • IF output may be too wide
  • Difficulties of building wideband backends
  • Necessity of having several spectral points
    across the IF bandwidth (e.g. for Faraday
    rotation)
  • Interest in a specific spectral region (e.g. line
    spectroscopy)
  • Necessity to avoid contaminated portion of the IF
    band
  • Baseband converters (BBC) select a portion of
    the IF bandwidth and convert it to frequencies
    near zero
  • Each BBC followed by a specific backend (total
    power, polarimeter, spectrometer, VLBI
    channel....)

5
Total power
  • Simplest observable total integrated flux over
    the receiver bandwidth
  • Filter selects the frequency band of interest
  • Square law detector diode (simpler, wideband) or
    analog multiplier (more accurate, expensive, band
    limited)
  • Integrator sets integration time time
    resolution vs. ADC speed
  • ADC converts to digital. Integrator ADC are
    often implemented as a voltage-to-frequency
    converter counter

6
Total power
  • Sensitivity
  • t integration time
  • Df bandwidth or frequency resolution
  • S total (receiver dominated) noise
  • For modern receivers, 1/f gain noise dominant for
    t gt 1-10 s
  • need for accurate calibration noise subtraction
  • Added mark
  • Correlating receiver
  • On-the fly mapping
  • Wobbling optics

7
Polarimetry
  • Dual polarization receiver vertical/horizontal
    or left/right
  • Cross products give remaining Stokes parameters
  • Instrumental polarization 30dB 0.1
  • Bandwidth limited by avaliable analog multipliers
  • Need for coarse spectroscopic resolution (Faraday
    rotation)

8
Spectroscopy
  • Acousto-optic spectrometer
  • signal converted to acoustic waves in a crystal
  • diffraction pattern of a laser beam focussed on a
    CCD
  • amplitude of diffracted light proportional to
    S(f)
  • Large bandwidth, limited (1000 points) resolution
  • Rough, compact design
  • All parameters (band, resolution) determined by
    physical design gt not adjustable

9
AOS Array for Herschel - HiFi
  • LiNb cell with 4 acoustic channels
  • Instantaneous band 4x1.1 GHz (4 8 GHz)
  • Resolution 1 MHz

10
Spectroscopy Digital correlator
  • Digital spectrometers
  • Bandwidth determined by sampling frequency
  • Max BW technologically limited, currently to few
    100MHz
  • Reducing sampling frequency decreases BW gt
    increased resolution
  • Autocorrelation spectrometers (XF)
  • Compute autocorrelation function
  • Fourier transform to obtain S(f)
  • Frequency resolution
  • Signal quantized to few bits (typ. 2)
  • Complexity proportional to N. of spectral points

11
Spectroscopy FFT spectrometer
  • FFT spectrometers
  • Compute spectrum of finite segment of data
  • Square to obtain power and integrate in time
  • Complexity proportional to log2(N) gt N large
  • Requires multi-bit (typ. 16-18 bit) arithmetic
  • Easy to implement in modern, fast FPGA, with HW
    multipliers
  • Slower than correlator, but keeping pace
  • Polarimetric capabilities with almost no extra
    cost

12
Spectroscopy FFT spectrometer
  • Poly-phase structure multiply (longer) data
    segment with windowing function gt very good
    control of filter shape
  • Very high dynamic range (106-109) gt RFI control

13
Interferometry
  • Visibility function ltE1(t)E2(tt)gt
  • Computed at distant or remote location need for
    physical transport of the radio signal
  • Directly connected interferometers
  • Connected interferometers with digital samplers
    at the antennas and digital data link
  • E-VLBI time-tagged data over fast commercial
    (IP) link
  • Conventional VLBI data recorded on magnetic
    media
  • Accurate phase and timing control

14
Interferometry
  • Visibility computed on dedicated correlator or
    FFT processor
  • Conventional correlator scales as (number of
    antennas)2
  • FFT (FX) scales as N
  • Must compensate varying geometric delay
  • Varying sampler clock
  • Memory based buffer, delay
  • by integer samples
  • Phase correction in the
  • frequency domain
  • Due to frequency conversion,
  • varying delay causes
  • fringe frequency in the correlation

ALMA correlator (1 quadrant)
15
Digital vs. Analog Backend
  • All backend functions can be performed on a
    digital signal representation
  • Current programmable logic devices allow to
    implement complex functions on a single chip
  • Digital system advantages
  • predictable performances easy calibration
  • high rejection of unwanted signals - RFI
  • Better performances, filter shapes etc.
  • Easy interface with digital equipments

Example of a general-purpose full digital backend
16
Digital vs. Software Backend
  • Software backends (e.g. SW correlator) becoming
    possible
  • e.g Blue Chip IBM supercomputer viable as LOFAR
    correlator
  • Most Radio Science processing done on software
  • Computing requirements scale as a power of the BW
  • Dedicated programmable logic still convenient
  • 1 FPGA 50-500 MegaOPS, 16 FPGA/board
  • MarkIV correlator (in FX architecture) 1.7
    TeraOPS
  • EVLA Correlator 240 TeraOPS

17
Digital Backend Examples
  • ALMA Digital filterbank
  • 2 GHz IF input
  • 32x62.5 MHz independently tunable BBC
  • General purpose board, can be configured to
    implement 16 FFT spectropolarimeters _at_ 125 MHz BW
    each

18
Digital Backend Examples
  • VLBI dBBC
  • 1 GHz IF input
  • 250 MHz output bandwidth
  • Directly interfaces with E-VLBI
  • BEE2 Berkeley system
  • 1 GHz IF input
  • General purpose board, with library of predefined
    components
  • System design and validation using MATLAB
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com