Title: Human Rights Impact Assessments of Trade-Related Rules and Policies: Case Study of the Right to Food
1Human Rights Impact Assessments of Trade-Related
Rules and Policies Case Study of the Right to
Food
2Content
- Starting Point
- Objectives of the PhD
- Indicators of the Right to Food
- Structural Indicators
- Process Indicators
- Outcome Indicators
- Methodology
- Next Steps
3Starting point 1/2
- States have Human Rights obligations concurrent
with their commitments in the area of
international trade - gt 150 WTO Members
- 124 parties to the ICESCR
- Every WTO Member has at least ratified one of the
major human rights treaties - The assessment of the empirical relationship
between the two regimes varies from a veritable
nightmare to trade being the panacea for
fullfilling human rights
4Starting point 2/2
- Increasing calls for Human Rights Impact
Assessments (HRIAs) - The Committee strongly recommends that the
State party evaluate the impact of the
free-trade agreements that entered into force in
2006 on the economic, social and cultural rights
of the people of Morocco. - Concluding Observations of the Committee on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
Morocco, E/C.12/MAR/CO/3 (9/2006) - To date little research has been undertaken to
develop methodologies and systematic tools for
HRIAs of policies
5Objectives of the PhD project
- Develop a conceptual and methodological framework
for HRIAs of trade-related rules and policies - Produce a guide on conducting HRIAs for
trade-related rules and policies and apply it to
case studies - Contribute to identify quantitative human rights
indicators
6What is a HRIA?
- Help people identify and assess their rights
- Understand how trade reform can affect the
enjoyment of those rights - Identify ways in which government can improve
trade policies to fulfil human rights obligations
- Identify ways in which the international
community can cooperate with national governments
to fulfil human rights obligation
7Indicators of the Right to Food
- Most critical step in HRIAs choice of indicators
- A recent study chaired by Prof. Eibe Riedel
identified 37 indicators of the right to food - All indicators grounded in the normative content
of the right to food as elaborated in Art. 11
ICESCR, General Comment 12 and the FAO Voluntary
Guidelines to support the progressive realization
of the right to adequate food in the context of
national food security
8Structural Indicators
- Recognition of the right to adequate food and
related rights - National strategy on implementing the right to
food - Mechanisms to ensure a functioning market system
- Instruments to ensure cultural or traditional
food use and nutrition - Nutrition and nutrition adequacy legislation and
programs - Protection and enhancement of access to
productive resources and labour
9Mechanisms to ensure a functioning market system
- Possible Sub-Indicators
- Regulation of the volatility / stability of food
prices (VG 4.1) - Promotion of the development of small-scale local
and regional markets (VG 4.5) - Mechanisms to ensure functioning internal
marketing, storage, transportation,
communication, and distribution systems (VG 4.8) - Mechanisms to provide adequate protection to
consumers against fraudulent market practices,
misinformation and unsafe food (VG 4.4) - Possible Sources of Data
- WTO, UNCTAD, National Administration, FAO, World
Bank
10Process Indicators
- Expenditure for rural development
- Expenditure for agricultural research
- Coverage of of programs to secure or prepare
access to productive resources - Coverage of a social transfer scheme or food
safety net - Estimate of access of women and girls to adequate
food within the household - Percentage of judges, lawyers, prosecutors and
administrators benefiting from education on
esc-rights
11Outcome Indicators
- Number of starvation / malnutrition deaths
recorded - Percentage of malnourished population
- Percentage of population living in poverty and
extreme poverty - Percentage of population lacking access to
productive resources - Per capita availability sourced throuf domestic
production, import and food-aid - Proportion of population wh
12Methodology
- Conceptual framework
- Analysis of the legal content of the human right
to adequate food - Translation into a limited number of
characteristic attributes - Configuration of appropriate structural, process
and outcome indicators - Methodological framework
- Integrated approach case studies, economic
modelling, econometric analysis, expert opinion,
stakeholder consultations - Causal chain analysis for ex ante assessments
- Elasticity indicators for vulnerable groups for
ex post assessments
13Causal-Chain Analysis
Kirkpatrick, C. George, C. (2006).
Methodological issues in the impact assessment of
trade policy expericence from the European
Commissions Sustainability Impact Assessment
programme. Impact Assessment and Project
Appraisal, 325334.
14Elasticity Indicators
- Compare the percentage change in one variable,
with the - accompanying percentage change in another
variable. - Numerator Measures changes in, e.g., gender
equality - - Income / - Wages
- - Employment (export sectors / import-competing
sectors, unemployment / under-employment rates,
gendered job segregation) - Denominator Measures changes in trade
- - Total value of trade of a country / region
- - Total value of trade as a share of GDP
- - Openness (measured as tariff reduction of x
percent)
See Irene Van Staveren, Gender Indicators for
Monitoring Trade Agreements (WIDE Briefing Paper,
February 2007).
15How to integrate the results of HRIAs into
decison-making
- Decision-Making Process at the Domestic Level
- In-House Approach (e.g. Canada)
- Independent studies by external consultants (e.g.
EC) - Negotiations under the Doha Mandate
- General Exception Clauses and Dispute Settlement
16Next steps
- Select countries for case-studies to test the
indicators - Present a paper on methodology for HRIAs of
trade-related rules and policies in November