Transportation and Distribution Planning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Transportation and Distribution Planning

Description:

Transportation and Distribution Planning Matthew J. Liberatore John F. Connelly Chair in Management Professor, Decision and Information Techologies – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:140
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Matth219
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Transportation and Distribution Planning


1
Transportation and Distribution Planning
  • Matthew J. Liberatore
  • John F. Connelly Chair in Management
  • Professor, Decision and Information Techologies

2
TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM
  • Mathematical programming has been successfully
    applied to important supply chain problems.
  • These problems address the movement of products
    across links of the supply chain (supplier,
    manufacturers, and customers).
  • We now focus on supply chain applications in
    transportation and distribution planning.

3
TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM
  • A manufacturer ships TV sets from three
    warehouses to four retail stores each week.
    Warehouse capacities (in hundreds) and demand (in
    hundreds) at the retail stores are as follows
  • Capacity Demand
  • Warehouse 1 200 Store 1 100
  • Warehouse 2 150 Store 2 200
  • Warehouse 3 300 Store 3 125
  • 650 Store 4 225
  • 650

4
TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM
  • The shipping cost per hundred TV sets for each
    route is given below
  • To
  • From Store 1 Store 2 Store 3 Store 4
  • warehouse 1 10 5 12 3
  • warehouse 2 4 9 15 6
  • warehouse 3 15 8 6 11

5
(No Transcript)
6
TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM
  • What are the decision variables?
  • XIJnumber of TV sets (in cases) shipped from
    warehouse I to store J
  • I is the index for warehouses (1,2,3)
  • J is the index for stores (1,2,3,4)

7
TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM
  • What is the objective?
  • Minimize the total cost of transportation which
    is obtained by multiplying the shipping cost by
    the amount of TV sets shipped over a given route
    and then summing over all routes
  • OBJECTIVE FUNCTION 
  • MIN 10X115X1212X13 3X14
  • 4 X219X2215X23 6X24
  • 15X318X32 6X3311X34

8
TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM
  • How are the supply constraints expressed?
  • For each warehouse the amount of TV sets shipped
    to all stores must equal the capacity at the
    warehouse
  • X11X12X13X14200 SUPPLY CONSTRAINT FOR
    WAREHOUSE 1
  • X21X22X23X24150 SUPPLY CONSTRAINT FOR
    WAREHOUSE 2
  • X31X32X33X34300 SUPPLY CONSTRAINT FOR
    WAREHOUSE 3

9
TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM
  • How are the demand constraints expressed?
  • For each store the amount of TV sets shipped
    from all warehouses must equal the demand of the
    store
  • X11X21X31100 DEMAND CONSTRAINT FOR STORE 1
  • X12X22X32200 DEMAND CONSTRAINT FOR STORE 2
  • X13X23X33125 DEMAND CONSTRAINT FOR STORE 3
  • X14X24X34225 DEMAND CONSTRAINT FOR STORE 4

10
TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM
  • Since partial shipment cannot be made, the
    decision variables must be integer valued
  • However, if all supplies and demands are
    integer-valued, the values of our decision
    variables will be integer valued

11
TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM
  • After solution in Solver
  • The total shipment cost is 3500, and the optimal
    shipments are warehouse 1 ships 25 cases to
    store 2 and 175 to store 4 warehouse 2 ships 100
    to store 1 and 50 to store 4, and warehouse 3
    ships 175 to store 2 and 125 to store 3.
  • The reduced cost of X11 is 9, so the cost of
    shipping from warehouse 1 to store 1 would have
    to be reduced by 9 before this route would be
    used

12
UNBALANCED PROBLEMS
  • Suppose warehouse 2 actually has 175 TV sets.
    How should the original problem be modified?
  • Since total supply across all warehouses is now
    greater than total demand, all supply constraints
    are now lt
  • Referring to the original problem, suppose store
    3 needs 150 TV sets. How should the original
    problem be modified?
  • The demand constraints are now lt

13
RESTRICTED ROUTE
  • Referring to the original problem, suppose there
    is a strike by the shipping company such that the
    route from warehouse 3 to store 2 cannot be used.
  • How can the original problem be modified to
    account for this change?
  • Add the constraint
  • X320

14
WAREHOUSE LOCATION
  • Suppose that the warehouses are currently not
    open, but are potential locations.
  • The fixed cost to construct warehouses and their
    capacity values are given as
  • WAREHOUSES FIXED COST CAPACITY
  • Warehouse 1 125,000 300
  • Warehouse 2 185,000 525
  • Warehouse 3 100,000 325

15
WAREHOUSE LOCATION
  • How do we model the fact that the warehouses may
    or may not be open?
  • Define a set of binary decision variables YI, I
    1,2,3, where warehouse I is open if YI 1 and
    warehouse I is closed if YI 0

16
WAREHOUSE LOCATION
  • How must the objective function change?
  • Additional terms are added to the objective
    function which multiply the fixed costs of
    operating the warehouse by YI and summing over
    all warehouses I
  • 125000Y1185000Y2100000Y3
  • Why cant we use the current capacity
    constraints?
  • Product cannot be shipped from a warehouse if it
    is not open. Since the capacity is available
    only if the warehouse is open, we multiply
    warehouse 1s capacity by Y1.

17
WAREHOUSE LOCATION
  • Also, we must make the YI variables binary
    integer
  • Total fixed and shipping costs are 289,100
    warehouses 2 and 3 are open warehouse 2 ships
    100 to store 1, 225 to store 4 and warehouse 3
    ships 200 to store 2 and 125 to store 4
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com